Research Article
Can I Trust You? Estimation Models for e-Bikers Stop-Go Decision before Amber Light at Urban Intersection
Table 4
Estimates of parameters in BLM and RPLM for e-bikers’ YLR behaviour.
| Variables | BLM | RPLM | Mean | SE | Mean | SE |
| Intercept | −1.337 | 0.681 | −1.041 | 0.699 |
| Gender | | | | | Male vs. female | −0.672 | 0.028 | −0.661 | 0.024 | Std. dev. of parameter distribution | | | 0.451 | 0.033 |
| Age | | | | | Young vs. old | −1.174 | 0.876 | −0.874 | 0.076 | Std. dev. of parameter distribution | | | 0.815 | 0.030 | Middle-age vs. old | 0.342 | 0.057 | 0.212 | 0.038 | Std. dev. of parameter distribution | | | 0.638 | 0.231 |
| Vehicle type (VT) | | | | | Bicycle-style e-bike vs. scooter-style e-bike | 0.332 | 0.041 | 0.446 | 0.124 | Std. dev. of parameter distribution | | | 0.265 | 0.066 |
| Number of acceleration rate changes (NA) | | | | | Zero changes vs. one change | −1.267 | 0.650 | −1.312 | 0.049 | Std. dev. of parameter distribution | | | 1.592 | 0.234 | More than 2 changes vs. one change | −0.72 | 0.102 | −0.634 | 0.048 | Std. dev. of parameter distribution | | | 0.961 | 0.085 | Approaching speed (AS) | 0.391 | 0.098 | 0.427 | 0.086 | Std. dev. of parameter distribution | | | 0.688 | 0.026 | Distance to the stop-line (DTS) | −0.256 | 0.058 | −0.312 | 0.064 | Std. dev. of parameter distribution | | | 0.201 | 0.049 |
|
|
Statistically significant at α = 0.10. Statistically significant at α = 0.05. Statistically significant at α = 0.01. |