Application of Unit Commitment with Market Pool in a Peaking Power Generation Firm in the Philippines for a Cost Reduction Case Study

Table 2

Sample of daily dispatch schedule.

Day	Generator (load)
	1 (MW)	2 (MW)	3 (MW)	4 (MW)	WESM (MW)	Demand (MW)	Total cost (Php)	Actual cost (Php)	Difference (Php)
1	7.60	11.00	20.78	6.00	190.14	235.52	516,099.23	861,311.36	345,212.13
2	—	22.00	21.36	6.00	190.90	240.25	577,580.07	826,157.23	248,577.16
3	—	55.00	42.50	6.00	119.30	222.80	576,724.88	799,232.89	222,508.01
4	—	—	—	—	152.00	152.00	137,587.94	314,429.24	176,841.30
5	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
7	14.37	33.00	11.00	12.00	176.50	246.87	508,505.66	817,308.86	308,803.20
8	11.10	44.00	43.50	—	186.04	284.64	800,760.58	893,468.85	92,708.27
9	6.40	44.00	53.50	12.00	169.98	285.88	831,577.92	978,041.81	146,463.89
10	11.10	—	20.00	6.00	249.34	286.44	627,515.56	872,805.62	245,290.06
11	—	11.00	—	—	129.00	140.00	286,158.43	466,501.54	180,343.11
12	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
13	—	11.00	—	—	199.31	210.31	381,044.86	670,454.24	289,409.38
14	—	11.00	—	—	220.38	231.38	443,115.71	636,757.35	193,641.64
15	—	11.00	—	—	131.00	142.00	219,223.07	468,133.91	248,910.84
16	—	22.00	—	—	194.42	216.42	402,135.54	567,306.37	165,170.83
17	—	—	—	—	242.16	242.16	363,391.14	594,183.21	230,792.07
18	—	11.00	—	—	116.00	127.00	255,926.07	416,199.68	160,273.61
19	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
20	—	—	11.50	—	213.90	225.40	385,745.60	570,024.00	184,278.40
21	8.90	44.00	31.90	6.42	169.16	260.38	549,674.20	801,667.40	251,993.20
22	—	—	—	—	251.08	251.08	383,628.67	600,849.85	217,221.18
23	—	—	—	—	220.50	220.50	358,822.83	579,351.73	220,528.90
24	—	11.00	—	—	230.22	241.22	438,375.30	650,212.15	211,836.85
25	7.19	22.00	—	6.00	119.00	154.19	336,915.39	607,571.60	270,656.21
26	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
27	47.50	88.00	86.20	12.00	78.30	312.00	959,102.37	1,124,398.40	165,296.03
28	28.04	132.50	97.78	24.00	37.88	320.20	1,039,227.83	1,259,901.12	220,673.29