Generation of Recombinant Porcine Parvovirus Virus-Like Particles in <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i> and Development of Virus-Specific Monoclonal Antibodies

Tamošiūnas, Paulius Lukas; Petraitytė-Burneikienė, Rasa; Lasickienė, Rita; Akatov, Artiomas; Kundrotas, Gabrielis; Sereika, Vilimas; Lelešius, Raimundas; Žvirblienė, Aurelija; Sasnauskas, Kęstutis

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/573531

Journal of Immunology Research

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results and Discussion Conclusions References Copyright Related Articles

Special Issue

Veterinary Immunology: Development of Vaccines and Diagnostic Techniques

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 | Article ID 573531 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/573531

Generation of Recombinant Porcine Parvovirus Virus-Like Particles in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Development of Virus-Specific Monoclonal Antibodies

Paulius Lukas Tamošiūnas,¹Rasa Petraitytė-Burneikienė,¹Rita Lasickienė,¹Artiomas Akatov,¹Gabrielis Kundrotas,¹Vilimas Sereika,²Raimundas Lelešius,²Aurelija Žvirblienė,¹and Kęstutis Sasnauskas¹

Academic Editor: Juergen Richt

Received25 Jan 2014

Revised09 May 2014

Accepted25 May 2014

Published19 Jun 2014

Abstract

Porcine parvovirus (PPV) is a widespread infectious virus that causes serious reproductive diseases of swine and death of piglets. The gene coding for the major capsid protein VP2 of PPV was amplified using viral nucleic acid extract from swine serum and inserted into yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae expression plasmid. Recombinant PPV VP2 protein was efficiently expressed in yeast and purified using density gradient centrifugation. Electron microscopy analysis of purified PPV VP2 protein revealed the self-assembly of virus-like particles (VLPs). Nine monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) against the recombinant PPV VP2 protein were generated. The specificity of the newly generated MAbs was proven by immunofluorescence analysis of PPV-infected cells. Indirect IgG ELISA based on the recombinant VLPs for detection of PPV-specific antibodies in swine sera was developed and evaluated. The sensitivity and specificity of the new assay were found to be 93.4% and 97.4%, respectively. In conclusion, yeast S. cerevisiae represents a promising expression system for generating recombinant PPV VP2 protein VLPs of diagnostic relevance.

1. Introduction

Porcine parvovirus (PPV), first isolated from sows in Germany [1], has been found to occur worldwide [2–4]. PPV is the major causative agent in a syndrome or reproductive failure in swine. This syndrome is characterized by stillbirth, mummified fetuses, early embryonic and fetal death, delayed return to estrus, and infertility (abbreviated as SMEDI) [5, 6]. PPV is also shown to be an agent able to increase the effects of porcine circovirus type 2 infection in the clinical course of postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome [7], which is a significant disease in global swine production [8].

Five different groups of porcine parvoviruses (PPV) have been identified: classic PPV (PPV1), PPV2, PPV3 (known as porcine PARV4, hokovirus, or partetravirus), and PPV4 and porcine bocaviruses, which all have substantial genetic divergence [9–12]. Recently, a new parvovirus provisionally proposed to be named as PPV5 was discovered in the United States [13].

Classic PPV has one serotype subdivided into four clinical genotypes (biotypes) according to their pathogenicity. The NADL-8 strain can cause viremia and crosses the placenta to infect fetuses, leading to fetus death [14]. In contrast, nonpathogenic NADL-2 strain is currently widely used as an attenuated vaccine and causes only limited viremia without crossing the placental barrier in experimental infections [15]. The other two groups are the Kresse and IAF-A83 strains, which are associated with dermatitis and enteric diseases, respectively [16].

PPV is a small, nonenveloped virus, assigned to the genus Parvovirus. This group of viruses also infects rodents and carnivores and belongs to the Parvoviridae subfamily within the Parvoviridae family [9]. PPV has a negative, single-stranded DNA of about 5 kb with distinct hairpin termini. The genome contains two major open reading frames (ORFs), each located in the same frame of the complementary strand. ORF1 encodes three nonstructural proteins and the structural proteins VP1, VP2, and VP3 are encoded in ORF2. VP1 and VP2 are translated from differently spliced RNAs, whereas VP3 is formed by proteolytic cleavage of VP2 [17, 18].

