Research Article

Process Improvement by Eliminating Mixing of Whole Blood Units after an Overnight Hold Prior to Component Production Using the Buffy Coat Method

Table 2

Quality of pooled platelets produced with and without mixing. Sample size was 12 pairs (mixed/not mixed) for all parameters on Day 1 and after expiry. On Day 5, sample size was 10 pairs for CD62P and 11 pairs for morphology. In keeping with current QC processes at CBS, rWBC/unit was assessed at the beginning of storage, and platelet yield/unit and pH were tested after expiry. All QC criteria (parameters in bold) were met and noninferiority of platelets produced without being mixed was confirmed.

Testing timeParameterStudy armMean ± SDPassed QC?
(pass rate)
Difference (95% CI)

Day 1rWBC/unitNM Yes (100%)−0.000
(−0.001, 0.001)
M Yes (100%)
Platelet yield/unit
(×109/unit)
NM256 ± 36.4N/A−0.08
(−8.87, 8.70)
M256 ± 28.3N/A
pH (corrected
to 22°C)
NM6.93 ± 0.03N/A0.02
(−0.01, 0.06)
M6.95 ± 0.05N/A
CD62P
(% of population)
NM15.71 ± 4.06N/A−0.19
(−2.28, 1.90)
M15.53 ± 3.78N/A
MorphologyNM358 ± 8.78N/A−0.29
(−7.89, 7.31)
M358 ± 12.39N/A
Extent of shape change (%)NM37.7 ± 3.07N/A2.85
(1.22, 4.47)
M40.5 ± 3.78N/A

Day 5CD62P
(% of population)
NM26.00 ± 3.53N/A1.169
(−0.021, 2.358)
M27.17 ± 4.28N/A
MorphologyNM327 ± 7.0N/A−4.864
(−11.150, 1.423)
M322 ± 8.9N/A
Extent of shape change (%)NM36.2 ± 5.52N/A0.588
(−1.757, 2.932)
M36.8 ± 5.25N/A

After expiryPlatelet yield/unit (× /unit)NM279 ± 29.3Yes ( )−0.667
(−10.920, 9.587)
M278 ± 27.4Yes ( )
pH (corrected to 22 ° C)NM7.38 ± 0.058Yes ( )0.033
(−0.006, 0.073)
M7.42 ± 0.058Yes ( )

SD: standard deviation, QC: quality control, CI: confidence interval, NI: noninferiority, rWBC: residual white blood cells, M: mixed, NM: not mixed, and N/A: not applicable.