Review Article

Intergenerational Cycle of Obesity and Diabetes: How Can We Reduce the Burdens of These Conditions on the Health of Future Generations?

Table 2

Most important human clinical interventions trials performed in pregnant mothers to reduce or improve maternal, neonatal, and child outcomes.

StudyPopulationStudy designInterventionMaternal outcomesGestational or obstetrical outcomesNeonatal outcomesLong-term offspring outcomes

Guelinckx et al. 2010Am J Clin Nutr [103] , nondiabetic obese (BMI > 29) pregnant (<15 weeks) womenRandomized controlled trialPassive group: brochure on general advices at 1st prenatal visit
Active group: brochure + 3 group sessions with dietitian during pregnancy on nutrition and physical activity
Control group: routine care
Gestational weight gain: similar
GDM incidence: N/A
Intervention impact: in active group, improved nutritional habits during pregnancy and compared to other groups; similar physical activity
Intervention impact: similarIntervention impact: similar birth weightN/A

Wolff et al., 2008 Int J Obes [104] , nondiabetic obese (BMI = 35) pregnant (<15 weeks) womenRandomized controlled trialIntervention group: ten individual sessions with dietitian during pregnancy to improve gestational weight gain with energy intake restriction
Control group: routine care
Gestational weight gain: 6.7 kg versus controls ( )
GDM incidence: similar
Intervention impact: at 27 weeks: insulin, leptin versus controls
at 36 weeks: insulin,
glucose versus controls
Intervention impact: similarIntervention impact: similar birth weight, placental weight, head, and abdominal circumferenceN/A

Callaway et al., 2010 Diabetes Care [105] , obese (BMI ≥ 30) pregnant women
*participants with type 1 diabetes excluded
Randomized controlled trialIntervention group: individual exercise program with energy expenditure (EE) goal of 900 kcal/week from 12-week gestation to delivery
Control group: routine care
Gestational weight gain: N/A
GDM incidence: in intervention group, 12% ↑ at 12 week ( ) and similar at 28 week ( )
Intervention impact: at 28 weeks: ↑ EE ( ),
fasting glucose ( ), at 36 weeks: fasting insulin ( )
N/AN/AN/A

Clapp. 1996J Pediatr [106] , recruited before pregnancy, healthy (BMI not mentioned) caucasian women.
Offspring aged 5 yrs: girls and 8 boys in each group
Prospective cohort studyActive women: healthy and physically active before and throughout pregnancy.
Control women: healthy and physically active before and stop at initiation of pregnancy
No intervention in children
Gestational weight gain: in active versus control group
GDM incidence: N/A
N/AIntervention impact:
birth weight, ponderal index, fat mass, body fat %, and abdominal circumference ( )
Intervention impact at 5 years of age:
weight, skinfolds, arm area fat mass ( ), and ponderal index ( ); ↑general intelligence, language skill ( ), and neurodevelopmental score ( )

Artal et al., 2007 Appl Physiol Nutr Metab [107] , overweight or obese (BMI > 25) pregnant (<33 weeks) women with GDM (no insulin)Randomized controlled trial
No control group without intervention
Diet (D) group: individual counseling on diet and weight gain goal according to BMI
Exercise and diet (ED) group: same plus individual counseling on moderate exercise
All received usual GDM management
Gestational weight gain: in ED versus D group ( )
GDM incidence:
1st trimester: similar
2nd trimester: similar in term of prescription related to insulin to maintain glucose.
Intervention impact: similar caesarean ratesIntervention impact: similar for macrosomia, small for gestational age and birth weightN/A

Quinlivan et al., 2011Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol [108] , overweight or obese (BMI > 25) pregnant womenRandomized controlled trialIntervention group: 4 steps individual approach: (1) continuity of care provider, (2) weighting at each visit, (3) brief dietary intervention by a food technologist, and (4) psychological support
Control group: routine care
Gestational weight gain: in intervention versus control ( )
GDM incidence: in intervention versus control ( )
Intervention impact: N/AIntervention impact: similar birth weightN/A

Korpi-Hyovalti et al., 2011 BMC Public health [109] , high risk for GDM pregnant (8–12 weeks) women irrespective of BMI at inclusionOpen multicenter randomized controlled trialIntervention group: individual counseling on nutrition (dietitian) and physical activity (physiotherapist)
Control group: close followup
Gestational weight gain: small in intervention group ( )
GDM incidence: similar
Intervention impact: similarIntervention impact: heavier birth weight ( ); similar rates of macrosomia, admissions to NICU and respiratory distressN/A

