About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Clinical and Developmental Immunology
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 986789, 16 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/986789
Review Article

Th17 Cells in Immunity and Autoimmunity

Department of Microbiology and Cell Science, University of Florida, P.O. Box 110700, Museum Road Building 981, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA

Received 3 September 2013; Revised 13 November 2013; Accepted 20 November 2013

Academic Editor: Luca Gattinoni

Copyright © 2013 Simone Kennedy Bedoya et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Th17 and IL-17 play important roles in the clearance of extracellular bacterial and fungal infections. However, strong evidence also implicates the Th17 lineage in several autoimmune disorders including multiple sclerosis, psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, systemic lupus erythematosus, and asthma. The Th17 subset has also been connected with type I diabetes, although whether it plays a role in the pathogenicity of or protection from the disease remains a controversial issue. In this review we have provided a comprehensive overview of Th17 pathogenicity and function, including novel evidence for a protective role of Th17 cells in conjunction with the microbiota gut flora in T1D onset and progression.

1. Introduction

Antigen presenting cells activate naïve T lymphocytes by presenting specific antigens, and by providing the necessary costimulatory signals and cytokine environment [1]. T lymphocytes bearing T cell receptor (TCR) specificity towards the presented antigen subsequently undergo clonal expansion and mediate effector functions largely dictated by the stimulatory and environmental clues provided [2]. In a past classical model, CD4+ effector T cells were assigned to either the Th1 or Th2 subset, each with its own distinct cytokines, transcription factors, and functions [3]. Th1 cells produce IFNγ and are regulated by IL-12 through the transcription factor Tbet, while Th2 cells produce the cytokines IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 and are regulated by the transcription factor GATA3. Th1 cells are associated with protection against intracellular pathogens, and T lymphocytes bearing the Th2 phenotype regulate humoral immunity, and are involved in the protection against extracellular pathogens [4]. Having established a role for Th1 and Th2 cells within the context of immune defense against microorganisms, the Th1/Th2 paradigm was then utilized to garner insight into the onset and progression of autoimmune disorders. The goal of this review is to explicate how limitations of the Th1/Th2 paradigm in the context of autoimmunity led to the discovery of the Th17 phenotype, and to examine the implications of the Th17 phenotype within the context of several autoimmune disorders, including T1D.

2. A Shift in Focus to the Th17 Phenotype

The experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) model of multiple sclerosis (MS) provided the first clues to the possibility that other T cell effector functions, beyond those attributed to the Th1 and Th2 subsets, could be contributing to the onset and progression of autoimmune disorders. Under the previously existing dogma, IL-12 and henceforth Th1 cells and IFNγ were thought to be central in disease progression and severity. However, several studies noted irregularities in this theory as mice models including IFNγ−/−, IFNγR−/−, IL-12βR−/−, and IL-12p35−/− mice showed an exacerbation and progression of the disease [510], an exacerbation that was downregulated and protected with a functional Th1 pathway intact [57].

A major development came in 2003 by Cua et al. when the critical cytokine in murine EAE was elucidated as interleukin-23 (IL-23), a heterodimeric cytokine composed of the p40 and p19 subunits [11, 12]. Previous work had shown that blocking IL-12 or the IL-12p40 subunit in animal models conferred protection from EAE [1317]; however, the p40 subunit is shared by both IL-12 and IL-23 [12]. Cua et al. showed that mice with a deleted p19 subunit specific for IL-23 were protected from EAE development. Mice lacking the p35 subunit specific for IL-12, however, were still susceptible to EAE development. A study by Murphy and colleagues in 2003 followed shortly that also described a protective role for IL-12 and IFNγ in models of collagen-induced arthritis (CIA), another disease which was previously thought to follow the Th1/Th2 model as well [18]. Murphy et al. determined that IL-23 promoted a subset of IL-17-producing CD4+ T cells, which in turn furthered CIA disease progression [18].

These and subsequent studies in 2005 led to the realization that there was a novel subset of T helper cells distinct from the classical Th1/Th2 paradigm [1921]. This novel subset, termed Th17 for its production of interleukin-17 (IL-17), involves a combination of cytokines, transcription factors, and immunological functions that make it distinct from both T helper 1 and 2 cells.

3. The Th1/Th2 Paradigm is Insufficient for Type 1 Diabetes

The pivotal research studies which implicated Th17 cells in the roles previously assigned to Th1 cells regarding autoimmunity also prompted an interrogation of the Th17 phenotype within the context of T1D. Under the classic Th1/Th2 paradigm, IFNγ-producing Th1 cells were strongly implicated as a major contributor to T1D progression [2224], while Th2 T lymphocytes were identified as having a protective role [25]. However, studies have shown that the loss of either the IFNγ receptor or IFNγ production failed to prevent the spontaneous development of T1D in nonobese diabetic (NOD) mice [26, 27], while another study showed that IFNγ induction restored normoglycemia [28]. Moreover, it was shown that IL-4 deficiency did not exacerbate disease [29], calling into question the protective role of Th2 lymphocytes. Together these studies made it clear that the Th1/Th2 paradigm was insufficient to explain the immunopathogenic events leading to autoimmune diseases such as T1D.

The resulting evidence from both human and rodent studies regarding the role of Th17 cells and IL-17A production in the onset and development of T1D has been conflicting. Monocytes derived from T1D patients spontaneously induce Th17 cells [30], and it has been shown that Th17 cell inhibition was sufficient to regulate T1D in the NOD mouse model [31]. Conversely, it has been shown that Th17 cells delay T1D in NOD mice treated with mycobacterial adjuvant [32]. IL-17-producing gamma delta T cells have also been shown to have a protective role in the NOD model of spontaneous T1D [33]. The controversial nature of IL-17 production in relation to T1D is likely due to the fact that IL-17 is in actuality produced by a spectrum of T cell phenotypes possessing both varied and distinct effector functions.

It has become clear that the Th17 lineage is not a single distinct lineage, but rather encompasses several T lymphocytes which all produce IL-17A, but possess varied effector functions. Although IL-17-producing cells have been identified in the onset and progression of several autoimmune disorders, we now know that not all IL-17-producing T lymphocytes are pathogenic [34]. Strikingly, researchers have shown that IFNγ+IL-17+ T lymphocytes, which originate from IL-17-producing Th17 cells, are closely associated with pathogenicity [35]. This finding is likely to be significant in the understanding of T1D, as Th17 differentiated CD4+ T lymphocytes are incapable of mediating T1D in the inducible NOD.scid model prior to acquisition of the IFNγ effector function [36, 37]. While this may suggest that IFNγ mediates T1D onset, it is more likely that onset is mediated by an effector function present in this population of IFNγ+IL-17+ cells, but absent in the IFNγ+ and IL-17+ single cytokine-producing populations.

Notably, the discovery of the Th17 phenotype was closely paralleled by the characterization of yet another CD4+ T cell lineage, the Foxp3+ regulatory T cells (Treg), which are critical in the prevention of immune responses directed against self-antigens [38, 39]. Although generally associated with protection from inflammation and autoimmunity, Tregs have recently been shown to be highly plastic in an inflammatory cytokine environment. Studies have shown in both murine models and humans that Tregs stimulated ex vivo with IL-6 or IL-1β can be induced to produce IL-17 [40, 41]. For example, it has been shown that Tregs (identified as “ex-Tregs”) that acquire the IL-17 effector function can mediate T1D [42]. Tregs treated with IL-6 have also been shown to lose their ability to protect mice from a lupus-like disease [43]. RORγT+Foxp3+ and IL-17+Foxp3+ T cells have also been identified in vivo and are unable to control inflammation [44, 45]. These IL-17+Foxp3+ T cells have also been identified in the lamina propia of Crohn’s Disease patients but not in those from healthy controls [45].

4. Differentiation of Th17 Cells

Th17 differentiation, survival, and expansion rely on a variety of cytokines and transcription factors that work in concert to drive the induction of increased Th17 numbers and to also suppress the induction of other lineages of T helper cells (Figure 1). Transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) in synergy with IL-6 have been described as the central factors involved in generating de novo Th17 cells [4649]. TGFβ has also been implicated in the differentiation of Foxp3+ Tregs [50]; however, it seems that TGFβ favors Th17 induction in an inflammatory environment [46, 49, 51]. IL-6 can also act to induce expression of IL-21, which then acts as a positive autocrine feedback loop, inducing more IL-21 production and upregulating IL-23 receptor alpha chain expression (IL23R) [52, 53]. In addition, it has been shown that Th17 cells can be induced by IL-6, IL-1β, and IL-23 independent of TGFβ [54]. Notably, these “alternatively- derived” Th17 cells have been described as being more pathogenic than those derived from IL-6 and TGFβ alone [34].

986789.fig.001
Figure 1: The world according to Th17 cells. Th17 cell induction occurs through combination of IL-6 and TGFβ, or IL-21 and TGFβ—in the absence of IL-6. The Th17 lineage produces cytokines which include IL-17A, IL-17F, IL-22, IL-21, GM-CSF, TNFα, IL-9, IL-10, and IFNγ. This population is enhanced through IL-23, IL-1β, TNFα, and high levels of sodium. Conversely, IL-25, IL-27, IL-2, SOCS3, SOCS1, Vitamin D, and retinoic acid serve to negatively regulate Th17 cells.

Although IL-23 was originally thought to be critical in the de novo generation of the Th17 lineage, it was revealed that IL-23 acts to sustain the phenotype subsequent to the upregulation of IL-23R. IL-23 is necessary for Th17 lineage expansion and survival as p19−/− mice may still be capable of producing Th17 cells, but without IL-23 the population is not able to expand and survive [48]. In more recent studies, it has been shown that IL-23 signaling significantly contributes to the pathogenicity of the Th17 subset [34]. In addition to Th17 lineage amplification, IL-21 has also been shown in an alternative pathway model that, together with TGFβ and in the absence of IL-6, can also induce generation of Th17 cells [55]. The process of Th17 differentiation has been found to be amplified through many different factors including TNFα and IL-1β [48, 56]. Differentiated Th17 cells produce a variety of cytokines including IL-17A, IL-17F, IL-21, IL-22, GM-CSF, IL-9, IL-10, and IFNγ, which vary depending on the cytokine milieu in which the differentiation occurs [57]. IL-17A is considered the primary effector cytokine of the Th17 lineage, but it also shares a 55% identity to IL-17F [58]; both are capable of forming homodimers or combining to form heterodimers [59, 60]. In relation to T1D, one of the more interesting cytokines associated with the Th17 lineage is GM-CSF, as it has been shown that GM-CSF production can mediate the induction of tolerogenic, protective dendritic cells [61, 62]. It would be worth investigating whether differences in GM-CSF production by IL-17-producing T lymphocytes could account for the published discrepancies in Th17-mediated T1D protection or pathogenicity.

CD4+ T lymphocyte lineages are regulated by specific transcription factors. Whereas Th1 and Th2 lineages are modulated by the transcription factors, T-bet, and GATA3, respectively [63]; the central modulator of the Th17 lineage is the orphan nuclear receptor γ (RORγT) [64]. RORγT directs the transcription of genes encoding IL-17A and IL-17F among others; however, RORγT deficiency does not completely abrogate Th17 differentiation. It was found that RORα also contributes a similar role in the differentiation of naïve CD4+ T cells, and both are capable of being induced by TGFβ and IL-6 [65].

Other transcription factors involved in directing naïve CD4+ T cells toward Th17 differentiation include STAT3, interferon regulatory factor 4 (IRF4), the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR), NOTCH, and BATF [6672]. STAT3 can be activated by IL-6 and IL-23, and regulates the expression of RORγT, as STAT3 deficiency impairs RORγT expression and leads to elevated expressions of T-bet and Foxp3 [67]. It has also been suggested that STAT3 is able to bind directly to the IL17 promoter, thereby further enhancing a cell’s commitment to the Th17 lineage [66]. It was shown that IRF4 was significant in Th17 differentiation when IRF4−/− mice were incapable of generating Th17 cells or IL-22 production and were also resistant to developing EAE [68]. IRF4−/− mice had normal STAT3 levels, but RORγT expression was impaired, Foxp3 levels were increased, and the mice had a defective response to IL-6 [68]. In particular, IRF4 has also been shown necessary for IL-21 to promote further production of itself and expression of IL-23R [69], thus propagating the Th17 positive feedback loop. With regard to T1D, it has been shown that a lack of IL-21/IL-21R signaling confers protection against T1D [73]. BATF−/− mice show a normal cell population distribution but have marked decreases in IL-17 and IL-21 production even while under Th17-inducing conditions. BATF−/− mice were also shown to be resistant to EAE, and although these mice exhibited normal IL-6 and TGFβ signaling, RORγT and the IL17 promoter were shown to have BATF dependence [72]. Notably, reduction in NOTCH signaling also reduces EAE severity [71].