VP2 consists of an eight-stranded antiparallel β-barrel motif with 4 large loops between β-strands. These loops are shown to possess many B-cell epitopes and can tolerate insertions [19, 20] that make PPV VP2 a potential antigen carrier and play a key role in PPV diagnosis and immune prophylaxis [21]. The structure of PPV capsid composed of baculovirus system generated recombinant VP2 is available in 3.5 Å resolution (PDB Accession Number 1K3V) [22].

Immunogenic major capsid protein VP2 of PPV has been synthesized in several expression systems including bacteria [21, 23]. PPV VP2 protein expressed using the baculovirus expression vector system was shown to assemble into virus-like particles (VLPs) similar in size and morphology to the original virions. Such VLPs were shown to induce antibodies in immunized pigs [24] and guinea pigs [25]. VLPs generated in baculovirus system exhibit positive immunoreactivity for PPV and are used in most commercial ELISA tests [26]. Most recently, immunogenic PPV VP2 protein was synthesized in yeast Pichia pastoris [27]

The formation of recombinant antigenic human parvovirus capsid protein VLPs in S. cerevisiae has been recently demonstrated [28, 29]. Regarding costs, yield, and ease of handling, VLP production in yeast represents an alternative to the recombinant baculovirus expression system, which is so far the dominating source of VP2-derived VLPs of parvoviruses [27, 28].

In the current study, we have generated the PPV VP2 protein as VLPs in S. cerevisiae expression system, demonstated their structural and antigenic similarity with viral capsids and developed a new indirect IgG ELISA based on the use of PPV VP2-derived VLPs. Moreover, we have developed a panel of PPV VP2 protein-specific monoclonal antibodies and demonstrated their reactivity with PPV-infected cells.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Serum Samples

One hundred and eighty-three swine serum samples from farms in Lithuania (), Romania (), and Ukraine () were collected in years 2008–2010 and used in this study. Samples were stored at −70°C prior to testing.

2.2. Viral DNA Isolation

Viral nucleic acids (NAs) were extracted from porcine kidney cell culture PK-15 (ATCC CCL-33) infected with porcine parvovirus strain NADL-2. NAs were extracted using commercial QIAamp UltraSens Virus kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer’s manual and stored at −70°C until use.

2.3. Cloning and Characterization of PPV VP2 Gene

The PPV VP2 gene was amplified using High Fidelity Enzyme Mix (Fermentas/Thermo Fisher Scientific, Vilnius, Lithuania) directly from extracted NAs using the following pair of primers (IDT, Munich, Germany): PPV-vp2-F 5′-TCTACTAGTACAATGAGTGAAAATGTGGAACAA-3′ PPV-vp2-R 5′-GAGACTAGTCTAGTATAATTTTCTTGGTATAAGT-3′

The primers used for amplification incorporated BcuI site (underlined) for subcloning into the yeast vector pFX7. The thermal cycle conditions were the following: initial denaturation for 3 min at 95°C, followed by 30 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 55°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 2 min, and then the final elongation at 72°C for 10 min. The PCR amplification product was digested with BcuI and inserted into XbaI-linearized and dephosphorylated yeast expression plasmid pFX7 under control of yeast GAL1-10 promoter [30] and confirmed by PCR and subsequent DNA sequence analysis. The nucleotide sequence of the amplified PPV VP2 was compared with those in GenBank using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST). All DNA manipulations were performed according to standard procedures [31] using enzymes and kits from Fermentas/Thermo Fisher Scientific. Recombinant constructs were screened in Escherichia coli DH5α F′.

2.4. Strains, Media, Yeast Transformation, Cultivation, and Protein Purification

Recombinant construct containing PPV VP2 sequence was screened in E. coli DH5αF′ cells. Saccharomyces cerevisiae haploid strain AH22 MATa (leu2 his4 pep4) was used for the expression of PPV VP2 protein. Selection of yeast transformants resistant to formaldehyde was carried out on the YEPD (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, 2% dextrose, Difco, Sparks, MD, USA) agar supplemented with 5 mM formaldehyde. S. cerevisiae transformants were grown in YEPD medium supplemented with 5 mM formaldehyde or in YEPG induction medium (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, 2% galactose, Difco). Cultivation of transformed yeast cells, expression and purification of PPV VP2 was performed as previously described [32, 33]. After purification, the total protein concentration was determined by the Bradford assay (Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany) with bovine serum albumin (BSA) used as a standard.

