The Kansei Design Characteristics towards Learning Style

Table 11

Correlation between design proposed toward cognitive alert style.

Design	Kansei words	Q1	Q2	Q3	Q4	Q5	Q6	Q7	Q8	Q9
Design-1	1-Fragile-Durable
	1-Unattractive-Attractive
	1-Old Fashion-Modern
	1-Lame-Cool
	1-Unintuitive-Intuitive
	1-Inconvenient-Ergonomic
Design-2	2-Fragile-Durable
	2-Unattractive-Attractive
	2-Old Fashion-Modern				−0.257**
	2-Lame-Cool				−0.226*					−0.199*
	2-Unintuitive-Intuitive
	2-Inconvenient-Ergonomic				−0.234*
Design-3	3-Fragile-Durable
	3-Unattractive-Attractive
	3-Old Fashion-Modern
	3-Lame-Cool
	3-Unintuitive-Intuitive
	3-Inconvenient-Ergonomic
Design-4	4-Fragile-Durable
	4-Unattractive-Attractive								0.230*
	4-Old Fashion-Modern								0.199*
	4-Lame-Cool
	4-Unintuitive-Intuitive
	4-Inconvenient-Ergonomic
Design-5	5-Fragile-Durable
	5-Unattractive-Attractive							−0.222*
	5-Old Fashion-Modern							−0.209*
	5-Lame-Cool
	5-Unintuitive-Intuitive
	5-Inconvenient-Ergonomic
Design-6	6-Fragile-Durable								−0.197*
	6-Unattractive-Attractive
	6-Old Fashion—Modern
	6-Lame—Cool
	6-Unintuitive-Intuitive
	6-Inconvenient-Ergonomic
Design-7	7-Fragile-Durable
	7-Unattractive-Attractive
	7-Old Fashion-Modern
	7-Lame-Cool
	7-Unintuitive-Intuitive
	7-Inconvenient-Ergonomic
Design-8	8-Fragile-Durable
	8-Unattractive-Attractive
	8-Old Fashion-Modern
	8-Lame-Cool
	8-Unintuitive-Intuitive
	8-Inconvenient-Ergonomic

∗Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2 tailed).
∗∗Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2 tailed).