About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Clinical and Developmental Immunology
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 125643, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/125643
Research Article

Dextromethorphan Inhibits Activations and Functions in Dendritic Cells

1Institute of Biomedical Science, National Chung-Hsing University, Taichung 402, Taiwan
2Faculty of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei 112, Taiwan
3Division of Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 407, Taiwan
4Laboratory of Toxicology and Pharmacology, National Institutes of Environmental, Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA
5Graduate Institute of Immunology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei 100, Taiwan
6Biomedical Technology and Device Research Laboratories, Industrial Technology Research Institute, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan
7Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei 112, Taiwan
8Division of Chest Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua 500, Taiwan
9Department of Respiratory Care, College of Health Sciences, Chang Jung Christian University, Tainan 711, Taiwan
10School of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung 402, Taiwan
11Department of Medical Research and Education, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 407, Taiwan

Received 1 February 2013; Accepted 25 March 2013

Academic Editor: Beatrice Gaugler

Copyright © 2013 Der-Yuan Chen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Dendritic cells (DCs) play an important role in connecting innate and adaptive immunity. Thus, DCs have been regarded as a major target for the development of immunomodulators. In this study, we examined the effect of dextromethorphan (DXM), a common cough suppressant with a high safety profile, on the activation and function of DCs. In the presence of DXM, the LPS-induced expression of the costimulatory molecules in murine bone marrow-derived dendritic cells (BMDCs) was significantly suppressed. In addition, DXM treatment reduced the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), proinflammatory cytokines, and chemokines in maturing BMDCs that were activated by LPS. Therefore, DXM abrogated the ability of LPS-stimulated DCs to induce Ag-specific T-cell activation, as determined by their decreased proliferation and IFN-γ secretion in mixed leukocyte cultures. Moreover, the inhibition of LPS-induced MAPK activation and NF-κB translocation may contribute to the suppressive effect of DXM on BMDCs. Remarkably, DXM decreased the LPS-induced surface expression of CD80, CD83, and HLA-DR and the secretion of IL-6 and IL-12 in human monocyte-derived dendritic cells (MDDCs). These findings provide a new insight into the impact of DXM treatment on DCs and suggest that DXM has the potential to be used in treating DC-related acute and chronic diseases.

1. Introduction

Dendritic cells (DCs), a highly specialized type of bone marrow-derived leukocytes that are important for the initiation of T-cell responses, link innate and adaptive immunity. They are present in different stages of maturation in the circulation as well as in lymphoid and nonlymphoid organs. DCs reside in an immature form in nonlymphoid tissues, where they act as sentinels [13]. After they capture and process antigens in peripheral nonlymphoid tissues, DCs migrate through afferent lymph to the T-cell-dependent areas of secondary lymphoid organs (e.g., lymph nodes), where they activate naive T-cell responses and undergo phenotypic and functional changes (i.e., maturation). The immunostimulatory properties of mature DCs include increased surface expression of major histocompatibility complexes (MHCs) with Ag-peptides and costimulatory molecules (e.g., CD40, CD80), increased secretion of cytokines and chemokines, and reduced Ag uptake [4, 5]. While mature DCs can potently initiate primary T-cell-mediated immune responses, immature DCs stimulate T-cell responses only weakly or may even promote the generation of regulatory T (Treg) cells [6].

Because pharmacological modulation of DC activation prevents the development of several T-cell-mediated diseases [7], DCs may represent a new therapeutic approach for treating harmful immune responses such as hypersensitivity reactions and autoimmunity [8, 9]. Notably, the clinical efficacy of corticosteroids and other antirheumatic drugs, such as gold sodium thiomalate, leflunomide, mycophenolic acid, and valproic acid, may be due to their significant disruption of DC function [1015].

Dextromethorphan (d-3-methoxy-17-methylmorphinan, abbreviated DXM), a dextrorotatory morphinan, is widely and clinically used as an antitussive. There is an increasing evidence that DXM has anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects. DXM protects mice against lipopolysaccharide/GalN-induced endotoxemia and liver damage; the mechanism of protection may involve faster TNF-α clearance, decreased superoxide production, and decreased expression of genes associated with inflammation and hepatocellular death [16]. In addition, DXM prevents moderate experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by inhibiting the NOX2-mediated production of ROS and decreasing the infiltration of monocytes and lymphocytes into the spinal cord [17]. DXM reduces Group A Streptococcal (GAS)-induced systemic inflammatory responses and organ injury in mice [18]. Furthermore, DXM reduces cytokine and superoxide production in macrophages by inhibiting NAPDH oxidase, resulting in decreased atherosclerosis and neointima in mice [19]. DXM attenuates oxidative stress and inflammation markers in habitual smokers [20]. Because the cellular targets of DXM in the immune system have yet to be studied, the role of DXM in the cellular maturation and immunoregulatory activity of DCs is an open question.