2.5. SDS-PAGE and Western Blotting Analysis

The samples were boiled in a reducing sample buffer and separated in gel electrophoresis in SDS-Tris-glycine buffer. Proteins were visualized by staining with Coomassie Brilliant Blue (Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA). For Western blotting, proteins were electrotransferred to Immobilon P membrane (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA) as described by Sambrook and Russell [31]. The membranes were blocked with 5% milk in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) for 2 h. The blocking solution was removed and the blots were incubated with the MAbs against PPV VP2 protein (undiluted hybridoma supernatants). Secondary antibodies conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (HRP) (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) were used for detection of specific antibody binding. The blots were stained with 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) ready-to-use chromogenic substrate (Clinical Science Products Inc., Mansfield, MA, USA).

2.6. Electron Microscopy

After purification by CsCl ultracentrifugation, suspension of the recombinant PPV VP2 protein was placed on 400-mesh carbon coated copper grids (Agar Scientific, Stansted, UK). The protein samples were stained with 2% aqueous uranyl acetate solution (Reachim, Moscow, Russia) and examined with a Morgagni-268 electron microscope (FEI, Eindhoven, The Netherlands).

2.7. Characterization of Serum Samples by Commercial Test

Porcine serum samples were assayed for the presence of anti-PPV antibodies using a commercial INGEZIM PPV compact kit (Ingenasa, Madrid, Spain). This is an enzymatic assay based on the blocking ELISA technique which uses MAb specific for porcine parvovirus VP2 protein, and baculovirus expression systems generated recombinant capsid of VP2. The sera were tested according to the recommendations of the manufacturer. Two blocking percentage (BP) values were used for result interpretation: samples with BP higher than 30% were considered as positive and samples with BP lower than 25% were considered as negative. Samples with BP between both values were considered as doubtful.

2.8. Indirect ELISA

Polystyrene microtiter plates (Nerbe plus, Winsen/Luhe, Germany) were coated with 50 ng per well of recombinant PPV VP2 protein, diluted in 100 μL of 0.05 M carbonate-bicarbonate coating buffer (pH 9.6) and incubated overnight at 4°C. Plates were washed three times with PBST (phosphate buffered saline with 0.05% (v/v) Tween 20, (Bio-Rad, Richmond, CA, USA)) and then blocked by the addition of 150 μL of blocking buffer per well (1x Roti-Block, Carl Roth GmbH & Co.) and incubation at room temperature for 1 hour. After blocking, the plates were washed three times with PBST and 100 μL aliquots of serum specimens, diluted 1 : 400 in PBST with 1% BSA, were added to the wells. Antigen concentration and serum dilution level for this assay were determined by titration to reach optimal conditions for sensitivity and specificity (data not shown). After 2 h of incubation at 37°C, the plates were rinsed three times with PBST. HRP-conjugated rabbit anti-pig IgG (Sigma-Aldrich Biosciences, Seattle, USA) diluted 1 : 30 000 in PBST, containing 1% BSA, were added to the wells in 100 μL aliquots and incubated for 1 h at 37°C. The plates were washed as described above. Binding of specific antibodies was visualized by the addition of 100 μL/well of TMB substrate (Clinical Science Products Inc., Mansfield, MA, USA). After 10 min of incubation at the room temperature, the reaction was stopped by adding 100 μL/well of 10% sulphuric acid and the optical density (OD) was measured at 450 nm (reference filter 620 nm).

