Research Article
Blending Influence on the Conversion Efficiency of the Cogasification Process of Corn Stover and Coal
Table 3
A comparison of the simulated results from this study with experimental data from the literature.
| Blend ratio (%) | Materials blended | Gasification efficiency (%) |
| This study | 90 : 10 | Corn stover : coal | 58 | 80 : 20 | 53.5 | 70 : 30 | 54.4 | 60 : 40 | 52.6 | 50 : 50 | 51.3 | 40 : 60 | 50.8 | 30 : 70 | 49.3 | 20 : 80 | 46.1 | 10 : 90 | 44.9 |
| Previous authors | 90 : 10 | Wood : coal [13] | 50–95 | 80 : 20 | Wood : coal [13] | 43 | 70 : 30 | Pine chips : coal [9] | Improved H2 eff. From 17% to 22% | 60 : 40 | Mulia coal : Japanese cedar [7] | 47.9 | Coal : pine chips [14] | Improved efficiency | 50 : 50 | Woody biomass : coal [7] | 65–85 | Indonesian Tinto coal : sawdust [14] | 45 | 40 : 60 | Coal : pinewood [13] | 48–62 | Coal : pine chips [15] | Improved efficiency | 30 : 70 | Bagasse : coal [16] | 55.03 | 20 : 80 | Pine chips : coal [9] | Continuous and stable operation/Improved efficiency | 10 : 90 | Coal : pine sawdust [17] | 82.3 | Coal : almond shell [17] | 77.7 | Coal : olive stones [17] | 81.6 |
|
|