In this study, we examined the potential effects of DXM on the maturation and functional properties of DCs. We found that DXM inhibited the LPS-induced functional maturation of murine BMDCs and human MDDCs. In addition, DXM downregulated the LPS-induced MAPK signaling pathways (ERK1/2, JNK, and p38 MAPK), IκB expression, and NF-κBp65 nuclear translocation. Taken together, these results suggest that DXM manipulates the immunostimulatory properties of DC and may have important applications against harmful immune responses such as chronic inflammation, autoimmunity, and transplantation.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Mice and Preparation of Bone Marrow-Derived Murine DCs

Five- to eight-week-old specific pathogen-free female C57BL/6 (H-2b) mice were purchased from the National Laboratory Animal Center (Taipei, Taiwan) or the National Cheng-Kung University (Tainan, Taiwan). OT-I TCR transgenic mice were purchased from Jackson Lab (Bar Harbor, ME, USA), and OT-II TCR transgenic mice were provided by Dr. Clifford Lowell (UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA). All mice were housed in the barrier facility at Taichung Veterans General Hospital (Taichung, Taiwan) in accordance with the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee guidelines for animal experimentation. Murine bone marrow-derived DCs were generated as previously described [21]. Briefly, femurs and tibias were aseptically removed from mice. After the surrounding muscle tissue was removed, the bones were placed in a 10 mm dish with 70% alcohol for 1 min, washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and transferred into a fresh dish with RPMI 1640 medium. Both ends of the bones were cut with scissors, and the marrow was flushed with RPMI 1640 using a syringe and a 25-gauge needle. The red cells were lysed with ammonium chloride. Bone marrow cells (5–7 × 105 cells/mL) were suspended in RPMI-1640 supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, 2 mm L-glutamine, 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 μg/mL streptomycin, 5 × 105 M 2-ME, 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 20 ng/mL recombinant murine granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (PeproTech), and 20 ng/mL recombinant murine IL-4 (PeproTech). Cells were placed in 6-well plates. The culture medium was changed every 2 days, and nonadherent or loosely adherent cells were harvested on day 7 and used as immature DCs. More than 80% of the cells expressed CD11c, as determined using flow cytometry. CD11c+ DCs were further selected from BM cells with CD11c (N418) microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec), according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and these cells were used for the experiments. The purity of the CD11c+ cells was >90% (data not shown).

2.2. Generation of Human Monocyte-Derived DCs

DCs were prepared from peripheral blood monocytes (PBMCs) by standard procedures. Briefly, peripheral blood was collected from healthy volunteer donors, and PBMCs were isolated from peripheral blood buffy coats by magnetic cell sorting with anti-CD14 MicroBeads, per the manufacturer’s protocol (Miltenyi Biotec). The purity of the CD14+ fraction was always >90%, as assessed using flow cytometry. Purified monocytes were seeded in 6-well plates and cultured in complete medium ( RPMI 1640 (Gibco) containing 10% FBS (Gibco)), recombinant human 80 ng mL−1 GM-CSF (PeproTech), and 100 ng mL−1 IL-4 (PeproTech) to generate immature DCs. Every two days, fresh medium containing GM-CSF and IL-4 was added to the cells. After 7 days of culture, nonadherent or loosely adherent cells were harvested, washed once with PBS, and used for the experiments.

2.3. Flow Cytometry Analysis

The expression of cell surface molecules was quantified by flow cytometry as follows. DXM hydrobromide hydrate was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, and a 12.5 mM stock solution was made with PBS. Aliquots of 2 × 105 immature BMDCs or MDDCs were cultured in the presence or absence of DXM for 1 h and then stimulated with 100 ng/mL Escherichia coli serotype O26:B6 LPS (Sigma) or 100 ng/mL LPS plus 10 ng/mL IFN-γ (PeproTech) for 18 h. The control group was treated with PBS alone. After incubation, DCs were harvested and stained with the following antibodies for 45 min on ice (1 μg/mL diluted in PBS/1.0% FCS (v/v)): FITC-conjugated anti-human CD1a+ or anti-murine CD11c+; phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated anti-human CD80+, anti-human CD83+, anti-murine CD40, anti-murine CD80, anti-murine CD86, anti-murine MHC class I, anti-murine MHC class II or isotype-matched control mAbs (all of the above from Biolegends); or PE-conjugated anti-human HLA-DR (BD Pharmingen). After washing with PBS, the cells were analyzed in a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences), and the data were analyzed using WINMDI software (Scripps, La Jolla, CA, USA).

2.4. Cytokine Assay

Supernatants were collected from DCs (1 × 106/mL) propagated in the presence or absence of DXM for 1 h. The cells were then stimulated with 100 ng/mL LPS or 100 ng/mL LPS plus 10 ng/mL IFN- or other TLR ligands, including Pam3CSK4 (5 μg/mL, TLR1/TLR2), PolyI:C (250 μg/mL, TLR3), flagellin (500 ng/mL, TLR5), and CpG ODN 1826 (200 nM TLR-9) (all from InvivoGen) for 18 h (6 h for TNF-alpha and RANTES). The control group was treated with PBS alone. After incubation, cytokine and chemokine production in DC supernatants was determined using sandwich ELISA assays, according to the manufacturer’s specifications (PeproTech).

2.5. Measurement of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS)

ROS generation was measured after staining the cells with the oxidative sensitive dye 5-(and-6)-carboxy-2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (DCFDA, Molecular Probes). For this assay, DC cells at a density of 3 × 105 cells/mL were cultured in the presence or absence of DXM (50 μM) for 1 h followed by stimulation with 100 ng/mL LPS. The control group was treated with PBS alone. After LPS stimulation for 6 h, the medium was removed, and culture medium containing 5 μM DCFDA was added under low-light conditions. The cells were incubated for 30 min at 37°C, and the amount of ROS was analyzed by flow cytometry as described above.

2.6. DXM Cytotoxicity Assay

To determine cell viability and apoptosis, murine BMDCs and human MDDCs (2 × 105 cells/mL) were cultured in the presence or absence of DXM for 1 h and stimulated with 100 ng/mL LPS for 18 h. The control group was treated with PBS alone. Cell viability was determined using the CCK-8 colorimetric assay according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Sigma). To detect apoptosis, cell death was measured by flow cytometry using a phycoerythrin-conjugated Annexin V detection kit-I (BioVision) per the manufacturer’s protocol. Flow cytometry was performed as described above by gating on 2 × 104 CD11c+ DC cells per sample.

