- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Annual Issues ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Articles in Press ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents

Journal of Function Spaces

Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 743279, 19 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/743279

## Approximating Common Fixed Points of Bregman Weakly Relatively Nonexpansive Mappings in Banach Spaces

^{1}Department of Information Management, Yuan Ze University, Chung-Li 32003, Taiwan^{2}Department of Mathematics, Yasouj University, Yasouj 75918, Iran^{3}Department of Applied Mathematics, National Sun Yat-Sen University, Kaohsiung 804, Taiwan

Received 8 September 2013; Accepted 1 December 2013; Published 3 February 2014

Academic Editor: Yakov Alber

Copyright © 2014 Chin-Tzong Pang and Eskandar Naraghirad. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

#### Abstract

Using Bregman functions, we introduce a new hybrid iterative scheme for finding common fixed points of an infinite family of Bregman weakly relatively nonexpansive mappings in Banach spaces. We prove a strong convergence theorem for the sequence produced by the method. No closedness assumption is imposed on a mapping , where is a closed and convex subset of a reflexive Banach space . Furthermore, we apply our method to solve a system of equilibrium problems in reflexive Banach spaces. Some application of our results to the problem of finding a minimizer of a continuously Fréchet differentiable and convex function in a Banach space is presented. Our results improve and generalize many known results in the current literature.

#### 1. Introduction

Throughout this paper, we denote the set of real numbers and the set of positive integers by and , respectively. Let be a Banach space with the norm and the dual space . For any , we denote the value of at by . Let be a sequence in ; we denote the strong convergence of to as by and the weak convergence by . The modulus of convexity of is denoted by
for every with . A Banach space is said to be *uniformly convex* if for every . Let . The norm of is said to be *Gâteaux differentiable* if, for each , the limit
exists. In this case, is called *smooth*. If the limit (2) is attained uniformly for all , then is called *uniformly smooth*. The Banach space is said to be *strictly convex* if whenever and . It is well known that is uniformly convex if and only if is uniformly smooth. It is also known that if is reflexive, then is strictly convex if and only if is smooth; for more details, see [1–3].

Let be a nonempty subset of . Let be a mapping. We denote the set of fixed points of by ; that is, . A mapping is said to be *nonexpansive* if for all . A mapping is said to be *quasinonexpansive* if and for all and . The mapping is called *closed*, if for any sequence with and , then we have . Let be a nonexpansive mapping. Recall that the Mann-type [4] iteration is given by the following formula:
Here, is a sequence of real numbers in satisfying some appropriate conditions. A more general iteration scheme is the Halpern [5] iteration given by
where the sequences and satisfy some appropriate conditions. Numerous results have been proved on Mann's and Halpern's iterations for nonexpansive mappings in Hilbert and Banach spaces (see, e.g., [6–11]).

Let be a smooth, strictly convex, and reflexive Banach space and let be the normalized duality mapping of . Let be a nonempty, closed, and convex subset of . The generalized projection from onto [12] is defined and denoted by
where . Let be a nonempty, closed, and convex subset of smooth Banach space and let be a mapping from into itself. A point is said to be an *asymptotic fixed point* [13] of if there exists a sequence in which converges weakly to and . We denote the set of all asymptotic fixed points of by . A point is called a *strong asymptotic fixed point* of if there exists a sequence in which converges strongly to and . We denote the set of all strong asymptotic fixed points of by .

Following Matsushita and Takahashi [14], a mapping is said to be *relatively nonexpansive* if the following conditions are satisfied:(1) is nonempty;(2), ;(3).

The mapping is called *relatively weak quasinonexpansive* [15, 16] if the following conditions are satisfied:(1) is nonempty;(2), .

In 2005, Matsushita and Takahashi [14] proved the following strong convergence theorem for relatively nonexpansive mappings in a Banach space.

Theorem 1. *Let be a uniformly convex and uniformly smooth Banach space, let be a nonempty, closed, and convex subset of , let be a relatively nonexpansive mapping from into itself, and let be a sequence of real numbers such that and . Suppose that is given by
**
Then converges strongly to .*

In 2010, Plubtieng and Ungchittrakool [17] proved the following strong convergence theorem for relatively nonexpansive mappings in a Banach space.

