- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Annual Issues ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Recently Accepted Articles ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents

Journal of Function Spaces and Applications

Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 820437, 13 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/820437

## On the Space of Functions with Growths Tempered by a Modulus of Continuity and Its Applications

Department of Mathematics, Rzeszów University of Technology, Powstańców Warszawy 8, 35-959 Rzeszów, Poland

Received 7 February 2013; Accepted 20 March 2013

Academic Editor: Janusz Matkowski

Copyright © 2013 Józef Banaś and Rafał Nalepa. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

#### Abstract

We are going to study the space of real functions defined on a bounded metric space and having growths tempered by a modulus of continuity. We prove also a sufficient condition for the relative compactness in the mentioned function space. Using that condition and the classical Schauder fixed point theorem, we show the existence theorem for some quadratic integral equations of Fredholm type in the space of functions satisfying the Hölder condition. An example illustrating the mentioned existence result is also included.

#### 1. Introduction

The principal aim of the paper is to discuss the function space consisting of functions with growths tempered by a given modulus of continuity. Functions belonging to such a space have their moduli of continuity in some sense proportional to a given modulus of continuity. We assume here that the mentioned function space consists of real functions defined on a bounded metric space and, as we pointed out above, having growths tempered by a given modulus of continuity. Typical examples of function spaces of such a type are the space of functions satisfying the Lipschitz condition and the space of Hölder functions, that is, the space of functions satisfying the Hölder condition with a given exponent belonging to the interval .

It is a surprising fact that those spaces, although they are frequently used in mathematical investigations, were not intensively studied and described in mathematical literature (cf. [1–4]). It is probably caused by the fact that the norm in the mentioned function space is not convenient for use in comparison with the norm in the classical space of real functions being continuous on a compact set. On the other hand, there are no known convenient sufficient conditions for relative compactness of bounded subsets of the function space in question.

It is also worthwhile mentioning that it is very difficult to encounter some applications of the space of functions with growths tempered by a modulus of continuity in the theory of operator equations (functional, differential, integral, etc.), (cf. [5, 6]).

In this paper we are going to discuss in detail the above mentioned function space consisting of real functions having growths tempered by a given modulus of continuity. We describe a general form of such a space and we point out some important particular cases of spaces of the described type.

Apart from this, we indicate some essential properties of the considered function space. Namely, we show that such a space is not a closed subspace of the space of all real continuous functions with the supremum norm, with respect to this norm. The consequence of this property is the fact that the norm introduced in the space of functions with tempered growths is not equivalent to the classical supremum norm. This causes that it is not possible to use the supremum norm in all considerations conducted in the mentioned space of functions with tempered growths.

The main result proved in the paper is a sufficient condition for relative compactness of bounded subset of the discussed function space. We also point out several particular cases of that result, especially in the space of functions satisfying the Hölder condition.

The last part of the paper contains an application of the obtained results in proving a theorem on the existence of a solution of a quadratic integral equation in the space of functions satisfying the Hölder condition. An example showing the applicability of that theorem to a concrete quadratic integral equation is also included.

#### 2. The Space of Functions with Tempered Moduli of Continuity

In this section we discuss the space of real functions defined on a given bounded metric space and having the growths tempered by a given modulus of continuity. Moreover, we will also study some important particular cases of that space.

To this end denote by the set of all real numbers and put . A function is said to be * a modulus of continuity* if for , and is nondecreasing on .

We will also assume (but not always) that the modulus of continuity is continuous at , that is, as .

In order to clarify the concept of the modulus of continuity, let us assume that is a given bounded metric space. Denote by the space of all real functions defined and continuous on the metric space . For and for an arbitrary fixed number let us define the quantity by the formula

The function is called * the modulus of continuity* of the function . Observe that in order to define this concept it is sufficient to consider the space consisting of real functions defined and bounded on .

Observe that if , then the modulus of continuity of , that is, the function , is the modulus of continuity in the above defined sense. Obviously, this modulus is continuous at if and only if is uniformly continuous on .

In what follows let us fix a modulus of continuity and assume, as before, that is a given bounded metric space. Denote by the set of all real functions defined on such that their growths are tempered by the modulus of continuity . More precisely, a function belongs to the set provided and there exists a constant such that for all . In other words, we have that if and only if the quantity is finite.

It is easy to check that the set forms a linear space over the field of real numbers . Obviously, is a linear subspace of the space .

In the sequel, let us notice that if , then in view of (2) there exists a constant such that for any . Obviously the converse implication is also true.

Thus, we can say equivalently that the set consists of all real functions defined on *X * such that the moduli of continuity of those functions are tempered by the given modulus of continuity .