2.7. OVA-Specific T-Cell Activation

The protocol was modified from our previous report [22]. Briefly, purified DCs were pulsed with 2 μg/mL OVA257−264 (OVAP1) or OVA323−339 (OVAP2) (synthesized by Echo Chemical Co., Taiwan) and incubated with LPS (100 ng/mL), DXM (50 μM), or LPS plus DXM for 18 h. After incubation, the cells were harvested and washed with PBS. OVAP1 specific CD8+ T cells and OVAP2 specific CD4+ T cells were positively enriched from the spleens of OT-1 and OT-2 mice using the EasySep Murine CD8a or CD4 positive selection kits, respectively, according to the manufacturer’s protocols (stem cells). The cells were more than 90% pure, as determined by flow cytometry with FITC-conjugated anti-CD4 and CD8 mAbs (Biolegends). Purified T cells (2 × 105) and different treated DCs were added at various DC : T-cell ratios to 96-well round-bottom plates. After 3 days, T-cell proliferation was measured. [3H] thymidine (1 μCi; GE Healthcare) was added to the culture, and after an overnight incubation period, the incorporated [3H] thymidine was quantified by liquid scintillation counting (β-Counter; Beckman). In addition, supernatants from the DC—OT-I/OT-II cultures were collected after 3 days, and their IFN-γ levels were measured using an ELISA kit (eBioscience).

2.8. Preparation of Nuclear Extracts and Western Blot Analysis

Briefly, purified DCs were cultured in the presence or absence of 50 μM DXM for 1 h and stimulated with LPS (100 ng/mL). Whole-cell lysates were prepared at the indicated time points, as described previously [23]. Nuclear extracts were prepared using the NE-PER nuclear and cytoplasmic Extraction system (Pierce), per the manufacturer’s instructions. All of the steps in the preparations included the protease inhibitors leupeptin (Sigma-Aldrich) and aprotinin (Sigma-Aldrich) at 10 μg/mL. Protein concentrations were determined using a BCA protein assay kit (Pierce). Protein extracts were boiled, resolved by SDS-PAGE and electrotransferred to nitrocellulose membranes. After blocking in 10% milk in TBS, the membranes were incubated with antibodies for phospho-p38 (Thr180/Tyr182), p38, phospho-p42/44 (Thr202/Tyr204, 20G11), total p42/44 (137F5), phosphor-JNK (81E11), JNK, anti-IκB (56G8), anti- NF-κB p65 (C22B4) (all purchased from cell signaling) or anti-Lamin B (M-20), anti-IDO Ab (mIDO-48) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. The membranes were then washed, incubated with horseradish peroxidase-labeled secondary Abs (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA, USA), developed with enhanced chemoluminescence (Amersham), and analyzed with the LAS3000 system (Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan). Densitometric analysis was performed with ImageJ software (National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).

2.9. Statistical Analysis

The results are expressed as the mean ± SD. Statistical analyses were performed by one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test (Graphpad Prism 4.0, GraphPad Software). values 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. DXM Affects the Expression of Cell Surface Molecules in LPS-Stimulated Murine BMDCs

In the first series of experiments, we investigated the effects of DXM on the maturation of immature DCs. Immature BMDCs were cultured in the presence of DXM (12.5, 25, 50, and 100 μM) and then exposed to bacterial LPS which is a strong inducer of DC maturation. In general, DC maturation is accompanied by the enhanced expression of surface molecules, including costimulatory molecules and major histocompatibility complex molecules (MHC) that mediate adhesion with T cells by stabilizing the DC/T cells contact zone. Consistent with previously published data, the LPS stimulation of BMDCs resulted in the significant upregulation of costimulatory molecules (CD80, CD86 and CD40) and major histocompatibility complex molecules (MHC class II, MHC class I) within 18 h. While the DXM inhibition of LPS-induced maturation was dose-dependent, the expression of CD80, CD86, CD40, MHC class I, and MHC class II was significantly lower in the presence of DXM than in untreated mature BMDCs cells (Figure 1). These effects were not due to an increase in the number of dead cells (as determined by CCK-8 or flow cytometry with Annexin V); there was no marked difference in the percentage of dead cells in cultures containing 100 μM DXM or PBS-treated controls (Supplemental Figure available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/125643). These observations suggested that DXM impaired LPS-induced DC phenotypic maturation.

125643.fig.001
Figure 1: DXM reduces the expression of immunomodulatory cell surface markers in LPS-induced BMDCs. Immature BMDCs were stimulated with 100 ng/mL LPS with or without DXM for 18 h. Control groups were treated with PBS alone. After incubation, the expression of the surface markers CD40, CD80, CD86, MHC class I and MHC class II was analyzed by flow cytometry with fluorescently labeled Abs. The gray-filled area represents staining with an isotype-matched control Ab. The geometric mean fluorescence intensity (GMFI) of LPS or LPS+DXM is indicated. All data are representative of three independent experiments showing similar results.
3.2. DXM Modulates Cytokine, Chemokine, and ROS Production in LPS-Stimulated BMDCs

