Active Commuting among K-12 Educators: A Study Examining Walking and Biking to Work

Table 2

Pearson correlations for active commuting and social ecological model variables.

Variable	𝑟	𝑃
Individual level
Age	0.01	0.99
Body mass index (kg/m^2)	−0.109	0.04
Number of reported chronic diseases	−0.017	0.72
Perceived health status (range 1–5)	0.14	0.008
Number of cars in the household	−0.183	<0.001
Number of children	−0.07	0.21
Self-efficacy for bicycling skills (range: 1–4)	0.14	0.02
AC behavioral beliefs score (range: 13–91)	0.13	0.02
Perceived behavioral control for AC (range: 7–42)	−0.441	<0.001
Interpersonal level
Spouse AC (times/week)	0.29	<0.001
Spouse normative beliefs for AC (range: 4–20)	0.26	<0.001
Perceived coworker AC (range: 1–5)	0.07	0.13
Coworker normative beliefs for AC (range: 4–20)	0.23	<0.001
Institutional level
Number of employer supports for AC (range: 0–7)	0.14	<0.001
Perceived employer support for AC (range: 1–5)	0.15	<0.001
Community level
Perceived community support for AC (range: 5–25)	0.06	0.27
Perceived pedestrian friendliness for AC (range: 1–5)	0.1	0.06
Perceive bicycle friendliness for AC (range: 1–5)	0.06	0.22
Environment level (range 1–5)
Lack of on-street bike lanes	−0.15	0.01
Lack of off-street walking/biking paths	−0.2	<0.001
Lack of sidewalks	−0.22	<0.001
Speed and volume of traffic along route	−0.14	0.01
Perceived crime along route	−0.05	0.37
Difficult terrain	−0.18	<0.001
Bad weather	−0.13	0.03

Note. AC: active commuting; bold face indicates significance.