Active Commuting among K-12 Educators: A Study Examining Walking and Biking to Work

Table 3

Hierarchical regression explaining variance in active commuting (AC).

Variable	𝐵	SEB	𝛽	𝑅^2	Δ𝑅^2
Step1: Individual influences				0.42
Perceived health status	−0.05	0.26	−0.17
Body mass index	0.03	0.04	0.05
Perceived behavioral control for AC	−0.17	0.03	−0.48***
Self-efficacy for skills	−0.07	0.2	−0.03
Number of cars in the household	−0.3	0.27	−0.09
Step2: Interpersonal influences				0.53	0.11
Coworker normative beliefs for AC	0.07	0.07	0.08
Spouse AC	0.4	0.11	0.27**
Spouse normative beliefs for AC	0.06	0.06	0.1
Step3: Institutional influences				0.53	0.001
Perceived employer support for AC	−0.03	0.19	−0.01
Number of employer supports for AC	0.04	0.16	0.02
Step4: Community influences				0.56	0.03
Perceived walk time to work	−1.3	0.52	−0.1*
Step5: Environmental influences				0.61	0.05
Lack of on-street bike lanes	0.15	0.29	0.09
Lack of off-street walking/biking paths	0.04	0.35	0.03
Lack of sidewalks	−0.59	0.27	−0.37*
Speed and volume of traffic along route	0.5	0.2	0.3*
Difficult terrain	0.15	0.2	0.08
Bad weather	−0.23	0.19	−0.12

Note. ^∗𝑃<0.05, ^∗∗𝑃<0.01, and ^∗∗∗𝑃<0.001.