Mature DCs secrete cytokines and chemokines that modulate inflammatory responses and adaptive immunity [24]. We examined whether DXM altered cytokine and chemokine secretion in LPS-stimulated BMDCs. First, we examined changes in the BMDC TNF-alpha production, which is a hallmark of DC activation. TNF-alpha was quantified using ELISA for supernatants that were collected from LPS-triggered BMDCs propagated in the presence or absence of DXM. Figure 2 shows that unstimulated immature BMDCs did not produce detectable levels of TNF-alpha. As expected, BMDCs started producing a large amount of TNF-alpha after stimulation with LPS, but DXM pretreatment led to dose-dependent significant decreases in TNF-alpha production. The secretion of other proinflammatory cytokines (e.g., IL-6, IL-12) and chemokines (e.g., MCP-1, MIP-1 alpha, and RANTES) was also inhibited by DXM. IL-12 production is an important marker for DC maturation and can be used to select Th1-dominant adjuvants (Figure 2). Additionally, increased levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) are involved in the activation of DCs by different stimuli, and antioxidants inhibit DC activation [25]. To assess the potential intracellular mechanisms for DXM inhibition of DC maturation, we analyzed ROS levels in BMDCs pretreated with DXM and matured with LPS, which is known to increase ROS in DCs [25]. As expected, ROS levels were increased following treatment with LPS (Figure 3). However, treatment with DXM reduced LPS-induced ROS in BMDCs. These results further suggest that DXM attenuates the maturation and immunostimulatory activity of DCs activated by LPS.

fig2
Figure 2: DXM impaired the release of cytokines and chemokines from LPS-stimulated BMDCs. Immature BMDCs were stimulated with 100 ng/mL LPS with or without DXM. The control group was treated with PBS alone. Culture supernatants were collected after 18 h (4 h for TNF-alpha and RANTES), and cytokines and chemokines were quantified by ELISA. Data are presented as the means ± SD of samples from three wells. Significant differences between DXM-treated and untreated LPS-activated BMDCs are shown with asterisks ( , ). All data are representative of three independent experiments.
fig3
Figure 3: ROS production in LPS-stimulated BMDCs was impaired by DXM. Immature BMDCs were stimulated with 100 ng/mL LPS with or without DXM for 18 h. The control group was treated with PBS alone. After incubation, the cells were harvested, stained with DCFDA, and analyzed by flow cytometry. The mean fluorescence intensities for ROS generation were tabulated. The data are represented as the mean ± SD in triplicate tests. All data are representative of three independent experiments. Significant differences between DXM-treated and untreated LPS-activated BMDCs are shown with asterisks ( ).
3.3. DXM Inhibits the Ability of LPS-Stimulated BMDCs to Stimulate OVA-Specific T-Cell Proliferation

Because the critical function of mature DCs is to activate T-cell proliferation, we determined whether DXM-treated BMDCs could induce antigen-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses. OVA257−264 (OVAP1) or OVA323−339 (OVAP2) peptide-loaded immature BMDCs were preincubated in the presence or absence of DXM, stimulated with LPS, and tested for their ability to stimulate allogeneic OVA-specific CD4+ OT-II or CD8+ OT-I T cells. T-cell proliferation was measured by [3H] thymidine incorporation. Coculture with LPS-stimulated BMDCs effectively enhanced CD4+ OT-II and CD8+ OT-I T-cell proliferative responses, but this proliferation was reduced by DXM (Figure 4). Because IFN-γ is produced by activated T cells, IFN-γ in the culture supernatants was measured using ELISA. As shown in Figure 5, DXM treatment reduced the IFN-γ produced by activated CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Thus, DXM attenuated the ability of DCs to activate Ag-specific T-cell immune responses.

fig4
Figure 4: DXM inhibits Ag-specific T-cell activation by LPS-stimulated BMDCs. (a) Either OT-I CD8+ T cells or OT-II CD4+ T cells were cocultured with BMDCs pulsed with OVA peptide and treated with PBS, LPS (100 ng/mL) + PBS, or LPS + DXM (50 μM) at the indicated ratio of DC : T cells for 3 days. The cells were exposed to [3H]-thymidine for 18 h before cell-associated radioactivity was determined. (b) Supernatants were collected from cultures after 4 days. IFN-γ production was measured by ELISA. The data shown are the mean ± SD of samples of three wells. Significant differences between DXM-treated and untreated LPS-activated BMDCs are shown with asterisks ( ). All data are representative of three independent experiments.
fig5
Figure 5: DXM inhibition of MAPK and NF-κB activation in BMDCs. Immature BMDCs were stimulated with 100 ng/mL LPS with or without DXM and lysed at the indicated time points. (a) The ERK, JNK, and p38 MAPK (native and phosphorylated) in whole cell lystes. (b) IκBα in whole-cell lystes and NF-κB p65 in nuclear extracts as mentioned were determined by Western blot with antibodies. β-actin and Lamin B loading controls are also shown to demonstrate relatively equal protein load across all lanes. The data are representative of three independent experiments showing similar results.
3.4. DXM Suppressed MAPK and NF-κB Pathways in LPS-Stimulated BMDCs

The activation of MAPKs and NF-κB is crucial for DC maturation and the inflammatory response [26]. The LPS stimulation of TLR-4 signaling activates MAPKs and NF-κB signal pathways, resulting in DC maturation [27, 28]. To explore the molecular mechanisms of the DXM inhibitory effect, we determined whether MAPKs and NF-κB activation were altered by DXM in LPS-stimulated BMDCs. DXM treatment blocked the phosphorylation of MAPKs ERK, p38, and JNK but did not affect the level of unphosphorylated proteins (Figure 5(a)). To determine whether DXM decreased NF-κB activation, the expression of IκB protein and nuclear translocation of NF-κB p65 were measured. Iκb is known to be an inhibitor of NF-κb and can form a complex with the NF-κb, thereby preventing nuclear translocation of NF-κb. Under partial external stimulus such as LPS, IκB undergoes phosphorylation and degradation, thereby unlocking NF-κb and resulting in the nuclear translocation of NF-κb and the activation of related signaling pathways. As shown in Figure 5, in LPS-stimulated BMDCs, DXM treatment prevented downregulation of IκB protein (Figure 5(a)) and decreased NF-κB p65 nuclear localization (Figure 5(b)). These results suggest that DXM inhibits LPS-induced DC activation, possibly by disrupting the MAPK and NF-κB pathways.