2.9. Production of Monoclonal Antibodies

MAbs to recombinant PPV VP2 were produced essentially as described by Kohler and Milstein [34]. Eight-week-old female BALB/c mice (obtained from a breeding colony at the Center for Innovative Medicine, Vilnius, Lithuania) were immunized at days 0, 28, and 56 by a subcutaneous injection of 50 μg of recombinant PPV VP2 protein. For an initial immunization, the antigen was emulsified in complete Freund’s adjuvant (Sigma-Aldrich). Subsequent immunizations were performed without an adjuvant, with the antigen dissolved in PBS. Three days after the final injection, mouse spleen cells were fused with Sp2/0-Ag 14 mouse myeloma cells using polyethylene glycol 1500 (PEG/DMSO solution, Hybri-Max, Sigma-Aldrich). Hybrid cells were selected in growth medium supplemented with hypoxanthine, aminopterin, and thymidine (50×HAT media supplement, Sigma-Aldrich). Samples of supernatant from wells with viable clones were screened by an indirect ELISA (as described above) using goat anti-mouse IgG (Bio-Rad) diluted 1 : 5000 to detect specific antibodies to PPV VP2. Hybridomas secreting specific antibodies to PPV VP2 protein were subcloned twice by a limiting dilution assay. Hybridoma cells were maintained in complete Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM, Biochrom, Berlin, Germany) containing 15% fetal calf serum (Biochrom) and antibiotics. Antibodies in hybridoma culture supernatants were isotyped using the mouse monoclonal antibody isotyping kit (Pierce, Thermo Scientific) in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol.

2.10. Immunofluorescence Assay

The reactivity of the MAbs with PPV-infected cells was analyzed by immunofluorescence assay (IFA) using porcine parvovirus FA substrate slides (VMRD, Inc., Pullman, USA) containing fixed swine testicle cells infected and noninfected with porcine parvovirus strain KY-11. The slides were treated according to the manufacturer’s protocol, incubated with undiluted hybridoma supernatants and developed with fluorescein isothiocyanate- (FITC-) labelled secondary antibody (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). The immunostained slides were observed by fluorescent microscope Olympus IX-70 (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Expression and Purification of PPV VP2 VLPs in Yeast

The gene encoding PPV VP2 was derived from the nucleic acids extract obtained from PPV-infected cell culture. The 1700 bp sequence amplified by PCR was sequenced and confirmed to be identical to VP2 gene from porcine parvovirus strain NADL-2 (GenBank Entry Number NC001718). The gene was cloned into S. cerevisiae expression vector pFX7 under the galactose-inducible promoter. A SDS-PAGE analysis of the lysate of induced yeast biomass revealed a major protein band of approximately 64 kDa (Figure 1, lane 2). No additional protein bands were observed in crude lysates of S. cerevisiae harboring empty yeast vector pFX7 (Figure 1, lane 1). After centrifugation of lysates through 30% sucrose cushion, the pellets harboring recombinant proteins were subjected to CsCl-gradient centrifugation. CsCl gradients revealed recombinant PPV VP2 protein (Figure 1, lane 3) in fractions with buoyant density of 1.286–1.308 g/mL.

In several preparative procedures, the yield of purified recombinant PPV VP2 protein was found to be 8-9 mg per liter of induced yeast culture. There was no significant yield difference using fresh or frozen biomass. After CsCl gradient purification, the recombinant VP2 protein was dialyzed against PBS and stored at −20°C in PBS containing 50% glycerol.

Formation of VLPs by PPV VP2 protein was confirmed by negative staining electron microscopy. Typical icosahedral structures of parvoviruses with a diameter of approximately 25–30 nm were observed indicating that PPV VP2 protein is self-assembled to VLPs (Figure 2(a)). VLPs of PPV produced in S. cerevisiae expression system were similar to those previously generated in insect cells [35] or native PPV particles [17]. Treatment with 25 mM EDTA or 10 mM EGTA did not cause the dissociation of recombinant VLPs indicating that the assembled structures do not require divalent ions (data not shown). The recombinant PPV VP2-derived VLPs were found to be stable when lyophilized and stored at −20°C longer than a year and VLPs remained intact when resolubilized in PBS as no pentamers or disrupted particles were observed by electron microscopy (Figure 2(b)). Moreover, the ELISA results using freshly prepared and resolubilized PPV VP2 antigen were fully concordant (data not shown). The stability of VLPs is crucial to ensure their successful transportation and possible application in the point-of-care tests.

