- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Recently Accepted Articles ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents
Journal of Chemistry
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 469470, 8 pages
Synthesis of Oligonucleotide Conjugates and Phosphorylated Nucleotide Analogues: An Improvement to a Solid Phase Synthetic Approach
Department of Chemical Sciences, University of Napoli “Federico II”, Via Cintia 4, 80126 Napoli, Italy
Received 13 January 2013; Revised 20 April 2013; Accepted 23 April 2013
Academic Editor: Alvaro Somoza
Copyright © 2013 Valeria Romanucci et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
An improvement to our solid phase strategy to generate pharmacologically interesting molecule libraries is proposed here. The synthesis of new o-chlorophenol-functionalised solid supports with very high loading (0.18–0.22 meq/g for control pore glass (CPG) and 0.25–0.50 meq/g for TG) is reported. To test the efficiency of these supports, we prepared nucleotide and oligonucleotide models, and their coupling yields and the purity of the crude detached materials were comparable to previously available results. These supports allow the facile and high-yield preparation of highly pure phosphodiester and phosphoramidate monoester nucleosides, conjugated oligonucleotides, and other yet unexplored classes of phosphodiester and phosphoramidate molecules.
Oligonucleotides (ODNs) and nucleotides represent classes of potential therapeutic agents with a broad spectrum of pharmacological activities. Desired improvements of certain properties, such as cell-specific delivery, cellular uptake efficiency, intracellular distribution, and target specificity, can be achieved by chemical modifications. Conjugation of ODNs to other molecules (e.g., proteins and peptides, saccharides, fluorophores and photoprobes, inhibitors, and vitamins) that provide the conjugate with a desired novel property offers a feasible way to address these requirements [1–16]. With regard to nucleosides, however, many research groups have developed a prodrug approach to deliver biologically active nucleosides into cells in the form of masked charged monophosphate derivatives; a variety of different 5′-phosphorothioate and 5′-phosphodiester nucleoside analogues have been prepared for this purpose [17–21].
Organic chemists investigating these fields must prepare many types of pure modified compounds in sufficient quantities. The methods used for the preparation of these molecules fall into two major categories: solution and solid phase approaches. The solid phase method, in association with combinatorial chemistry approaches, has proven useful for the synthesis of a large number of these analogues. An advantage of the solid-supported method compared with conjugation or derivatisation in solution is that it is less laborious, among other advantages. In fact, on a solid support, the unreacted compounds are usually used in considerable excess, and the possible by-products can be removed by simple washing. The development of a broad array of reactions in the solid phase has increased the scope and potential of this method, allowing the synthesis of large libraries of compounds endowed with a diverse series of molecular motifs [26–29]. Various combinatorial approaches have been successfully adopted for the generation of a wide range of oligomeric and small molecule libraries for biological screens. Moreover, the combinatorial approach has allowed the rapid screening of a plethora of different substrates, accelerating lead identification and resulting in fundamental developments in biomedicinal chemistry. Within this framework, the low loading of the solid supports has proven to be a limitation of this method, as it strongly inhibits the amount of targets that can be obtained.
Current solid phase methods for the synthesis of ODN conjugates include the utilisation of prefabricated labels, previously converted into the corresponding phosphoramidite or H-phosphonate derivatives, and elaborate supports bearing an appropriate linker to incorporate the conjugating residue, generally employed as a postsynthetic modification of the ODNs . In both strategies, stringently applied purifications (in the first approach, for the reactive phosphorylated derivatives of the labels; in the second, for the preparation of the linker or in the final step) are typically required to isolate the desired conjugated molecule in a pure form [31–34]. Although many methods have been reported for the solid phase synthesis of conjugated ODNs, the same cannot be said for solid phase synthesis of modified nucleotides. A variety of different 5′-phosphorylated, 5′-phosphoramidate, and 5′-phosphorothioate nucleoside analogues have been prepared and evaluated for their biological activity [17–21].
As part of our continuing effort towards the synthesis of new solid supports that are useful for generating pharmacologically interesting molecule libraries [22–25, 35–40] of high quality in large quantities, we present here an improvement of our solid phase strategy discussed above. Aiming to achieve the synthesis of a solid support with a higher load than that currently available and that is also compatible with phosphoramidite and phosphotriester chemistry, we devised a straightforward and efficient synthetic protocol to prepare a new support in which the loading of the o-chlorofunctional group is very high (0.20–0.50 meq/g).
