Research Article

Analysis of Antifungal Components in the Galls of Melaphis chinensis and Their Effects on Control of Anthracnose Disease of Chinese Cabbage Caused by Colletotrichum higginsianum

Table 2

Calibration curve parameter, limits of detection (LOD), precision, and recovery for the indicator compounds.

CompoundCalibration curveCorrelation coefficients ()Linear range (µg/mL) LOD (µg/mL)Concentration (μg/mL)Intraday precisionInterday precisionSpiked concentration (μg/mL) Recovery (%)RSD (%)
Mean ± SD (RSD %)

1 0.99952.49–498.00 0.1809.96 9.02 ± 0.06 (0.63) 8.76 ± 0.23 (2.61)6.58118.02 ± 3.853.26
249.00250.86 ± 0.48 (0.19)248.87 ± 1.63 (0.65)13.63105.45 ± 1.111.05
498.00497.11 ± 0.67 (0.14)493.71 ± 2.90 (0.59)26.67106.78 ± 1.101.10

2 0.99962.50–500.00 0.2009.96 8.69 ± 0.14 (1.62) 8.57 ± 0.13 (1.25)26.60126.33 ± 0.910.72
249.00252.57 ± 0.71 (0.28)251.79 ± 1.71 (0.68)120.33106.75 ± 0.330.31
498.00498.75 ± 3.55 (0.71)498.75 ± 2.51 (0.50)264.79105.16 ± 0.430.41

3 0.999924.50–490.05 0.01249.01 48.85 ± 0.13 (0.26) 49.61 ± 0.70 (1.42)102.64108.61 ± 2.882.65
98.01 98.71 ± 0.36 (0.36) 98.91 ± 0.70 (0.71)124.62 96.98 ± 0.600.62
490.05489.95 ± 0.94 (0.19)498.99 ± 7.68 (1.54)168.50 93.01 ± 1.201.29

4 0.999810.09–50.47 0.01010.09 10.00 ± 0.02 (0.21) 10.01 ± 0.02 (0.19)10.09 95.59 ± 0.420.44
25.24 25.40 ± 0.19 (0.73) 25.81 ± 0.60 (2.34)25.24 89.26 ± 0.130.14
50.47 50.44 ± 0.33 (0.65) 50.31 ± 0.31 (0.61)50.47 90.41 ± 0.080.09

5 0.99929.93–49.66 0.0109.93 10.33 ± 0.08 (0.82) 10.31 ± 0.05 (0.45)9.93 81.12 ± 2.152.65
24.83 24.19 ± 0.14 (0.56) 24.17 ± 0.12 (0.52)24.83 99.81 ± 0.350.36
49.66 49.89 ± 0.10 (0.19) 50.29 ± 0.65 (1.30)49.66108.67 ± 0.490.45

6 0.99689.75–48.76 0.0109.75 10.55 ± 0.09 (0.86) 10.61 ± 0.08 (0.72)9.75 88.64 ± 0.630.71
24.38 23.11 ± 0.06 (0.26) 23.35 ± 0.19 (0.81)24.83 82.00 ± 0.360.44
48.76 49.24 ± 0.25 (0.50) 49.76 ± 0.51 (1.03)48.76 94.96 ± 0.740.78