(a)

(b)

VP2 protein is a major immunogen of most parvoviruses [36, 37]. Therefore, it is successfully employed for the serodiagnostics as well as epidemiological studies of PPV infection [24]. Moreover, VP2 protein is the major agent for developing vaccines [38]. To meet the need for stable recombinant VLPs of PPV, several expression systems were tested as an alternative to baculovirus expression system that is a major source of the antigen for the market [26]. E. coli [23], Lactobacillus casei [21], and recently yeast Pichia pastoris [27] were reported to have been successfully used for producing PPV VP2 protein, but VLP formation in these expression systems has not been confirmed. To our knowledge, our study provides the first evidence of stable recombinant PPV VP2 VLPs not produced in baculovirus expression system.

S. cerevisiae expression system has been shown to be efficient in producing antigenic VLPs of diagnostic relevance of human parvoviruses [28, 29] and porcine circovirus [39]. Therefore, it represents a potential system to meet the need for VLP-forming antigens to detect and differentiate a number of newly discovered porcine.

3.2. Indirect IgG PPV ELISA

PPV VP2 protein-derived VLPs generated in S. cerevisiae were used to develop an indirect ELISA for the detection of PPV-specific IgG antibodies in swine serum specimens. In order to test the antigenic properties of yeast-derived VLPs, 187 serum samples were tested using INGEZIM PPV compact test as a gold standard and further retested with the newly developed Indirect IgG PPV ELISA. Both assays were performed in parallel for every serum sample to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the new Indirect IgG PPV ELISA. The cut-off value for the new assay was calculated as the mean OD value of the 39 negative sera (identified with the commercial kit) plus 2 standard deviations () resulting in 95% confidence. The mean OD value and SD were 0.150 and 0.090, respectively. Therefore, sera with OD values above 0.330 were considered positive () and those with OD value below this cut-off were assessed as negative () in the newly developed Indirect IgG PPV ELISA.

Thirty-eight out of the 39 sera tested as negative with a commercial kit were assessed as negative by the Indirect IgG PPV ELISA. Nine out of 137 positive and all 11 doubtful serum samples by INGEZIM assay showed the OD value below the cut-off in the Indirect IgG PPV ELISA and were considered as negative (Table 1). Thus, the calculated specificity and sensitivity for the new Indirect IgG PPV ELISA were 97.4% (38/39) and 93.4% (128/137), respectively. All 9 false-negative samples of the new assay were weak positive in INGEZIM kit showing blocking percentage in the 33–45% range. All samples above BP equal to 30% were considered positive in this commercial kit. The only false-positive sample in the Indirect IgG PPV ELISA showed OD = 0.354 that is just above the cut-off OD of 0.330. To obtain more precise estimation of the sensitivity and specificity of the new assay, additional evaluation with more serum samples and alternative assays must be done in the future. Alternatively, the precision of the test can be improved using other formats of ELISA. In summary, results of the current study are promising to the use of PPV VP2 antigen synthesized in yeast S. cerevisiae in diagnostic kits.

3.3. Generation of Monoclonal Antibodies and Their Characterization

Purified recombinant PPV VP2 protein was used to immunize mice and generate PPV VP2-specific MAbs. After screening and cloning of positive hybridoma clones, 9 stable hybridoma cell lines producing IgG antibodies were derived. Six MAbs produced by hybridoma clones were of IgG1 subtype and the remaining three were found to be of IgG2a subtype. All MAbs reacted specifically with recombinant PPV VP2 protein in ELISA and did not react with other yeast-expressed proteins used as a negative control (Table 2).

To characterize the nature of the epitopes recognized by the MAbs, their reactivity in Western blotting was analyzed. The MAbs 4F11, 16G11, 25C5, 6D1, and 10A7 recognized SDS-denatured PPV VP2 protein in Western blotting assay (Figure 3, lanes 2). This result indicates that these MAbs recognize SDS-denatured epitopes of the PPV VP2 protein. The other four MAbs (clones 1F8, 16A1, 22G2, and 23A7) did not recognize SDS-denatured PPV VP2 protein in Western blotting assay (data not shown), suggesting that these MAbs recognize conformation-dependent epitopes.

