On the Performance of the Current MANET Routing Protocols for VoIP, HTTP, and FTP Applications

<table class="table-group" width="800px"><tr class="fig-image" id="a"><td><img alt="154983.fig.006a" src="https://static.hindawi.com/articles/jcnc/volume-2014/154983/figures/154983.fig.006a.jpg"/></td></tr><tr class="fig-caption"><td align="center"><table><tr><td><b>(a) </b>Average time in queue</td></tr></table></td></tr><tr class="fig-image" id="b"><td><img alt="154983.fig.006b" src="https://static.hindawi.com/articles/jcnc/volume-2014/154983/figures/154983.fig.006b.jpg"/></td></tr><tr class="fig-caption"><td align="center"><table><tr><td><b>(b) </b>Total energy consumption</td></tr></table></td></tr><tr class="fig-image" id="c"><td><img alt="154983.fig.006c" src="https://static.hindawi.com/articles/jcnc/volume-2014/154983/figures/154983.fig.006c.jpg"/></td></tr><tr class="fig-caption"><td align="center"><table><tr><td><b>(c) </b>Average end-to-end delay</td></tr></table></td></tr><tr class="fig-image" id="d"><td><img alt="154983.fig.006d" src="https://static.hindawi.com/articles/jcnc/volume-2014/154983/figures/154983.fig.006d.jpg"/></td></tr><tr class="fig-caption"><td align="center"><table><tr><td><b>(d) </b>Average jitter</td></tr></table></td></tr></table>

<table>Performance metrics comparison for OLSRv2, DYMO, and MP-OLSR for different VoIP traffic load with 60 nodes.</table>

Journal of Computer Networks and Communications

fig6

Figure 6

Figure 6: On the Performance of the Current MANET Routing Protocols for VoIP, HTTP, and FTP Applications 