Cellular Factors Targeting APCs to Modulate Adaptive T Cell Immunity

Visperas, Anabelle; Do, Jeongsu; Min, Booki

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/750374

Journal of Immunology Research

On this page

Abstract Introduction Conclusion Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Special Issue

Pathophysiological Roles of Cytokine-Chemokine Immune Network

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 | Article ID 750374 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/750374

Cellular Factors Targeting APCs to Modulate Adaptive T Cell Immunity

Anabelle Visperas,^1,2Jeongsu Do,¹and Booki Min^1,2

Academic Editor: Mizuko Mamura

Received08 Apr 2014

Accepted08 May 2014

Published14 Jul 2014

Abstract

The fate of adaptive T cell immunity is determined by multiple cellular and molecular factors, among which the cytokine milieu plays the most important role in this process. Depending on the cytokines present during the initial T cell activation, T cells become effector cells that produce different effector molecules and execute adaptive immune functions. Studies thus far have primarily focused on defining how these factors control T cell differentiation by targeting T cells themselves. However, other non-T cells, particularly APCs, also express receptors for the factors and are capable of responding to them. In this review, we will discuss how APCs, by responding to those cytokines, influence T cell differentiation and adaptive immunity.

1. Introduction

Naïve CD4 T cells stimulated by cognate antigens presented by professional APCs within the lymphoid tissues undergo clonal expansion and differentiate into distinct lineages of effector/regulatory subsets, orchestrate various adaptive immune responses, and then ultimately mature into memory phenotype cells that either continue to circulate the periphery or migrate into nonlymphoid tissues where they play a role in immune surveillance [1, 2]. Extensive efforts have been made to define cellular and molecular mechanisms that initiate the differentiation processes and to identify the features of each T cell subset. While Th1 type cells producing IFN are generated in the presence of IL-12, Th2 type cells producing IL-4 and IL-13 are generated in the presence of IL-4. Newly recognized proinflammatory IL-17-producing Th17 type cells are generated in the presence of IL-6 and TGF. On the other hand, Foxp3-expressing inducible regulatory T cells can be generated in the presence of TGF. Other effector/regulatory T cell subsets include Th9 and Tr1 type cells, which produce IL-9 and IL-10, respectively. Although a great number of cellular and molecular pathways to initiate the differentiation programs have already been uncovered, most of studies have heavily focused on those factors that directly target T cells. In this review, we will focus on the roles of factors that control T cell differentiation processes by acting on non-T-cell targets, especially APCs.

2. APC Stimulation by IL-12 and IFN

Naïve CD4 T cells activated in the presence of IL-12 become Th1 type effector CD4 T cells and play a key role in eliminating intracellular pathogens and viruses. IL-12 is a heterodimeric protein consisting of the IL-12p35 and IL-12p40 subunits [3], mainly produced by antigen presenting cells (APCs), and its production is greatly enhanced by microbial stimuli such as LPS. IL-12 binds the IL-12 receptor (IL-12R1 and IL-12R2) expressed on naive CD4 T cells, signals through STAT4 upon ligation of the receptor [3, 4], and induces transcription of Ets variant gene 5 (ERM) and T-box 21 [5, 6]. T-box transcription factor Tbx21, which encodes T-bet, is a Th1 specific transcription factor controlling the expression of IFN [7]. Mice deficient in IL-12 display impaired delayed type hypersensitivity responses and succumb to microbial infections such as Toxoplasma gondii or Cryptococcus neoformans due to the inability to mount Th1 responses [8, 9]. Likewise, T cells deficient in T-bet are unable to differentiate into Th1 cells and T-bet-deficient mice succumb to pathogen infections that are controlled by Th1 cells [7].

T-bet is also expressed by monocytes and myeloid DCs [10]. Indeed, it was reported that T-bet expression in DCs is essential for optimal induction of Th1 immunity in vivo [11]. T-bet-deficient DCs are unable to produce IFN after stimulation and to induce Th1 differentiation [11]. T-bet expression by DCs is also necessary for the Th2 to Th1 repolarization process that occurs during B7-DC cross-linking on DCs [12].

It is evident that IL-12 directly regulates the function of DCs and macrophages. Monocyte-derived DCs express both subunits of IL-12 receptors [13–15]. Stimulation of DCs by IL-12 induces expression of GM-CSF, IL-1, IL-6, and IFN, all of which could have a direct impact on T cell differentiation [16]. IL-12 stimulated DCs or macrophages are also capable of presenting an otherwise poorly immunogenic tumor peptide [14, 17]. An inhibitory mechanism of DC production of IL-12 via DC-specific ICAM-3 grabbing nonintegrin receptor 1 (DC-SIGNR1) was also identified. Stimulating DC-SIGNR1 in DCs increases suppressors of cytokine signaling 1 (SOCS1) and lowers IL-12 production [18].

