Research Article

Actual Application of a H2-Based Polyvinyl Chloride Hollow Fiber Membrane Biofilm Reactor to Remove Nitrate from Groundwater

Table 3

Electronic-equivalent fluxes for sulfate and nitrate.

PeriodDenitrification rate or
substrate fluxa
Electron-equivalent flux
(eq/m2d)
Distribution of electron-equivalent 
fluxes (%)
Nitrate (g/m2d)Sulfate (g /m2d)O2 (g/m2d)NitratebSulfatecSum-up of the fluxesNitrateSulfateO2

Run I0.490.450.150.180.040.020.2376.015.98.1
Run II0.980.750.150.350.060.020.4381.514.24.3
Run III1.180.970.150.420.080.020.5281.215.23.6

Calculated by influent flow rate () × removed substrate ()area of biofilm surface (), where Q is in m3/d, S is in g-substrate (-N or )/m3, is in m2, and J is in g--N/m2d or g-/m2d.
bCalculated by = (influent flow rate () × removed -N ())/(area of biofilm surface () × EWNitrate), where is in m3/d, is in g--N/m3, is in m2, EWNitrate is in 14 g--N/5 e equivalent for reduction of nitrate to nitrogen gas, and is in g--N/m2d. We assume five electrons per mole for nitrate reduction to nitrogen gas.
cCalculated by (influent flow rate () × removed ())/(area of biofilm surface () × EWSulfate), where Q is in m3/d, ΔS is in g-/m3, is in m2, EWSulfate is in 96 g--N/8 e equivalent for reduction of sulfate to sulfide, and J is in g-/m2d. We assume 8 electrons per mole for sulfate reduction to sulfide, for seen   (i) [26].
dCalculated by (influent flow rate () × removed O2 ())/(area of biofilm surface () × EWOxygen), where Q is in m3/d, ΔS is in g-O/m3, is in m2, EWOxygen is in 32 g-O2/4 e equivalent for reduction of O2 to O2−, and J is in g-O2/m2d. We assume 4 electrons per mole for reduction O2 to O2−, for seen   (ii).