NMR spectra were recorded in CDCl3 and CD3OD with a Bruker WM 400 spectrometer. The chemical shifts () are given in ppm and referenced to the residual solvent signal (7.26 and 3.31 ppm, resp.), and coupling constants are in Hz. NMR spectra were recorded at 161.98 MHz using D3PO4 as an external standard. For ESI-MS analysis, a Waters Micromass ZQ instrument—equipped with an electrospray source—was used in the negative mode. MALDI TOF mass spectrometric analyses were performed on a PerSeptive Biosystems Voyager-DE Pro MALDI mass spectrometer in the linear mode. HPLC analysis and purification were performed on an Agilent Technologies 1200 series instrument equipped with a UV detector. The crude materials of 5 and 6 were analysed by HPLC on a C18 Phenomenex LUNA column (5 μm, mm) eluted with a linear gradient of CH3CN in H2O, flow rate = 0.8 mL/min, and detection at nm. The crude material of 9 was analysed by HPLC on a Nucleogel SAX column (Macherey-Nagel, 1000–8/46); buffer A: 20 mM KH2PO4 aq. solution, pH 7.0, containing 20% (v/v) CH3CN; buffer B: 1.0 M KCl, 20 mM KH2PO4 aq. solution, pH 7.0, containing 20% (v/v) CH3CN; linear gradient from 0 to 100% B over 30 min, flow rate 0.8 mL/min, and detection at nm. The crude material was purified by gel filtration chromatography on a Sephadex G25 column eluted with H2O/EtOH (4 : 1, v/v). LCAA-CPG and TentaGel amino supports were purchased from Link Technologies and Novabiochem, respectively. The nucleotide phosphoramidites, the activator solution (0.45 M tetrazole in CH3CN), and the oxidiser solution (0.1 M I2/THF/H2O/pyridine) were purchased from Link Technologies.
2.2. Synthesis of Supports 1a and 1b
Support 1a: 250 mg of LCAA-CPG-NH2 (0.10 meq/g, 0.02 mmol) was reacted, at r.t. overnight, with a mixture of 109.5 mg (0.25 mmol) of N-α-Fmoc-3-chloro-L-tyrosine, 51.5 mg (0.25 mmol) of DCCI, 45 μL (0.25 mmol) of DIEA, and 38.0 mg (0.25 mmol) of N-hydroxybenzotriazole (HOBt·H2O) dissolved in 3 mL of anhydrous pyridine. After exhaustive washing with DCM and Et2O, the support was dried under reduced pressure and then treated with 20% piperidine in DMF three times for 5 min. The coupling and Fmoc removal were repeated twice more in similar conditions. According to the Kaiser test , the incorporation of the linker was always in the range of 65–85%, corresponding to 0.19–0.25 meq/g. After capping the unreacted amino functional groups with Ac2O/pyridine (1 : 1, v/v) for 1 h at r.t., the support was treated with conc. aq. ammonia (28%) at 50°C for 1 h. After exhaustive washing with CH3OH, DCM, and Et2O, the resulting support 1a was dried under reduced pressure.
Support 1b: 250 mg of TG-NH2 LL (0.29 meq/g, 0.07 mmol) was reacted, at r.t. overnight, with a mixture of 317.5 mg (0.72 mmol) of N-3-chlorotyrosine acid, 150.0 mg (0.72 mmol) of DCCI, 126.0 μL of DIEA, and 110.0 mg (1.5 mmol) of N-hydroxybenzotriazole (HOBt·H2O) dissolved in 5 mL of anhydrous pyridine. After exhaustive washing with DCM and Et2O, the support was dried under reduced pressure and then treated with 20% piperidine in DMF three times for 5 min. The coupling and Fmoc removal were repeated twice more in similar conditions. The incorporation of the linker was always in the range of 65–85%, corresponding to 0.50–0.75 meq/g, according to the Kaiser and Fmoc tests. After capping the unreacted amino functional groups with Ac2O/pyridine (1 : 1, v/v) for 1 h at r.t., the support was treated with conc. aq. ammonia (28%) at 50°C for 1 h. After exhaustive washing with CH3OH, DCM, and Et2O, the resulting support 1b was dried under reduced pressure.