IFN is the signature cytokine produced by differentiated Th1 type effector cells and regulates IL-18R/IL-12R expression on T cells to prime Th1 differentiation [19]. IFN also promotes DC maturation and enhances production of cytokines such as IL-1 and IL-12 by directly acting on DCs [20]. IFNR DCs exhibit impaired function to stimulate alloreactive T cells, to drive Th1 differentiation, and to induce efficient antitumor immunity [21]. Similarly, human monocytes in vitro stimulated with cytokine cocktails consisting of TNF, IL-1, IL-6, and prostaglandin E2 produce high levels of IL-10 and low levels of IL-12 [22]. Adding IFN into the culture condition dramatically increases IL-12 and decreases IL-10 production, thereby enhancing Th1 polarization [22]. IFN induces IL-27 production in DCs and favors induction of IL-10-producing Tr1 cells, limiting Th17-mediated autoimmune neuroinflammation [23]. The protective role of IFN is also associated with decreased expression of osteopontin, which is known to have potent proinflammatory function, in DCs [24]. Type I IFN is another potent cytokine similarly influencing adaptive Th17 cell immunity by acting on DCs by regulating expression of IL-27 and osteopontin. IFN acts on DCs, suppresses intracellular translational isoform of osteopontin, known as Opn-i, enhances IL-27 production, and antagonizes Th17 development [25].

We recently reported that IFN signaling in non-T-cell targets plays a critical role in limiting T cell responses and inflammation in the intestine [26]. Using a model of T-cell-induced colitis, a murine model of human inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) induced by naïve CD4 T cells transferred into immunodeficient recipients, we demonstrated that while transfer of naïve wild type CD4 T cells into Rag recipients induces chronic colitis that develops ~4 weeks after transfer, the same CD4 T cells transferred into IFNR Rag recipients induce acute fulminant colitis within 7 days after transfer [26]. Unlike above-mentioned studies where IFN stimulation of DCs alters DC production of cytokines that promote Th1 differentiation, the relative proportion of IFN-producing CD4 T cell generation in these recipients is similar in the absence of host expression of IFNR. Instead, the overall expansion of activated T cells (i.e., IFN- and IL-17-producing CD4 T cells) is dramatically enhanced in this condition [26]. It turned out that IFN signaling in DCs enhances T cell responses in part by directly controlling survival of DCs. As a result, DCs deficient in IFNR display enhanced survival in vivo, possibly resulting in prolonged stimulation to T cells [26]. Sercan et al. similarly reported that IFN signaling in CD11b+ cells controls memory CD8 T cell differentiation [27]. However, a cellular mechanism by which IFN-mediates memory fate decision remains to be examined.

3. APC Stimulation by IL-4

IL-4 is a key cytokine that induces Th2 differentiation by acting on the IL-4 receptors expressed on naïve CD4 T cells [28]. IL-4 signals through STAT6 molecule, activates expression of Th2 associated transcription factors such as GATA3 and c-Maf, and induces expression of Th2 signature cytokines, IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 [28]. IL-4 exerts its biologic function using two distinct types of IL-4 receptors, type I (IL-4R and c) and type II (IL-4R and IL-13R1) receptors [29]. The expression of both receptors is different depending on the cell types. While T cells, the major targets of IL-4, express only type I receptors, DCs and macrophages express both receptors [30]. In DCs, differential functions of IL-4 receptors were noted. For example, IL-4 induces DC maturation, upregulating MHCII and costimulatory molecule expression, via type II IL-4R [30]. By contrast, IL-4 also enhances IL-12 production in DCs induced by microbial products, and this function is mediated by the type I IL-4R [30]. IL-4-mediated induction of IL-12 production in DCs is achieved through downregulation of IL-10 [31]. Moreover, IL-4 also induces IL-4 production in DCs [32]. Consistent with these findings, Guenova et al. reported that human DCs differentiated under low-dose IL-4 produce no IL-12 and promote Th2 differentiation, while DCs differentiated under high-dose IL-4 produce large amounts of IL-12 and low IL-10; thereby, Th1 differentiation is preferentially induced [33]. Therefore, IL-4 acting on DCs may influence both Th1 and Th2 differentiation.