3.5. DXM Affects the Expression of Surface Markers and Cytokine Secretion in Human Monocyte-Derived DCs (MDDCs)

In addition to murine BMDCs, we examined whether DXM regulates LPS-induced surface molecule expression and cytokine production in human MDDCs. MDDCs were cultured in the presence or absence of DXM for 1 h and then stimulated with LPS (100 ng/mL) plus IFN-γ (10 ng/mL). Immature MDDCs stimulated with LPS plus IFN-γ released IL-6 and IL-12. The release of these cytokines was suppressed by incubation with DXM (Figure 6(a)). We also analyzed the effect of DXM on the expression of DC surface activation markers. The LPS stimulation of MDDCs resulted in the upregulation of CD80, CD83, and HLA-DR; however, this upregulation was significantly inhibited by DXM (Figure 6(b)). Also, these inhibited effects were not due to cytotoxicity of DXM, because there were no marked difference in the cell viability and percentage of Annexin V+/dead cells in cultures containing DXM or PBS-treated controls (Supplemental Figure 1(b)).

fig6
Figure 6: DXM inhibited human MDDC activation. Immature MDDCs were treated with LPS (100 ng/mL) + IFN-γ (10 ng/mL), LPS (100 ng/mL) + IFN-γ (10 ng/mL) + DXM (25, 50 μM) for 18 h. The control group was treated with PBS alone. (a) Supernatants were collected 18 h later (TNF, 6 h), and TNF-alpha, IL-6, and IL-12 production was measured by ELISA. Data are presented as the mean ± SD of samples from three wells. Significant differences between DXM-treated and untreated LPS + IFN-γ-activated DCs are shown with asterisks ( ). (b) The expression of CD80, CD83, and HLA was determined by flow cytometry. All data were gated on CD1a+ cells. The gray-filled area represents staining with an isotype-matched control Ab. The change of geometric mean fluorescence intensity in the LPS + IFN-γ or LPS + IFN-γ + DXM samples is indicated. All data are representative of five independent experiments with cells from individual donors.

4. Discussion

Because DCs can initiate primary T-cell responses, they form a crucial interface between innate and adaptive immunity. Potential interference with this essential cell type might affect the pharmacological profile of an immunosuppressive drug [1014]. In this study, we examined the activity of DXM, a widely used antitussive, on the immune function of DCs. We showed that DXM interfered with DC maturation, as measured using costimulatory molecules, cytokine, reactive oxygen species (ROS), and stimulation of allogeneic T cells. This is the first study to report that DXM has an immunomodulatory effect on DCs.

The NF-κB signaling pathway is critical for DC maturation and cytokine production [28]. The NF-κB signaling pathway includes several important molecules such as NF-κB, IκB, and IκB kinase [29]. DXM inhibits LPS-induced IκBα degradation and the nuclear translocation of p65 in human endothelial cells [30]. MAPK signaling pathways have also received attention as molecular targets for DC therapies [2628, 31, 32]. The minimal MAPK cascade consists of a three kinase core where an MAP3 K (MAP2 K kinase) activates a MAP2 K (MAPK kinase) that activates an MAPK (ERK, JNK, p38), resulting in the activation of NF-κB pathways that contribute to cell growth, survival, and antiapoptosis [33]. In this study, we showed that DXM decreased NF-κB and MAPK (ERK, p38, JNK) activation in LPS-treated BMDCs (Figure 5), and this inhibitory effect was associated with DC maturation.

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are also known to have important signaling properties, including activation of NF-κB and MAPK signaling in many cell types [34]. ROS are also known to influence the production and secretion of cytokines; after exposure to ROS, DCs more efficiently present antigens [25]. Previous studies have shown that DXM has antioxidant properties in many cell types [16, 19, 3537]. In this study, we investigated whether DXM could affect ROS formation during the process of LPS-stimulated dendritic cell maturation. Our results confirmed that DXM inhibited ROS production in LPS-stimulated BMDCs. Although the underlying mechanism remains unclear, suppressed ROS production due to the inhibition of NOX2, iNOS, or NADPH oxidase expression and activity is possible [16, 19, 35, 38]. NOX2- and NADPH oxidase-deleted dendritic cells cannot be induced to mature [39, 40]. Further investigation of the influence and possible mechanism of action of DXM on NOX2 and NADPH oxidase in dendritic cells is necessary.

Because activated DCs regulate T-cell responses, the type of cytokines that they release may determine whether CD4+ T cells mature into Th1, Th2, Th17, or Treg cells [41]. IL-12 drives T helper type 1 (Th1) responses, whereas IL-4 promotes Th2-type responses [42]. We observed that DXM significantly inhibited LPS-induced IL-12 production in murine and human DCs (Figures 2 and 6). In addition, we showed that LPS-stimulated OVA peptide-pulsed BMDCs skewed naive OT-II T cells toward IFN-γ-producing T cells, but OT-II T cells stimulated with OVA-pulsed BMDCs exposed to DXM produced lower levels of IFN-γ (Figure 4). Because IFN-γ is a major product of Th1 cells [43], these results suggest that DXM may be effective in several Th1-dominant chronic inflammatory diseases, such as multiple sclerosis (MS), diabetes, and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) [44].