AHR, also referred to as the dioxin receptor, is a ligand-dependent transcription factor whose expression is restricted to the Th17 subset of CD4+ T cells and is found in both mice and humans [70]. AHR deficient naïve T cells possess an impaired capability to differentiate into Th17 cells, even under Th17-inducing conditions [74]. AHR ligation and activation result in dramatic increases in the number of Th17 cells and promote the expression of IL-22, IL-17A, and IL-17F [70]. Interestingly it has been shown that 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) and 3-methylcholanthrene (3-MC), two components derived from cigarette smoke and known environmental risk factors for rheumatoid arthritis, act as exogenous ligands for AHR [75]. Thus, AHR may represent an interesting link between environmental factors and autoimmune development in regard to rheumatoid arthritis. Although it is clear that a number of transcription factors contribute to the Th17 phenotype, as the specific effector functions of IL-17-producing cells can vary [76], further research is necessary to determine the specific contribution of each to variations in Th17 effector functions.

Researchers have further explored the link between autoimmunity and environmental factors by looking at the effect of a high salt diet, such as is seen in a typical “Western diet”, in the pathology of autoimmunity, specifically Th17 cells. Kleinewietfeld and colleagues showed that high levels of sodium chloride induce an increase in Th17 cells that were shown to be highly stable and pathogenic [77]. It was determined that increased levels of sodium chloride induce the salt-sensing kinase SGK1, which then upregulates IL-23R expression and Th17 differentiation [78]. Although more research is needed to explore this mechanism, this is an important development as the influence of environmental factors on autoimmune disorder development has become a prominent area of interest.

5. Negative Regulation of the Th17 Subset

As with all immunological responses, there are negative regulators set in place in order to better ensure immune homeostasis and prevent aberrant Th17 responses. For example, both Th1 and Th2 cells act as negative reciprocals of each other, and their effector cytokines IFNγ and IL-4 act to downregulate the expansion of Th17 cells as well [19, 21, 79]. Interleukin-25 (IL-25), also referred to as IL-17E, is another member of the IL-17 family [80]. IL-25 has been shown to skew immune responses to the Th2 phenotype and was seen to be decreased in the sera and inflamed mucus of patients diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) [8183]. It has been shown using IL-25−/− mice that the lack of IL-25 increases IL-23 and IL-17 production, therefore resulting in increased EAE disease severity [84]. IL-25 was also shown to inhibit production of TNFα, IFNγ, and IL-17A but upregulated the production of IL-10 [83].

In T1D studies, mice which received either a neutralizing anti-IL-17 antibody or recombinant IL-25 at 10 weeks of age were able to prevent development of T1D [31]. In the same study, IL-25 was also able to restore normal glucose levels in newly diagnosed NOD mice, delay the return of autoimmunity following syngeneic islet transplant, and reduce autoreactive Th2 and Th17 cell populations to allow for the development of a protective Treg population. IL-25 therefore is a possible target for T1D mediation through regulation of Th17 cells. However, IL-25 is known to bias the immune response towards a Th2 phenotype [80], suggesting that inhibiting Th1 differentiation may play an important role in disease prevention. Moreover, IL-25 is not a Th17-specific cytokine [85] and regardless of the severity of insulitis, the researchers were able to identify only very small numbers of Th17 cells in the pancreas [31]. The upregulation of IL-10 by IL-25 is also likely significant as Th17 cells possess elevated levels of the IL-10 receptor α chain. Moreover, numerous studies have shown an important role of IL-10 in the regulation of T1D [8688]. As Th17 cells are likely involved in the progression of disease severity, but not in the initial onset of T1D, targeting the inflammatory properties of Th17 cells may have efficacy in early onset T1D patients; as this may delay the total ablation of insulin-producing pancreatic β-cells and therefore the dependence on exogenously-derived insulin for survival.

IL-27, composed of the Epstein-Barr virus-induced gene 3 (EBI3) and the subunit p28, has also been shown to regulate IL-17 signaling [89]. IL-27 signals through the common gp130 subunit and the IL-27-specific WSX-1 subunit, which is upregulated upon T cell activation [90, 91]. IL-27 suppresses the development of Th17 cells in a STAT1-dependent manner [92, 93] and suppresses IL-6-mediated T cell proliferation, not surprisingly as IL-6 and IL-27 both signal through the shared receptor component gp130 [89, 92]. IL-27 has been shown capable of suppressing the ability of diseased lymph node and spleen cells to confer EAE on healthy mice and was able to suppress autoreactive Th17 cells in vitro and in vivo [94]. High numbers of Th17 cells and high levels of IL-17 were found in patients with uveitis and scleritis and in murine models of EAU; moreover IL-27 was found to reduce these levels in vitro through upregulation of STAT1 [95]. The immune-regulatory properties of IL-27 are also of interest in T1D as GWAS studies have shown deficiencies in both IL-27 and WSX-1 within T1D patient cohorts [96, 97].

IL-2, a cytokine that has been well established as a necessary growth factor for activated T lymphocytes and Tregs, also acts to inhibit Th17 expansion, as blockage of IL-2 or deletion of STAT5 leads to enhanced production of Th17 cells [98]. As IL-2 is critical for the thymic production and peripheral stability of Tregs [99], it is possible that IL-2 deficiency may be acting directly upon the ability of Tregs to regulate the Th17 population. Alternatively, limited amounts of IL-2 may favor the differentiation of naïve T lymphocytes into the Th17 phenotype as opposed to the iTreg. It has also been reported that SOCS3 and SOCS1, members of the protein family of suppressor of cytokine signaling, regulate Th17 differentiation and expansion possibly through modulating IL-23-mediated STAT3 phosphorylation [100, 101]. Notably as cytokines which oppose Th17 differentiation often oppose each other (e.g., IL-2 inhibition by IL-27 or IFNγ inhibition by IL-4), [102, 103] more in vivo studies must be conducted to further elucidate the mechanisms by which cytokines and the SOCS regulatory pathways moderate IL-17 signaling.

Vitamin D can act as another source of Th17 regulation, as the vitamin D receptor is induced in Th17 cells, and treatment of murine models of EAE with 1,25 Dihydroxyvitamin D3, an active ligand of the vitamin D receptor, ameliorates the disease and reduces the levels of IL-17A and IL-17F [104]. 1,25D3 appears to inhibit Th17 polarization through posttranscriptional regulation, as the suppression of cytokines occurs at the protein level, while mRNA levels remain unchanged [105]. Oral doses of calcitriol, a synthetic vitamin D analog, were also found to prevent and partially reverse uveitis and suppress Th17 induction without affecting transcription factor expression [106].

The importance of vitamin A on immunological and overall health has been long recognized. A metabolite of vitamin A, retinoic acid, has also come into the spotlight as a potent attenuator of immune function and has been shown to have effects on T cell differentiation and function [107]. Early studies indicated that the administration of retinoic acid abrogated EAE development by reducing cellular infiltration and neurological symptoms [108]. Administration of retinoic acid also attenuated an experimental autoimmune model of nephritis, which was associated with decreased antiglomerular basement membrane antibodies, proteinuria, and levels of TNFα and IL-1β [109]. Retinoic acid production by CD103+ dendritic cells (DCs) was shown to reduce the severity of DSS-induced colitis. In the experimental allergic asthma model, retinoic acid was able to mediate airway inflammation by decreasing Th17 differentiation, IL-17A, production, and RORγT transcription factor levels [110, 111]. Retinoic acid regulates the inappropriate immune responses found in autoimmune models by inhibiting the differentiation and expansion of the Th17 cell population and increasing Foxp3+ Tregs [110113]. This effect was seen to be independent of IL-2 or STAT3/STAT5 mechanisms, but it has been suggested that retinoic acid inhibits Th17s and upregulates Tregs by promoting TFGβ-driven SMAD signaling and blocking the expression of IL-6 and IL-23R [112, 113]. Interestingly 1,25D3 and retinoic acid were found to act synergistically in the inhibition of both human and murine Th17 differentiation and development, along with a decrease in Th17-related cytokines and transcription factors [114].

6. Differentiation of Human Th17 Cells

Given the implication of Th17 cells in several murine autoimmune models, it is an important priority to determine whether Th17 cells share a similar pathogenicity in human autoimmune disorders. Although there are distinctions between murine and human Th17 pathways, many similarities still exist. In humans, it has been shown that TGFβ, IL-1β, and IL-6, combined with IL-21 or IL-23 can induce Th17 differentiation [115118]. Although the role of TGFβ was first dismissed as dispensable for human Th17 differentiation [115], it has been confirmed to be required for naïve CD4+ T cell differentiation into Th17 cells [116, 117]. Human Th17 cells have also been reported to be promoted by exogenous nitric oxide (NO) and the induction of NOS2 signaling [119]. The transcription factors involved in human Th17 differentiation include RORc (homolog to RORγT) and STAT3 [116, 120, 121]. Other transcription factors include basic leucine zipper transcription factor, ATF-like (BATF), VDR, NOTCH1, and runt-related transcription factor 1 (RUNX) [71, 122, 123]. NOTCH1 signaling is important in Th17 differentiation, as it regulates RORγT in both mice and humans and directly interacts with the IL17 promoter [71]. Runx1 plays a role in Th17 regulation as well through induction of RORγT expression and suppression of Foxp3 [123].

Similar to mice, human-derived Th17 cells produce a group of cytokines including IL-17A, IL-17F, IL-21, IL-22, TNFα, and IFNγ, in addition to IL-26 and CCL20 (whose ligand is CCR6) [118, 124, 125]. Human Th17 cells are readily identified by surface cell markers including CCR6 and CCR4 [120]. Notably, it has been shown that human Th17 cells originate from CD4+CD161+ T cell precursors and that all IL-17-producing cells were contained in the CD161+CCR6+ T cell subset and are also able to express IL-23R [124].

The IL-17 receptor is found on a wide variety of cells including hematopoietic cells, osteoblasts, fibroblasts, endothelial cells and epithelial cells and when bound to IL-17 can induce the release of inflammatory proteins including IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-23, TNF, ICAM-1, PGE2, and GM-CSF [126130]. GM-CSF governs the growth and differentiation of granulocytes and macrophages, thereby playing a crucial role in the innate inflammatory response [131]. Moreover, the prostaglandins produced serve to perpetuate the Th17 inflammatory cycle. Prostaglandins, which are hormone-like lipid compounds derived from fatty acids, are active in promoting inflammation in the tissues of both humans and mice [132] and have been shown to induce IL-23 production in bone marrow-derived dendritic cells and increase p19 and p40 (but not p35) expression through EP2/EP4 receptors [133, 134]. PGE2 is also capable of inducing IL-1β and IL-6 in an IL-23-dependent manner and also CCL20, MIP-3α, CXCL8/IL-8, and CCR6 [133135].

7. Functions of the Th17 Lineage

Th17 cells have earned a well-deserved reputation as key modulators in autoimmunity; however, the Th17 lineage has pleiotropic effects on a variety of cell types including epithelial, endothelial, and fibroblastic cells [130]. The Th17 lineage provides a unique mechanism for protection against bacterial and fungal pathogens through production and induction of inflammatory cytokines and other proteins. The Th17 lineage is also largely responsible for the induction of granulopoiesis, or the recruitment of neutrophils, a vital and key component of the innate immune response [136]. For example, mice deficient in IL-17R, therefore lacking the ability to recruit the necessary numbers of neutrophils, experience 100% mortality when challenged with Klebsiella pneumoniae [137]. Neutrophil recruitment induced by Th17 cells is also necessary for pathogen protection and clearance in several other models including Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Bordetella pertussis, Candida albicans, Pneumocystis carinii, Francisella tularensis, Staphylococcus aureus, and Citrobacter rodentium [138146]. However clearance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and intracellular bacteria such as Salmonella enterica are more reliant on a Th1 response, as Th17 immune responses are only slightly effective in the absence of the Th1 pathway [147149]. Th17 cells have also been found necessary for complete vaccination protection against the 3 systemic mycoses that are endemic to North America which include Coccidioides posadasii, Histoplasma capsulatum, and Blastomyces dermatitidis [150, 151].