Regulatory roles of IL-4 in DC function were recently examined using DC-specific IL-4R deficient animals. Hurdayal et al. reported that IL-4 signaling in DCs plays a key role in mounting protective immune responses using a Leishmania major infection model [34]. Susceptibility to L. major infection is largely determined by the development of Th2 type responses [35]. Paradoxically, IL-4 administration during early infection enhances IL-12 production by DCs and establishes resistance to L. major in susceptible BALB/c mice [36]. CD11c-cre IL-4R mice infected with L. major become hypersusceptible to the infection [34].

IL-4-mediated modulation of DC function was also found in other infection models. Infection of IL-4-deficient mice with Candida albicans results in impaired development of Th1 immunity [37]. A molecular mechanism underlying the roles of IL-4 in regulating DC production of IL-12 and IL-10 will be a subject of importance especially for vaccine development.

4. APC Stimulation by IL-27

IL-27 is a heterodimeric protein consisting of the IL-27p28 and Ebi3 subunits and binds to the IL-27R complexes made of IL-27R/TCCR/WSX-1 and gp130 [38]. IL-27 is primarily produced by APCs activated by IFN, TLR ligands, or type I IFNs [38]. Both pro- and anti-inflammatory roles of IL-27 have been well documented. For example, Th1 differentiation is greatly enhanced by IL-27, while IL-27 antagonizes Th1, Th2, and Th17 type effector responses in part by inhibiting IL-2 production [39], [38]. IL-27 induces T-bet expression and activates both STAT1 and STAT4, promoting Th1 differentiation [10, 40]. Accordingly, mice deficient in IL-27R infected with intracellular pathogens including Listeria, Leishmania, and Mycobacteria are more susceptible to the infections [41]. Following Toxoplasma gondii infection in IL-27R mice, a robust IFN response is induced and the clearance of the infection is rapidly achieved. However, these mice succumb to uncontrolled immune activation [42], strongly suggesting that IL-27 not only may promote Th1 differentiation, but also may be important to suppress overactive immune responses, possibly by inducing IL-10 by CD4 T cells [43]. IL-27-mediated suppression of Th17 immunity is also supported by the fact that IL-27R mice develop more severe experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) [44].

Immunoregulatory roles of IL-27 described above are examples of IL-27 action on T cells. However, IL-27 receptors are expressed on multiple cell types, including DCs and macrophages [38]. IL-27 upregulates MHC and TLR4 expression in human monocytes, resulting in increased production of IL-1 and IL-6 following LPS stimulation [45]. Alternatively, IL-27 downregulates IL-12 production by activated macrophages in Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection models [46]. IL-27 is also capable of inducing B7-H1 expression in DCs, which then display reduced function to stimulate allogeneic T cell responses [47]. IL-27 was recently reported to induce CD39 expression in DCs and interferes with EAE development [48]. CD39 induced by IL-27 decreases the extracellular ATP and downregulates ATP-mediated activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome [48].

By contrast, we recently reported that IL-27 signaling in non-T cells especially macrophages and DCs plays a crucial role in generating proinflammatory Th17 responses [49]. This conclusion is made based on the T-cell-induced colitis model using lymphopenic mice deficient in IL-27R. While IL-27R+ lymphopenic mice that receive naïve CD4 T cells develop chronic colitis associated with colitogenic Th1 and Th17 type effector cell generation, lymphopenic mice deficient in IL-27R are completely protected from the colitis after the T cell transfer. Interestingly, generation of IL-17-producing CD4 T cells is completely abrogated in this condition, while IFN-producing CD4 T cell generation remains unaltered [49]. To investigate which host cells are responsible for the lack of Th17 differentiation, we next examined DCs and macrophage expression of cytokines promoting Th17 differentiation, namely, IL-1 and IL-6. Indeed, APCs from IL-27R mice failed to produce IL-1 and IL-6. Therefore, it seems that IL-27 produced by activated APCs acts on the same or neighboring APCs to increase production of Th17-promoting cytokines. Unlike above-mentioned studies, we were not able to find immunosuppressive roles of IL-27 in DCs. It will be important to identify cellular and molecular pathways of IL-27 leading to immunostimulatory or immunosuppressive function of DCs.