2.3. Synthesis of Supports 4a, 4b, and 8a
Support 4a: 1.1 mL (0.5 mmol) of a commonly used “activator solution” (0.45 M tetrazole in CH3CN) was added to 0.08 mmol of 5′-O-(2-cyanoethyl)-N,N-diisopropylphosphoramidite-3′-O-(4,4′-dimethoxytriphenylmethyl)-thymidine, and 250 mg (0.22 meq/g, 0.05 mmol) of support 1a. After 1 h, the support was exhaustively washed with CH3CN and treated (3 times) with 5 mL of a commonly used “oxidiser” solution (I2/pyridine/H2O/THF) for 5 min. After exhaustive washing with CH3CN, DCM, and Et2O, the resulting support 3a was dried under reduced pressure. Incorporation yields of the nucleotides were always in the range of 82–99% (0.18–0.22 meq/g), as determined by a quantitative DMT test performed on dried and weighed samples of support 3a. After the standard capping procedure with Ac2O/pyridine (1 : 1, v/v), the 2-cyanoethyl group from the phosphate was then removed by treatment with 20% piperidine in DMF for 5 min at r.t. (3 times), resulting in support 4a.
Support 4b: 4.9 mL (2.2 mmol) of a commonly used “activator solution” (0.45 M tetrazole in CH3CN) was added to 0.35 mmol of the 5′-O-(2-cyanoethyl)-N,N-diisopropylphosphoramidite-3′-O-(4,4′-dimethoxytriphenylmethyl)-2′-deoxyribonucleoside, and 250 mg (0.55 meq/g, 0.14 mmol) of support 1b. After 1 h, the support was exhaustively washed with CH3CN and treated (5 times) with 5 mL of a commonly used “oxidiser” solution (I2/pyridine/H2O/THF) for 5 min. After exhaustive washing with CH3CN, DCM, and Et2O, the resulting support was dried under reduced pressure. The complete oxidation of the phosphite triester into a phosphate triester, leading to support 3b, was monitored by NMR of the resin suspended in CDCl3. As is typical, a relevant upfield shift of the signal at 137 ppm to two signals centred at −6.5 ppm was observed. After a standard capping procedure with Ac2O/pyridine (1 : 1, v/v), the 2-cyanoethyl group was removed from the phosphate by treatment with 20% piperidine in DMF for 5 min at r.t. (5 times), resulting in support 4b. Incorporation yields of nucleotides, calculated after capping, were always in the range of 75–91% (0.40–0.50 meq/g), as determined by a quantitative DMT test performed on dried and weighed samples of support 4b. The total deprotection of the phosphates was confirmed by a characteristic upfield shift in the signal of the NMR spectrum of the solid support suspended in CDCl3.
Support 8a: this support was obtained by following the procedure described for the synthesis of support 4a, using 5′-O-(4,4′-dimethoxytriphenylmethyl)-3′-O-(2-cyanoethyl)-N,N-diisopropylphosphoramidite-thymidine starting from support 1a.
2.4. Synthesis of Thymidine Analogue 5
30 mg (0.40 meq/g, 0.012 mmol) of dried support 4b was washed and swelled in anhydrous pyridine and then reacted with a mixture of 46 mg (0.12 mmol) of cholesterol and 36 mg (0.12 mmol) of MSNT in 500 μL of anhydrous pyridine for 12 h at r.t. After exhaustive washing with pyridine, CH3OH, DCM, and Et2O, the target analogues were detached from the support by conc. aq. ammonia treatment at 50°C for 5 h. The crude material of 5 was analysed by HPLC on a C18 Phenomenex LUNA column (5 μm, mm) eluted with a linear gradient (from 10 to 100% B over 30 min, A = H2O, B = CH3CN), flow rate = 0.8 mL/min, detection at nm, = 16.5 min, and HPLC purity 88% (see Figure 1). NMR (CD3OD, 400 MHz) δ: 7.79 (1H, s, H-6 T), 6.35 (1H, dd, , 6.4 Hz, H-1′ T), 5.32 (1H, m, H-6 cholesterol residue), 4.50 (1H, m, H-3′ T), 4.04–3.90 (3H, overlapped signals, H-4′, and H2-5′ T), 3.65 (1H, s, H-3 cholesterol residue), 2.30 (2H, m, H2-2′ T), 2.20–0.65 (complex signals of cholesterol residue), and 1.94 (3H, s, CH3 T) ppm. NMR (CD3OD, 161.98 MHz) δ: 2.6 ppm. ESI-MS : 688.51 .