The specificities of the MAbs were further analyzed by IFA to verify the ability of the MAbs to recognize native virion. For this purpose, commercial porcine parvovirus control slides containing virus-infected and noninfected fixed cells were used. None of the MAbs reacted with noninfected cells, which confirms the specificity of the assay (Figure 4, negative control). Both groups of MAbs recognizing linear or conformational epitopes reacted with infected cells; however, only the latter ones produced images with sharp nucleus-shaped patterns. In contrast, the MAbs recognizing linear epitopes produced signal outside the nuclei but in lesser intensity (Figure 4). This difference could be explained by the possibility that PPV VLPs finish their assembly in the nucleus forming conformational epitopes. Taking into consideration trimer translocation model for other parvoviruses [40], conformational epitopes might be available only in intact capsid but not in trimmers or pentamers formed by VP2 protein. This possibility emphasizes the importance of properly assembled VLPs to elicit strong immune responses when using recombinant antigens as potential vaccines. Further epitope mapping needs to be done to answer if linear epitopes remain accessible on the intact VLP surface or are hidden within the structure. However, our generated MAbs represent an attractive tool for studying intracellular PPV infection and capsid formation process.

The PPV VP2-derived VLPs generated in S. cerevisiae have not been yet tested for a possible use as a vaccine in pigs; however, considering results on the antigenic structure and the immunogenicity in mice described in this study, this is an attractive alternative to the currently used recombinant PPV vaccines. In previous studies, PPV VP2-derived VLPs have been shown to be effective epitope carriers to elicit a strong immune response in mice [41, 42]. Furthermore, yeast expression system does not require additional contaminant elimination procedure as described for baculovirus expression system [35] for such recombinant subunit vaccine preparation. Therefore, PPV VP2-derived VLPs generated in yeast S. cerevisiae are a promising platform for new PPV vaccine development.

4. Conclusions

In this study, we have demonstrated that yeast S. cerevisiae is a suitable host for the production of recombinant PPV VP2 protein as stable immunogenic VLPs. The recombinant yeast-derived PPV VP2 protein can be employed in an indirect ELISA for detection of PPV-specific IgG antibodies in swine sera with high specificity and sensitivity. The MAbs raised against yeast-derived PPV VP2 VLPs recognize virus-infected cells and differentiate conformational and linear epitopes of PPV VP2 protein.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests.

Acknowledgment

This study was supported by the Lithuanian Science Council, Grant no. MIP-060/2011.