8. A Proinflammatory Role for Th17 Cells in Autoimmune Disorders

Since the identification of the Th17 lineage, researchers have continued to garner information on the role of Th17 cells in not only murine models of disease, but also from human samples as well. In the following section we will discuss the role that Th17 cells play in the mentioned murine models and the human disease counterparts.

As mentioned previously, Th17 cells were found to be the central effector lineage involved in the pathogenicity of murine EAE, an important model of multiple sclerosis (MS) [11]. MS is a neurodegenerative autoimmune disorder in which axon demyelination lesions develop in the central nervous system (CNS) [90]. Prior to the discovery of Th17 cells, researchers had already begun to publish on the positive correlations found between levels of IL-17, IL-6, and G-CSF and the progression of active multiple sclerosis [152]. With the relatively recent discovery of T helper 17 cells, research disseminating its newly described role in EAE and MS progressed quickly. Human blood-brain barrier endothelial cells were found to express receptors for IL-17 and IL-22, thus making it possible for IL-17 and IL-22 to disrupt blood-brain barrier junctions [153]. It was also found that human Th17 lymphocytes were able to migrate past blood-brain barrier-associated cells, where they continued to promote inflammation through CD4+ T cell recruitment and inflammatory cytokine production [153]. Further studies continued to correlate the number of Th17 cells and amount of IL-17 expression found in MS lesions with active disease [154, 155]. Researchers observed that IFN-β and IL-27 were able to suppress active disease in MS patient-derived cells and in murine EAE, which is consistent with previous knowledge of their Th17-suppressive capabilities [156].

With regard to the role of microbiota in the prevention or progression of EAE and MS, reports have thus far been varied. Researchers have shown that the use of specific probiotic mixtures is able to suppress EAE development though Th1/Th17 polarization inhibition, and increases Foxp3+ Treg numbers and IL10 production [157]. Still, others have also described a pathogenic role for gut microbiota including several studies which showed that germ-free mice or antibiotic-treated mice had reduced disease severity, reduced proinflammatory cytokine productions, and an increase in Treg accumulations [158]. Yokote and colleagues also demonstrated that the administration of antibiotics altered gut flora composition and ameliorated EAE development through a possible invariant natural killer cell-Th17 interaction-dependent mechanism [159].

The etiology of psoriasis, a skin-associated inflammatory disease, has also shifted from a Th1 to a Th17 focus [160]. The idea that psoriasis was a Th1-regulated autoimmune disorder was supported by studies such as the one done by Kauffman et al. in 2004, which found success during a phase 1 clinical trial using a humanized monoclonal antibody to IL-12p40. Patients improved significantly; however, without knowing that IL-23 and IL-12 share the p40 subunit, researchers attributed its success to Th1 inhibition [161]. Data began to show, however, that, while infiltrative and activated T cells are the primary modulators of disease progression, Th1 cells may not be as centrally involved as originally thought [162]. When dendritic cells are activated by inflammatory stress signals from keratinocytes (the predominant cell type in the epidermis), DCs can actively skew naïve CD4+ T cells into subsets of specific T helper cells, especially Th17 cells [163]. Once Th17 cells have differentiated and localized to the tissue site of inflammation, their CCR6 ligand is able to bind to CCL20 found on local keratinocytes [164]. The production of inflammatory cytokines from these localized Th17 cells can upregulate CCL20 expression from antigen presenting cells and CCR6 expression on the Th17 cells, thus creating a system which propagates the Th17 population [164]. To further confirm the vital role of the Th17 subset in psoriasis, patients have been shown to have increased levels of CCL20, CCR6, and Th17 cells in the psoriatic lesions compared to healthy controls [165].

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disorder whose symptoms include synovial inflammation, autoantibody production, and cartilage and bone destruction among a list of others [166]. A common mouse model for RA is the collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) model, whose pathogenicity was originally attributed to a deregulated T helper 1 inflammatory process [76]. In 2003 Murphy et al. saw that IL-23p19−/− mice were protected from CIA, whereas IL-12p35−/− mice exhibited an exacerbated disease [18]. Blockage of IL-23 expression protected mice from joint and bone destruction, and an anti-IL-17 antibody has been shown to inhibit osteoclast formation in human rheumatoid arthritis samples [18, 167]. IFNγ was in actuality shown to be capable of negatively regulating Th17 differentiation and suppressing CIA through the induction of indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase, a compound which has previously been shown capable of regulating autoreactive Th17 cells [168]. PGE2, a known positive regulator of Th17 differentiation, was shown capable of enhancing CIA severity through enhanced DC-derived IL-6 production, thereby shifting the IL-23/IL-12 more towards IL23 and IL17 [169]. Patients with RA exhibit high levels of IL-17, IL-17R, IL-1β, and IL-6 among others in synovial fluid samples [167, 170, 171]. IL-17 has also been found in large quantities in the synovial biopsies of RA patients [171]. IL-17 was shown to augment production of nitrous oxide, which has previously been described to promote RA-associated autoinflammation [172].

Much like in MS, the potential role that an individual’s microbiota might have in RA disease development or prevention is of high interest. In a study of streptococcal cell wall-induced arthritis in F344 rats (which are resistant to chronic joint inflammation), germ-free F344 rats developed SCW-induced arthritis, while conventionalization dramatically moderated the arthritic phenotype [173]. However in another study using HLA-B27 transgenic rats, it was shown that rats in the germ-free state were protected against chronic inflammation including colitis and arthritis, while transgenic conventionalized rats developed high levels of proinflammatory cytokine production. Thus the normal luminal bacteria induced systemic inflammation [174, 175]. Notably, a study by Wu and colleagues revealed that germ-free conditions protected mice from arthritis development as seen with reductions in Th17 populations, while neutralization of IL-17 in SPF mice also had similar effects. It was also shown in the same study that a single, gut-residing species segmented filamentous bacteria restored Th17 induction and subsequent arthritis development [176].

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is comprised of Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), and results when the mucosal immune system mounts an inappropriate and sustained inflammatory response against normal, resident gut flora [177]. The relative success of an anti-IL-12 antibody in ameliorating CD again encouraged researchers to classify colitis as a product of a Th1 immune response [178]. While there have been conflicting results published as to whether Th17 cells play a pathogenic or protective role in IBD, there is very strong evidence to support the former. IL-23p19, IL-17, and IRF4 deficient mice were both protected from colitis-related symptoms, including weight loss and production of high levels of proinflammatory cytokines including IL-6, IL-17, and IL-22 [179181]. The role of Th17 cells in colitis is also supported in reports which indicate that PGE2 augments expansion of the Th17 population by skewing DC production of IL-12 to IL-23 [182]. Development of colitis has been shown to be inhibited by blocking production of IL-6, which encourages apoptosis of lamina propia autoreactive Th17 cells [183]. A humanized anti-IL-6 monoclonal antibody has also showed promising results in a pilot trial involving patients with active disease [184]. A genome-wide association study with CD patients showed a high association of IL-23R and CCR6 to states of active disease, while another study indicated that patients with active disease had higher numbers of IL-17 and IL-23p19+ cells in the lamina propria and had increased mRNA expression of IL-17, IL-6, IL-23, IL-1β, and CCR6 [185188]. In addition, patients have also been found to have higher levels of IL-17 in sera and inflamed mucosa samples, as well as increases in pSTAT3 and NOS signaling [189].

With regard to IBD, a molecular-based analysis of microbiome populations in the small intestines of CD and UC patients revealed significant differences in the makeup of sick patients compared to those of healthy controls [190]. Decreases in members of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes represented significant abnormalities in patients with IBD [190]. Studies involving monozygotic twins revealed that healthy individuals had a higher bacterial diversity than twins with CD and that the intestinal microbial compositions differed between healthy and sick individuals [191, 192]. A study done by Frank et al. in 2011 showed that markers of IBD phenotype and genotype correlated with shifts in intestinal-dwelling microbiota [193].

Another disease exhibiting strong links to the Th17 lineage is systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). SLE is a complex autoimmune disorder characterized by autoantibody and immune complex formation and has has been strongly correlated to a dysregulated Th17/regulatory T cell balance [194, 195]. IL-17 and Th17 cells have been detected at higher levels in several murine models of lupus compared to those found in healthy, wild type mice [196]. A role for Th17 cells in murine lupus was demonstrated with the success of an anti-CD3 antibody in symptom improvement whose effects were dependent on decreased IL-17 production and a decrease in Th17 kidney-infiltrating cells; tolerance was correlated with decreased levels of IL-6 production but an increase in TGFβ and regulatory T cells [197]. Overexpression of the Epstein-Barr virus-induced gene 3 (EBI3) in an MRL/lpr murine lupus model resulted in relatively normal renal function, decreases in anti-dsDNA, and an increase in Foxp3+ Tregs, supporting the need for a correct regulatory T cell/Th17 ratio [198].

It has been proposed in SLE that DCs commonly come into contact with apoptotic debris and therefore develop into a mature phenotype and produce higher amounts of IL-6; in turn the higher level of IL-6 production results in the differentiation of naïve CD4+ T cells into Th17 cells, when in fact they may have been converted into regulatory T cells under normal conditions [199]. SLE patients have elevated levels of inflammatory cytokines including IL-23, IL-17, and IL-6 and higher frequencies of lymph nodal Th17 cells [200, 201]. SLE patients have also been found to have decreased absolute numbers of regulatory T cells, and it has been shown that higher numbers of regulatory T cells correlate to decreased disease severity [202].

Another piece of evidence that supports the role of Th17 cells in lupus pathology is the use of hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of SLE patients [203]. Hydroxychloroquine in an antimalarial agent, which has recently been shown to ameliorate SLE symptoms by inhibiting the production of IL-6, IL-17, and IL-22 possibly through reduction of the Th17 population [203].

Asthma is a chronic lung disease associated with airway inflammation, airway hyperresponsiveness, increased mucus production, and infiltration by eosinophils and T lymphocytes [204]. It has generally been accepted that Th2 cells as well as the Th2-related cytokines IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 play a central role in eosinophil infiltration into the airways and the resulting pathogenicity of the disease [205]. Recent research indicates that in addition to Th2 cells, Th17 cells and IL-17 may also be playing a critical role in asthma development and progression [204]. In mice sensitized with ovalbumin (a classical method by which to study asthma pathology), IL-17 mRNA expression was elevated in inflamed lung tissue and was correlated to enhanced neutrophil recruitment to the airways. In this same study, an anti-IL-17 monoclonal antibody significantly reduced the level of neutrophil influx into these tissues [206]. Similar to IL-17A, IL-17F has also been shown to increase neutrophil recruitment and levels of CXC chemokine and inflammatory cytokine gene expression [207]. A common treatment for asthmatic symptoms is the administration of corticosteroids to reduce the airway inflammation. Th17 cells however are involved in mediating what has been termed “steroid-resistant” airway inflammation [205, 208]. Several studies have shown that, while Th2-mediated inflammation and eosinophil infiltration respond to the administration of steroids, neutrophil influx and inflammatory Th17 cytokines are nonresponsive [208]. Kobayashi et al. have also recently reported that IL-1 family member, IL-1β, may potently induce Th17 differentiation in response to airborne antigens [209].

The number and percentages of Th17 cells in the sputum, lung tissue sections, and submucosa of asthma patients are also elevated compared to those of healthy controls [210, 211]. Fibroblasts and macrophages from asthmatic patients generated more GM-CSF, TNFα, IL-1β, IL-8, and IL-6 in vitro when stimulated with IL-17 [212]. Interestingly exposure to diesel exhaust particles (which are a major component of air pollution caused by traffic) not only led to Th17 cell accumulation in the lungs of mice, but also increased asthmatic symptoms and IL-17A serum levels in children [213].

