Review Article

Challenges of the Oral Cancer Burden in India

Table 1

Summary of study design and sample characteristics of all studies included in this review of oral cancer in India.

First author Period of studyStudy designAgeCity, state (region)Sample size ( )

Manoharan et al. [3]2001–2005Cross-sectional study using a population-based cancer registry. Data collected on new cancer cases diagnosed among Delhi urban resident population. The sources for cancer registration are more than 162 government hospitals/centres and 250 private hospitals and nursing homes. 0–80 Delhi (urban)54,554 participants 28,262 males, 26,292 females

Sunny et al. [10]1986–2000Cross sectional study using a population-based cancer registry Mumbai population-based cancer registry.0–80Mumbai, Maharashtra (urban)9,670 Participants with oral cancers registered, 6577 males, 3093 females

Thorat et al. [11]1995Cross-sectional random sample of villages from Barshi rural cancer registry. House to house recruitment visits Eligibility: adult males were only included; interviewed for tobacco habits in 1995 and again in 2004-2005.>14 yearsBarshi (rural) and Mumbai (urban), Western Maharashtra5,319 enrolled out of a random sample of 6,673 enrolled

Elango et al. [1]1986–1998Retrospective Study using data collected as part of a Cancer Registry of an urban and rural population reviewed over a 13 and 11 year period. Cancer registry data monitored by National Cancer Registry Programme of the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR).0–80 yearsChennai, Tamil Nadu (urban) & Barshi, Maharashtra (rural)Urban registry recorded head and neck cancers. 6, 857 total; 4777 males, 2080 females. Rural registry recorded 325 total; 272 males, 53 females

Sankaranarayanan et al. [2]1996–2004Cluster-randomized, controlled trial of oral cancer screening in southern India. Participants were arranged in 13 clusters and randomized to either an intervention group or a control group. Subjects in the intervention group received 3 rounds of screening consisting of oral visual inspection by trained health workers at 3-year intervals.>35 yearsKerala, South India (urban)59,894 eligible subjects in the intervention group and 54,707 in the control group; 31.4% of the former group reported no tobacco or alcohol habits, compared with 44.1% of the latter

Gupta et al. [12]1977–1982Case-control study conducted as a house to house survey interviewed for tobacco habits and examined for the presence of oral leukoplakia and precancerous lesions in a survey and then over a five-year period. Control group included the first 5 year results of a ten year followup study conducted in the same areas, but with different individuals within the population. Study was nested within another survey study using a cancer registry in Ernakulum, Srikakulam, and Bhavanagar.>15 years3 locations; Ernakulum, Kerala, Srikakulam, AP and Bhavanagar, Gujarat (rural)36,471 participants selected based on use of tobacco chewing products and smoking. Followup rate: 97%

Malaowalla et al. [13]1976Prospective cohort of industrial workers examined for oral lesions, and reexamined after a 2 year interval; biopsies conducted.>35 yearsGujarat (urban)57,518 participants selected based on presence of oral lesions

Swaminathan et al. [14]2003–2006Cross sectional study using Cancer registry including the registration of incident cancer cases occurring in the resident population carried out by active case finding from medical records at major hospitals in government and private sectors, nursing homes, consultants, radiation centers, pathology laboratories, imaging centers, and hospices. House visits were undertaken annually for each registered case for data completion.0–80Dindigul District, Tamil Nadu-South (rural)4516 incident cancers participants included in sample

Mehta et al. [15]Date of Publication 1989 (date of study unknown)Cross-sectional study using house to house recruitment techniques conducted during a population-based survey of tobacco users. Participants excluded based on loss to followup. Baseline diagnosis was conducted in 1977 and 106 in nine annual followup examinations conducted through the course of the study.15–44 yearsErnakulam district, Kerala India (rural)182 participants selected on the basis of presence of tongue lesions and the use of tobacco. 16 excluded from analyses

Gupta et al. [16] 1977-1978 (Baseline conducted)Prospective cohort, house to house recruitment, interviewed and examined in baseline survey to record details of tobacco use and examined for presence of oral cancer and reexamined annually for 10 years. Eligibility: any type of tobacco habit.>15 yearsErnakulam district, Kerala India (rural)12,212 participants

Khandekar et al. [4]1999-2000Cross-sectional study, hospital based, selected based on patient reporting to outpatient dental clinic department for oral complaints and provisional confirmation of clinical diagnosis. Patient interviews conducted. 117 initially included, 13 excluded due to insufficient information, and 24 declined biopsy.Majority >51–60 years (Range: 1–71 years)Nagpur, Maharashtra (urban)80 cases of oral cancer; registered with demographic characteristics and history of tobacco use

Maudgal et al. [17]Date of Publication 2010, (date of study unknown)Cross-sectional study conducted at 12 organizations and community centres; children with suspected vulnerability to tobacco usage interviewed and screened by trained social workers for precancerous lesions. Children suspected with suspicious oral lesions sent for further evaluation at diagnostic cancer facility.3–21 yearsRegions of Maharashtra and Assam (urban and rural)1700 participants checked for precancerous lesions

Cancela et al. [9]1996–1999Prospective cohort study embedded into a cluster randomized oral cancer screening trial evaluating role of alcohol intake and oral cavity caner risk; participants completed baseline lifestyle questionnaire on frequency and duration of alcohol consumption, and followed up for oral cancer incidence and mortality in Trivandrum oral cancer screening study. >35 yearsTrivandrum, Kerala; (urban area)32,347 male participants

Mehta et al. [18]1966Mixed Methods Study was conduced in 3 phases: first phase of the study consisted of a cross-section survey to determine the prevalence of oral cancer and precancerous lesions, second phase was a ten year followup survey to determine the incidence and natural history of oral precancer third phase was an intervention study aimed at persuading subjects to give up tobacco, and to measure the subsequent changes in the incidence and regression rate of oral precancer. >15 yearsErnakulum district, Kerala, Bhavnagar district, Gujarat, and Srikakulam district, AP (rural)12 000 participants selected on the basis of tobacco use

Van der Eb et al. [19]1991-1992Cross-sectional study, participants randomly selected to be interviewed. All persons were visited at home for an examination of the oral cavity and a detailed interview. Physical examination of the mouth was carried out before the detailed interview. Structured questionnaire was used for data collection Information about smoking status, diet, and access to mass media was obtained in each case and an examination of the oral cavity was performed.>21 yearsNorth Coastal Areas of AP (rural)480 participants

Jayalekshmi et al. [20]1990–2005Cross-sectional study of all residents in the area using cancer registry; all the households were visited by trained interviewers. Information collected on sociodemographic factors, religion, family income in rupees, education, occupation, lifestyles, and other factors, using a 6-page standardised questionnaire, baseline information collected on lifestyle, including tobacco chewing, and sociodemographic factors during the period.30–84 years Karunagappally, Kerala, India (rural)78,140 female-92 oral cancer cases

Wahi [21]1964–1966Cross sectional study conducted in order to set up cancer registry at a local medical school in association with WHO, seven rural cancer detection clinics were setup and staffed by a team of specialists; an interview study was carried out for a 10% random sample of population using the cluster sampling method.>35 yearsMainpuri district near Agra (rural)34,997 participants 600 cases of oral cancer registered; 346 confirmed