Review Article
Current Immunotherapeutic Approaches in Pancreatic Cancer
Table 3
DC-based vaccines.
| Patients | DC-based vaccines | Response | Ref |
| 12 pancreatic and biliary cancer patients with resected tumors | MUC1 peptide-loaded DC | 4 of the 12 patients followed for over four years were alive. | [88] |
| 10 patients with advanced breast, pancreatic, or papillary cancer | DC transfected with MUC1 cDNA | A vaccine-specific delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) reaction was observed in 3 out of 10 patients. |
[89] | 4 patients showed a 2- to 10-fold increase in the frequency ofMUC1-specific IFN-gamma-secreting CD8+ T cells. |
| 1 patient who could not continue chemotherapy due to sever neutropenia | DC transfected with hTERT mRNA | The patient showed no evidence of active disease based on PET/CT scans. |
[93] | The patient developed an immune response against several hTERT-derived Th and CTL epitopes. |
| 49 patients with advanced pancreatic cancer refractory to standard chemotherapy | Peptide (WT1, MUC1, CEA, and CA125)-loaded DC | 2 patients showed complete remission (CR), 5 partial remission (PR) and 10 stable disease (SD). |
[94] | Gemcitabine/S-1 | Median survival time was 360 days. |
|
|