Research Article
Arsenic Removal from Water Using Industrial By-Products
Table 4
Comparative evaluation of various industrial by-products as adsorbents for arsenic removal.
| Adsorbent |
pH | Concentration/range | Surface area (m2/g) | Temperature (°C) | Model used to calculate adsorption capacity | Capacity (mg/g) | Reference | As(III) | As(V) |
| Bauxsol | 4.5 | 0.80–31.0 mM | — | 23 | Langmuir | — | 1.081 | [18] | Red mud | 3.5 As(III) 7.25 As(V) | 33.37–400.4 µmol/L | — | 25 | Langmuir | 0.884 | 0.941 | [19] | Rice husks | 6.5 | 100 µg/mL | — | 20 | Column | 0.020 | 0.007 | [20] | Orange juice residue | 7–11 As(III) 2–6 As(V) | — | — | 30 | Langmuir | 70.43 | 67.43 | [21] | Pine wood char | 3.5 | 10–100 µg/L | 2.73 | 25 | Langmuir | 0.0012 | — | [22] | Oak wood char | 3.5 | 10–100 µg/L | 2.04 | 25 | Langmuir | 0.006 | — | [22] | Oak bark char | 3.5 | 10–100 µg/L | 25.4 | 25 | Langmuir | 0.0074 | — | [22] | Fe(III)/Cr(III) hydroxide waste from cooling water systems | 4.0 | 20–100 mg/L | — | 32 | Langmuir | — | 11.02 | [23] |
|
|