2.5. Synthesis of Thymidine Analogue 6
Synthesis of 6 starting from 4a: 50 mg (0.22 meq/g, 0.011 mmol) of dried support 4a was washed and swelled in anhydrous pyridine. The support was then treated with 1 mL of a freshly prepared tosyl chloride solution (0.2 M TsCl, 0.4 M NMIm in pyridine) for 15 min at r.t. to generate the active ester, followed by addition of 1 mL of the amine solution (0.45 M in pyridine), with appropriate washing steps in between . This procedure was repeated six times. After exhaustive washing with pyridine, CH3OH, DCM, and Et2O, the resulting support was dried under reduced pressure. The conjugation yields were evaluated by the DMT cation test on a weighed sample of the support after ammonia treatment (28% NH4OH, 50°C, 5 h). The conjugation yields were always in the range of 65–75%. The target analogue 6 was detached from the support by conc. aq. ammonia treatment at 50°C for 5 h. The crude material was analysed by HPLC on a C18 Phenomenex LUNA column (5 μm, mm) eluted with a linear gradient (from 0 to 100% B over 30 min, A = H2O, B = CH3CN), flow rate = 0.8 mL/min, detection at nm, = 13.6 min, and HPLC purity 91%.
Synthesis of 6 starting from 4b: 30 mg (0.40 meq/g, 0.012 mmol) of dried support 4b was washed and swelled in anhydrous pyridine. The support was then treated with 2 mL of a freshly prepared tosyl chloride solution (0.2 M TsCl, 0.4 M NMIm in pyridine) for 15 min at r.t. to generate the active ester, followed by the addition of 1 mL of the butylamine solution (0.45 M in pyridine), with appropriate washing steps in between. This procedure was repeated ten times. After exhaustive washings with pyridine, CH3OH, DCM, and Et2O, the resulting support was dried under reduced pressure. The conjugation yields were evaluated by the DMT cation test on a weighed sample of the support after ammonia treatment (28% NH4OH, 50°C, 5 h). The conjugation yields were always in the range of 85–90%. The target analogue 6 was detached from the support by conc. aq. ammonia treatment at 50°C for 5 h. The crude material was analysed by HPLC on a C18 Phenomenex LUNA column (5 μm, mm) eluted with a linear gradient (from 0 to 100% B over 30 min, A = H2O, B = CH3CN), flow rate = 0.8 mL/min, detection at nm, = 13.6 min, and HPLC purity 86%. NMR (CD3OD, 400 MHz) δ: 7.89 (1H, s, H-6 T), 6.35 (1H, dd, J = 6.4, 6.4 Hz, H-1′ T), 4.52 (1H, m, H-3′ T), 4.03 (1H, bs, H-4′ T), 3.96 (2H, bs, H2-5′ T), 2.86 (2H, m, CH2-NH), 2.33-2.18 (2H, m, H2-2′ T), 1.95 (3H, s, CH3 T), 1.46 (2H, m, CH3-CH2-CH2-CH2-NH), 1.32 (2H, m, CH3-CH2-CH2-CH2-NH), and 0.89 (3H, t, Hz, CH3 butyl residue) ppm. NMR (CD3OD, 161.98 MHz) δ: 11.0 ppm. ESI-MS : 376.24 .
2.6. Synthesis of Oligonucleotide Conjugated 9
50 mg (0.22 meq/g, 0.011 mmol) of dried support 8a was washed and swelled in anhydrous pyridine. The support was then treated with 1 mL of a freshly prepared tosyl chloride solution (0.2 M TsCl, 0.4 M NMIm in pyridine) for 15 min at r.t. to generate the active ester, followed by the addition of 1 mL of the butylamine solution (0.45 M in pyridine), with appropriate washing steps in between. This procedure was repeated six times. After exhaustive washings with pyridine, CH3OH, DCM, and Et2O, the resulting support was dried under reduced pressure. Starting from 25 mg of support, a 10-mer oligodeoxyribonucleotide was assembled by the automated standard phosphoramidite procedure  (DMT off), using commercially available phosphoramidite nucleosides. Detachment from the support and deprotection were achieved by treatment with conc. aq. ammonia solution (28%, 6 h, 55°C), and the crude material, thus, released was then purified by a simple gel filtration chromatography on a Sephadex G25 column eluted with H2O/EtOH (4 : 1, v/v). The purity of the isolated compounds was then checked by ion exchange HPLC analysis and their identities determined by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry = 31.2 min. MALDI-TOF : 3040.63  (obsv.), 3038.55 (calcd.).