Theorem 2. *Let be a uniformly convex and uniformly smooth Banach space and let and be two nonempty, closed, and convex subsets of such that . Let be a sequence of relatively nonexpansive mappings from into such that is nonempty and let be a sequence defined as follows:
**
where satisfies either*(a)* for all and or*(b)*.**
Suppose that for any bounded subset of , there exists an increasing, continuous, and convex function such that , and . Let be a mapping from into defined by for all and suppose that . Then , , and converge strongly to .*

*In 2010, Cai and Hu [15] proved the following strong convergence theorem for a finite family of closed relatively weak quasinonexpansive mappings in a Banach space.*

*Theorem 3. Let be a nonempty, closed, and let convex subset of uniformly convex and uniformly smooth Banach space and let be a finite family of closed relatively weak quasinonexpansive mappings from into itself with . Assume that is uniformly continuous for all . Let be a sequence generated by the following algorithm
Let and be sequences in such that and . Then converge strongly to as .*

*1.1. Some Facts about Gradients*

*For any convex function , we denote the domain of by . For any and any , we denote by the right-hand derivative of at in the direction ; that is,
The function is said to be Gâteaux differentiable at if exists for any . In this case, coincides with , the value of the gradient of at . The function is said to be Gâteaux differentiable if it is Gâteaux differentiable everywhere. The function is said to be Fréchet differentiable at if this limit is attained uniformly in . The function is Fréchet differentiable at (see, e.g., [18, p. 13] or [19, p. 508]) if for all , there exists such that implies that
The function is said to be Fréchet differentiable if it is Fréchet differentiable everywhere. It is well known that if a continuous convex function is Gâteaux differentiable, then is norm-to-weak* continuous (see, e.g., [18, Proposition ]). Also, it is known that if is Fréchet differentiable, then is norm-to-norm continuous (see, [19, p. 508]). The function is said to be strongly coercive if
It is also said to be bounded if is bounded for each bounded subset of . Finally, is said to be uniformly Fréchet differentiable on a subset of if the limit (9) is attained uniformly for all and .*

*1.2. Some Facts about Legendre Functions*

*Let be a reflexive Banach space. For any proper, lower semicontinuous, and convex function , the conjugate function of is defined by
It is well known that for all . It is also known that is equivalent to
Here, is the subdifferential of [20, 21]. We also know that if is a proper, lower semicontinuous, and convex function, then is a proper, weak* lower semicontinuous, and convex function; see [2] for more details on convex analysis.*

*The function is called Legendre if it satisfies the following conditions:(i) is both locally bounded and single-valued on its domain;(ii) is locally bounded on its domain and is strictly convex on every convex subset of dom .*

*
For more details, we refer to [22].*

*If is a reflexive Banach space and is a Legendre function, then in view of [23];
*

*Examples of Legendre functions are given in [22, 24]. One important and interesting Legendre function is , where the Banach space is smooth and strictly convex and, in particular, a Hilbert space.*

*1.3. Some Facts about Bregman Distances*

*Let be a Banach space and let be the dual space of . Let be a convex and Gâteaux differentiable function. Then the Bregman distance [25, 26] corresponding to is the function defined by
It is clear that for all . In that case when is a smooth Banach space, setting for all , we obtain that for all and hence for all .*

*Let be a Banach space and let be a nonempty, convex, and subset of . Let be a convex and Gâteaux differentiable function. Then, we know from [27, 28] that for and ,
Furthermore, if is a nonempty, closed, and convex subset of a reflexive Banach space and is a strongly coercive Bregman function, then for each , there exists a unique such that
The Bregman projection from onto is defined by for all . It is also well known that has the following property [27]:
for all and (see [18] for more details). Let be a reflexive Banach space, let be a strongly coercive Bregman function, and let be the Bregman distance corresponding to . Then, is convex and Gâteaux differentiable [29]. Let be the function defined by
for , where is the gradient of . We know from [28] that
for all . We have from the definition of that
In particular,
Indeed, there exist such that , and . Therefore,
*

*1.4. Some Facts about Uniformly Convex Functions*

*Let be a Banach space and let for all . Then a function is said to be uniformly convex on bounded subsets of ([29, pp. 203, 221]) if for all , where is defined by
for all . The function is called the gauge of uniform convexity of . The function is also said to be uniformly smooth on bounded subsets of ([29, pp. 207, 221]) if for all , where is defined by
for all .*