The role of microbiota in asthma has also been explored, and Russell et al. have reported that treatment of neonatal mice with antibiotics results in susceptibility to allergic asthma following a shift in the resident gut flora [214]. In a following study by Russell et al. it was shown that this antibiotic driven shift in microbiota resulted in increased IgE production and decreased Tregs. The role of Th17 cells in the development of asthma has only recently been described, and requires more in-depth analysis.

9. A Protective Role for Th17 and Gut Flora in T1D

Type 1 diabetes is one of the most prevalent autoimmune diseases in modern day society, with over 1 million Americans having been diagnosed and 15,000 more children being diagnosed each year [215]. T1D is a CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell-mediated autoimmune disorder which targets and destroys insulin producing β-cells in the pancreas. The absence of insulin results in uncontrolled blood glucose levels, leading to clinical symptoms which can include excessive thirst, frequent urination, tissue dehydration, and weight loss [216, 217]. As pancreatic β-cells do not normally possess surface molecules sufficient to activate naïve T lymphocytes [218], it has been postulated that conventional T cell receptor (TCR)/MHC/antigen-mediated activation is occurring through interactions with APCs sampling antigens from the pancreas. The APCs, such as dendritic cells, present pancreatic antigens to T cells in the pancreatic lymph node (PLN), which leads to increased development of autoreactive T cells [219221]. This is supported by the fact that removal of PLN from young nonobese diabetic (NOD) mice, a classical model of T1D, prevents onset of T1D [222].

Although genetic predisposition is critical in T1D onset [223], a concordance rate between monozygotic twins of 30–50% [224226] implies that environmental factors also play a significant role. When discussing the effect of environmental cues on health and disease, the gut microflora of each individual, in addition to diet and chemical exposure, is undoubtedly an important factor to be considered. The human body plays host to as many as 100 trillion bacteria in the digestive tract alone, thus ensuring a continued interaction between these resident microbes and the mucosal immune system [227]. Gut microbiota provide several important functions including the absorption of nutrients and protection against pathogenic bacterial species [228]. Studies have shown that alterations of the gut composition through Caesarian methods, germ-free environments, or antibiotic usage resulted in changes in T1D onset and progression, clearly indicating the important effect gut composition has on disease modulation and health [229231]. A gut microbiome metagenomics analysis indicated that autoimmune subjects have a functioning aberrant microbiome [232], and children with β-cell autoimmunity, indicative of T1D, have a markedly different composition of gut flora species than do healthy controls [233]. The capability of lamina propia DCs to differentiate CD4+ T cells into Tregs in T1D patients is impaired, which suggests a possible lack of intestinal immunoregulation by gut flora [234]. Moreover, the association of Th17 lymphocytes with T1D progression has been heightened by the importance of Th17 cells in the regulation of commensal bacteria and extracellular bacterial pathogens [137, 139, 235].

Several studies, including our own, have highlighted the importance of how changes in gut flora modulate the mucosal immune response, specifically in T1D onset and progression [31]. In a recent study it was shown that the transfer of gut microbiota from healthy adult male NOD mice to immature NOD females altered the females’ gut microbiome resulting in reduced islet inflammation, reduced autoantibody production, and vigorous protection against T1D [236]. Biobreeding diabetes prone (BB-DP) and biobreeding diabetes resistant (BB-DR) rats are models that can provide insight into gut microflora in the context of T1D [237]. When BB-DP rats were fed Lactobacillus johnsonii N6.2 (LjN6.2) and Lactobacillus reuteri isolated from BB-DR rats, diabetes onset was inhibited with LjN6.2, while the addition of L. reuteri increased incidence of disease [238]. Interestingly, it was shown that BB-DP rats exhibiting T1D resistance possessed a larger population of Th17 cells in the mesenteric lymph nodes and spleen compared to their sick counterparts [239]. LjN6.2 was further shown to be capable of upregulating Th17 populations in vitro as well [239]. Moreover, we showed that dendritic cells, incubated with LjN6.2, were sufficient to mediate a Th17 bias both in vitro and in vivo. Although NOD mice are genetically prone to develop T1D, it was shown that NOD mice that were resistant to T1D had a natural segregation of segmented filamentous bacteria that also mediated a Th17 bias [240]. The studies outlined in this review present a model whereby gut flora-mediated Th17 differentiation rescues T lymphocytes from a diabetogenic phenotype. Moreover IL-17 production could potentially serve as a biomarker indicating T lymphocytes that were inhibited from acquiring diabetogenic properties. This finding is potentially significant as comparing gut flora-modulated Th17 cells to “diabetogenic” T lymphocytes could assist in identifying true effector functions leading to T1D onset (Figure 2).

fig2
Figure 2: A Proposed model of bacterial regulation of T1D. Type 1 diabetes is due to the acquisition of diabetogenic effector functions by prediabetogenic T lymphocytes (T lymphocytes which bear TCR specific for pancreas related antigens have not yet been activated). Gut flora has been shown to play a critical role in immune homeostasis (see text). In this model we propose that specific microbial strains such as L. johnsonii and SFB, which naturally reside within the mucosa, can inhibit the onset of T1D by inhibiting the development of diabetogenic effector functions by T lymphocytes. While IFNγ has been associated with effector functions which lead to T1D, the work by us and others has implicated that IL17 production by T lymphocytes is associated with effector functions that are protective in T1D.

10. Discussion

Considerable progress has been made in our understanding of IL-17-producing, CD4+ T lymphocytes since their initial discovery. Scientists have progressed rapidly in our knowledge of Th17 differentiation, regulation, and its role in autoimmunity. It has become increasingly clear that the interface between Th17 cells and the native gut flora play a crucial role in the immune response [228, 241]. With that in mind, there is ample data to suggest the involvement of gut flora composition in modulation of EAE [157, 159, 242], IBD [190193], arthritis [173176], and asthma [214, 242]. This would suggest that a dysbiosis of the microflora may drive aberrant Th17 activity and thereby play an important role in the progression of autoimmune disorders.

