Research Article
Towards Virtual VATS, Face, and Construct Evaluation for Peg Transfer Training of Box, VR, AR, and MR Trainer
Table 5
Comparisons of the five peg transfer simulators.
| ā | Advantages | Disadvantages | Immersive | Haptic | Visual | Environments |
| Box | Realistic force feedback Realistic 3D perception Cost-effective Portable and easy to use | Low integration Lack of objective assessment Low immersion Without OR environment | III | I | I |
| VR | Objective assessment High interactivity Unlimited use | Low immersion Without OR environment Low 3D perception | I | I | I |
| CVR | Objective assessment High interactivity High immersion Motion track (HMD) | Virtual OR environment Narrow FOV Low 3D perception | I | II | II |
| AR | Objective assessment High interactivity High immersion Realistic 3D perception | Low immersion Without OR environment Environmental influence | I | I | I |
| MR | 100% OR environment Objective assessment High interactivity High immersion | OR environment distortion Narrow FOV | I | III | III |
|
|