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Synthesis of Supports following the New Strategy
We have recently reported a simple solid phase methodology to obtain phosphodiester and phosphoramidate monoester nucleoside analogues and 5′- and 3′-ODN conjugates in extremely pure form by using standard phosphotriester chemistry (Scheme 1). Initially, inspired by Pedroso’s procedure previously developed for the solid phase synthesis of cyclic ODNs , we prepared a small library of thymidine analogues conjugated at the 5′-position with a set of representative alcohols and amines . Later, a number of 5′- or 3′-ODN and 3′-oligoribonucleotide conjugates, incorporating a variety of labels covalently linked through a phosphodiester or a phosphoramidate bond, were synthesised and characterised [23, 24, 37]. In all cases, ad hoc derivatised solid supports, to which the first nucleoside unit was attached through a phosphate linkage, have been exploited (Scheme 1). The key step in our strategy is the derivatisation of the solid support (TG, CPG) with a 3-chloro-4-hydroxyphenylacetic linker, onto which the nucleotide is attached through a phosphate triester linkage. Due to the structure of the linker, after cleavage from the support, the HPLC analyses of the released nucleotides and ODNs showed only the single desired product in all cases. High purity can be obtained because only the nucleoside or ODN linked to the support through a phosphotriester or phosphoramidate diester bond is cleaved from the resin after ammonia treatment, whereas the nucleoside or ODN anchored through a phosphodiester bond, that is, the unreacted ODN chain, is not affected under the same conditions.
Recently, this approach was extended to the regioselective solid phase synthesis of cyclodextrins (CDs) tethered to a variety of labels through a stable phosphodiester linkage at the C-6 position (Scheme 1) . The new support, based on the Novagel resin anchored with an o-nitrophenol linker (0.46 meq/g), allowed the detachment of the desired products under conditions milder than those required for the support with the o-chlorophenol linker. These results have shown that anchoring the o-chloro- or o-nitrophenol linker to a suitable matrix allows us to extend our methodology to all molecules whose phosphoramidites are either commercially available or easily realised through standard, recognised chemistry.
To exploit the advantages of the regioselective release of the o-chlorophenol support, here, we report the synthesis of a support derivatised with an o-chlorophenol linker that shows higher loading than those previously reported and is useful for large scale syntheses. The key step was the derivatisation of commonly used (LCAA-CPG and TG) solid supports with N-α-Fmoc-3-chloro-L-tyrosine (3-Cl-Tyr). Unlike the 3-chloro-4-hydroxy-phenylacetic linker, used previously, the 3-chloro-L-tyrosine linker not only contains an o-chlorophenol skeleton but also simultaneously has amino and acidic functional groups, which allow a versatile elongation of the peptide chain, with a resulting increase of the functionalisation of the OH groups. In an initial series of experiments, we synthesised supports (LCAA-CPG (load 0.10 meq/g) or TG (load 0.29 meq/g) amino supports) with a homopeptide (3-Cl)-Tyr3 following an Fmoc protocol, leading to 1a and 1b, respectively (Scheme 2). The peptide chain was prepared using DCC/HOBt as coupling agents, with each monomer addition monitored by the Kaiser test; the yields were always in the range of 65–85%, corresponding to 0.19–0.25 meq/g for 1a and 0.50–0.75 meq/g for 1b.
To test the efficiency of these supports in the synthesis of phosphodiester and phosphoramidate monoester nucleoside analogues, we followed two different methods, as previously reported. In preliminary tests, we chose to synthesise the cholesteryl phosphodiester and butylamino phosphoramidate of thymidine as nucleotide models. Initially, the 5′-phosphoramidite thymidine derivative 2 was anchored to matrices (CPG and TG) by exploiting classical phosphoramidite chemistry. After conversion of the phosphite to phosphate triesters, affording supports 3a and 3b, the incorporation of the nucleotide, as determined by the DMT test, was always in the range of 0.18–0.22 meq/g for LCAA-CPG (3a) and 0.25–0.50 meq/g starting from a TG amino resin (3b). Compared with our previous work, here we have doubled resin loading (0.08–0.10 meq/g and 0.19–0.22 meq/g, resp.).