Now, fix arbitrarily an element . For an arbitrary function we define the quantity by the formula

Notice that for any . Moreover, it can be shown that is a norm in the space ; that is, is a normed space with the norm defined by (5).

We show that the norm defined by (5) is complete. To this end, take a Cauchy sequence in the space . Fix arbitrarily a number and denote , where denotes the diameter of the metric space . Then, we can find a natural number such that for , we have that or, by (5), Further, let us notice that from (6) we infer that This means that the real sequence satisfies the Cauchy condition in with natural metric. Hence we obtain that this sequence is convergent to a real number, say , that is, .

Next, keeping in mind (6) again we deduce that

Putting in the above inequality , we get that for each , the following estimate holds

This yields the inequality

which is valid for and ( denotes the set of natural numbers).

From that last inequality we get

Hence we obtain for an arbitrary and .

Linking the above inequality and (7), we deduce that for and for . But this fact means that is a real Cauchy sequence for arbitrarily fixed . Thus this sequence is convergent in . Denote its limit by , that is,

Passing in (13) with , we obtain

for any and for . This means that the sequence converges uniformly to the function on the metric space .

Now, we show that the sequence converges to the function in the sense of norm (5). To this end we prove first that . Indeed, taking into account the fact that is a Cauchy sequence in the space , we infer that is bounded in ; that is, there exists a constant such that for . Hence, in view of (5) we have

This implies that for arbitrarily fixed and for , we get and, consequently, for all and for .

Now, fix arbitrarily . Then, passing in the above inequality with , we obtain for all . But this means that .

In what follows, using the fact that the sequence satisfies inequality (6), we derive that for arbitrary and for arbitrary , the following inequality holds

Fixing and passing with , we get

Hence, in virtue of the arbitrariness of the choice of points , we have the estimate being valid for .

In a similar way, keeping in mind inequality (6), we infer that for . Hence, for , we obtain Now, combining (22), (24), and (5), we obtain that for all . This means that the sequence is convergent in the space to the function . Thus, is a Banach space.

Now, we provide a few examples.

*Example 1. *Take for . Obviously is a modulus of continuity. Moreover, notice that if and only if there exists a constant such that
for . This means that the space consists of functions satisfying the Lipschitz condition. The norm in the space has the form

*Example 2. *Let denote the modulus of continuity which corresponds to the Hölder condition. This means that for , where is a fixed number from the interval .

Observe that if and only if there exists a constant such that
for all . In other words, the function satisfies the Hölder condition with a constant and with an exponent . Notice that the norm in the space has the from

*Example 3. *Now, let us take into account the modulus of continuity having the form

Note that if and only if there exists a constant such that for . Obviously, this condition is equivalent to the boundedness of the function . Indeed, fix . Then, for any we have

This yields
for . The converse implication is also obvious. Thus we can write that ; that is, contains all functions defined and bounded on . Further, observe that the norm in the space has now the form

It is easy to show that this norm is equivalent to the classical supremum norm in the space . Indeed, we have
for any function , where .

The examples of the functions and in the space with show that the equality signs in (34) are attained.

#### 3. Some Properties of the Space of Hölder Functions

In order to simplify the considerations in this section, we restrict ourselves to spaces of real functions defined on a fixed interval . In this way we will consider the space consisting of functions , which are continuous on and equipped with the norm .

Further, if is a fixed number, then the symbol will denote the space (see Example 2) with ; that is, is the collection of all real functions defined on and satisfying the Hölder condition. More precisely, if there exists a constant such that for all .

Observe that forms a linear subspace of the linear space .

In what follows, for , the symbol will denote the least possible constant for which inequality (35) is satisfied. In other words, we can write

Notice that in the case , the linear space coincides with the space of real functions defined on and satisfying the Lipschitz condition, that is, for some constant and for all . This space will be denoted by the symbol .

Our principal aim is to show that the spaces (for ) do not form closed subspaces of the space with respect to the norm . In order to prove this fact, observe that the space can be normed in a natural way (cf. Example 2) if for we put

Observe that in view of (36), the above definition can be written in the from Obviously, the space with the norm (38) is the Banach space (cf. Section 2).

Further on let us notice that for an arbitrarily fixed and for an arbitrary we obtain

Hence we get

The above inequality means that the norm is dominated by the norm .

If the space would be a closed subspace of with respect to the norm , then this would mean that (as the linear space) is a Banach space with respect to the norm . In other words, the space would be a Banach space both with respect to the norm and with respect to the norm . Hence, keeping in mind (41) and taking into account the theorem on the equivalence of dominated norms [4], we would infer that the norms and are equivalent in the space .