References

A. Mayr, P. A. Bachmann, G. Siegl, H. Mahnel, and B. E. Sheffy, “Characterization of a small porcine DNA virus,” Archiv für die Gesamte Virusforschung, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 38–51, 1968.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Cui, X. Wang, Y. Ren, S. Cui, G. Li, and X. Ren, “Genome sequence of Chinese porcine parvovirus strain PPV2010,” Journal of Virology, vol. 86, no. 4, p. 2379, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. L. Mengeling, K. M. Lager, J. K. Zimmerman, N. Samarikermani, and G. W. Beran, “A current assessment of the role of porcine parvovirus as a cause of fetal porcine death,” Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 33–35, 1991.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Kim and C. Chae, “Concurrent presence of porcine circovirus type 2 and porcine parvovirus in retrospective cases of exudative epidermitis in pigs,” Veterinary Journal, vol. 167, no. 1, pp. 104–106, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
U. Truyen and A. F. Streck, “Porcine parvovirus,” in Diseases of Swine, J. K. Zimmerman, L. Karriker, A. Ramirez, K. Schwartz, and G. Stevenson, Eds., pp. 447–455, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 10th edition, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Szelei, Z. Zadori, and P. Tijssen, “Porcine parvovirus,” in Parvoviruses, J. R. Kerr, S. F. Cotmore, M. E. Bloom, R. M. Linden, and C. R. Parrish, Eds., pp. 435–445, Hodder Arnold, London, UK, 2006.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Krakowka, J. A. Ellis, B. Meehan, S. Kennedy, F. McNeilly, and G. Allan, “Viral wasting syndrome of swine: experimental reproduction of postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome in gnotobiotic swine by coinfection with porcine circovirus 2 and porcine parvovirus,” Veterinary Pathology, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 254–263, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Segalés, G. M. Allan, and M. Domingo, “Porcine circovirus diseases,” Animal Health Research Reviews, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 119–142, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Tijssen, M. Agbandje-McKenna, J. M. Almendral et al., “Parvoviridae,” in Virus Taxonomy: Classification and Nomenclature of Viruses: Ninth Report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses, A. M. Q. King, M. J. Adams, E. Carstens, and E. J. Lefkowitz, Eds., pp. 375–395, Elsevier, San Diego, Calif, USA, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
S. K. P. Lau, P. C. Y. Woo, H. Tse et al., “Identification of novel porcine and bovine parvoviruses closely related to human parvovirus 4,” Journal of General Virology, vol. 89, no. 8, pp. 1840–1848, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A.-L. Blomström, S. Belák, C. Fossum et al., “Detection of a novel porcine boca-like virus in the background of porcine circovirus type 2 induced postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome,” Virus Research, vol. 146, no. 1-2, pp. 125–129, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. K. Cheung, G. Wu, D. Wang, D. O. Bayles, K. M. Lager, and A. L. Vincent, “Identification and molecular cloning of a novel porcine parvovirus,” Archives of Virology, vol. 155, no. 5, pp. 801–806, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C.-T. Xiao, P. F. Gerber, L. G. Giménez-Lirola, P. G. Halbur, and T. Opriessnig, “Characterization of porcine parvovirus type 2 (PPV2) which is highly prevalent in the USA,” Veterinary Microbiology, vol. 161, no. 3-4, pp. 325–330, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. L. Mengeling and R. C. Cutlip, “Pathogenesis of in utero infection: experimental infection of five-week-old porcine fetuses with porcine parvovirus,” The American Journal of Veterinary Research, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 1173–1177, 1975.
View at: Google Scholar
P. S. Paul and W. L. Mengeling, “Evaluation of a modified live-virus vaccine for the prevention of porcine parvovirus-induced reproductive disease in swine,” The American Journal of Veterinary Research, vol. 41, no. 12, pp. 2007–2011, 1980.
View at: Google Scholar
T. Opriessnig, H. G. Shen, N. Pal et al., “A live-attenuated chimeric porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) vaccine is transmitted to contact pigs but is not upregulated by concurrent infection with porcine parvovirus (PPV) and porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) and is efficacious in a PCV2b-PRRSV-PPV challenge model,” Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 1261–1268, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. W. Molitor, H. S. Joo, and M. S. Collett, “Porcine parvovirus: virus purification and structural and antigenic properties of virion polypeptides,” Journal of Virology, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 842–854, 1983.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Bergeron, J. Menezes, and P. Tijssen, “Genomic organization and mapping of transcription and translation products of the NADL-2 strain of porcine parvovirus,” Virology, vol. 197, no. 1, pp. 86–98, 1993.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Sedlik, M.