References

  1. R. M. Steinman, D. Hawiger, K. Liu et al., “Dendritic cell function in vivo during the steady state: a role in peripheral tolerance,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 987, pp. 15–25, 2003. View at Scopus
  2. B. Stockinger, C. Bourgeois, and G. Kassiotis, “CD4+ memory T cells: functional differentiation and homeostasis,” Immunological Reviews, vol. 211, pp. 39–48, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. T. R. Mosmann, H. Cherwinski, and M. W. Bond, “Two types of murine helper T cell clone. I: definition according to profiles of lymphokine activities and secreted proteins,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 136, no. 7, pp. 2348–2357, 1986. View at Scopus
  4. J. Zhu, H. Yamane, and W. E. Paul, “Differentiation of effector CD4+ T cell populations,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 28, pp. 445–489, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. C.-Q. Chu, S. Wittmer, and D. K. Dalton, “Failure to suppress the expansion of the activated CD4 T cell population in interferon γ-deficient mice leads to exacerbation of experimental autoimnaune encephalomyelitis,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 192, no. 1, pp. 123–128, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. I. A. Ferber, S. Brocke, C. Taylor-Edwards et al., “Mice with a disrupted IFN-γ gene are susceptible to the induction of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE),” Journal of Immunology, vol. 156, no. 1, pp. 5–7, 1996. View at Scopus
  7. D. O. Willenborg, S. Fordham, C. C. A. Bernard, W. B. Cowden, and I. A. Ramshaw, “IFN-γ plays a critical down-regulatory role in the induction and effector phase of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-induced autoimmune encephalomyelitis,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 157, no. 8, pp. 3223–3227, 1996. View at Scopus
  8. G.-X. Zhang, B. Gran, S. Yu et al., “Induction of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in IL-12 receptor-β2-deficient mice: IL-12 responsiveness is not required in the pathogenesis of inflammatory demyelination in the central nervous system,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 170, no. 4, pp. 2153–2160, 2003. View at Scopus
  9. B. Becher, B. G. Durell, and R. J. Noelle, “Experimental autoimmune encephalitis and inflammation in the absence of interleukin-12,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 110, no. 4, pp. 493–497, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. B. Gran, G.-X. Zhang, S. Yu et al., “IL-12p35-deficient mice are susceptible to experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis: evidence for redundancy in the IL-12 system in the induction of central nervous system autoimmune demyelination,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 169, no. 12, pp. 7104–7110, 2002. View at Scopus
  11. D. J. Cua, J. Sherlock, Y. Chen et al., “Interleukin-23 rather than interleukin-12 is the critical cytokine for autoimmune inflammation of the brain,” Nature, vol. 421, no. 6924, pp. 744–748, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. B. Oppmann, R. Lesley, B. Blom et al., “Novel p19 protein engages IL-12p40 to form a cytokine, IL-23, with biological activities similar as well as distinct from IL-12,” Immunity, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 715–725, 2000. View at Scopus
  13. J. P. Leonard, K. E. Waldburger, S. J. Goldman, and H. W. Murray, “Prevention of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by antibodies against interleukin 12,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 181, no. 1, pp. 381–386, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. P. Leonard, K. E. Waldburger, and S. J. Goldman, “Regulation of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by interleukin-12,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 795, pp. 216–226, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. C. S. Constantinescu, M. Wysocka, B. Hilliard et al., “Antibodies against IL-12 prevent superantigen-induced and spontaneous relapses of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 161, no. 9, pp. 5097–5104, 1998. View at Scopus
  16. B. M. Segal, B. K. Dwyer, and E. M. Shevach, “An interleukin (IL)-10/IL-12 immunoregulatory circuit controls susceptibility to autoimmune disease,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 187, no. 4, pp. 537–546, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. H. P. M. Brok, M. Van Meurs, E. Blezer et al., “Prevention of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in common marmosets using an anti-IL-12p40 monoclonal antibody,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 169, no. 11, pp. 6554–6563, 2002. View at Scopus
  18. C. A. Murphy, C. L. Langrish, Y. Chen et al., “Divergent pro- and antiinflammatory roles for IL-23 and IL-12 in joint autoimmune inflammation,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 198, no. 12, pp. 1951–1957, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. L. E. Harrington, R. D. Hatton, P. R. Mangan et al., “Interleukin 17-producing CD4+ effector T cells develop via a lineage distinct from the T helper type 1 and 2 lineages,” Nature Immunology, vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 1123–1132, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. C. L. Langrish, Y. Chen, W. M. Blumenschein et al., “IL-23 drives a pathogenic T cell population that induces autoimmune inflammation,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 201, no. 2, pp. 233–240, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. H. Park, Z. Li, X. O. Yang et al., “A distinct lineage of CD4 T cells regulates tissue inflammation by producing interleukin 17,” Nature Immunology, vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 1133–1141, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. O. Kanagawa, G. Xu, A. Tevaarwerk, and B. A. Vaupel, “Protection of nonobese diabetic mice from diabetes by gene(s) closely linked to IFN-γ receptor loci,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 164, no. 7, pp. 3919–3923, 2000. View at Scopus
  23. B. Wang, I. André, A. Gonzalez et al., “Interferon-γ impacts at multiple points during the progression of autoimmune diabetes,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 94, no. 25, pp. 13844–13849, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. M. Debray-Sachs, C. Carnaud, C. Boitard et al., “Prevention of diabetes in NOD mice treated with antibody to murine IFNγ,” Journal of Autoimmunity, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 237–248, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. M. J. Rapoport, A. Jaramillo, D. Zipris et al., “Interleukin 4 reverses T cell proliferative unresponsiveness and prevents the onset of diabetes in nonobese diabetic mice,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 178, no. 1, pp. 87–99, 1993. View at Scopus
  26. B. Hultgren, X. Huang, N. Dybdal, and T. A. Stewart, “Genetic absence of γ-interferon delays but does not prevent diabetes in NOD mice,” Diabetes, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 812–817, 1996. View at Scopus
  27. D. V. Serreze, C. M. Post, H. D. Chapman, E. A. Johnson, B. Lu, and P. B. Rothman, “Interferon-γ receptor signaling is dispensable in the development of autoimmune type 1 diabetes in NOD mice,” Diabetes, vol. 49, no. 12, pp. 2007–2011, 2000. View at Scopus
  28. R. Jain, D. M. Tartar, R. K. Gregg et al., “Innocuous IFNγ induced by adjuvant-free antigen restores normoglycemia in NOD mice through inhibition of IL-17 production,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 205, no. 1, pp. 207–218, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. B. Wang, A. Gonzalez, P. Höglund, J. D. Katz, C. Benoist, and D. Mathis, “Interleukin-4 deficiency does not exacerbate disease in NOD mice,” Diabetes, vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 1207–1211, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. E. M. Bradshaw, K. Raddassi, W. Elyaman et al., “Monocytes from patients with type 1 diabetes spontaneously secrete proinflammatory cytokines inducing Th17 cells,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 183, no. 7, pp. 4432–4439, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. J. A. Emamaullee, J. Davis, S. Merani et al., “Inhibition of Th17 cells regulates autoimmune diabetes in NOD mice,” Diabetes, vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 1302–1311, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. E. Nikoopour, J. A. Schwartz, K. Huszarik et al., “Th17 polarized cells from nonobese diabetic mice following mycobacterial adjuvant immunotherapy delay type 1 diabetes,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 184, no. 9, pp. 4779–4788, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. G. Han, R. Wang, G. Chen et al., “Interleukin-17-producing γδ+ T cells protect NOD mice from type 1 diabetes through a mechanism involving transforming growth factor-β,” Immunology, vol. 129, no. 2, pp. 197–206, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. A. Peters, Y. Lee, and V. K. Kuchroo, “The many faces of Th17 cells,” Current Opinion in Immunology, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 702–706, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. K. Hirota, J. H. Duarte, M. Veldhoen et al., “Fate mapping of IL-17-producing T cells in inflammatory responses,” Nature Immunology, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 255–263, 2011.
  36. D. Bending, H. de la Peña, M. Veldhoen et al., “Highly purified Th17 cells from BDC2.5NOD mice convert into Th1-like cells in NOD/SCID recipient mice,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 119, no. 3, pp. 565–572, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. N. Martin-Orozco, Y. Chung, S. H. Chang, Y.-H. Wang, and C. Dong, “Th17 cells promote pancreatic inflammation but only induce diabetes efficiently in lymphopenic hosts after conversion into Th1 cells,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 216–224, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. C. C. Picca, J. Larkin III, A. Boesteanu, M. A. Lerman, A. L. Rankin, and A. J. Caton, “Role of TCR specificity in CD4+CD25+ regulatory T-cell selection,” Immunological Reviews, vol. 212, pp. 74–85, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. S. Sakaguchi, T. Yamaguchi, T. Nomura, and M. Ono, “Regulatory T cells and immune tolerance,” Cell, vol. 133, no. 5, pp. 775–787, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. G. L. Cvetanovich and D. A. Hafler, “Human regulatory T cells in autoimmune diseases,” Current Opinion in Immunology, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 753–760, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. Y. K. Lee, R. Mukasa, R. D. Hatton, and C. T. Weaver, “Developmental plasticity of Th17 and Treg cells,” Current Opinion in Immunology, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 274–280, 2009.
  42. X. Zhou, S. L. Bailey-Bucktrout, L. T. Jeker et al., “Instability of the transcription factor Foxp3 leads to the generation of pathogenic memory T cells in vivo,” Nature Immunology, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 1000–1007, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. S. G. Zheng, “Regulatory T cells versus Th17: differentiation of Th17 versus Treg, are the mutually exclusive?” The American Journal of Clinical and Experimental Immunology, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 94–106, 2013.
  44. L. Li and V. A. Boussiotis, “The role of IL-17-producing Foxp3+ CD4+ T cells in inflammatory bowel disease and colon cancer,” Clinical Immunology, vol. 148, no. 2, pp. 246–253, 2013.
  45. Z. Hovhannisyan, J. Treatman, D. R. Littman, and L. Mayer, “Characterization of interleukin-17-producing regulatory T cells in inflamed intestinal mucosa from patients with inflammatory bowel diseases,” Gastroenterology, vol. 140, no. 3, pp. 957–965, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. E. Bettelli, Y. Carrier, W. Gao et al., “Reciprocal developmental pathways for the generation of pathogenic effector TH17 and regulatory T cells,” Nature, vol. 441, no. 7090, pp. 235–238, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. P. R. Mangan, L. E. Harrington, D. B. O'Quinn et al., “Transforming growth factor-β induces development of the T H17 lineage,” Nature, vol. 441, no. 7090, pp. 231–234, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. M. Veldhoen, R. J. Hocking, C. J. Atkins, R. M. Locksley, and B. Stockinger, “TGFβ in the context of an inflammatory cytokine milieu supports de novo differentiation of IL-17-producing T cells,” Immunity, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 179–189, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. M. Veldhoen, R. J. Hocking, R. A. Flavell, and B. Stockinger, “Signals mediated by transforming growth factor-β initiate autoimmune encephalomyelitis, but chronic inflammation is needed to sustain disease,” Nature Immunology, vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 1151–1156, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. M. O. Li, S. Sanjabi, and R. Flavell, “Transforming growth factor-β controls development, homeostasis, and tolerance of T cells by regulatory T cell-dependent and -independent mechanisms,” Immunity, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 455–471, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. S. K. Bedoya, T. D. Wilson, E. L. Collins, K. Lau, and J. Larkin III, “Isolation and Differentiation of Th17 Naive CD4 T Lymphocytes,” Journal of Visualized Experiments, no. 79, Article ID e50765, 2013.
  52. R. Nurieva, X. O. Yang, G. Martinez et al., “Essential autocrine regulation by IL-21 in the generation of inflammatory T cells,” Nature, vol. 448, no. 7152, pp. 480–483, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. L. Zhou, I. I. Ivanov, R. Spolski et al., “IL-6 programs T(H)-17 cell differentiation by promoting sequential engagement of the IL-21 and IL-23 pathways,” Nature Immunology, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 967–974, 2007.
  54. K. Ghoreschi, A. Laurence, X.-P. Yang et al., “Generation of pathogenic TH 17 cells in the absence of TGF-β 2 signalling,” Nature, vol. 467, no. 7318, pp. 967–971, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. T. Korn, E. Bettelli, W. Gao et al., “IL-21 initiates an alternative pathway to induce proinflammatory T H17 cells,” Nature, vol. 448, no. 7152, pp. 484–487, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. L. Guo, G. Wei, J. Zhu et al., “IL-1 family members and STAT activators induce cytokine production by Th2, Th17, and Th1 cells,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 32, pp. 13463–13468, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. A. K. Marwaha, N. J. Leung, A. N. McMurchy, and M. K. Levings, “TH17 cells in autoimmunity and immunodeficiency: protective or pathogenic?” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 3, article 129, 2012.
  58. J. K. Kolls and A. Lindén, “Interleukin-17 family members and inflammation,” Immunity, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 467–476, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. S. C. Liang, A. J. Long, F. Bennett et al., “An IL-17F/A heterodimer protein is produced by mouse Th17 cells and induces airway neutrophil recruitment,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 179, no. 11, pp. 7791–7799, 2007. View at Scopus
  60. J. F. Wright, Y. Guo, A. Quazi et al., “Identification of an interleukin 17F/17A heterodimer in activated human CD4+ T cells,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 282, no. 18, pp. 13447–13455, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. G. Besin, S. Gaudreau, M. Menard, C. Guindi, G. Dupuis, and A. Amrani, “Thymic stromal lymphopoietin and thymic stromal lymphopoietin-conditioned dendritic cells induce regulatory T-cell differentiation and protection of NOD mice against diabetes,” Diabetes, vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 2107–2117, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. S. Gaudreau, C. Guindi, M. Ménard, G. Besin, G. Dupuis, and A. Amrani, “Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor prevents diabetes development in NOD mice by inducing tolerogenic dendritic cells that sustain the suppressive function of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 179, no. 6, pp. 3638–3647, 2007. View at Scopus