We show that such a conclusion is not true.

To this end fix a number and consider the sequence of real functions defined on the interval by the formula for . Observe that and for . On the other hand, we have

This implies that , for . Hence we get

which shows that as . Thus the norms and are not equivalent in the space . Hence we infer that is not closed subspace of the space with respect to the norm . Obviously the same assertion is true if we replace the interval by an arbitrary interval .

In what follows, let us observe that for the following inclusions hold:

Particularly, taking into account that for , we have

which yields

for .

Indeed, if , we obtain This shows that and hence we infer that inclusions (47) hold.

Further, for and for arbitrarily fixed , we derive

Hence we get for . Thus the norm is dominated by the norm .

We show that the inverse assertion is not true. To this end, take the function sequence , where is defined by the formula for . It is easily seen that for . On the other hand, we have for . Hence we get which yields that as . This shows that the norm is not dominated by the norm . Thus these norms are not equivalent.

#### 4. A Sufficient Condition for Relative Compactness in the Space

This section is devoted to present a criterion for relative compactness in the space of functions with growths tempered by a given modulus of continuity . More precisely, we will discuss a sufficient condition for relative compactness in .

It is worthwhile mentioning that as far as we know, there are no known conditions of such a type (e.g., cf. [1–4]).

Let us recall that the complete description of the space was given in Section 2.

Theorem 4. *Assume that is a given modulus of continuity such that as , and assume that is a compact metric space. Let be a bounded subset of the space such that functions belonging to are equicontinuous with respect to the modulus of continuity ; that is, the following condition is satisfied:
**
Then the set is relatively compact in the space .*

*Proof. *At first, let us observe that since is bounded, then there exists a constant such that for an arbitrary the following inequality holds:
where is a fixed element of the metric space (cf. (5)).

Particularly, we conclude that
for an arbitrary . Moreover, on the basis of (56) we infer that for any and for arbitrary , the following inequality holds:

The above inequality yields
for an arbitrary function and for all .

Since from (59) we deduce that all functions belonging to the set are equicontinuous on the set . Apart from that, from (59) we have that for an arbitrary the inequality
holds for all . Putting in the above inequality , we infer that for arbitrary and the following estimate is satisfied:

This implies that
for and . This means that functions from the set are equibounded.

Now, let us consider an arbitrary sequence in the set . Taking into account the above established facts, we infer that functions of the sequence are equibounded and equicontinuous on the set . Hence, in view of Ascoli-Arzéla criterion we derive that there exists a subsequence of the sequence which is uniformly convergent on the set to a function . To avoid complicated notation, we will denote the mentioned subsequence of the sequence by the same symbol . Observe that the function is continuous on the set .

In what follows, we show that . To this end observe that from the fact that functions belonging to the sequence satisfy inequality (59), we have that

for an arbitrary and for . Since for an arbitrary element , thus keeping in mind the continuity of the absolute value and other standard facts from mathematical analysis, we deduce from the last inequality that
for arbitrary .

Similarly, on the basis of (57), we have
for . Hence we obtain that

Combining (64) and (66) we derive the following estimate:
for arbitrary . This implies that
which shows that .

Further on we show that the sequence is convergent to the function in the sense of the norm of the space .

To this end for convenience, let us denote
where is a fixed number.

Obviously we have that and the sets are disjoint.

Further, for an arbitrarily fixed natural number , we obtain

Next, fix arbitrarily a number . Let denote a number corresponding to according to the assumption about equicontinuity of functions from the set with respect to the modulus of continuity .

Now, denote by the number defined as follows:

Keeping in mind the fact that functions of the sequence are uniformly convergent on the set to a function , let us choose a natural number such that
for all and for any .

Further, let us observe that for . Hence we infer that . Thus, for an arbitrary , in view of (71) and (72) we get

Next, taking into account the fact that the functions of the sequence belong to the set , in virtue of the choice of the number to the number , we infer that for an arbitrary pair and for an arbitrary natural number the following inequality is satisfied:

Hence we obtain
for such that .

Letting in the above inequality with , we get
for such that . Consequently, we obtain
for arbitrary .

Now, in view of (74) and (77), we derive the following estimates:

Combining (70) with inequalities (72), (73), and (78), we obtain that for . This means that the sequence is convergent to the function with respect to the norm of the space . Finally, we conclude that the set is relatively compact in the space and the proof is complete.

Now, based on Theorem 4, we prove a manageable and handy sufficient condition for relative compactness in the space .

