Comparative Study of the Thermal Shock Resistance of an Industrial Tableware Porcelain

<table class="table-group" width="800px"><tr class="fig-image" id="a"><td><img alt="972019.fig.005a" src="https://static.hindawi.com/articles/je/volume-2013/972019/figures/972019.fig.005a.jpg"/></td></tr><tr class="fig-caption"><td align="center"><table><tr><td><b>(a) </b><i>Glazed face</i></td></tr></table></td></tr><tr class="fig-image" id="b"><td><img alt="972019.fig.005b" src="https://static.hindawi.com/articles/je/volume-2013/972019/figures/972019.fig.005b.jpg"/></td></tr><tr class="fig-caption"><td align="center"><table><tr><td><b>(b) </b><i>Normal face</i></td></tr></table></td></tr></table>

<table>Total length (mm) of cracks as a function of the number of thermal cycles <svg height="11.825" id="M36" style="vertical-align:-0.1638pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 58.087502 11.825" width="58.087502" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,.062,11.55)"><path d="M600 0h-557v24l268 633l28 8l261 -641v-24zM497 50l-194 489l-196 -489h390z" id="x394"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,10.959,11.55)"><path d="M649 676l-22 -187l-33 -2q3 56 -12 94q-8 20 -31.5 26.5t-86.5 6.5h-74l-90 -491q-4 -23 -6 -36.5t1 -25t7 -16.5t18 -9t27 -5t41 -3l-6 -28h-286l4 28q68 5 84 18.5t28 76.5l94 491h-55q-74 0 -100.5 -6t-41.5 -23q-24 -29 -54 -98l-32 1q32 98 53 188h22q7 -18 15 -22
t37 -4h417q23 0 33.5 5t25.5 21h23z" id="x1D447"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,26.989,11.55)"><path d="M535 323h-483v50h483v-50zM535 138h-483v50h483v-50z" id="x3D"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,41.692,11.55)"><path d="M412 140l28 -9q0 -2 -35 -131h-373v23q112 112 161 170q59 70 92 127t33 115q0 63 -31 98t-86 35q-75 0 -137 -93l-22 20l57 81q55 59 135 59q69 0 118.5 -46.5t49.5 -122.5q0 -62 -29.5 -114t-102.5 -130l-141 -149h186q42 0 58.5 10.5t38.5 56.5z" id="x32"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,49.852,11.55)"><path d="M285 378v-2q65 -13 102 -54.5t37 -97.5q0 -57 -30.5 -104.5t-74 -75t-85.5 -42t-72 -14.5q-31 0 -59.5 11t-40.5 23q-19 18 -16 36q1 16 23 33q13 10 24 0q58 -51 124 -51q55 0 88 40t33 112q0 64 -39 96.5t-88 32.5q-29 0 -64 -11l-6 29q77 25 118 57.5t41 84.5
q0 45 -26.5 69.5t-68.5 24.5q-67 0 -120 -79l-20 20l43 63q51 56 127 56h1q66 0 107 -37t41 -95q0 -42 -31 -71q-22 -23 -68 -54z" id="x33"></path></g>
</svg>0°C.</table>

Journal of Engineering

fig5

Figure 5

Figure 5: Comparative Study of the Thermal Shock Resistance of an Industrial Tableware Porcelain 