  63. K. M. Murphy and S. L. Reiner, “The lineage decisions of helper T cells,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 933–944, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. I. I. Ivanov, B. S. McKenzie, L. Zhou et al., “The orphan nuclear receptor RORγt directs the differentiation program of proinflammatory IL-17+ T helper cells,” Cell, vol. 126, no. 6, pp. 1121–1133, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. X. O. Yang, B. P. Pappu, R. Nurieva et al., “T helper 17 lineage differentiation is programmed by orphan nuclear receptors ROR alpha and ROR gamma,” Immunity, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 29–39, 2008.
  66. A. N. Mathur, H.-C. Chang, D. G. Zisoulis et al., “Stat3 and Stat4 direct development of IL-17-secreting Th cells,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 178, no. 8, pp. 4901–4907, 2007. View at Scopus
  67. X. O. Yang, A. D. Panopoulos, R. Nurieva et al., “STAT3 regulates cytokine-mediated generation of inflammatory helper T cells,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 282, no. 13, pp. 9358–9363, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. A. Brustle, S. Heink, M. Huber et al., “The development of inflammatory T(H)-17 cells requires interferon-regulatory factor 4,” Nature Immunology, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 958–966, 2007.
  69. M. Huber, A. Brüstle, K. Reinhard et al., “IRF4 is essential for IL-21-mediated induction, amplification, and stabilization of the Th17 phenotype,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 105, no. 52, pp. 20846–20851, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. M. Veldhoen, K. Hirota, A. M. Westendorf et al., “The aryl hydrocarbon receptor links TH17-cell-mediated autoimmunity to environmental toxins,” Nature, vol. 453, no. 7191, pp. 106–109, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. S. Keerthivasan, R. Suleiman, R. Lawlor et al., “Notch signaling regulates mouse and human Th17 differentiation,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 187, no. 2, pp. 692–701, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. B. U. Schraml, K. Hildner, W. Ise et al., “The AP-1 transcription factor Batf controls T H 17 differentiation,” Nature, vol. 460, no. 7253, pp. 405–409, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. R. Spolski, M. Kashyap, C. Robinson, Z. Yu, and W. J. Leonard, “IL-21 signaling is critical for the development of type I diabetes in the NOD mouse,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 105, no. 37, pp. 14028–14033, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. A. Kimura, T. Naka, K. Nohara, Y. Fujii-Kuriyama, and T. Kishimoto, “Aryl hydrocarbon receptor regulates Stat1 activation and participates in the development of Th17 cells,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 105, no. 28, pp. 9721–9726, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. N. T. Nguyen, T. Nakahama, and T. Kishimoto, “Aryl hydrocarbon receptor and experimental autoimmune arthritis,” Seminars in Immunopathology, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 637–644, 2013.
  76. T. Korn, E. Bettelli, M. Oukka, and V. K. Kuchroo, “IL-17 and Th17 cells,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 27, pp. 485–517, 2009.
  77. M. Kleinewietfeld, A. Manzel, J. Titze et al., “Sodium chloride drives autoimmune disease by the induction of pathogenic TH17 cells,” Nature, no. 7446, pp. 518–522, 2013.
  78. C. Wu, N. Yosef, T. Thalhamer et al., “Induction of pathogenic TH17 cells by inducible salt-sensing kinase SGK1,” Nature, vol. 496, no. 7446, pp. 513–517, 2013.
  79. A. N. Mathur, H.-C. Chang, D. G. Zisoulis et al., “T-bet is a critical determinant in the instability of the IL-17-secreting T-helper phenotype,” Blood, vol. 108, no. 5, pp. 1595–1601, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. M. M. Fort, J. Cheung, D. Yen et al., “IL-25 Induces IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 and Th2-associated pathologies in vivo,” Immunity, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 985–995, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. A. M. Owyang, C. Zaph, E. H. Wilson et al., “Interleukin 25 regulates type 2 cytokine-dependent immunity and limits chronic inflammation in the gastrointestinal tract,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 203, no. 4, pp. 843–849, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. S. A. Saenz, M. C. Siracusa, J. G. Perrigoue et al., “IL25 elicits a multipotent progenitor cell population that promotes T H 2 cytokine responses,” Nature, vol. 464, no. 7293, pp. 1362–1366, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. J. Su, T. Chen, X. Y. Ji et al., “IL-25 downregulates Th1/Th17 immune response in an IL-10-dependent manner in inflammatory bowel disease,” Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 720–728, 2013.
  84. M. A. Kleinschek, A. M. Owyang, B. Joyce-Shaikh et al., “IL-25 regulates Th17 function in autoimmune inflammation,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 204, no. 1, pp. 161–170, 2007.
  85. R. Caruso, C. Stolfi, M. Sarra et al., “Inhibition of monocyte-derived inflammatory cytokines by IL-25 occurs via p38 Map kinase-dependent induction of Socs-3,” Blood, vol. 113, no. 15, pp. 3512–3519, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. K. S. Goudy, B. R. Burkhardt, C. Wasserfall et al., “Systemic overexpression of IL-10 induces CD4+CD25+ cell populations in vivo and ameliorates type 1 diabetes in nonobese diabetic mice in a dose-dependent fashion,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 171, no. 5, pp. 2270–2278, 2003. View at Scopus
  87. S. You, C. Chen, W.-H. Lee, T. Brusko, M. Atkinson, and C.-P. Liu, “Presence of diabetes-inhibiting, glutamic acid decarboxylase-specific, IL-10-dependent, regulatory T cells in naive nonobese diabetic mice,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 173, no. 11, pp. 6777–6785, 2004. View at Scopus
  88. Y. C. Zhang, A. Pileggi, A. Agarwal et al., “Adeno-associated virus-mediated IL-10 gene therapy inhibits diabetes recurrence in syngeneic islet cell transplantation of NOD mice,” Diabetes, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 708–716, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  89. R. A. Kastelein, C. A. Hunter, and D. J. Cua, “Discovery and biology of IL-23 and IL-27: related but functionally distinct regulators of inflammation,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 25, pp. 221–242, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  90. E. Charles and J. L. Egwuagu III, “Therapeutic targeting of STAT pathways in CNS autoimmune diseases,” Landes Bioscience, vol. 2, no. 1, Article ID e24134, 2013.
  91. A. Villarino, L. Hibbert, L. Lieberman et al., “The IL-27R (WSX-1) is required to suppress T cell hyperactivity during infection,” Immunity, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 645–655, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  92. M. Batten, J. Li, S. Yi et al., “Interleukin 27 limits autoimmune encephalomyelitis by suppressing the development of interleukin 17-producing T cells,” Nature Immunology, vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 929–936, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  93. J. S. Stumhofer, A. Laurence, E. H. Wilson et al., “Interleukin 27 negatively regulates the development of interleukin 17-producing T helper cells during chronic inflammation of the central nervous system,” Nature Immunology, vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 937–945, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  94. D. C. Fitzgerald, B. Ciric, T. Touil et al., “Suppressive effect of IL-27 on encephalitogenic Th17 cells and the effector phase of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 179, no. 5, pp. 3268–3275, 2007. View at Scopus
  95. A. Amadi-Obi, C.-R. Yu, X. Liu et al., “TH17 cells contribute to uveitis and scleritis and are expanded by IL-2 and inhibited by IL-27/STAT1,” Nature Medicine, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 711–718, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  96. M. P. L. Reddy, H. Wang, S. Liu et al., “Association between type 1 diabetes and GWAS SNPs in the southeast US Caucasian population,” Genes and Immunity, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 208–212, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  97. R. Bergholdt, C. Brorsson, A. Palleja et al., “Identification of novel type 1 diabetes candidate genes by integrating genome-wide association data, protein-protein interactions, and human pancreatic islet gene expression,” Diabetes, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 954–962, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  98. A. Laurence, C. M. Tato, T. S. Davidson et al., “Interleukin-2 signaling via STAT5 constrains T helper 17 cell generation,” Immunity, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 371–381, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  99. T. R. Malek, A. Yu, L. Zhu, T. Matsutani, D. Adeegbe, and A. L. Bayer, “IL-2 family of cytokines in T regulatory cell development and homeostasis,” Journal of Clinical Immunology, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 635–639, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  100. Z. Chen, A. Laurence, Y. Kanno et al., “Selective regulatory function of Socs3 in the formation of IL-17-secreting T cells,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 103, no. 21, pp. 8137–8142, 2006.
  101. L. D. Jager, R. Dabelic, L. W. Waiboci et al., “The kinase inhibitory region of SOCS-1 is sufficient to inhibit T-helper 17 and other immune functions in experimental allergic encephalomyelitis,” Journal of Neuroimmunology, vol. 232, no. 1-2, pp. 108–118, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  102. A. V. Villarino, J. S. Stumhofer, C. J. M. Saris, R. A. Kastelein, F. J. De Sauvage, and C. A. Hunter, “IL-27 limits IL-2 production during Th1 differentiation,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 176, no. 1, pp. 237–247, 2006. View at Scopus
  103. S. R. Paludan, “Interleukin-4 and interferon-γ: the quintessence of a mutual antagonistic relationship,” Scandinavian Journal of Immunology, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 459–468, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  104. S. H. Chang, Y. Chung, and C. Dong, “Vitamin D suppresses Th17 cytokine production by inducing C/EBP Homologous Protein (CHOP) expression,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 285, no. 50, pp. 38751–38755, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  105. T. P. Staeva-Vieira and L. P. Freedman, “1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 inhibits IFN-γ and IL-4 levels during in vitro polarization of primary murine CD4+ T cells,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 168, no. 3, pp. 1181–1189, 2002. View at Scopus
  106. J. Tang, R. Zhou, D. Luger et al., “Calcitriol suppresses antiretinal autoimmunity through inhibitory effects on the Th17 effector response,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 182, no. 8, pp. 4624–4632, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  107. J. A. Hall, J. R. Grainger, S. P. Spencer, and Y. Belkaid, “The role of retinoic acid in tolerance and immunity,” Immunity, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 13–22, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  108. L. Massacesi, A. L. Abbamondi, and C. Giorgi, “Suppression of experimental allergic encephalomyelitis by retinoic acid,” Journal of the Neurological Sciences, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 55–64, 1987. View at Scopus
  109. M. M. Escribese, E. Conde, A. Martín et al., “Therapeutic effect of all-trans-retinoic acid (at-RA) on an autoimmune nephritis experimental model: role of the VLA-4 integrin,” BMC Nephrology, vol. 8, article 3, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  110. P. Konieczna, R. Ferstl, M. Ziegler et al., “Immunomodulation by Bifidobacterium infantis 35624 in the murine lamina propria requires retinoic acid-dependent and independent mechanisms,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 5, Article ID e62617, 2013.
  111. J. Wu, Y. Zhang, Q. Liu, W. Zhong, and Z. Xia, “All-trans retinoic acid attenuates airway inflammation by inhibiting Th2 and Th17 response in experimental allergic asthma,” BMC Immunology, vol. 14, article 28, 2013.
  112. K. M. Elias, A. Laurence, T. S. Davidson et al., “Retinoic acid inhibits Th17 polarization and enhances FoxP3 expression through a Stat-3/Stat-5 independent signaling pathway,” Blood, vol. 111, no. 3, pp. 1013–1020, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  113. S. Xiao, H. Jin, T. Korn et al., “Retinoic acid increases Foxp3+ regulatory T cells and inhibits development of Th17 cells by enhancing TGF-β-driven Smad3 signaling and inhibiting IL-6 and IL-23 receptor expression,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 181, no. 4, pp. 2277–2284, 2008. View at Scopus
  114. U. Ikeda, D. Wakita, T. Ohkuri et al., “1α,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 and all-trans retinoic acid synergistically inhibit the differentiation and expansion of Th17 cells,” Immunology Letters, vol. 134, no. 1, pp. 7–16, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  115. E. V. Acosta-Rodriguez, G. Napolitani, A. Lanzavecchia, and F. Sallusto, “Interleukins 1β and 6 but not transforming growth factor-β are essential for the differentiation of interleukin 17-producing human T helper cells,” Nature Immunology, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 942–949, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  116. N. Manel, D. Unutmaz, and D. R. Littman, “The differentiation of human TH-17 cells requires transforming growth factor-β and induction of the nuclear receptor RORγt,” Nature Immunology, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 641–649, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  117. L. Yang, D. E. Anderson, C. Baecher-Allan et al., “IL-21 and TGF-β are required for differentiation of human T H17 cells,” Nature, vol. 454, no. 7202, pp. 350–352, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  118. N. J. Wilson, K. Boniface, J. R. Chan, et al., “Development, cytokine profile and function of human interleukin 17-producing helper T cells,” Nature Immunology, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 950–957, 2007.
  119. N. Obermajer, J. L. Wong, R. P. Edwards, et al., “Induction and stability of human Th17 cells require endogenous NOS2 and cGMP-dependent NO signaling,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 210, no. 7, pp. 1433–1445, 2013.
  120. E. V. Acosta-Rodriguez, L. Rivino, J. Geginat et al., “Surface phenotype and antigenic specificity of human interleukin 17-producing T helper memory cells,” Nature Immunology, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 639–646, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  121. L. de Beaucoudrey, A. Puel, O. Filipe-Santos, et al., “Mutations in STAT3 and IL12RB1 impair the development of human IL-17-producing T cells,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 205, no. 7, pp. 1543–1550, 2008.
  122. S. Tuomela, V. Salo, S. K. Tripathi, et al., “Identification of early gene expression changes during human Th17 cell differentiation,” Blood, vol. 119, no. 23, pp. e151–e160, 2012.