Lindholm et al., 2010 Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand [110] , overweight (BMI 30–35, ) or obese (BMI > 35, ) pregnant womenUncontrolled prospective intervention studyIndividual counseling with midwife every 2 weeks + 2 group sessions from 1st trimester to delivery on diet and exercise. One initial consultation with dietitian
Goal: gestational weight gain ≤ 6 kg
Gestational weight gain: 14/25 reached goals; in prepregnancy BMI > 35 versus 30–35 ( )
GDM incidence: as expected
Intervention impact: in prepregnancy BMI > 35 versus 30–35:↑ gestational weeks ( ),
caesarean ( )
Intervention impact: fetal growth and birth weight: as expectedN/A

Shirazian et al., 2010 Am J Perinatol [111] , nondiabetic obese (BMI > 30) pregnant womenProspective study with historical controlsIntervention group: individual counseling on healthy diet and exercise, ≥ 5 one-on-one counselling or phone calls + ≥ 1 seminar/trimester x/trimester. Weight gain goal ≤ 15 lbs.
Control group: routine care
Gestational weight gain:1/2 of control ( )
GDM incidence: similar
Intervention impact: similarIntervention impact: similar birth weight and rates of fetal complicationsN/A

Crowther et al., 2005 N Engl J Med [112]
Gillman et al., 2010 Diabetes Care [113]
, mild GDM pregnant women (median BMI = 26)
Offspring aged 4-5 yrs: (intervention group); (control group)
Multicenter randomized controlled trial
ACHOIS study
Intervention group: individual dietary and lifestyle counseling, usual GDM care, insulin therapy in 20% of women; from recruitment (24–34 week gestation) to delivery
Control group: routine care
No intervention in children
Gestational weight gain: in intervention versus control ( )
GDM incidence: similar
Intervention impact: ↑ postpartum quality of life
Intervention impact:
↑ induction of labor ( ), similar caesarean rates
Intervention impact:
perinatal complications ( ),
↑ admission to neonatal nursery ( ),
birth weight ( ),
macrosomia (<0.001)
Intervention impact: in offspring 4-5 y.o., similar BMI Z-score, and proportion of BMI ≥ 85th percentile

Landon et al., 2009 N Engl J Med [114] , mild GDM pregnant women (median BMI = 30)Multicenter randomized controlled trialIntervention group: individual nutritional counseling, usual GDM care, insulin therapy (required in 37 women); from recruitment (24–31 weeks) to delivery
Control group: routine care, insulin therapy (required in 2 women)
Gestational weight gain: in intervention versus control ( ).
GDM incidence: N/A
Intervention impact: achievement of maternal glucose targets
Intervention impact:
caesarean ( ), shoulder dystocia ( ), preeclampsia, or hypertension ( )
Intervention impact:
birth weight ( ), macrosomia ( ), fat mass ( ); similar perinatal complications, small for gestational age, admissions to NICU, and respiratory distress
N/A

Garner et al., 1997 Am J Obstet Gynecol [115]
And Malcolm et al., 2006 Diabet Med [116]
, low-risk pregnant (24–32 weeks) women with GDM
Offspring aged 7–11 yrs: (intervention group), (control group)
Randomized controlled trialIntervention group: individual dietary counseling by dietitian biweekly, usual GDM care, insulin therapy (required in 36 women)
Control group: not seen by dietitian; recommended to eat unrestrictedly according to Canada food guide; biweekly self-glucose monitoring
No intervention in children
Gestational weight gain: similar
GDM incidence: similar OGTT area under the curves
Intervention impact: at 28–30 weeks:
↑ preprandial glucose levels ( )
at 36–38 weeks:
preprandial ( ) and 1-hour postprandial ( ) glucose levels
Intervention impact: similar caesarean ratesIntervention impact: similar birth weight, perinatal complicationsIntervention impact: similar mean fasting glucose, mean fasting insulin, and mean 2 hrs glucose and insulin; 5 children born to mothers from intervention group had AGT

Moses et al., 2006 Am J Clin Nutr [117] , pregnant (12–16 weeks) women
*Participants with conditions associated to abnormal glucose metabolism and insulin resistance problem were excluded
Randomized controlled trial
No control group without intervention
Low-glycemic index group: individual nutritional counseling by dietitian 5 times during pregnancy on recommended nutritional intake plus low-glycemic index diet
High-glycemic index group: idem except for recommendation of high- glycemic index diet
Gestational weight gain: similar
GDM incidence: similar (only 1 case)
Intervention impact: in low versus high-glycemic index group: glycemic index ( ), fasting glucose ( )Within low-glycemic index group: fasting glucose ( )
Intervention impact: in low- versus high-glycemic index group: similar caesarean ratesIntervention impact: in low- versus high-glycemic index group: birth weight ( ), macrosomia ( ), ponderal index ( ); similar perinatal complications, small for gestational age, admissions to NICU, respiratory distressN/A

ACHOIS: Australian Carbohydrate Intolerance in Pregnant Women study, AGT: abnormal glucose tolerance, BMI: body mass index, GDM: gestational diabetes mellitus, MET: metabolic equivalent task, NICU: neonatal intensive care unit, N/A: not applicable, OGTT: oral glucose tolerance test.