To obtain the phosphodiester thymidine derivative 5 (Scheme 3), support 4b was reacted with MSNT and cholesterol in pyridine at r.t. for 12 h. To prepare the phosphoramidate thymidine derivative, support 4a was treated three times with p-tosyl chloride in pyridine and then reacted with the butylamine dissolved in pyridine. As expected, the conjugation efficiency was always in the range of 70–80%, leading to supports with 0.13–0.18 meq/g and 0.18–0.40 meq/g loading for 4a and 4b, respectively. These yields could be indirectly evaluated by DMT tests on weighed samples of the support after ammonia treatment, determining the amount of unconjugated material left on the solid support. In fact, only nucleosides linked to the support through a phosphotriester or phosphoramidate diester linkage are easily removed upon basic treatment (28% NH4OH, 50°C, 5 h), whereas nucleosides anchored through a phosphodiester bond are not cleaved from the resin under the same conditions. After DMT removal and detachment from the supports, the obtained crude material was analysed by RP-HPLC, and the profiles showed a single major peak with an area (85%–91%) similar to values reported previously (Figure 1). The identity of 5 and 6 was determined by , NMR, and ESI-MS experiments that were conducted directly on the crude detached material. As expected, starting from 30 mg of support 4a or 4b, the target nucleotides were recovered as discrete compounds in 2–4 mg and 4–9 mg quantities, respectively, in a highly pure form.
To demonstrate the reliability of the CPG supports for the automatic synthesis of ODNs, automated assembly has been explored for the synthesis of the ODN chains, adopting the elongation directions (3′–5′). Starting from support 8a, a 10-mer was synthesised (Scheme 3), and after ammonia cleavage and deprotection (6 h, 50°C), ion exchange HPLC analysis of the released ODN showed a single product corresponding to the desired compound 9. The purity of the isolated compound was then checked by HPLC, and its identity was determined by MALDI-TOF MS analysis. In a typical experiment, starting from 35 mg of functionalised support 8a with an average 0.15 meq/g incorporation of the conjugating residue, 150–200 OD units of pure ODNs were isolated after gel filtration.
In conclusion, we have reported the synthesis of a new o-chlorophenol-functionalised solid support, characterised by a higher loading of hydroxyl phenol functions than previously achievable (0.18–0.22 meq/g to CPG and 0.25–0.50 meq/g to TG). This support allows the facile and high-yield preparation of phosphodiester and phosphoramidate monoester nucleosides, as well as other yet unexplored classes of phosphodiester and phosphoramidate molecules. To test the efficiency of this support, we prepared model thymidine analogues conjugated at the 5′-position to cholesterol and n-butylamine through phosphodiester and phosphoramidate bridges, respectively. In all cases, the coupling yields and purity of crude detached materials were comparable to our previous results, and twice as much target was obtained, due to the loading being doubled on average. Based on these preliminary studies, the method is efficient and very reliable. This synthetic approach proposed here can be a starting point for the development of a preparative method for obtaining new phosphodiester and phosphoramidate nucleotides and oligonucleotide conjugates. Further studies are currently in progress to optimise the yields of 3-chloro-L-tyrosine incorporation on the matrix and to evaluate the relationship between the loading of matrices with 3-chloro-L-tyrosine and the structure of the targets as well as the HPLC purity of the crude detached material.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare no conflict of interests.
This study has been supported by AIPRAS Onlus (Associazione Italiana per la Promozione delle Ricerche sull’Ambiente e la Saluta umana). The authors thank CIMCF (Centro di Metodologie Chimico-Fisiche) and Università degli Studi di Napoli “Federico II” for the MS and NMR facilities. They also acknowledge Tecno Bios for grants in support of this investigation.
- T. Aboul-Fadl, “Antisense oligonucleotides: the state of the art,” Current Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 12, no. 19, pp. 2193–2214, 2005.
- S. T. Crooke, “Progress in antisense technology,” Annual Reviews of Medicine, vol. 55, pp. 61–95, 2004.
- N. M. Dean and C. F. Bennett, “Antisense-oligonucleotide-based therapeutics for cancer,” Oncogene, vol. 22, pp. 9087–9096, 2003.
