Abstract
Using the series-expansion of digamma functions and other techniques, some monotonicity and logarithmical concavity involving the ratio of gamma function are obtained, which is to give a partially affirmative answer to an open problem posed by B.-N.Guo and F.Qi. Several inequalities for the geometric means of natural numbers are established.
1. Introduction
For real and positive values of
the Euler gamma function
and its logarithmic derivative
, the so-called digamma function, are defined as
(1.1) For extension of these functions
to complex variables and for basic properties see [1].
In recent years, many monotonicity results and
inequalities involving the Gamma and incomplete Gamma functions have been
established. This article is stimulated by an open problem posed by Guo and Qi in [2]. The extensions and generalizations of this problem can be found
in [3–5] and some references therein.
Using Stirling formula, for all nonnegative integers
, natural numbers
and
,
an upper bound of the quotient of two geometrical means of natural numbers was
established in [4] as follows:
(1.2)and the following lower bound
was appeared in [2, 5]:
(1.3)
Since
as a generalization of inequality (1.3), the
following monotonicity result was obtained by Guo and Qi in [2]. The
function
(1.4)is decreasing with respect to
on
for fixed
Hence, for positive real numbers
and
,
we have
(1.5)
Recently, in [6], Qi and Sun proved that the
function
(1.6)is strictly increasing with
respect to
for all 
Now, we generalize the function in (1.4) as follows:
for positive real numbers
and 
,
let
(1.7)
The aim of this paper is to discuss the monotonicity
and logarithmical convexity of the function
with respect to parameter
.
For convenience of the readers, we recall the
definitions and basic knowledge of convex function and logarithmically convex
function.
Definition 1.1.
Let
be a convex set,
is called a convex function on
if
(1.8)for all
, and
is called concave if
is convex.
Definition 1.2.
Let
be a convex set,
is called a logarithmically convex function on
if
is convex on
,
and
is called logarithmically concave if
is concave.
The following criterion for convexity of function was
established by Fichtenholz in [7].
Proposition 1.3.
Let
be a convex set, if
have continuous second partial derivatives,
then
is a convex (or concave) function on
if and only if
is a positive (or negative) semidefinite
matrix for all
, where
(1.9)
and
for
.
Notation.
In Definitions 1.1, 1.2
and Proposition 1.3, we denote
by the points (or vectors) of
,
and denote
by the real variables in the later.
Our main results are Theorems 1.4 and 1.5.
Theorem 1.4.
(1) For any
fixed
is strictly increasing (or decreasing, resp.)
with respect to
on
if and only if
(or
,
resp.);
(2) For any fixed
is strictly increasing with respect to
on
if and only if
.
Theorem 1.5.
(1) If
,
then
is logarithmically concave with respect to
;
(2) If
is a convex set with nonempty interior and
,
then
is neither logarithmically convex nor
logarithmically concave with respect to
on
.
The following two corollaries can be derived from
Theorems 1.4 and 1.5 immediately.
Corollary 1.6.
If
,
then
(1.10)
Remark 1.7.
Inequality (1.3) can be derived from Corollary 1.6 if we take
.
Although we cannot get the inequality (1.2) exactly from Corollary 1.6, but we can
get the following inequality which is close to inequality (1.2):
(1.11)
Corollary 1.8.
If
,
then
(1.12)
Remark 1.9.
We conjecture that the inequality (1.2) can
be improved if we can choose two pairs of integers
and
properly.
2. Lemmas
It is well known that the Bernoulli numbers
is defined [8] in general by
(2.1)In particular, we have
(2.2) In [9], the following summation formula is given:
(2.3)for nonnegative integer
,
where
denotes the Euler number, which implies
(2.4)
Recently, the Bernoulli and Euler numbers and
polynomials are generalized in [10–13]. The following two Lemmas were
established by Qi and Guo in [3, 14].
Lemma 2.1 (see [3]).
For real number
and natural number
,
one has
(2.5)
(2.6)
(2.7)
(2.8)
Lemma 2.2 (see [14]).
Inequalities
(2.9)
(2.10)
hold in
for
.
Lemma 2.3.
Let
,
then the following statements are true:
(1)
if
,
then
for
;
(2)
if
,
then
for
.
Proof.
(1) Making use of (2.6) we get
(2.11)for any fixed
.
Since
and
,
we have
(2.12)for all
.
Therefore, Lemma 2.3(1) follows from (2.11)
and (2.12).
(2) If
,
then (2.12) leads to
(2.13)for
.
Therefore, Lemma 2.3(2) follows from (2.11)
and (2.13).
Lemma 2.4.
If
,
then
for
.
Proof.
It is easy to see that
(2.14)for all
.
Let
,
then
(2.15)
(2.16)
(2.17)for
.
On the other hand, from (2.10) we know that
is strictly decreasing on
.
Therefore, Lemma 2.4 follows from (2.14)–(2.17).
Remark 2.5.
Let
(2.18) Then simple computation shows
that
(2.19)
Lemma 2.6.
Let
then the following statements are true:
(1)
if
,
then
(2.20)for
;
(2)
if
then
(2.21)for
.
Proof.
