About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Journal of Ceramics
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 370603, 4 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/370603
Research Article

Grain Boundary Resistivity of Yttria-Stabilized Zirconia at 1400°C

1Materials Science and Engineering Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7907, USA
2Materials and Metallurgy Department, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, Yunnan 650093, China
3Department of Mechanical Engineering, Engineering Center, ECME 114, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0427, USA

Received 5 November 2012; Accepted 13 February 2013

Academic Editor: Young-Wook Kim

Copyright © 2013 J. Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The grain size dependence of the bulk resistivity of 3 mol% yttria-stabilized zirconia at 1400°C was determined from the effect of a dc electric field  V/cm on grain growth and the corresponding electric current during isothermal annealing tests. Employing the brick layer model, the present annealing test results were in accordance with extrapolations of the values obtained at lower temperature employing impedance spectroscopy and 4-point-probe dc. The combined values give that the magnitude of the grain boundary resistivity  ohm-cm. The electric field across the grain boundary width was 28–43 times the applied field for the grain size and current ranges in the present annealing test.

1. Introduction

In view of its high ionic conductivity, polycrystalline yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ) is attractive for application in solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) and sensors [1, 2]. The conductivity however, decreases with decrease in grain size [13], which is attributed to the greater resistivity of the grain boundaries compared to that of the grain interior.

The grain boundary resistivity in ceramics is usually determined employing impedance spectroscopy, which along with the cubic brick layer model of the grain microstructure gives for the bulk resistivity at constant temperature [47] where   is the resistivity of the grain interior,   the contribution of the grain boundaries to the bulk resistivity, the grain size,   the actual grain boundary resistivity (the so-called “specific grain boundary resistivity”), and  (= 1–10 nm) the grain boundary width including the space charge zone. An important feature of impedance spectroscopy is that it provides a measure of both the bulk resistivity and the grain boundary contribution. Employing this technique along with (1) has given values of that are one-to-three orders of magnitude greater than those of   [13].

Impedance spectroscopy measurements on YSZ are difficult to perform at high temperatures and have been limited for the most part to temperatures below ~1000°C. In this paper, we will present a method for determining at higher temperatures. The method is based on measuring the grain size and concurrent electric current in isothermal annealing tests with a dc applied electric field. The method also provides the magnitude of the electric field acting across the grain boundary width.

2. Experimental

Test specimens were prepared from 3 mol% yttria-stabilized zirconia (3Y-TZP) powder purchased from Tosoh, having initial grain size  nm and the following chemical composition in wt% (see Table 1).

tab1
Table 1

The as-received powder was cold-compacted (98 MPa) in a stainless steel die having a dog-bone-shaped cavity. The binder was removed by heating the compacted powder in air to 800°C in 72 hr and then holding at this temperature for 1 hr. Following binder burnout, the lower tab of the specimen was cutoff giving the geometry shown in Figure 1, which was then sintered by heating in air at a rate of 11°C/min to both without and with a constant dc voltage  V. The sintered specimens were then directly annealed at this temperature for various times without and with the applied dc electric field, the magnitude of which due to the sintering shrinkage had increased from 13.9 to 18.1 V/cm. The relative density at the beginning and throughout the isothermal annealing was determined from measurements of the length change due to the shrinkage of the specimen during sintering and subsequent annealing.

370603.fig.001
Figure 1: Schematic of test specimens geometry and the electric connections.

The electric field was applied to the specimen by wrapping fine Pt wire (0.13 mm dia.) around each end of the gage section as shown in Figure 1. Along with the voltage, the electric current during the anneal was measured to an accuracy of 1 mA. The corresponding current density was determined by taking where is the effective cross-section area for the current passage, is the specimen cross-section area following bake-out, the quantity is the reduction due to shrinkage with the relative longitudinal contraction, and accounts for the reduction in cross-section area due to the porosity.

The magnitude of Joule heating during the annealing with electric field was estimated from the relationship which considers the heat loss by black body radiation, namely [8], where is the electric energy in watts,  m2 is the surface area of the specimen between the electrodes, and  W m−2 K−4 is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant. Taking watts at  hr and 8.3 watts at  hr (, with  A and 0.33 A, resp.), (2) gives  K and 89 K, respectively, which are ~3% and ~5% of the 1673 K annealing temperature. In view of the heat loss by conduction from the region between the electrodes to the specimen tab (see Figure 1) and by conduction and convection to the surrounding air, it is expected that will be appreciably less than that given by (3). A temperature rise of only ~5°C was measured by a Pt-PtRh thermocouple contacting the midsection between the two electrodes.