The present study used the TLR-4 ligand LPS to stimulate DC maturation. LPS induces strong Th1-like responses but not Th2 immune responses [45]. We did not observe IL-4 expression in DCs after LPS stimulation (data not shown). However, we cannot exclude the possibility that DXM affects Th2 responses. Therefore, substances capable of stimulating Th2 immune responses, such as dust mite allergens [46], should be used in future investigations of the effects of DXM on DC-mediated Th2 responses.

We also found that DXM suppressed TNF-alpha expression when it was given before or after LPS stimulation (Supplemental Figure 2), implying that the anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects of DXM could be used for prevention or treatment purposes. Although LPS was the main stimulus used for DC maturation in this study, we also tested whether DXM could modulate the activation of immature BMDCs by other TLR ligands and applied Pam3CSK4, PolyI:C, flagellin, and CpG ODN ligands for TLR1/TLR2, TLR3, TLR5, and TLR9, respectively. The presence of each substance resulted in the release of the proinflammatory cytokine TNF-alpha. This release was completely inhibited by 50 μM of DXM (Supplemental Figure 3). Although the mechanism of DXM interference with DC activation after TLR ligand stimulation is not entirely clear, we suggest that it may be related to the inhibitory effect of DXM on MAPK and NF-κB activation. NF-κB is required for DCs to secrete inflammatory cytokines after they are stimulated with various TLR ligands [29]. Further investigation of the effect of DXM on DC maturation through other non-TLR pathways such asflt3 or c-kit ligands [47] or GM-CSF, IL-1β, and IL-7 (FKGm17) cytokine stimuli is necessary.

Increased IDO expression in DCs can cause T-cell apoptosis via tryptophan starvation [48]. IDO expression in DCs may be related to the differentiation of Treg cells [49, 50]. We found that DXM at 50 μM did not induce IDO expression or alter LPS-induced IDO expression (Supplemental Figure 4(a)). Previous studies reported that IL-10 inhibits effector T-cell responses and may induce Tr1 regulatory T-cell differentiation [51, 52]. In this study, ELISA indicated that no significant alteration in IL-10 expression was found in BMDCs treated with or without LPS (Supplemental Figure 4(b)). Based on these results, we suggest that the T-cell-inhibitory effect of DXM might occur via the suppression of surface costimulatory receptor expression and cytokine release. Further analysis of more immunomodulatory factors, such as high levels of PD-L1 (programmed death-1 ligand), retinoic acid (RA), TGF-beta, or other factors capable of activating Treg differentiation or activation is required [53, 54].

The clinical dose of DXM for adult human is 60–120 mg/kg/day, and the peak concentration of DXM is about 8–16 μM in serum after administration [55]. Another report describes that the maximum concentration of DXM is about 0.8–9.64 mg/kg (as high as 2 μM) in the serum of neurosurgery patients; however, the concentration of DXM in brain can be 68-fold higher than that in serum [56]. In our in vitro study, we found that 12.5 μM–50 μM DXM can attenuate the LPS-induced murine and human DC activation, which dosage is possible in physiological condition, suggesting that DXM may have a potential to modulate DC function in vivo.

5. Conclusion

In summary, we provided evidence for a novel cellular target of DXM in alloimmune responses in addition to its well-known T-cell inhibitory capacity. Because of its potent effects on DCs, DXM may potentially prevent or treat DC-associated chronic or acute immune diseases, such as MS, diabetes, and RA [44]. Because DCs are important for the eradication of tumors and pathogens [5759], future clinical studies should identify the risks associated with long-term DXM use.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Authors’ Contribution

Der-Yuan Chen and Pei-Sang Song contributed equally to this work.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by grants from the Taichung Veterans General Hospital Taichung, Taiwan (TCVGH-1017323D), by the Ministry of Education, Taiwan under the ATU plan (for C.C. Lin), and by STSP Grant EG310815101 (for C. L. Chu).

