A Combined Impact-Process Evaluation of a Program Promoting Active Transport to School: Understanding the Factors That Shaped Program Effectiveness

Table 5

Impact of the Ride2School program on students’ use of active transport at least once per week, unadjusted and adjusted for predictor variables, parent-reported data.

Variable	OR	95% CI	𝑃	AOR	95% CI	𝑃
Data collection period (reference = baseline)	1.30	0.95–1.79	0.107	1.67	1.04–2.70	0.035
School location (reference = metropolitan)	0.64	0.41–1.00	0.050	1.12	0.77–1.63	0.559
Child grade				1.64	1.33–2.03	0.000
Grade 4	Reference
Grade 5	1.97	1.19–3.27	0.008
Grade 6	2.02	1.23–3.32	0.005
Distance to school				0.42	0.35–0.51	0.000
Less than 0.5 km	8.36	2.43–28.72	<0.000
0.5–1 km	4.4	1.82–10.65	0.001
1.1–2 km	Reference
2.1–4 km	0.46	0.24–0.87	0.016
4.1–10 km	0.09	0.04–0.20	<0.000
More than 10 km	Not applicable (zero in one cell)
Number of cars per adult				0.48	0.14–1.65	0.245
None	Not applicable (zero in one cell)
One	Reference
Two	0.38	0.19–0.77	0.005
How often spouse/partner cycles	0.49	0.28–0.85	0.011	1.79	0.68–4.71	0.239
Walking to school is a possibility	0.43	0.02–0.08	0.000	5.63	3.48–9.11	0.000
Cycling to school is a possibility	0.17	0.11–0.26	0.000	2.81	1.52–5.18	0.001

Bold: 𝑃<0.05.