Robot device used Region/country Author/organization (year of publication), publisher [ref. number] Number of patients/end users Type of end users Location of the survey Subjective measure used Language of scale used Valid/reliable scale Number of scale’s items A sensory system and upper limb biomechanical model combined with a graphical interface Ontario, Canada Abdullah et al. (2011), J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. [17 ] 20 Patients Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation Unit Unknown (developed by themselves) English —/— 2 Robotic exoskeleton arm Italy Ambrosini et al. (2014), Robotica [43 ] 14 9 patients + 5 healthy Villa Beretta Rehabilitation Centre TSQ-WT, SUS Italian ?/?, ?/? TSQ-WT ( ), SUS ( ) Hand/wrist exoskeleton United Kingdom, Netherlands, Italy Amirabdollahian et al. (2014), Robotica [44 ] 12 Patients Not defined SUS English V/R 10 H2 robotic exoskeleton Not defined Bortole et al. (2015), J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. [18 ] 3 Patients Not defined Unknown (developed by themselves) English —/— 1 Haptic human-robot partnered stepping Atlanta, GA, USA Chen et al. (2015), PLoS ONE [19 ] 10 Healthy Healthcare Robotics Lab Unknown (developed by themselves) English —/— 14 Direct physical interface for nursing assistant robots Atlanta, GA, USA Chen and Kemp (2010), HRI 2010 [20 ] 18 Healthy (nurses) Healthcare Robotics Lab Unknown (developed by themselves) English —/— 11, 10 Robot suit HAL (Hybrid Assistive Limb) Tokyo, Japan Chihara et al. (2016), Neurol. Med. Chir. [39 ] 15 Patients Kyoto University Hospital Interviews Robot “El-E” Atlanta, GA, USA Choi et al. (2008), ASSETS ’08 [21 ] 8 Patients Healthcare Robotics Lab Unknown (developed by themselves) English —/— 8 SAM robotic aid system (a mobile Neobotix base equipped with a semiautomatic vision interface and a Manus robotic arm) France Coignard et al. (2013), Annals of Phys. and Rehab. Med. [22 ] 29 + 34 29 patients + 34 healthy (control group) Hopale Foundation in Berck-sur-Mer and the Kerpape Rehabilitation Centre in Ploemeur Unknown (developed by themselves) French —/— 9 (technical aspects), 7 (acceptability and usage) Hybrid FES-robot (exoskeleton) Spain del-Ama et al. (2014), J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. [48 ] 4 Patients Not defined QUEST English V/R 7 from 12 Wheelchair mounted robotic assisted transfer device Pittsburgh, USA Grindle et al. (2015), BioMed Res. Int. 2015 [23 ] 18 Patients 2011 National Veteran Wheelchair Games Unknown (developed by themselves) English —/— 4, 7 iCat robot Netherlands Heerink et al. (2010), Int. J. Soc. Robot. [24 ] 30 Healthy Not defined Unknown (based on the UTAUT questionnaire) English —/— 41 ARM, HEXAR-KR40P South Korea Kim et al. (2014), Int. J. Precis. Eng. Man. [25 ] 80 Patients Not defined Unknown (developed by themselves) English —/— 1 A-gear: wearable dynamic arm support Netherlands Kooren et al. (2015), J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. [26 ] 4 3 patients + 1 healthy Radboud UMC Outpatient Clinic Unknown (developed by themselves) Not defined —/— Not defined Grasping robot France Laffont et al. (2009), Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. [27 ] 20 + 24 20 patients + 24 healthy (control group) Four French departments of physical and rehabilitation medicine Unknown (developed by themselves) French —/— 3 Haptic-robotic platform for upper limb Canada Lam et al. (2008), J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. [28 ] 8 Healthy (physical and occup. therapists) Not defined Unknown (developed by themselves) English —/— 9 Teleoperated robot system Telenoid R3 Japan Liu et al. (2015), HRI 2015 [29 ] 20 Healthy (college students) ATR Intelligent Robotics and Communication Labs, Kyoto Unknown (developed by themselves) Japanese —/— 2 LEGO robot Spain Lopez-Samaniego et al. (2014), Bio-Med. Mater. Eng. [30 ] 9 Patients Not defined Unknown (developed by themselves), SUS Spanish —/—, ?/? Not defined, SUS (10) InMotion 2 robotic system Italy Mazzoleni et al. (2014), Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. [31 ] 34 Patients Not defined Unknown (developed by themselves) Italian —/— 7 Personal Transport Assistance Robot (PTAR) Japan Ozaki et al. (2013), Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. [32 ] 8 Patients Fujita Health University Unknown (developed by themselves) Japanese —/— 2 Rehabilitation robot Canada Pineau et al. (2010), Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing [33 ] 7 Healthy (university students) Not defined Unknown (developed by themselves) Not defined —/— Not defined Amadeo robot Italy Sale et al. (2012), Stroke Res. Treat. [41 ] 7 Patients Department of Neurorehabilitation, IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana COPM Robot-enhanced repetitive treadmill therapy (ROBERT) Germany Schroeder et al. (2014), Dev. Med. Child Neurol. [13 ] 83 Patients Not defined COPM Robot companion (artificial health advisor) Germany von der Pütten et al. (2011), ICMI '11 [40 ] 6 Healthy University of Duisburg-Essen Semistructured interviews Personal Mobility and Manipulation Appliance (PerMMA) USA Wang et al. (2013), Med. Eng. Phys. [34 ] 15 Patients Center for Assistive Technology, University of Pittsburgh Unknown (developed by themselves) English —/— 12 Kompaï (indoor assistive robot) France Wu et al. (2014), Clin. Interv. Aging [35 ] 11 Patients Living lab Unknown (developed by themselves) English —/— 25 ASIBOT (portable robot to aid patients) Spain
Jardón et al. (2011), Disabil. Rehabil. Assist. Technol. [49 ] 6 Patients Not defined QUEST Spanish V/R 12 Intelligent wheelchair Portugal
Mónica Faria et al. (2013), Assist. Technol. [45 ] 46 Healthy (students) School of Allied Health Sciences of Porto SUS Portuguese ?/? 10 Socially assistive robot (Nao) Austria Werner and Krainer (2013), ICSR 2013 [36 ] 14 Healthy Senior Citizen Centre Schwechat Unknown (developed by themselves) German —/— Not defined Reo Therapy System Israel Treger et al. (2008), Eur. J. Phys. Rehab. Med. [37 ] 10 Patients Loewenstein Rehabilitation Centre Unknown (developed by themselves) Not defined —/— 15 Robotic and electrical stimulation therapy United Kingdom Hughes et al. (2011), Disabil. Rehabil. Assist. Technol. [38 ] 5 Patients Not defined Unknown (developed by themselves) English —/— Not defined