*1.5. Some Facts about Resolvents*

*Let be a Banach space with the norm and the dual space . Let be a set-valued mapping. We define the domain and range of by and , respectively. The graph of is denoted by . The mapping is said to be monotone [30, 31] if whenever . It is also said to be maximal monotone [20] if its graph is not contained in the graph of any other monotone operator on . If is maximal monotone, then we can show that the set is closed and convex. Let be a reflexive Banach space with the dual space and let be a proper, lower semicontinuous, and convex function. Let be a maximal monotone operator from to . For any , let the mapping be defined by
The mapping is called the -resolvent of (see [32]). It is well known that for each (for more details, see, e.g., [1, 33]).*

*1.6. Some Facts about Bregman Quasinonexpansive Mappings*

*Let be a nonempty, closed, and convex subset of a reflexive Banach space . Let be a proper, lower semicontinuous, and convex function. Recall that a mapping is said to be Bregman quasinonexpansive, if and
Nontrivial examples of such mappings are given in [34].*

*A mapping is said to be Bregman relatively nonexpansive if the following conditions are satisfied:(1) is nonempty;(2), ;(3).A mapping is said to be Bregman weakly relatively nonexpansive if the following conditions are satisfied:(1) is nonempty;(2), , ;(3).It is clear that any Bregman relatively nonexpansive mapping is a Bregman quasinonexpansive mapping. It is also obvious that every Bregman relatively nonexpansive mapping is a Bregman weakly relatively nonexpansive mapping, but the converse is not true in general. Indeed, for any mapping , we have . If is Bregman relatively nonexpansive, then . It is easy to verify that any closed mapping is a Bregman weakly relatively nonexpansive mapping. To this end, let be a sequence of such that and as . This implies that as . From the closedness of , we conclude that . Below we show that there exists a Bregman weakly relatively nonexpansive mapping which is neither a Bregman relatively nonexpansive mapping nor a closed mapping.*

*Example 4. *Let , where
Let be a sequence defined by
where
for all . It is clear that the sequence converges weakly to . Indeed, for any , we have
as . It is also obvious that for any with sufficiently large. Thus, is not a Cauchy sequence. Let be an even number in and let be defined by
It is easy to show that for all , where
It is also obvious that
Now, we define a mapping by
Then and is a Bregman weakly relatively nonexpansive mapping which is not a Bregman relatively nonexpansive mapping; see [35] for more details. Now, we prove that is not a closed mapping. Indeed, let for all in . Then as , (since for all ), but .

*An example of a Bregman quasinonexpansive mapping which is neither a Bregman relatively nonexpansive mapping nor a Bregman weakly relatively nonexpansive mapping can be found in [35].*

*In this paper, we investigate the problem of finding zeros of mappings ; that is, find such that
Recently, Sabach [36] proved the following two strong convergence theorems for the products of finitely many resolvents of maximal monotone operators in a reflexive Banach space.*

*Theorem 5. Let be a reflexive Banach space and let , be maximal monotone operators such that . Let be a Legendre function that is bounded, uniformly Fréchet differentiable, and totally convex on bounded subsets of . Let be a sequence defined by the following iterative algorithm:
If, for each , , and the sequences of errors satisfy , then each such sequence converges strongly to as .*

*Theorem 6. Let be a reflexive Banach space and let , be maximal monotone operators such that . Let be a Legendre function that is bounded, uniformly Fréchet differentiable, and totally convex on bounded subsets of . Let be a sequence defined by the following iterative algorithm:
If, for each , , and the sequences of errors satisfy , then each such sequence converges strongly to as .*

*The approximation of fixed points of Bregman nonexpansive type mappings via Bregman distances has been studied in the last ten years and much intensively in the last five years. For some recent articles on the existence and the construction of fixed points for Bregman nonexpansive type mappings, we refer the readers to [36–40].*

*But it is worth mentioning that, in all the above results for Bregman nonexpansive type mappings, the assumption is imposed on the map or the closedness of is required. So, the following question arises naturally in a Banach space setting.*

*Question 1. *Is it possible to obtain strong convergence of modified Mann's type schemes to a common fixed point of an infinite family of Bregman quasinonexpansive mappings without imposing the closedness assumption, the uniformly continuity assumption, or the assumption on the mapping ?

