Research Article
Valorization of Wasted Black Tea as a Low-Cost Adsorbent for Nickel and Zinc Removal from Aqueous Solution
Table 4
The capacity of different adsorbents for Ni2+ and Zn2+ removal.
| Adsorbent | Adsorbent mass to solution volume ratio | Sorption capacity (mg/g) | Reference |
| Ni2+ removal |
Sphagnum moss peat | 0.4 : 100 | 9.18 | [31] | Baker’s yeast | 0.1 : 100 | 11.40 | [32] | Chlorella sorokiniana (FBCS) | 0.1 : 100 | 48.08 | [33] | Powdered activated carbon | 1.2 : 100 | 31.08 | [34] | Waste tea | 1.5 : 100 | 18.42 | [24] | Waste tea (formaldehyde-treated) | 0.2 : 100 | 120.50 | [35] | Black wasted tea | 2 : 100 | 90.91 | This study |
| Zn2+ removal | Olive oil mill residues | 0.4 : 100 | 52.91 | [36] | Bagasse-based activated carbon | 0.6 : 100 | 54.00 | [37] | Date pits-based activated carbon | 0.02 : 100 | 120.5 | [38] | Chitosan | 0.25 : 100 | 58.83 | [39] | Waste tea leaves | 0.15 : 100 | 11.76 | [40] | Black tea waste | 1 : 100 | 12.24 | [41] | Tea factory waste | 0.4 : 100 | 8.9 | [25] | Tea leaves (hydrazine monohydrate-exhausted) | 0.125 : 100 | 79.76 | [42] | Wasted black tea | 2 : 100 | 166.67 | This study |
|
|