Research Article
Robust Abnormal Event Recognition via Motion and Shape Analysis at ATM Installations
Table 5
Comparison of the recognition accuracy, recall, and precision for various MHI frames on our testing data set.
| Number of MHI frames | 5 | 10 | 15 | Accuracy | Precision | Recall | Accuracy | Precision | Recall | Accuracy | Precision | Recall |
| Single | 97.08% | 96.30% | 95.90% | 96.10% | 96.20% | 93.30% | 86.97% | 100.00% | 79.80% | Multiple | 89.86% | 76.10% | 49.10% | 94.71% | 81.00% | 85.50% | 92.44% | 58.60% | 47.20% | Multiple abnormal | 90.00% | 85.30% | 95.30% | 96.38% | 95.90% | 96.40% | 87.82% | 80.40% | 98.20% |
|
|