  123. F. Zhang, G. Meng, and W. Strober, “Interactions among the transcription factors Runx1, RORγt and Foxp3 regulate the differentiation of interleukin 17-producing T cells,” Nature Immunology, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 1297–1306, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  124. L. Cosmi, R. de Palma, V. Santarlasci et al., “Human interleukin 17-producing cells originate from a CD161 +CD4+ T cell precursor,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 205, no. 8, pp. 1903–1916, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  125. F. Annunziato, L. Cosmi, V. Santarlasci, et al., “Phenotypic and functional features of human Th17 cells,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 204, no. 8, pp. 1849–1861, 2007.
  126. M. K. Spriggs, “Interleukin-17 and its receptor,” Journal of Clinical Immunology, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 366–369, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  127. D. V. Jovanovic, J. A. Di Battista, J. Martel-Pelletier et al., “IL-17 stimulates the production and expression of proinflammatory cytokines, IL-β and TNF-α, by human macrophages,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 160, no. 7, pp. 3513–3521, 1998. View at Scopus
  128. Z. Yao, S. L. Painter, W. C. Fanslow et al., “Human IL-17: a novel cytokine derived from T cells,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 155, no. 12, pp. 5483–5486, 1995. View at Scopus
  129. M. Laan, Z.-H. Cui, H. Hoshino et al., “Neutrophil recruitment by human IL-17 via C-X-C chemokine release in the airways,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 162, no. 4, pp. 2347–2352, 1999. View at Scopus
  130. F. Fossiez, O. Djossou, P. Chomarat et al., “T cell interleukin-17 induces stromal cells to produce proinflammatory and hematopoietic cytokines,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 183, no. 6, pp. 2593–2603, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  131. A. J. Fleetwood, A. D. Cook, and J. A. Hamilton, “Functions of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor,” Critical Reviews in Immunology, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 405–428, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  132. E. Ricciotti and G. A. FitzGerald, “Prostaglandins and inflammation,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis and Vascular Biologyl, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 986–1000, 2011.
  133. A. F. Sheibanie, I. Tadmori, H. Jing, E. Vassiliou, and D. Ganea, “Prostaglandin E2 induces IL-23 production in bone marrow-derived dendritic cells,” FASEB Journal, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 1318–1320, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  134. K. Boniface, K. S. Bak-Jensen, Y. Li et al., “Prostaglandin E2 regulates Th17 cell differentiation and function through cyclic AMP and EP2/EP4 receptor signaling,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 206, no. 3, pp. 535–548, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  135. C. Chizzolini, R. Chicheportiche, M. Alvarez et al., “Prostaglandin E2 synergistically with interleukin-23 favors human Th17 expansion,” Blood, vol. 112, no. 9, pp. 3696–3703, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  136. P. Schwarzenberger, V. la Russa, A. Miller et al., “IL-17 stimulates granulopoiesis in mice: use of an alternate, novel gene therapy-derived method for in vivo evaluation of cytokines,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 161, no. 11, pp. 6383–6389, 1998. View at Scopus
  137. P. Ye, F. H. Rodriguez, S. Kanaly et al., “Requirement of interleukin 17 receptor signaling for lung CXC chemokine and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor expression, neutrophil recruitment, and host defense,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 194, no. 4, pp. 519–527, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  138. Q. Wu, R. J. Martin, J. G. Rino, R. Breed, R. M. Torres, and H. W. Chu, “IL-23-dependent IL-17 production is essential in neutrophil recruitment and activity in mouse lung defense against respiratory Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection,” Microbes and Infection, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 78–86, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  139. S. C. Higgins, A. G. Jarnicki, E. C. Lavelle, and K. H. G. Mills, “TLR4 mediates vaccine-induced protective cellular immunity to Bordetella pertussis: role of IL-17-producing T cells,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 177, no. 11, pp. 7980–7989, 2006. View at Scopus
  140. W. Huang, L. Na, P. L. Fidel, and P. Schwarzenberger, “Requirement of interleukin-17A for systemic anti-Candida albicans host defense in mice,” Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 190, no. 3, pp. 624–631, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  141. H. R. Conti, F. Shen, N. Nayyar et al., “Th17 cells and IL-17 receptor signaling are essential for mucosal host defense against oral candidiasis,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 206, no. 2, pp. 299–311, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  142. A. Puel, S. Cypowyj, J. Bustamante et al., “Chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis in humans with inborn errors of interleukin-17 immunity,” Science, vol. 332, no. 6025, pp. 65–68, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  143. X. L. Rudner, K. I. Happel, E. A. Young, and J. E. Shellito, “Interleukin-23 (IL-23)-IL-17 cytokine axis in murine Pneumocystis carinii infection,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 75, no. 6, pp. 3055–3061, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  144. Y. Lin, S. Ritchea, A. Logar et al., “Interleukin-17 is required for T helper 1 cell immunity and host resistance to the intracellular pathogen Francisella tularensis,” Immunity, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 799–810, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  145. J. S. Cho, E. M. Pietras, N. C. Garcia et al., “IL-17 is essential for host defense against cutaneous Staphylococcus aureus infection in mice,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 120, no. 5, pp. 1762–1773, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  146. H. Ishigame, S. Kakuta, T. Nagai et al., “Differential roles of interleukin-17A and -17F in host defense against mucoepithelial bacterial infection and allergic responses,” Immunity, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 108–119, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  147. S. M. Schulz, G. Köhler, C. Holscher, Y. Iwakura, and G. Alber, “IL-17A is produced by Th17, γδ T cells and other CD4- lymphocytes during infection with Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis and has a mild effect in bacterial clearance,” International Immunology, vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 1129–1138, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  148. S. M. Schulz, G. Köhler, N. Schütze et al., “Protective immunity to systemic infection with attenuated Salmonella enterica serovar enteritidis in the absence of IL-12 is associated with IL-23-dependent IL-22, but not IL-17,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 181, no. 11, pp. 7891–7901, 2008. View at Scopus
  149. S. A. Khader, J. E. Pearl, K. Sakamoto et al., “IL-23 compensates for the absence of IL-12p70 and is essential for the IL-17 response during tuberculosis but is dispensable for protection and antigen-specific IFN-γ responses if IL-12p70 is available,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 175, no. 2, pp. 788–795, 2005. View at Scopus
  150. M. Wüthrich, B. Gern, C. Y. Hung et al., “Vaccine-induced protection against 3 systemic mycoses endemic to North America requires Th17 cells in mice,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 121, no. 2, pp. 554–568, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  151. M. Wuthrich, V. LeBert, K. Galles et al., “Interleukin 1 enhances vaccine-induced antifungal T-helper 17 cells and resistance against Blastomyces dermatitidis infection,” Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 208, no. 7, pp. 1175–1182, 2013.
  152. C. Lock, G. Hermans, R. Pedotti et al., “Gene-microarray analysis of multiple sclerosis lesions yields new targets validated in autoimmune encephalomyelitis,” Nature Medicine, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 500–508, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  153. H. Kebir, K. Kreymborg, I. Ifergan et al., “Human TH17 lymphocytes promote blood-brain barrier disruption and central nervous system inflammation,” Nature Medicine, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 1173–1175, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  154. J. S. Tzartos, M. A. Friese, M. J. Craner et al., “Interleukin-17 production in central nervous system-infiltrating T cells and glial cells is associated with active disease in multiple sclerosis,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 172, no. 1, pp. 146–155, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  155. D. Matusevicius, P. Kivisäkk, B. He et al., “Interleukin-17 mRNA expression in blood and CSF mononuclear cells is augmented in multiple sclerosis,” Multiple Sclerosis, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 101–104, 1999. View at Scopus
  156. D. C. Fitzgerald, Z. Fonseca-Kelly, M. L. Cullimore et al., “Independent and interdependent immunoregulatory effects of IL-27, IFN-beta, and IL-10 in the suppression of human Th17 cells and murine experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 190, no. 7, pp. 3225–3234, 2013.
  157. H. K. Kwon, G. C. Kim, Y. Kim et al., “Amelioration of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by probiotic mixture is mediated by a shift in T helper cell immune response,” Clinical Immunology, vol. 146, no. 3, pp. 217–227, 2013.
  158. K. Berer and G. Krishnamoorthy, “Commensal gut flora and brain autoimmunity: a love or hate affair?” Acta Neuropathologica, vol. 123, no. 5, pp. 639–651, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  159. H. Yokote, S. Miyake, J. L. Croxford, S. Oki, H. Mizusawa, and T. Yamamura, “NKT cell-dependent amelioration of a mouse model of multiple sclerosis by altering gut flora,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 173, no. 6, pp. 1714–1723, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  160. M. A. Lowes, A. M. Bowcock, and J. G. Krueger, “Pathogenesis and therapy of psoriasis,” Nature, vol. 445, no. 7130, pp. 866–873, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  161. C. L. Kauffman, N. Aria, E. Toichi et al., “A phase I study evaluating the safety, pharmacokinetics, and clinical response of a human IL-12 p40 antibody in subjects with plaque psoriasis,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 123, no. 6, pp. 1037–1044, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  162. A. di Cesare, P. di Meglio, and F. O. Nestle, “The IL-23Th17 axis in the immunopathogenesis of psoriasis,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 129, no. 6, pp. 1339–1350, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  163. E. F. Wagner, H. B. Schonthaler, J. Guinea-Viniegra, and E. Tschachler, “Psoriasis: what we have learned from mouse models,” Nature Reviews Rheumatology, vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 704–714, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  164. B. Homey, M. C. Dieu-Nosjean, A. Wiesenborn, et al., “Up-regulation of macrophage inflammatory protein-3 alpha/CCL20 and CC chemokine receptor 6 in psoriasis,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 164, no. 12, pp. 6621–6632, 2000.
  165. B. J. Lewis, S. Rajpara, A. M. Haggart, H. M. Wilson, R. N. Barker, and A. D. Ormerod, “Predominance of activated, clonally expanded T helper type 17 cells within the CD4+ T cell population in psoriatic lesions,” Clinical and Experimental Immunology, vol. 173, no. 1, pp. 38–46, 2013.
  166. I. B. McInnes and G. Schett, “The pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 365, no. 23, pp. 2205–2219, 2011. View at Scopus
  167. S. Kotake, N. Udagawa, N. Takahashi et al., “IL-17 in synovial fluids from patients with rheumatoid arthritis is a potent stimulator of osteoclastogenesis,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 103, no. 9, pp. 1345–1352, 1999. View at Scopus
  168. J. Lee, J. Lee, M. K. Park, et al., “Interferon gamma suppresses collagen-induced arthritis by regulation of Th17 through the induction of indoleamine-2, 3-deoxygenase,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 4, Article ID e60900, 2013.
  169. A. F. Sheibanie, T. Khayrullina, F. F. Safadi, and D. Ganea, “Prostaglandin E2 exacerbates collagen-induced arthritis in mice through the inflammatory interleukin-23/interleukin-17 axis,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 56, no. 8, pp. 2608–2619, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  170. M. Chabaud, J. M. Durand, N. Buchs et al., “Human interleukin-17: a T cell-derived proinflammatory cytokine produced by the rheumatoid synovium,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 963–970, 1999.
  171. M. C. Honorati, R. Meliconi, L. Pulsatelli, S. Canè, L. Frizziero, and A. Facchini, “High in vivo expression of interleukin-17 receptor in synovial endothelial cells and chondrocytes from arthritis patients,” Rheumatology, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 522–527, 2001. View at Scopus
  172. M. G. Attur, R. N. Patel, S. B. Abramson, and A. R. Amin, “Interleukin-17 up-regulation of nitric oxide production in human osteoarthritis cartilage,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1050–1053, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  173. M. F. van den Broek, M. C. J. van Bruggen, J. P. Koopman, M. P. Hazenberg, and W. B. van den Berg, “Gut flora induces and maintains resistance against streptococcal cell wall-induced arthritis in F344 rats,” Clinical and Experimental Immunology, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 313–317, 1992. View at Scopus
  174. H. C. Rath, H. H. Herfarth, J. S. Ikeda et al., “Normal luminal bacteria, especially bacteroides species, mediate chronic colitis, gastritis, and arthritis in HLA-B27/human β2 microglobulin transgenic rats,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 98, no. 4, pp. 945–953, 1996. View at Scopus
  175. J. D. Taurog, J. A. Richardson, J. T. Croft et al., “The germfree state prevents development of gut and joint inflammatory disease in HLA-B27 transgenic rats,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 180, no. 6, pp. 2359–2364, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  176. H.-J. Wu, I. I. Ivanov, J. Darce et al., “Gut-residing segmented filamentous bacteria drive autoimmune arthritis via T helper 17 cells,” Immunity, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 815–827, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  177. D. K. Podolsky, “Inflammatory bowel disease,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 347, no. 6, pp. 417–429, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  178. P. J. Mannon, I. J. Fuss, L. Mayer et al., “Anti-interleukin-12 antibody for active Crohn's disease,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 351, no. 20, pp. 2069–2079, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  179. Z. Zhang, M. Zheng, J. Bindas, P. Schwarzenberger, and J. K. Kolls, “Critical role of IL-17 receptor signaling in acute TNBS-induced colitis,” Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 382–388, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  180. J. Mudter, J. Yu, C. Zufferey et al., “IRF4 regulates IL-17A promoter activity and controls RORγt-dependent Th17 colitis in vivo,” Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 1343–1358, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  181. D. Yen, J. Cheung, H. Scheerens et al., “IL-23 is essential for T cell-mediated colitis and promotes inflammation via IL-17 and IL-6,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 116, no. 5, pp. 1310–1316, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  182. A. F. Sheibanie, J.-H. Yen, T. Khayrullina et al., “The proinflammatory effect of prostaglandin E2 in experimental inflammatory bowel disease is mediated through the IL-23→IL-17 axis,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 178, no. 12, pp. 8138–8147, 2007. View at Scopus
