Removal of Hg from Real Polluted Sediments Using Enhanced-EK Decontamination: Verification of Experimental Methods and Batch-Test Preliminary Results

<div>Electroosmotic flow (<svg height="11.2372pt" id="M28" style="vertical-align:-2.23925pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -8.99795 9.91808 11.2372" width="9.91808pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.0135,0,0,-0.0135,0,0)"><path d="M699 368C699 549 574 666 407 666C186 666 23 488 23 277C23 113 129 -3 288 -13L307 -26C431 -111 501 -139 533 -147C559 -154 613 -163 658 -164L666 -141C597 -111 507 -66 430 -11L416 -1C580 42 699 190 699 368ZM601 371C601 227 518 54 381 22L354 40L278 24C175 47 120 145 120 269C120 451 235 631 398 631C540 631 601 521 601 371Z" id="g113-82"></path><glyph.data ascent="3473" descent="-2876" horiz-adv-x="722" vert-adv-y="722"></glyph.data></g></svg>) as a function of treatment time (EK1, EK2).</div>

Journal of Chemistry

fig5

Figure 5

Figure 5: Removal of Hg from Real Polluted Sediments Using Enhanced-EK Decontamination: Verification of Experimental Methods and Batch-Test Preliminary Results 

Figure 5 | Removal of Hg from Real Polluted Sediments Using Enhanced-EK Decontamination: Verification of Experimental Methods and Batch-Test Preliminary Results 