References

  1. R. M. Steinman and H. Hemmi, “Dendritic cells: translating innate to adaptive immunity,” Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology, vol. 311, pp. 17–58, 2006. View at Scopus
  2. M. F. Lipscomb and B. J. Masten, “Dendritic cells: immune regulators in health and disease,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 97–130, 2002. View at Scopus
  3. R. Thomas and P. E. Lipsky, “Dendritic cells: origin and differentiation,” Stem Cells, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 196–206, 1996. View at Scopus
  4. C. Watts, M. A. West, and R. Zaru, “TLR signalling regulated antigen presentation in dendritic cells,” Current Opinion in Immunology, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 124–130, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. Y. Yanagawa, N. Iijima, K. Iwabuchi, and K. Onoé, “Activation of extracellular signal-related kinase by TNF-α controls the maturation and function of murine dendritic cells,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 125–132, 2002. View at Scopus
  6. P. Hubert, N. Jacobs, J. H. Caberg, J. Boniver, and P. Delvenne, “The cross-talk between dendritic and regulatory T cells: good or evil?” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 781–794, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. G. Thompson and R. Thomas, “Induction of immune tolerance by dendritic cells: implications for preventative and therapeutic immunotherapy of autoimmune disease,” Immunology and Cell Biology, vol. 80, no. 6, pp. 509–519, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. Menges, S. Rößner, C. Voigtländer et al., “Repetitive injections of dendritic cells matured with tumor necrosis factor α induce antigen-specific protection of mice from autoimmunity,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 195, no. 1, pp. 15–21, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. D. L. Roelen, D. H. Schuurhuis, D. E. M. van den Boogaardt et al., “Prolongation of skin graft survival by modulation of the alloimmune response with alternatively activated dendritic cells,” Transplantation, vol. 76, no. 11, pp. 1608–1615, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. D. Elftman, C. C. Norbury, R. H. Bonneau, and M. E. Truckenmiller, “Corticosterone impairs dendritic cell maturation and function,” Immunology, vol. 122, no. 2, pp. 279–290, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. Z. Y. Wang, A. Morinobu, S. Kawano, J. Saegusa, B. Wang, and S. Kumagai, “Gold sodium thiomalate suppresses the differentiation and function of human dendritic cells from peripheral blood monocytes,” Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 683–688, 2002. View at Scopus
  12. B. M. Kirsch, M. Zeyda, K. Stuhlmeier et al., “The active metabolite of leflunomide, A77 1726, interferes with dendritic cell function,” Arthritis research & therapy, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. R694–R703, 2005. View at Scopus
  13. P. P. Wadia, N. D. Herrera, M. M. Abecassis, and A. R. Tambur, “Mycophenolic acid inhibits maturation and function of human dendritic cells and B cells,” Human Immunology, vol. 70, no. 9, pp. 692–700, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. Frikeche, T. Simon, E. Brissot, M. Grégoire, and B. Gaugler M Mohty, “Impact of valproic acid on dendritic cells function,” Immunobiology, vol. 217, no. 7, pp. 704–710, 2012.
  15. J. Frikeche, Z. Peric, E. Brissot, M. Grégoire, B. Gaugler, and M. Mohty, “Impact of HDAC inhibitors on dendritic cell functions,” Experimental Hematology, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 783–791, 2012.
  16. C. C. Wang, Y. M. Lee, H. P. Wei, C. C. Chu, and M. H. Yen, “Dextromethorphan prevents circulatory failure in rats with endotoxemia,” Journal of Biomedical Science, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 739–747, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. O. V. Chechneva, F. Mayrhofer, D. J. Daugherty, D. E. Pleasure, J. S. Hong, and W. Deng, “Low dose dextromethorphan attenuates moderate experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by inhibiting NOX2 and reducing peripheral immune cells infiltration in the spinal cord,” Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 63–72, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. M. H. Li, Y. H. Luo, C. F. Lin et al., “Dextromethorphan efficiently increases bactericidal activity, attenuates inflammatory responses, and prevents group A streptococcal sepsis,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 967–973, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. S. L. Liu, Y. H. Li, G. Y. Shi et al., “Dextromethorphan reduces oxidative stress and inhibits atherosclerosis and neointima formation in mice,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 161–169, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. P. Y. Liu, C. C. Lin, W. C. Tsai et al., “Treatment with dextromethorphan improves endothelial function, inflammation and oxidative stress in male heavy smokers,” Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 6, no. 10, pp. 1685–1692, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. S. T. Wang, C. C. Chang, M. C. Yen et al., “RNA interference-mediated silencing of Foxo3 in antigen-presenting cells as a strategy for the enhancement of DNA vaccine potency,” Gene Therapy, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 372–383, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. C. C. Lin, Y. L. Yu, C. C. Shih et al., “A novel adjuvant Ling Zhi-8 enhances the efficacy of DNA cancer vaccine by activating dendritic cells,” Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, vol. 60, no. 7, pp. 1019–1027, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. C. S. Wu, Y. J. Chen, J. J. Chen et al., “Terpinen-4-ol induces apoptosis in human nonsmall cell lung cancer in vitro and in vivo,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2012, Article ID 818261, 13 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. R. M. Steinman and J. Banchereau, “Taking dendritic cells into medicine,” Nature, vol. 449, no. 7161, pp. 419–426, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. V. Verhasselt, W. Vanden Berghe, N. Vanderheyde, F. Willems, G. Haegeman, and M. Goldman, “N-acetyl-L-cysteine inhibits primary human T cell responses at the dendritic cell level: association with NF-κB inhibition,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 162, no. 5, pp. 2569–2574, 1999. View at Scopus
  26. M. Rescigno, M. Martino, C. L. Sutherland, M. R. Gold, and P. Ricciardi-Castagnoli, “Dendritic cell survival and maturation are regulated by different signaling pathways,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 188, no. 11, pp. 2175–2180, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. J. F. Arrighi, M. Rebsamen, F. Rousset, V. Kindler, and C. Hauser, “A critical role for p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase in the maturation of human blood-derived dendritic cells induced by lipopolysaccharide, TNF-α, and contact sensitizers,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 166, no. 6, pp. 3837–3845, 2001. View at Scopus
  28. H. An, Y. Yu, M. Zhang et al., “Involvement of ERK, p38 and NF-κB signal transduction in regulation of TLR2, TLR4 and TLR9 gene expression induced by lipopolysaccharide in mouse dendritic cells,” Immunology, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 38–45, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. T. Kawai and S. Akira, “Signaling to NF-κB by Toll-like receptors,” Trends in Molecular Medicine, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 460–469, 2007.
