Research Article
Towards Virtual VATS, Face, and Construct Evaluation for Peg Transfer Training of Box, VR, AR, and MR Trainer
Table 2
Subjective questionnaire of the face and content validity.
| | Face and content validity questions (score: 1–5, 1 = poor to 5 = excellent) |
| | Q1: Realism of peg model (visual) | | Q2: Realism of endoscope model (visual) | | Q3: Realism of surgical clamps (visual) | | Q4: Realism of surgical environment (visual) | | Q5: Comfortable of training content in HMD (visual) | | Q6: Overall realism of visualization | | Q7: Realism of peg manipulation (haptic) | | Q8: Realism of endoscope manipulation (haptic) | | Q9: Realism of surgical clamps manipulation (haptic) | | Q10: Realism of interaction between the surgical clamps and peg (haptic) | | Q11: Overall realism of manipulation | | Q12: I would like to recommend this simulator to VATS surgical training for medical students | | Q13: I would like to recommend this simulator as an assessment tool for VATS surgical skills |
|
|