*In this paper, using Bregman functions, we introduce a new hybrid iterative scheme for finding common fixed points of an infinite family of Bregman weakly relatively nonexpansive mappings in Banach spaces. We prove a strong convergence theorem for the sequence produced by the method. No closedness assumption is imposed on a mapping , where is a closed and convex subset of a reflexive Banach space . Consequently, the above question is answered in the affirmative in reflexive Banach space setting. Furthermore, we apply our method to solve a system of equilibrium problems in reflexive Banach spaces. Some application of our results to the problem of finding a minimizer of a continuously Fréchet differentiable and convex function in a Banach space is presented. Our results improve and generalize many known results in the current literature; see, for example, [8, 11–14, 41–48].*

*2. Preliminaries*

*In this section, we begin by recalling some preliminaries and lemmas which will be used in the sequel.*

*Definition 7 (see [19]). *Let be a Banach space. The function is said to be a Bregman function if the following conditions are satisfied: (1) is continuous, strictly convex, and Gâteaux differentiable;(2)the set is bounded for all and .

*The following lemma follows from Butnariu and Iusem [18] and Zălinescu [29].*

*Lemma 8. Let be a reflexive Banach space and let be a strongly coercive Bregman function. Then (1) is one-to-one, onto and norm-to-weak* continuous;(2) if and only if ;(3) is bounded for all and ;(4) is Gâteaux differentiable and .*

*We know the following two results; see [29, Proposition ].*

*Theorem 9. Let be a reflexive Banach space and let be a convex function which is bounded on bounded subsets of . Then the following assertions are equivalent:(1) is strongly coercive and uniformly convex on bounded subsets of ;(2) is bounded on bounded subsets and uniformly smooth on bounded subsets of ;(3) is Fréchet differentiable and is uniformly norm-to-norm continuous on bounded subsets of .*

*Theorem 10. Let be a reflexive Banach space and let be a continuous convex function which is strongly coercive. Then the following assertions are equivalent:(1) is bounded on bounded subsets and uniformly smooth on bounded subsets of ;(2) is Fréchet differentiable and is uniformly norm-to-norm continuous on bounded subsets of ;(3) is strongly coercive and uniformly convex on bounded subsets of .*

*Let be a Banach space and let be a convex and Gâteaux differentiable function. Then the Bregman distance [48] (see also [25, 26]) satisfies the three point identity that is
In particular, it can be easily seen that
Indeed, by letting in (39) and taking into account that , we get the desired result.*

*Lemma 11 (see [39]). Let be a Banach space and let be a Gâteaux differentiable function which is uniformly convex on bounded subsets of . Let and be bounded sequences in . Then the following assertions are equivalent:(1);(2).*

*The following result was first proved in [49] (see also [19, 38]).*

*Lemma 12. Let be a reflexive Banach space let be a strongly coercive Bregman function and the function defined by
Then the following assertions hold:(1) for all and ;(2) for all and .*

*The following lemma which is a generalization of Lemma 3.2 in [50] plays a key role in our results.*

*Lemma 13 (see [17]). Let be a subset of a real Banach space and let be a family of mappings from into . Suppose that for any bounded subset of , there exists a continuous increasing function such that and , where , for all . Then, for each , converges strongly to some point of . Moreover, let the mapping be defined by
Then, .*

*Lemma 14. Let be a Banach space and let be a convex function which is uniformly convex on bounded subsets of . Let be a constant, , , let be the gauge of uniform convexity of , and let be the gauge of uniform convexity of , respectively. Then(i)for any and (ii)for any (iii)if, in addition, is bounded on bounded subsets and uniformly convex on bounded subsets of , then, for any , and (iv)if, in addition, is bounded on bounded subsets, uniformly convex, and uniformly smooth on bounded subsets of , then, for any , *

*Proof. *In view of (24), we get (i). Let us prove (ii). If and , then we obtain
Letting in the above inequality, we arrive at
This implies that
(iii) Let , , and . Then

(iv) Since is uniformly smooth on bounded subsets of , is uniformly convex on bounded subsets of . Then, in view of (i), there exists a continuous, strictly increasing, and convex function such that
for all and all . If , then we obtain
Letting in the above inequality, we conclude that
This implies that
which completes the proof.

