Research Article
Th2 Regulation of Viral Myocarditis in Mice: Different Roles for TLR3 versus TRIF in Progression to Chronic Disease
Table 1
Similarity in cardiac function of C57BL/6 versus B6.129 mice prior to infection (day 0) and during acute (day 10) or chronic (day 35) CVB3 myocarditis based on pressure-volume analysis.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CO (μL/min), cardiac output; dP/dT Max, peak rate of pressure rise (mmHg/s); dP/dT Min, peak rate of pressure decline (mmHg/s); Ea/Ees, arterial elastance normalized to Ees; EDP (mmHg), end diastolic pressure; EDV (μL), end diastolic volume; Ees (mmHg/μL), LV end systolic elastance (stiffness); EF (%), ejection fraction; ESP (mmHg), end systolic pressure; ESV (μL), end systolic volume; HR (bmp), heart rate; PFR/EDV (s−1), peak flow rate normalized to EDV; PMX/EDV2, maximum ventricular power normalized to EDV2 (mW/μL2) × 100; PRSW (mmHg), preload recruitable stroke work; SV (μL), stroke volume; SW, stroke work; Tau, Weiss (ms), time constant of diastolic relaxation; V0 (μL), X-intercept of the ESP-volume relationship. *, **, and *** compare BL/6 to B6.129 by Student’s t-test at each timepoint. Data shown as mean ± SEM for 10 mice/group per timepoint. |