- H. Grosshans and W. Filipowicz, “Molecular biology: the expanding world of small RNAs,” Nature, vol. 451, pp. 414–416, 2008.
- D. R. Corey, “RNA learns from antisense,” Nature Chemical Biology, vol. 3, pp. 8–11, 2007.
- J. F. Lee, G. M. Stovall, and A. D. Ellington, “Aptamer therapeutics advance,” Current Opinion in Chemical Biology, vol. 10, pp. 282–289, 2006.
- T. Da Ros, G. Spalluto, M. Prato, T. Saison-Behmoaras, A. Boutorine, and B. Cacciari, “Oligonucleotides and oligonucleotide conjugates: a new approach for cancer treatment,” Current Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 71–88, 2005.
- E. Uhlmann and J. Vollmer, “Recent advances in the development of immunostimulatory oligonucleotides,” Current Opinion in Drug Discovery and Development, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 204–217, 2003.
- E. De Clercq, “Highlights in the discovery of antiviral drugs: a personal retrospective,” The Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 53, pp. 1438–1450, 2010.
- Y. Richter and B. Fischer, “Nucleotides and inorganic phosphates as potential antioxidants,” Journal of Biological Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 11, pp. 1063–1074, 2006.
- C. Simons, Nucleoside Mimetics: Their Chemistry and Biological Properties, Gordon and Breach Science, Singapore, 2001.
- N. Usman and L. M. Blatt, “Nuclease-resistant synthetic ribozymes: developing a new class of therapeutics,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 106, no. 10, pp. 1197–1202, 2000.
- X. Tan, C. K. Chu, and F. D. Boudinot, “Development and optimization of anti-HIV nucleoside analogs and prodrugs: a review of their cellular pharmacology, structure-activity relationships and pharmacokinetics,” Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 39, no. 1–3, pp. 117–151, 1999.
- T. S. Mansour and R. Storer, “Antiviral nucleosides,” Current Pharmaceutical Design, vol. 3, pp. 227–264, 1997.
- J. Balzarini, “Metabolism and mechanism of antiretroviral action of purine and pyrimidine derivatives,” Pharmacy World and Science, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 113–126, 1994.
- D. M. Huryn and M. Okabe, “AIDS-Driven nucleoside chemistry,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 92, pp. 1745–1768, 1992.
- S. L. Chang, G. W. Griesgraber, P. J. Southern, and C. R. Wagner, “Amino acid phosphoramidate monoesters of 3’-azido-3’-deoxythymidine: relationship between antiviral potency and intracellular metabolism,” The Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 223–231, 2001.
- S. C. Tobias and R. F. Borch, “Synthesis and biological studies of novel nucleoside phosphoramidate prodrugs,” The Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 44, no. 25, pp. 4475–4480, 2001.
- C. McGuigan, R. N. Pathirana, N. Mahmood, K. G. Devine, and A. J. Hay, “Aryl phosphate derivatives of AZT retain activity against HIV1 in cell lines which are resistant to the action of AZT,” Antiviral Research, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 311–321, 1992.
- W. Zhou, S. Upendran, A. Roland, Y. Jin, and R. P. Iyer, “Nucleotide libraries as a source of biologically relevant chemical diversity: solution-phase synthesis,” Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters, vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 1249–1252, 2000.
- Y. Jin, A. Roland, W. Zhou, M. Fauchon, J. Lyaku, and R. P. Iyer, “Synthesis and antiviral evaluation of nucleic acid-based (NAB) libraries,” Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters, vol. 10, no. 17, pp. 1921–1925, 2000.
- L. De Napoli, G. Di Fabio, J. D'Onofrio, and D. Montesarchio, “An efficient solid phase synthesis of 5’-phosphodiester and phosphoramidate monoester nucleoside analogues,” Chemical Communications, no. 20, pp. 2586–2588, 2005.
- M. Gaglione, N. Potenza, G. Di Fabio et al., “Tuning RNA interference by enhancing siRNA/PAZ recognition,” ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 75–78, 2012.
- L. Moggio, L. De Napoli, B. Di Blasio et al., “Solid-phase synthesis of cyclic PNA and PNA-DNA chimeras,” Organic Letters, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 2015–2018, 2006.
- G. Di Fabio, G. Malgieri, C. . Isernia et al., “Novel synthetic strategy for monosubstituted cyclodextrin derivatives,” Chemical Communication, vol. 48, pp. 3875–3877, 2012.
