EOQ Models with Varying Holding Cost

<table>Total cost versus cycle length for<svg height="11.125" id="M55" style="vertical-align:-0.1638pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 52.375 11.125" width="52.375" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,5.725,10.862)"><path d="M387 375q0 -16 -17 -31t-29 -15q-9 0 -12 13q-13 74 -80 74q-36 0 -61 -24.5t-25 -56.5t24 -51.5t68 -19.5q33 0 47 2l2 -7l-32 -42q-20 2 -54 2q-45 0 -74 -21.5t-29 -60.5q0 -41 28 -65.5t73 -24.5q78 0 145 67l17 -23q-33 -47 -84.5 -75t-111.5 -28q-70 0 -114.5 35.5
t-44.5 92.5q0 46 38 78t95 45v2q-35 10 -54.5 33t-19.5 52q0 55 53 88.5t122 33.5q67 0 98.5 -23.5t31.5 -49.5z" id="x1D700"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,17.403,10.862)"><path d="M535 323h-483v50h483v-50zM535 138h-483v50h483v-50z" id="x3D"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,32.107,10.862)"><path d="M241 635q53 0 94 -28.5t63.5 -76t33.5 -102.5t11 -116q0 -58 -11 -112.5t-34 -103.5t-63.5 -78.5t-94.5 -29.5t-95 28t-64.5 75t-34.5 102.5t-11 118.5q0 58 11.5 112.5t34.5 103t64.5 78t95.5 29.5zM238 602q-32 0 -55.5 -25t-35.5 -68t-17.5 -91t-5.5 -105
q0 -76 10 -138.5t37 -107.5t69 -45q32 0 55.5 25t35.5 68.5t17.5 91.5t5.5 105t-5.5 105.5t-18 92t-36 68t-56.5 24.5z" id="x30"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,40.266,10.862)"><path d="M113 -12q-24 0 -39.5 16t-15.5 42q0 24 16 40.5t40 16.5t40 -16.5t16 -40.5q0 -26 -16 -42t-41 -16z" id="x2E"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,44.142,10.862)"><path d="M384 0h-275v27q67 5 81.5 18.5t14.5 68.5v385q0 38 -7.5 47.5t-40.5 10.5l-48 2v24q85 15 178 52v-521q0 -55 14.5 -68.5t82.5 -18.5v-27z" id="x31"></path></g>
</svg> (Example <a href="https://static.hindawi.com/articles/jim/volume-2013/743921/figures/#nex1">1</a>). </table>

Journal of Industrial Mathematics

EOQ Models with Varying Holding Cost

Figure 2