  30. S. J. Jiang, S. Y. Hsu, C. R. Deng et al., “Dextromethorphan attenuates LPS-induced adhesion molecule expression in human endothelial cells,” Microcirculation, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 190–201, 2013.
  31. J. Brown, H. Wang, G. N. Hajishengallis, and M. Martin, “TLR-signaling networks: an integration of adaptor molecules, kinases, and cross-talk,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 417–427, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. A. Oeckinghaus, M. S. Hayden, and S. Ghosh, “Crosstalk in NF-κB signaling pathways,” Nature Immunology, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 695–708, 2011.
  33. J. L. Luo, H. Kamata, and M. Karin, “The anti-death machinery in IKK/NF-κB signaling,” Journal of Clinical Immunology, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 541–550, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. V. J. Thannickal and B. L. Fanburg, “Reactive oxygen species in cell signaling,” The American Journal of Physiology, vol. 279, no. 6, pp. L1005–L1028, 2000. View at Scopus
  35. T. C. Wu, C. Y. Chao, S. J. Lin, and J. W. Chen, “Low-dose dextromethorphan, a NADPH oxidase inhibitor, reduces blood pressure and enhances vascular protection in experimental hypertension,” PLoS One, vol. 7, no. 9, Article ID e46067, 2012.
  36. G. Li, G. Cui, N. S. Tzeng et al., “Femtomolar concentrations of dextromethorphan protect mesencephalic dopaminergic neurons from inflammatory damage,” FASEB Journal, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 489–496, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. W. Zhang, T. Wang, L. Qin et al., “Neuroprotective effect of dextromethorphan in the MPTP Parkinson's disease model: role of NADPH oxidase,” FASEB Journal, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 589–591, 2004. View at Scopus
  38. J. H. Song and J. Z. Yeh, “Dextromethorphan inhibition of voltage-gated proton currents in BV2 microglial cells,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 516, no. 1, pp. 94–98, 2012.
  39. A. Savina, C. Jancic, S. Hugues et al., “NOX2 controls phagosomal pH to regulate antigen processing during crosspresentation by dendritic cells,” Cell, vol. 126, no. 1, pp. 205–218, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. M. Vulcano, S. Dusi, D. Lissandrini et al., “Toll receptor-mediated regulation of NADPH oxidase in human dendritic cells,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 173, no. 9, pp. 5749–5756, 2004.
  41. J. Zhu, H. Yamane, and W. E. Paul, “Differentiation of effector CD4+ T cell populations,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 28, pp. 445–489, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. W. T. Watford, M. Moriguchi, A. Morinobu, and J. J. O'Shea, “The biology of IL-12: coordinating innate and adaptive immune responses,” Cytokine and Growth Factor Reviews, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 361–368, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. K. Schroder, P. J. Hertzog, T. Ravasi, and D. A. Hume, “Interferon-γ: an overview of signals, mechanisms and functions,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 163–189, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. R. B. Moss, T. Moll, M. El-Kalay et al., “Th1/Th2 cells in inflammatory disease states: therapeutic implications,” Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy, vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 1887–1896, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. G. M. Barton and R. Medzhitov, “Control of adaptive immune responses by Toll-like receptors,” Current Opinion in Immunology, vol. 14, pp. 380–383, 2002.
  46. H. Hammad, H. H. Smits, C. Ratajczak et al., “Monocyte-derived dendritic cells exposed to Der p 1 allergen enhance the recruitment of Th2 cells: major involvement of the chemokines TARC/CCL17 and MDC/CCL22,” European Cytokine Network, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 219–228, 2003. View at Scopus
  47. A. Galy, I. Christopherson, G. Ferlazzo, G. Liu, H. Spits, and K. Georgopoulos, “Distinct signals control the hematopoiesis of lymphoid-related dendritic cells,” Blood, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 128–137, 2000. View at Scopus
  48. C. Orabona and U. Grohmann, “Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase and regulatory function: tryptophan starvation and beyond,” Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 677, pp. 269–280, 2011. View at Scopus
  49. D. J. Chung, M. Rossi, E. Romano et al., “Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase-expressing mature human monocyte-derived dendritic cells expand potent autologous regulatory T cells,” Blood, vol. 114, no. 3, pp. 555–563, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. R. Kushwah and J. Hu, “Role of dendritic cells in the induction of regulatory T cells,” Cell and Bioscience, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2011.
  51. M. K. Levings, S. Gregori, E. Tresoldi, S. Cazzaniga, C. Bonini, and M. G. Roncarolo, “Differentiation of Tr1 cells by immature dendritic cells requires IL-10 but not CD25+CD4+ Tr cells,” Blood, vol. 105, no. 3, pp. 1162–1169, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. C. Haase, T. N. Jørgensen, and B. K. Michelsen, “Both exogenous and endogenous interleukin-10 affects the maturation of bone-marrow-derived dendritic cells in vitro and strongly influences T-cell priming in vivo,” Immunology, vol. 107, no. 4, pp. 489–499, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. A. Bai, N. Lu, Y. Guo, Z. Liu, J. Chen, and Z. Peng, “All-trans retinoic acid down-regulates inflammatory responses by shifting the Treg/Th17 profile in human ulcerative and murine colitis,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 86, no. 4, pp. 959–969, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. J. Banchereau, V. Pascual, and A. O. 'Garra, “From IL-2 to IL-37: the expanding spectrum of anti-inflammatory cytokines,” Nature Immunology, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 925–931, 2012.
  55. D. A. Capon, F. Bochner, N. Kerry, G. Mikus, C. Danz, and A. A. Somogyi, “The influence of CYP2D6 polymorphism and quinidine on the disposition and antitussive effect of dextromethorphan in humans,” Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 295–307, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. G. K. Steinberg, T. E. Bell, and M. A. Yenari, “Dose escalation safety and tolerance study of the N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist dextromethorphan in neurosurgery patients,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 84, no. 5, pp. 860–866, 1996. View at Scopus
  57. M. Colonna, B. Pulendran, and A. Iwasaki, “Dendritic cells at the host-pathogen interface,” Nature Immunology, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 117–120, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. A. Manickam, M. Sivanandham, and I. L. Tourkova, “Immunological role of dendritic cells in cervical cancer,” Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol. 601, pp. 155–162, 2007.
  59. B. Pulendran, “Modulating TH1/TH2 responses with microbes, dendritic cells, and pathogen recognition receptors,” Immunologic Research, vol. 29, no. 1–3, pp. 187–196, 2004.