Research Article
Crowd Event Perception Based on Spatiotemporal Weber Field
Table 1
Comparison of precision and recall for different algorithms.
| Index | Run (PETS209) | Run (UMN) | Gather | Split | Evacuation | Opposite flow | Precision | Recall | Precision | Recall | Precision | Recall | Precision | Recall | Precision | Recall | Precision | Recall |
| Proposed method | 0.887 | 0.902 | 0.847 | 0.902 | 0.825 | 0.883 | 0.912 | 0.882 | 0.903 | 0.878 | 0.879 | 0.854 | Social force [24] | 0.812 | 0.887 | 0.792 | 0.891 | 0.767 | 0.895 | 0.807 | 0.879 | 0.781 | 0.882 | 0.817 | 0.832 | HOG/HOF [36] | 0.892 | 0.919 | 0.832 | 0.878 | 0.817 | 0.836 | 0.923 | 0.813 | 0.915 | 0.867 | 0.833 | 0.781 | HOG3D [37] | 0.803 | 0.786 | 0.812 | 0.793 | 0.803 | 0.784 | 0.827 | 0.832 | 0.831 | 0.852 | 0.821 | 0.771 | Optical flow [8] | 0.836 | 0.868 | 0.803 | 0.822 | 0.809 | 0.812 | 0.903 | 0.792 | 0.822 | 0.841 | 0.812 | 0.769 |
|
|