Impact of CCSDS-IDC and JPEG 2000 Compression on Image Quality and Classification

<table>SNR (in dB) in relation to the bit rate (in bpppb) obtained for the images recovered of the studied crop areas and for the four compression strategies. (Please note that the <svg height="9.8625002" id="M8" style="vertical-align:-2.29482pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 7.875 9.8625002" width="7.875" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
<g transform="matrix(1.25,0,0,-1.25,0,9.8625)">
<g transform="translate(72,-64.11)">
<text transform="matrix(1,0,0,-1,-71.95,66.45)">
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="0" y="0">𝑦</tspan>
</text>
</g>
</g>
</svg>-axis is not the same as in Figures <a href="../fig4/">4</a> and <a href="../fig5/">5</a>.) </table>

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering

fig6

Figure 6

Figure 6: Impact of CCSDS-IDC and JPEG 2000 Compression on Image Quality and Classification 