-F. Saron, J. Sarraseca, I. Casal, and C. Leclerc, “Recombinant parvovirus-like particles as an antigen carrier: a novel nonreplicative exogenous antigen to elicit protective antiviral cytotoxic T cells,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 94, no. 14, pp. 7503–7508, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Pan, K. He, Y. Wang, X. Wang, and W. Ouyang, “Influence of minor displacements in loops of the porcine parvovirus VP2 capsid on virus-like particles assembly and the induction of antibody responses,” Virus Genes, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 465–472, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Xu and Y. Li, “Induction of immune responses in mice after intragastric administration of Lactobacillus casei producing porcine parvovirus VP2 protein,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 73, no. 21, pp. 7041–7047, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. A. Simpson, B. Hébert, G. M. Sullivan et al., “The structure of porcine parvovirus: comparison with related viruses,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 315, no. 5, pp. 1189–1198, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Qi and S. Cui, “Expression of porcine parvovirus VP2 gene requires codon optimized E. coli cells,” Virus Genes, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 217–222, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Martínez, K. Dalsgaard, J. A. Lopez de Turiso, E. Cortés, C. Vela, and J. I. Casal, “Production of porcine parvovirus empty capsids with high immunogenic activity,” Vaccine, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 684–690, 1992.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. F. G. Antonis, C. J. M. Bruschke, P. Rueda et al., “A novel recombinant virus-like particle vaccine for prevention of porcine parvovirus-induced reproductive failure,” Vaccine, vol. 24, no. 26, pp. 5481–5490, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Maranga, T. F. Brazão, and M. J. T. Carrondo, “Virus-like particle production at low multiplicities of infection with the baculovirus insect cell system,” Biotechnology and Bioengineering, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 245–253, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Guo, Z. Zhong, and Y. Huang, “Production and immunogenicity of VP2 protein of porcine parvovirus expressed in Pichia pastoris,” Archives of Virology, vol. 159, no. 5, pp. 963–970, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Lowin, U. Raab, J. Schroeder, R. Franssila, and S. Modrow, “Parvovirus B19 VP2-proteins produced in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: comparison with VP2-particles produced by baculovirus-derived vectors,” Journal of Veterinary Medicine B: Infectious Diseases and Veterinary Public Health, vol. 52, no. 7-8, pp. 348–352, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. L. Tamošiūnas, K. Simutis, I. Kodzė et al., “Production of human parvovirus 4 VP2 virus-like particles in yeast and their evaluation as an antigen for detection of virus-specific antibodies in human serum,” Intervirology, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 271–277, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
K. Sasnauskas, O. Buzaite, F. Vogel et al., “Yeast cells allow high-level expression and formation of polyomavirus-like particles,” Biological Chemistry, vol. 380, no. 3, pp. 381–386, 1999.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Sambrook and D. W. Russell, , Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, New York, NY, USA, 3rd edition, 2001.
D. Samuel, K. Sasnauskas, L. Jin et al., “High level expression of recombinant mumps nucleoprotein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its evaluation in mumps IgM serology,” Journal of Medical Virology, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 123–130, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Samuel, K. Sasnauskas, L. Jin et al., “Development of a measles specific IgM ELISA for use with serum and oral fluid samples using recombinant measles nucleoprotein produced in Saccharomyces cerevisiae,” Journal of Clinical Virology, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 121–129, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Köhler and C. Milstein, “Continuous cultures of fused cells secreting antibody of predefined specificity,” Nature, vol. 256, no. 5517, pp. 495–497, 1975.
View at: Google Scholar
P. Rueda, J. Fominaya, J. P. M. Langeveld, C. Bruschke, C. Vela, and J. I. Casal, “Effect of different baculovirus inactivation procedures on the integrity and immunogenicity of porcine parvovirus-like particles,” Vaccine, vol. 19, no. 7-8, pp. 726–734, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. A. Lopez de Turiso, E. Cortés, A. Ranz et al., “Fine mapping of canine parvovirus B cell epitopes,” Journal of General Virology, vol. 72, no. 10, pp. 2445–2456, 1991.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Kamstrup, J. P. M. Langeveld, A. Bøtner et al., “Mapping the antigenic structure of porcine parvovirus at the level of peptides,” Virus Research, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 163–173, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Lo-Man, P. Rueda, C. Sedlik, E. Deriaud, I. Casal, and C. Leclerc, “A recombinant virus-like particle system derived from parvovirus as an efficient antigen carrier to elicit a polarized Th1 immune response without adjuvant,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 1401–1407, 1998.
View at: Google Scholar
S. A. Bucarey, J. Noriega, P. Reyes et al., “The optimized capsid gene of porcine circovirus type 2 expressed in yeast forms virus-like particles and elicits antibody responses in mice fed with recombinant yeast extracts,” Vaccine, vol. 27, no. 42, pp. 5781–5790, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Riolobos, J. Reguera, M. G. Mateu, and J. M. Almendral, “Nuclear transport of trimeric assembly intermediates exerts a morphogenetic control on the icosahedral parvovirus capsid,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 357, no. 3, pp. 1026–1038, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Sedlik, A. Dridi, E. Deriaud et al., “Intranasal delivery of recombinant parvovirus-like particles elicits cytotoxic T-cell and neutralizing antibody responses,” Journal of Virology, vol. 73, no. 4, pp. 2739–2744, 1999.
View at: Google Scholar
Q. Pan, K. He, and K. Huang, “Development of recombinant porcine parvovirus-like particles as an antigen carrier formed by the hybrid VP2 protein carrying immunoreactive epitope of porcine circovirus type 2,” Vaccine, vol. 26, no. 17, pp. 2119–2126, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2014 Paulius Lukas Tamošiūnas et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

3383

Downloads

1524

Citations