Theorem 5. *Assume that , are moduli of continuity being continuous at zero and such that as , that is,
**
Further, assume that is a compact metric space. Then, if is a bounded subset of the space then is relatively compact in the space .*

*Proof. *Since is bounded in the space , then there exists a constant such that for any , or equivalently

Hence we infer that
for all .

Further, fix an arbitrary number . According to our assumptions there exists such that for . This yields that
for .

Linking (81) and (82), we deduce that
for all such that .

Now, take arbitrary such that . Then we get

Hence, in view of (81), we obtain
for all such that .

Finally, joining (81), (82), and (85), we deduce that the set is bounded in the space .

In what follows, let us fix arbitrarily a number . Keeping in mind the assumption requiring that as , we can find such that
provided .

Further, fix an arbitrary number . Then, according to (86), for the number let us choose . Then, for such that and we get

Hence we obtain
for and .

Next, taking such that , and keeping in mind (81), we derive the following estimate:

Hence we have
for such that and .

Finally, in view of Theorem 4 we conclude that the set is relatively compact in the space . This completes the proof.

*Example 6. *In order to illustrate the applicability of Theorem 5, let us consider two moduli of continuity of Hölder type having the form , where (cf. Section 3). Then we have

This shows that the moduli of continuity and satisfy the conditions of Theorem 5.

Thus, if we assume that a set is bounded in the space or , then is relatively compact in the space or , respectively, provided is a compact metric space.

In other words, if there exist numbers , with and such that is a bounded set in the Hölder space with the exponent , that is, there exists a constant such that
for any and for all , then the set is relatively compact in the Hölder space with the exponent .

#### 5. Application to a Quadratic Integral Equation

In this final section we are going to present an application of the results obtained in previous sections to derive an existence result for a quadratic integral equation of Fredholm type. Equations of such a type occur naturally in connection with some problems investigated in the theories of radiative transfer, neutron transport, and the kinetic theory of gases [7–11]. Those integral equations are known as Chandrasekhar quadratic integral equations (cf. [10]).

Let us pay attention to some important facts connected with our considerations.

First of all, notice that the study of the existence of solutions of functional, differential, and integral equations is very complicated in the Lipschitz and Hölder function spaces which were considered in Section 3. To justify such an opinion, let us recall a result due to Matkowski [6] asserting that the so-called superposition operator generated by the function maps the space into itself and is Lipschitzian (with respect to the norm in the space described in Example 1) if and only if the function is linear; that is, there exist functions such that for all and . Other results in this direction can be found in [5], for instance.

This shows that the investigations on the existence of solutions of operator equations in the space consisting of functions with growths tempered by a modulus of continuity are rather a delicate matter.

As we indicate above, the object of the study conducted in this section is the quadratic integral equation of Fredholm type having the form where .

In our further considerations we will assume that is a fixed number in the interval .

Now, we formulate the assumptions under which we will study (94). (i)The function belongs to the Hölder space .(ii) is a continuous function such that it satisfies the Hölder condition with the exponent with respect to the first variable; that is, there exists a constant such that for all .

In what follows, based on the above assumptions, we can define the finite constant by putting

Now, we are prepared to present our last assumption.(iii)The following inequality holds: where denotes the norm of the function in the space .

Now, we can formulate our existence result concerning (94).

Theorem 7. *Under assumptions − (94) has at least one solution belonging to the space , where is arbitrarily fixed number such that . *

*Proof. *At the beginning, let us notice that in view of inclusions (47) we have that if a function satisfies the Hölder condition with the exponent , then it satisfies this condition with the exponent . Thus, from assumptions (i) and (ii) it follows that there exists a constant such that
for all , where the constant associated with the function is defined by (36).

Now, let us consider the operator defined on the space by the formula
for .

Further, take an arbitrary function . Then, for arbitrarily fixed , in view of assumptions (i) and (ii) we obtain

Hence, in view of the inequalities (cf. (39) and (41)), we derive the following estimate:

This shows that the operator transforms the space into itself. Moreover, in view of assumption , we infer that transforms into itself the ball (in the space ) centered at the zero function and with radius , where is an arbitrary number from the interval , while
and .

Now, observe that in view of (47) the ball is contained in the space . Further, keeping in mind the fact established in Example 6, we conclude that the set is relatively compact in the space . Moreover, taking into account estimate (50), we deduce that is also closed in the space .

Thus, gathering the above obtained facts, we infer that the set is a compact and (obviously) convex subset of the space .

In what follows, we will treat the ball as a subset of the space .

We now show that the operator is continuous on the space .

To this end, fix arbitrarily and a number . Assume that is an arbitrary function such that . Then, for arbitrary we obtain