*Lemma 15 (see [35]). Let be a Banach space, let be a constant, and let be a continuous and convex function which is uniformly convex on bounded subsets of . Then
for all , , , and with , where is the gauge of uniform convexity of .*

*Lemma 16 (see [51]). Let be a sequence of real numbers such that there exists a subsequence of such that for all . Then there exists a subsequence such that and the following properties are satisfied by all (sufficiently large) numbers :
In fact, .*

*Lemma 17 (see [52–54]). Let be a sequence of nonnegative real numbers satisfying the inequality
where and satisfy the following conditions:(i) and , or equivalently, ;(ii);(ii)'. Then, .*

*3. Strong Convergence Theorems*

*3. Strong Convergence Theorems**In this section, we prove a strong convergence theorem concerning the approximation of fixed point of Bregman weak relatively nonexpansive mappings in a reflexive Banach space. We start with the following simple lemma which has been proved in [33].*

*Lemma 18. Let be a reflexive Banach space and let be a convex, continuous, strongly coercive, and Gâteaux differentiable function which is bounded on bounded subsets and uniformly convex on bounded subsets of . Let be a nonempty, closed, and convex subset of . Let be a Bregman quasinonexpansive mapping. Then is closed and convex.*

*Lemma 19. Let be a reflexive Banach space and let be a convex, continuous, strongly coercive, and Gâteaux differentiable function which is bounded on bounded subsets and uniformly convex on bounded subsets of . Let be a nonempty, closed, and convex subset of and let be an infinite family of Bregman quasinonexpansive mappings from into itself such that . Let the mapping be defined by
Then, is a Bregman quasinonexpansive mapping.*

*Proof. *Let and be fixed. Then we have that is a bounded sequence in . The function is bounded on bounded subsets of and, thus, is also bounded on bounded subsets of (see, e.g., [18, Proposition ] for more details). This implies that the sequence is bounded in . Since is uniformly norm-to-norm continuous on any bounded subset of , we obtain
Thus, is a Bregman quasinonexpansive mapping, which completes the proof.

*Theorem 20. Let be a reflexive Banach space and let be a strongly coercive Bregman function which is bounded on bounded subsets and uniformly convex and uniformly smooth on bounded subsets of . Let be a nonempty, closed and convex subset of and let be an infinite family of Bregman weak relatively nonexpansive mappings from into itself such that . Suppose in addition that , where is the identity mapping on . Let be a sequence generated by
where is the gradient of . Let be a sequence in such that .*

Suppose that for any bounded subset of , there exists an increasing, continuous, and convex function such that , and . Let be a mapping from into defined by for all and suppose that . Then , , and converge strongly to .

*Proof. *We divide the proof into several steps.*Step* *1*. We prove that is closed and convex for each .

It is clear that is closed and convex. Let be closed and convex for some . For , we see that
is equivalent to
It could easily be seen that is closed and convex. Therefore, is closed and convex for each .*Step* *2*. We claim that for all .

It is obvious that . Assume now that for some . Employing Lemma 12, for any , we obtain
This proves that and hence for all .*Step* *3*. We prove that , , , and are bounded sequences in .

In view of (18), we conclude that
This implies that the sequence is bounded and hence there exists such that
In view of Lemma 8(3), we conclude that the sequence is bounded. Since is an infinite family of Bregman weak relatively nonexpansive mappings from into itself, we have for any that
This, together with Definition 7 and the boundedness of , implies that the sequence is bounded.*Step* *4*. We show that for some , where .

From Step 3 it follows that is bounded. By the construction of , we conclude that and for any positive integer . This, together with (18), implies that
In view of (16), we conclude that
It follows from (68) that the sequence is bounded and hence there exists such that
In view of (67), we conclude that
This proves that is an increasing sequence in and hence by (69) the limit exists. Letting in (67), we deduce that . In view of Lemma 11, we obtain that as . This means that is a Cauchy sequence. Since is a Banach space and is closed and convex, we conclude that there exists such that
Now, we show that . In view of (67), we obtain
Since , we conclude that
This, together with (72), implies that
It follows from Lemma 11, (72), and (74) that
In view of (71), we get
From (71) and (76), it follows that
Since is uniformly norm-to-norm continuous on any bounded subset of , we obtain
Applying Lemma 11, we derive that
It follows from the three point identity (see (39)) that
as .

The function is bounded on bounded subsets of and, thus, is also bounded on bounded subsets of (see, e.g., [18, Proposition