Let
(2.22)Then it is not difficult to
verify
(2.23)
(2.24)
(2.25)
(1) If
,
then making use of Lemmas 2.2, 2.4 and (2.25) we get
(2.26)for
.
Let 
and
.
Then simple computation leads to
(2.27)
(2.28)
(2.29)
(2.30)for all
.
It is well known that
,
where
is the Euler's constant. From this we get
(2.31)
From Lemma 2.2, (2.27)–(2.29), (2.31) and the
assumption
,
we conclude that
(2.32)
Therefore, Lemma 2.6(1) follows from
(2.23)–(2.26), (2.30), and (2.32).
(2) If
,
then making use of (2.8), Lemma 2.4 and (2.25) we obtain
(2.33)Let
(2.34)Then
(2.35)for
by Lemma 2.2, and
(2.36)for
.
Therefore, Lemma 2.6(2) follows from
(2.23)–(2.25) and (2.33)–(2.36).
3. Proofs of Theorems 1.4 and 1.5
Proof of Theorem 1.4.
(1) Let
and
,
then
(3.1)The following three cases will
complete the proof of Theorem 1.4(1).
Case 1. If
,
then (3.1) and Lemma 2.2 imply
(3.2)for
.
From (3.2) and the fact that
for all
we know that
is strictly increasing with respect to
on
for any fixed
.Case 2. If
,
then (3.1) and (2.7) imply
(3.3)for
,
where
and
.
From (3.3) and the fact that
for all
we know that
is strictly decreasing with respect to
on
for any fixed
.Case 3. If
,
let
(3.4)Then
(3.5)
(3.6)for
.
It is obvious that (3.6) implies
(3.7)The continuity of
with respect to
for any fixed
and (3.7) imply that there exists
such that
(3.8)for
.
From (3.5), (3.8) and
we know that
is strictly decreasing with respect to
on
for
.
On the other hand, making use of (2.5) and (2.6) we
have
(3.9)where
(3.10)for
and
.
Equation (3.9) implies that there exists
such that
(3.11)for
.
Hence, from (3.11) we know that
is strictly increasing with respect to
on
for
.
(2) Since
(3.12) then, Theorem 1.4(2) follows from (3.12) and Lemma 2.3.
Proof of Theorem 1.5.
Let
and
,
then simple calculation yields
(3.13)
(3.14)
(3.15)where
, and
are defined in Remark 2.5 and Lemma 2.6.
According to the Definition 1.2 and Proposition 1.3, to
prove Theorem 1.5 we need only to show that
(3.16)
(3.17)for
and
,
and
(3.18)for
and
.
Next, let
then
(3.19)
(3.20)for
by Lemma 2.2 and
.
Therefore, (3.16) follows from (3.19) and (3.20), and
(3.17) and (3.18) follow from Lemma 2.6. The proof of Theorem 1.5 is completed.
Acknowledgments
This research is partly supported by 973 Project of China under grant 2006CB708304, N S Foundation of China under Grant 10771195, and N S Foundation Zhejiang Province under Grant Y607128.
References
- E. T. Whittaker and G. N. Watson, A Course of Modern Analysis, Cambridge Mathematical Library, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1996.
- B.-N. Guo and F. Qi, “Inequalities and monotonicity for the ratio of gamma functions,” Taiwanese Journal of Mathematics, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 239–247, 2003.
- F. Qi and B.-N. Guo, “Monotonicity and convexity of ratio between gamma functions to different powers,” Journal of the Indonesian Mathematical Society, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 39–49, 2005.
- F. Qi, “Inequalities and monotonicity of sequences involving ,” Soochow Journal of Mathematics, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 353–361, 2003.
- F. Qi and Q.-M. Luo, “Generalization of H. Minc and L. Sathre's inequality,” Tamkang Journal of Mathematics, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 145–148, 2000.
- F. Qi and J.-S. Sun, “A mononotonicity result of a function involving the gamma function,” Analysis Mathematica, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 279–282, 2006.
- G. M. Fichtenholz, Differential- und Integralrechnung. II, VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften, Berlin, Germany, 1966.
- M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun, Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables, vol. 55 of National Bureau of Standards Applied Mathematics Series, U.S.Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, USA, 1964.
- Zh.-X. Wang and D.-R. Guo, Introduction to Special Function, The Series of Advanced Physics of Peking University, Peking University Press, Beijing, China, 2000.
- B.-N. Guo and F. Qi, “Generalization of Bernoulli polynomials,” International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 428–431, 2002.
- Q.-M. Luo, B.-N. Guo, F. Qi, and L. Debnath, “Generalizations of Bernoulli numbers and polynomials,” International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences, vol. 2003, no. 59, pp. 3769–3776, 2003.
- Q.-M. Luo and F. Qi, “Relationships between generalized Bernoulli numbers and polynomials and generalized Euler numbers and polynomials,” Advanced Studies in Contemporary Mathematics (Kyungshang), vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 11–18, 2003.
- Q.-M. Luo, F. Qi, and L. Debnath, “Generalizations of Euler numbers and polynomials,” International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences, vol. 2003, no. 61, pp. 3893–3901, 2003.
- F. Qi and B.-N. Guo, “A new proof of complete monotonicity of a function involving psi function,” RGMIA Research Report Collection, vol. 11, no. 3, article 12, 2008.