Following each scheduled annealing time the specimen was furnace-cooled to room temperature. To determine the grain size, cross-sections were taken at three locations: (a) ~5 mm below the upper positive (+) electrode, (b) midway between the two electrodes, and (c) ~5 mm above the lower negative (−) electrode. The cross-sections were mechanically polished, thermally etched (1 hr at 1200°C), and observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). An example of the microstructure without and with field is shown in Figure 2. Approximately 200 linear intercept measurements with a resolution of 5 nm were made on each of the three SEM micrographs for a specific annealing time, giving a total of ~600 measurements for each annealing time. The reported grain size is the mean linear intercept value for the combined three locations.

fig2
Figure 2: SEM micrographs taken at the middle location of specimens annealed 12 hr at 1400°C: (a) and (b) .1 V/cm.

3. Results and Analysis

Figure 3 presents the mean linear intercept grain size for the combined (three) locations along the gage section versus the annealing time for the tests both without and with the applied electric field . The variation in between the three locations was within 10%. There was however no consistent variation from top to bottom (positive to negative electrode). To be noted in Figure 3 is that the grain growth curves are parabolic in shape and that the curve for annealing with field lies below that without, that is, the field retarded grain growth throughout the annealing. Included in Figure 3 are the corresponding relative density (= measured density divided by 6.03 g/cm3) and the electric current as a function of the annealing time. The form of the versus curve is also parabolic. Without field increases from 86% to 97% within 2 hrs and then increases more gradually to 99.5% at 24 hr. With field increases gradually from 98.0% to 99.5% over the 24 hr period.

370603.fig.003
Figure 3: Relative density , mean linear intercept grain size , and corresponding electric current versus time for annealing 3Y-TZP without and with an externally applied electric field  V/cm.

In keeping with (1) a plot of the bulk resistivity ( calculated employing (2)) versus the reciprocal of the three-dimensional average grain size (= 1.78  for tetrakaidecahedron [9]) for the present tests is given in Figure 4. Included for comparison are extrapolated values from Arrhenius plots of the resistivity for 3Y-TZP polycrystals obtained by impedance spectroscopy (IS) [1012] at lower temperatures (from maximum temperatures of ~1323 K, ~833 K, and ~773 K, resp.) and 4-point-probe dc measurements [13] (from maximum temperature ~1253 K). Also included in Figure 4 are the range and the average values of () for YSZ single crystals with 4–10 mol% yttria employing both 4-point-probe [14, 15] and IS [14, 16, 17] methods. To be noted in Figure 4 is that there exists reasonable agreement between the present results for the bulk resistivity of polycrystalline 3 Y-TZP and those obtained by IS and conventional 4-point-probe methods. Moreover, the combined results give a reasonable fit to a straight line whose intercept is in accordance with the value of () for single crystals. The least-squares values of the intercept and slope of the straight line for the combined measurements on polycrystals are 0.51 (ohm-cm) and 1.33 (ohm-cm) (μm), respectively, with a correlation coefficient of 0.96.

370603.fig.004
Figure 4: Bulk resistivity versus the reciprocal of the 3D grain size for present results, impedance spectroscopy measurements [1012], and 4-point-probe dc measurements [13] on polycrystals and impedance spectroscopy [14, 16, 17] and 4-point-probe measurements [14, 15] on single crystals.

According to (1) the slope of the line in Figure 4 equals the product . Taking = 10 nm (based on the segregation of yttria to the grain boundaries [18]) gives  ohm-cm. Further, taking  ohm-cm gives for the ratio of the grain boundary resistivity to that in the grain interior , which again is in accordance with that reported for impedance spectroscopy measurements [13].

Knowing the magnitudes of and one can calculate the value of the electric field across the grain boundary width by employing the conventional relation Taking  ohm-cm and the values of determined from the measured values of the current , one obtains the magnitude of and the ratio as a function of grain size presented in Figure 5. The magnitudes of and in turn the ratio increase from 497 V/cm to 771 V/cm and from 27.5 to 42.6, respectively, with increase in   from 0.340 to 0.483 m with = 18.1 V/cm and the corresponding values of the electric current.

370603.fig.005
Figure 5: Electric field across the grain boundary width and the ratio versus for the present tests.

4. Summary and Conclusions

The bulk resistivity of 3 mol% yttria-stabilized zirconia polycrystals (3Y-TZP) was determined from the effect of an applied dc field on grain growth and the corresponding electric current in isothermal annealing tests at 1400°C. Employing the brick layer model, the results give for the magnitude of the grain boundary resistivity = 133 Ω-cm, which in turn gives that the electric field across the grain boundary width times that of the applied electric field for the present test conditions. These values of and are in reasonable accordance with values obtained by impedance spectroscopy at lower temperatures.