- S. Booth, P. H. H. Hermkens, H. C. J. Ottenheijm, and D. Rees, “Solid-phase organic reactions III: a review of the literature Nov 96–Dec 97,” Tetrahedron, vol. 54, pp. 15385–15443, 1998.
- S. Kobayashi, “New methodologies for the synthesis of compound libraries,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 28, pp. 1–15, 1999.
- F. Balkenhohl, C. von dem Bussche-Huennefeld, A. Lansky, and C. Zechel, “Combinatorial synthesis of small organic molecules,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition, vol. 35, pp. 2288–2337, 1996.
- P. A. Tempest and R. W. Armstrong, “Cyclobutenedione derivatives on solid support: toward multiple core structure libraries,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 119, pp. 7607–7608, 1997.
- H. Lönnberg, “Solid-phase synthesis of oligonucleotide conjugates useful for delivery and targeting of potential nucleic acid therapeutics,” Bioconjugate Chemistry, vol. 20, pp. 1065–1094, 2009.
- P. Virta, J. Katajisto, T. Niittymäki, and H. Lönnberg, “Solid-supported synthesis of oligomeric bioconjugates,” Tetrahedron, vol. 59, pp. 5137–5174, 2003.
- D. A. Stetsenko and M. J. Gait, “A convenient solid-phase method for synthesis of 3’-conjugates of oligonucleotides,” Bioconjugate Chemistry, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 576–586, 2001.
- D. L. McMinn, T. J. Matray, and M. M. Greenberg, “Efficient solution phase synthesis of oligonucleotide conjugates using protected biopolymers containing 3’-terminal alkyl amines,” Journal of Organic Chemistry, vol. 62, no. 21, pp. 7074–7075, 1997.
- J. D. Kahl, D. L. McMinn, and M. M. Greenberg, “High-yielding method for on-column derivatization of protected oligodeoxynucleotides and its application to the convergent synthesis of 5’,3’-bis-conjugates,” Journal of Organic Chemistry, vol. 63, no. 15, pp. 4870–4871, 1998.
- J. D'Onofrio, M. De Champdoré, L. De Napoli, D. Montesarchio, and G. Di Fabio, “Glycomimetics as decorating motifs for oligonucleotides: solid-phase synthesis, stability, and hybridization properties of carbopeptoid- oligonucleotide conjugates,” Bioconjugate Chemistry, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 1299–1309, 2005.
- E. Alazzouzi, N. Escaja, A. Grandas, and E. Pedroso, “A straightforward solid-phase synthesis of cyclic oligodeoxyribonucleotides,” Angewandte Chemie, vol. 36, no. 13-14, pp. 1506–1508, 1997.
- J. D’Onofrio, D. Montesarchio, L. De Napoli, and G. Di Fabio, “An efficient and versatile solid-phase synthesis of 5’- and 3’- conjugated oligonucleotides,” Organic Letters, vol. 7, pp. 4927–4930, 2005.
- L. De Napoli, G. Di Fabio, J. D'Onofrio, and D. Montesarchio, “New nucleoside-based polymeric supports for the solid phase synthesis of ribose-modified nucleoside analogues,” Synlett, no. 11, pp. 1975–1979, 2004.
- M. de Champdoré, L. De Napoli, G. Di Fabio, A. Messere, D. Montesarchio, and G. Piccialli, “New nucleoside based solid supports. Synthesis of 5’,3’-derivatized thymidine analogues,” Chemical Communication, pp. 2598–2599, 2001.
- G. Di Fabio, A. De Capua, L. De Napoli et al., “A new strategy for the solid-phase synthesis of glycoconjugate biomolecules,” Synlett, no. 3, pp. 341–344, 2001.
- E. Kaiser, R. L. Colescott, C. D. Bossinger, and P. I. Cook, “Color test for detection of free terminal amino groups in the solid-phase synthesis of peptides,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 595–598, 1970.
- P. W. Davis and S. A. Osgood, “A new method for introducing amidate linkages in oligonucleotides using phosphoramidite chemistry,” Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters, vol. 9, no. 18, pp. 2691–2692, 1999.
- F. Eckstein, Oligonucleotides and Analogues: A Practical Approach, IRL Press, Oxford, UK, 1991.