  183. R. Atreya, J. Mudter, S. Finotto et al., “Blockade of interleukin 6 trans signaling suppresses T-cell resistance against apoptosis in chronic intestinal inflammation: evidence in Crohn disease and experimental colitis in vivo,” Nature Medicine, vol. 6, pp. 583–588, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  184. H. Ito, M. Takazoe, Y. Fukuda et al., “A pilot randomized trial of a human anti-interleukin-6 receptor monoclonal antibody in active Crohn's disease,” Gastroenterology, vol. 126, no. 4, pp. 989–996, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  185. R. H. Duerr, K. D. Taylor, S. R. Brant et al., “A genome-wide association study identifies IL23R as an inflammatory bowel disease gene,” Science, vol. 314, no. 5804, pp. 1461–1463, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  186. A. Y. Lee, R. Eri, A. B. Lyons, M. C. Grimm, and H. Korner, “CC chemokine ligand 20 and its cognate receptor CCR6 in mucosal T cell immunology and inflammatory bowel disease: odd couple or axis of evil?” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 4, article 194, 2013.
  187. S. Fujino, A. Andoh, S. Bamba et al., “Increased expression of interleukin 17 in inflammatory bowel disease,” Gut, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 65–70, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  188. V. Holtta, P. Klemetti, T. Sipponen, et al., “IL-23/IL-17 immunity as a hallmark of Crohn's disease,” Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 1175–1184, 2008.
  189. H. Rafa, H. Saoula, M. Belkhelfa et al., “IL-23/IL-17A axis correlates with the nitric oxide pathway in inflammatory bowel disease: immunomodulatory effect of retinoic acid,” Journal of Interferon and Cytokine Research, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 355–368, 2013.
  190. D. N. Frank, A. L. St. Amand, R. A. Feldman, E. C. Boedeker, N. Harpaz, and N. R. Pace, “Molecular-phylogenetic characterization of microbial community imbalances in human inflammatory bowel diseases,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 104, no. 34, pp. 13780–13785, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  191. J. Dicksved, J. Halfvarson, M. Rosenquist et al., “Molecular analysis of the gut microbiota of identical twins with Crohn's disease,” ISME Journal, vol. 2, no. 7, pp. 716–727, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  192. B. Willing, J. Halfvarson, J. Dicksved et al., “Twin studies reveal specific imbalances in the mucosa-associated microbiota of patients with ileal Crohn's disease,” Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 653–660, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  193. D. N. Frank, C. E. Robertson, C. M. Hamm et al., “Disease phenotype and genotype are associated with shifts in intestinal-associated microbiota in inflammatory bowel diseases,” Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 179–184, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  194. K. Ohl and K. Tenbrock, “Inflammatory cytokines in systemic lupus erythematosus,” Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology, vol. 2011, Article ID 432595, 14 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  195. A. Alunno, E. Bartoloni, O. Bistoni, et al., “Balance between regulatory T and Th17 cells in systemic lupus erythematosus: the old and the new,” Clinical and Developmental Immunology, vol. 2012, Article ID 823085, 5 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  196. A. Nalbandian, J. C. Crispín, and G. C. Tsokos, “Interleukin-17 and systemic lupus erythematosus: current concepts,” Clinical and Experimental Immunology, vol. 157, no. 2, pp. 209–215, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  197. H.-K. Kang, M. Liu, and S. K. Datta, “Low-dose peptide tolerance therapy of lupus generates plasmacytoid dendritic cells that cause expansion of autoantigen-specific regulatory T cells and contraction of inflammatory Th17 cells,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 178, no. 12, pp. 7849–7858, 2007. View at Scopus
  198. N. Shinsuke and I. Hiroshi, “Overexpression of Epstein-Barr virus-induced gene 3 protein (EBI3) in MRL/lpr mice suppresses their lupus nephritis by activating regulatory T cells,” Autoimmunity, vol. 46, no. 7, pp. 446–454, 2013.
  199. J. H. Fransen, J. V. D. Vlag, J. Ruben, G. J. Adema, J. H. Berden, and L. B. Hilbrands, “The role of dendritic cells in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus,” Arthritis Research and Therapy, vol. 12, no. 2, article 207, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  200. D. Y. Chen, Y. M. Chen, M. C. Wen, T. Y. Hsieh, W. T. Hung, and J. L. Lan, “The potential role of Th17 cells and Th17-related cytokines in the pathogenesis of nephritis,” Lupus, vol. 21, no. 13, pp. 1385–1396, 2012.
  201. C. K. Wong, L. C. W. Lit, L. S. Tam, E. K. M. Li, P. T. Y. Wong, and C. W. K. Lam, “Hyperproduction of IL-23 and IL-17 in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: implications for Th17-mediated inflammation in auto-immunity,” Clinical Immunology, vol. 127, no. 3, pp. 385–393, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  202. W. Kleczynska, B. Jakiela, H. Plutecka, M. Milewski, M. Sanak, and J. Musial, “Imbalance between Th17 and regulatory T-cells in systemic lupus erythematosus,” Folia Histochemica et Cytobiologica, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 646–653, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  203. J. C. da Silva, H. A. Mariz, L. F. da Rocha Jr. et al., “Hydroxychloroquine decreases Th17-related cytokines in systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis patients,” Clinics, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 766–771, 2013.
  204. L. Cosmi, F. Liotta, E. Maggi, S. Romagnani, and F. Annunziato, “Th17 cells: new players in asthma pathogenesis,” Allergy, vol. 66, no. 8, pp. 989–998, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  205. H. Nakajima and K. Hirose, “Role of IL-23 and Th17 cells in airway inflammation in asthma,” Immune Network, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–4, 2010.
  206. P. W. Hellings, A. Kasran, Z. Liu et al., “Interleukin-17 orchestrates the granulocyte influx into airways after allergen inhalation in a mouse model of allergic asthma,” The American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 42–50, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  207. N. Oda, P. B. Canelos, D. M. Essayan, B. A. Plunkett, A. C. Myers, and S.-K. Huang, “Interleukin-17F induces pulmonary neutrophilia and amplifies antigen-induced allergic response,” The American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 171, no. 1, pp. 12–18, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  208. L. McKinley, J. F. Alcorn, A. Peterson et al., “TH17 cells mediate steroid-resistant airway inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness in mice,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 181, no. 6, pp. 4089–4097, 2008. View at Scopus
  209. T. Kobayashi, K. Iijima, J. L. Checkel, and H. Kita, “Interleukin-1-family cytokines drive T helper 2 and 17 cells to innocuous airborne antigens,” The American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 989–998, 2013.
  210. C. Doe, M. Bafadhel, S. Siddiqui et al., “Expression of the T helper 17-associated cytokines IL-17A and IL-17F in asthma and COPD,” Chest, vol. 138, no. 5, pp. 1140–1147, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  211. K. Li, Z. Wang, Y. Cao et al., “The study of the ratio and distribution of Th17 cells and Tc17 cells in asthmatic patients and the mouse model,” Asian Pacific Journal of Allergy and Immunology, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 125–131, 2013.
  212. S. Molet, Q. Hamid, F. Davoine et al., “IL-17 is increased in asthmatic airways and induces human bronchial fibroblasts to produce cytokines,” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 108, no. 3, pp. 430–438, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  213. E. B. Brandt, M. B. Kovacic, G. B. Lee et al., “Diesel exhaust particle induction of IL-17A contributes to severe asthma,” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 132, no. 5, pp. 1194.e2–1204.e2, 2013.
  214. S. L. Russell, M. J. Gold, M. Hartmann et al., “Early life antibiotic-driven changes in microbiota enhance susceptibility to allergic asthma,” EMBO Reports, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 440–447, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  215. “Type 1 Diabetes Fact Sheet,” Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation International, 2013, http://jdrf.org/about-jdrf/fact-sheets/type-1-diabetes-facts/.
  216. S. Shao, F. He, Y. Yang, G. Yuan, M. Zhang, and X. Yu, “Th17 cells in type 1 diabetes,” Cellular Immunology, vol. 280, no. 1, pp. 16–21, 2012.
  217. B. L. Wajchenberg, “β-cell failure in diabetes and preservation by clinical treatment,” Endocrine Reviews, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 187–218, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  218. J. E. Smith-Garvin, G. A. Koretzky, and M. S. Jordan, “T cell activation,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 27, pp. 591–619, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  219. E. Sebzda, V. A. Wallace, J. Mayer, R. S. M. Yeung, T. W. Mak, and P. S. Ohashi, “Positive and negative thymocyte selection induced by different concentrations of a single peptide,” Science, vol. 263, no. 5153, pp. 1615–1618, 1994. View at Scopus
  220. P. Höglund, J. Mintern, C. Waltzinger, W. Heath, C. Benoist, and D. Mathis, “Initiation of autoimmune diabetes by developmentally regulated presentation of islet cell antigens in the pancreatic lymph nodes,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 189, no. 2, pp. 331–339, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  221. Y. Zhang, B. O'Brien, J. Trudeau, R. Tan, P. Santamaria, and J. P. Dutz, “In situ β cell death promotes priming of diabetogenic CD8 T lymphocytes,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 168, no. 3, pp. 1466–1472, 2002. View at Scopus
  222. M.-C. Gagnerault, J. J. Luan, C. Lotton, and F. Lepault, “Pancreatic lymph nodes are required for priming of β cell reactive T cells in NOD mice,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 196, no. 3, pp. 369–377, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  223. D. Zipris, “Epidemiology of type 1 diabetes and what animal models teach us about the role of viruses in disease mechanisms,” Clinical Immunology, vol. 131, no. 1, pp. 11–23, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  224. K. A. Metcalfe, G. A. Hitman, R. E. Rowe et al., “Concordance for Type 1 diabetes in identical twins is affected by insulin genotype,” Diabetes Care, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 838–842, 2001. View at Scopus
  225. M. J. Redondo, L. Yu, M. Hawa et al., “Heterogeneity of Type I diabetes: analysis of monozygotic twins in Great Britain and the United States,” Diabetologia, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 354–362, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  226. V. Hyttinen, J. Kaprio, L. Kinnunen, M. Koskenvuo, and J. Tuomilehto, “Genetic liability of type 1 diabetes and the onset age among 22, 650 young Finnish twin pairs: a nationwide follow-up study,” Diabetes, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 1052–1055, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  227. R. E. Ley, D. A. Peterson, and J. I. Gordon, “Ecological and evolutionary forces shaping microbial diversity in the human intestine,” Cell, vol. 124, no. 4, pp. 837–848, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  228. J. Chow and S. K. Mazmanian, “Getting the bugs out of the immune system: do bacterial microbiota “Fix” intestinal T cell responses?” Cell Host and Microbe, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 8–12, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  229. O. Vaarala, M. A. Atkinson, and J. Neu, “The “perfect storm” for type 1 diabetes: the complex interplay between intestinal microbiota, gut permeability, and mucosal immunity,” Diabetes, vol. 57, no. 10, pp. 2555–2562, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  230. C. Alam, E. Bittoun, D. Bhagwat et al., “Effects of a germ-free environment on gut immune regulation and diabetes progression in non-obese diabetic (NOD) mice,” Diabetologia, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 1398–1406, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  231. S. Brugman, F. A. Klatter, J. T. J. Visser et al., “Antibiotic treatment partially protects against type 1 diabetes in the Bio-Breeding diabetes-prone rat: is the gut flora involved in the development of type 1 diabetes?” Diabetologia, vol. 49, no. 9, pp. 2105–2108, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  232. C. T. Brown, A. G. Davis-Richardson, A. Giongo et al., “Gut microbiome metagenomics analysis suggests a functional model for the development of autoimmunity for type 1 diabetes,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 10, Article ID e25792, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  233. M. C. de Goffau, K. Luopajarvi, M. Knip, et al., “Fecal microbiota composition differs between children with beta-cell autoimmunity and those without,” Diabetes, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 1238–1244, 2013.
  234. E. Badami, C. Sorini, M. Coccia et al., “Defective differentiation of regulatory FoxP3+ T cells by small-intestinal dendritic cells in patients with type 1 diabetes,” Diabetes, vol. 60, no. 8, pp. 2120–2124, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  235. K. I. Happel, P. J. Dubin, M. Zheng et al., “Divergent roles of IL-23 and IL-12 in host defense against Klebsiella pneumoniae,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 202, no. 6, pp. 761–769, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  236. J. G. Markle, D. N. Frank, S. Mortin-Toth, et al., “Sex differences in the gut microbiome drive hormone-dependent regulation of autoimmunity,” Science, vol. 339, no. 6123, pp. 1084–1088, 2013.
  237. L. F. Roesch, G. L. Lorca, G. Casella et al., “Culture-independent identification of gut bacteria correlated with the onset of diabetes in a rat model,” ISME Journal, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 536–548, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  238. R. Valladares, D. Sankar, N. Li et al., “Lactobacillus johnsonii N6.2 mitigates the development of type 1 diabetes in BB-DP rats,” PLoS ONE, vol. 5, no. 5, Article ID e10507, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  239. K. Lau, P. Benitez, A. Ardissone et al., “Inhibition of type 1 diabetes correlated to a Lactobacillus johnsonii N6.2-mediated Th17 bias,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 186, no. 6, pp. 3538–3546, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  240. M. A. Kriegel, E. Sefik, J. A. Hill, H.-J. Wu, C. Benoist, and D. Mathis, “Naturally transmitted segmented filamentous bacteria segregate with diabetes protection in nonobese diabetic mice,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 108, no. 28, pp. 11548–11553, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  241. I. I. Ivanov, R. D. L. Frutos, N. Manel et al., “Specific microbiota direct the differentiation of IL-17-producing T-helper cells in the mucosa of the small intestine,” Cell Host and Microbe, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 337–349, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  242. S. L. Russell, M. J. Gold, B. P. Willing, L. Thorson, K. M. McNagny, and B. B. Finlay, “Perinatal antibiotic treatment affects murine microbiota, immune responses and allergic asthma,” Gut Microbes, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 158–164, 2013.