Acknowledgments

J. Wang and H. Conrad were funded by NSF Grant no. DMR-1002751, Dr. Lynnette Madsen, Manager Ceramics Program, Materials Science Division. D. Yang and R. Raj were funded by the Division of Basic Sciences, Department of Energy, Grant no. DE-F602.ER46403. H. Conrad acknowledges stimulating discussions with Professor H. Näfe, University of Stuttgart.

References

  1. M. C. Martin and M. L. Mecartney, “Grain boundary ionic conductivity of yttrium stabilized zirconia as a function of silica content and grain size,” Solid State Ionics, vol. 161, no. 1-2, pp. 67–79, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. S. Hui, J. Roller, S. Yick et al., “A brief review of the ionic conductivity enhancement for selected oxide electrolytes,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 172, no. 2, pp. 493–502, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. S. H. Chu and M. A. Seitz, “The ac electrical behavior of polycrystalline ZrO2-CaO,” Journal of Solid State Chemistry, vol. 23, no. 3-4, pp. 297–314, 1978. View at Scopus
  4. J. E. Bauerle, “Study of solid electrolyte polarization by a complex admittance method,” Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids, vol. 30, no. 12, pp. 2657–2670, 1969. View at Scopus
  5. H. Näfe, “Ionic conductivity of ThO2 and ZrO2-based electrolytes between 300 and 2000 K,” Solid State Ionics, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 255–263, 1984. View at Scopus
  6. R. Gerhardt and A. Nowick, “Grain-boundary effect in ceria doped with trivalent cations. I, electrical measurements,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 69, no. 9, pp. 641–646, 1986.
  7. J. MacDonald, Impedance Spectroscopy: Emphasizing Materials and Systems, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1987.
  8. D. Yang, R. Raj, and H. Conrad, “Enhanced sintering rate of zirconia (3Y-TZP) through the effect of a weak dc electric field on grain growth,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 93, no. 10, pp. 2935–2937, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. H. Han and D. Y. Kim, “Analysis of the proportionality constant correlating the mean intercept length to the average grain size,” Acta Metallurgica Et Materialia, vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 3185–3188, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S. P. S. Badwal, F. T. Ciacchi, and V. Zelizko, “The effect of alumina addition on the conductivity, microstructure and mechanical strength of zirconia—yttria electrolytes,” Ionics, vol. 4, no. 1-2, pp. 25–32, 1998. View at Scopus
  11. T. Uchikoshi, Y. Sakka, and K. Hiraga, “Effect of silica doping on the electrical conductivity of 3 mol% yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia prepared by colloidal processing,” Journal of Electroceramics, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 113–120, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. X. Guo and J. Maier, “Grain boundary blocking effect in zirconia: a schottky barrier analysis,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 148, no. 3, pp. E121–E126, 2001. View at Scopus
  13. Y. Shiratori, F. Tietz, H. J. Penkalla, J. Q. He, Y. Shiratori, and D. Stöver, “Influence of impurities on the conductivity of composites in the system (3YSZ)1−x(MgO)x,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 148, no. 1-2, pp. 32–42, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. Ikeda, O. Sakurai, K. Uematsu, N. Mizutani, and M. Kato, “Electrical conductivity of Yttria-Stabilized zirconic single crystals,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 18, pp. 32–42, 2005.
  15. J. D. Solier, I. Cachadina, and A. Dominguez-Rodriguez, “Ionic Conductivity of ZrO2-12 mol % Y2O3 single crystals,” Physical Review B, vol. 48, pp. 3704–3712, 1993.
  16. A. Pimenov, J. Ullrich, P. Lunkenheimer, A. Loidl, and C. H. Rüscher, “Ionic conductivity and relaxations in ZrO2-Y2O3 solid solutions,” Solid State Ionics, vol. 109, no. 1-2, pp. 111–118, 1998. View at Scopus
  17. I. Kosacki, C. M. Rouleau, P. F. Becher, J. Bentley, and D. H. Lowndes, “Nanoscale effects on the ionic conductivity in highly textured YSZ thin films,” Solid State Ionics, vol. 176, no. 13-14, pp. 1319–1326, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. K. Matsui, H. Yoshida, and Y. Ikuhara, “Grain-boundary structure and microstructure development mechanism in 2~8 mol% yttria-stabilized zirconia polycrystals,” Acta Materialia, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 1315–1325, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar