Research Article

Psychosocial and Quality of Life in Women Receiving the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay: The Impact of Decision Style in Women with Intermediate RS

Table 1

Sociodemographic and medical characteristics ( š‘ = 8 1 ).

Sociodemographics š‘ (%) š‘€ (SD)

Age54.35 (9.18)
Education
ā€ƒ<College degree22 (27)
ā€ƒCollege degree19 (23)
ā€ƒGraduate/professional training40 (50)
Race
ā€ƒCaucasian62 (77)
ā€ƒNon-Caucasian19 (23)
Marital status
ā€ƒMarried/partner50 (62)
ā€ƒSingle/widow/divorced31 (38)
Annual household income
ā€ƒ<$50,00014 (17)
ā€ƒ$50,000ā€“100,00010 (12)
ā€ƒ>$100,00045 (56)
ā€ƒRefused/missing12 (15)

Treatments received

Surgery
ā€ƒLumpectomy48 (59)
ā€ƒUnilateral mastectomy17 (21)
ā€ƒBilateral mastectomy16 (20)
Chemotherapy
ā€ƒYes24 (30)
ā€ƒNo57 (70)
Radiation
ā€ƒYes24 (30)
ā€ƒNo57 (70)
Tamoxifen
ā€ƒYes47 (58)
ā€ƒNo34 (42)
Aromatase inhibitors
ā€ƒYes32 (40)
ā€ƒNo48 (59)
ā€ƒDo not know1 (1)
Recurrence Score Ɨ Treatment
ā€ƒLow-hormonal therapy19 (23)
ā€ƒIntermediate-hormonal therapy38 (47)
ā€ƒIntermediate-chemohormonal therapy13 (16)
ā€ƒHigh-chemohormonal therapy11 (14)

Psychosocial and quality of life variables

Decision style
ā€ƒPassive12 (15)
ā€ƒShared29 (36)
ā€ƒActive40 (49)
Cancer-related distress (IES)19.06 (17.51)
Decisional conflict1.69 (.51)
Worry about recurrence1.65 (.83)
Quality of life (FACT-B)111.75 (18.85)