5. APC Stimulation by Other Cytokines

5.1. IL-21

IL-21 is a cytokine produced by activated CD4 T cells and NK cells. Previous studies demonstrated a key role for IL-21 in Th17 differentiation, when acting with TGF, as a redundant cytokine to IL-6 [50]. IL-21 also amplifies Th17 differentiation in concert with IL-23 [50–52]. IL-21 is known to have a pleiotropic role by controlling multiple cell functions. IL-21 inhibits DC function to mediate T cell activation [53]. Thus, IL-21-treated DCs are unable to induce CD8 T cell proliferation and contact hypersensitivity responses [53]. It was also reported that IL-21 induces granzyme B expression in human plasmacytoid DCs, which then partially impairs pDC function to stimulate T cell proliferation [54]. Type I diabetes susceptibility locus known as insulin-dependent diabetes susceptibility 3 (Idd3) encodes cytokine gene IL-21 and regulates diabetes [55]. It was demonstrated that APCs from diabetes-susceptible NOD and diabetes-resistant NOD. Idd3 mice differentially support diabetogenic Th17 immunity and that IL-21 signaling in APCs plays a critical role in regulating the Th17-promoting APC functions [55].

5.2. IL-17

IL-17 is the signature cytokine produced by Th17 cells. Many Th17 cells produce IL-17A and IL-17F. IL-17 plays a protective role in host defense against extracellular pathogens and fungus especially at the epithelial and mucosal surface [56]. IL-17 promotes the generation of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, which attract neutrophils and macrophages to the sites [57, 58]. IL-17-responding targets cells include nonhematopoietic cells including fibroblasts and epithelial cells, as well as macrophages and neutrophils. IL-17 also acts on DCs [59]. IL-17A but not IL-17F stimulates bone marrow derived DCs to secrete more IL-12, IL-6, and IL-1 [59]. IL-17A also upregulates MHCI expression in DCs [59]. IL-17 stimulation in DCs enhances cross-priming function for CD8 T cells during Listeria infection [59], although whether it also affects CD4 T cell responses remains to be examined.

6. Conclusion

Activated APCs are the main sources of cytokines capable of influencing adaptive T cell responses. As discussed in this review, there is evidence that APCs are also potent target cells of these cytokines, and the stimulation of APCs might have equally important roles in generating different effector immunity (Figure 1). Therefore, many cytokines will affect T cell immunity by acting on the T cells in concert with its targeting on APCs. In order to dissect the pathways in vivo, utilizing animal models with a cell type specific deletion of cytokine receptors will be an ideal approach. Endeavor to understand the pathways has already begun.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This paper is supported by NIH Grants R01-AI074932 (B.M.) and T32-GM088088 (A.V.) and by the Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation of America SRA no. 291524 (B.M.).

References

J. Kaye, “Niche marketing: regulation of the homeostasis of naive CD4⁺ T cells,” Nature Immunology, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 136–138, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Pepper and M. K. Jenkins, “Origins of CD4⁺ effector and central memory T cells,” Nature Immunology, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 467–471, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. K. Gately, L. M. Renzetti, J. Magram et al., “The interleukin-12/interleukin-12-receptor system: role in normal and pathologic immune responses,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 16, pp. 495–521, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. E. Thierfelder, J. M. van Deursen, K. Yamamoto et al., “Requirement for Stat4 in interleukin-12-mediated responses of natural killer and T cells,” Nature, vol. 382, no. 6587, pp. 171–174, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Ouyang, N. G. Jacobson, D. Bhattacharya et al., “The Ets transcription factor ERM is Th1-specific and induced by IL-12 through a Stat4-dependent pathway,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 96, no. 7, pp. 3888–3893, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Yang, J. C. Ochando, J. S. Bromberg, and Y. Ding, “Identification of a distant T-bet enhancer responsive to IL-12/Stat4 and IFNγ/Stat1 signals,” Blood, vol. 110, no. 7, pp. 2494–2500, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. J. Szabo, B. M. Sullivan, C. Sternmann, A. R. Satoskar, B. P. Sleckman, and L. H. Glimcher, “Distinct effects of T-bet in T_H1 lineage commitment and IFN-γ production in CD4 and CD8 T cells,” Science, vol. 295, no. 5553, pp. 338–342, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Decken, G. Köhler, K. Palmer-Lehmann et al., “Interleukin-12 is essential for a protective Th1 response in mice infected with Cryptococcus neoformans,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 66, no. 10, pp. 4994–5000, 1998.
View at: Google Scholar
G. Yap, M. Pesin, and A. Sher, “Cutting edge: IL-12 is required for the maintenance of IFN- $γ$ production in T cells mediating chronic resistance to the intracellular pathogen, Toxoplasma gondii,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 165, no. 2, pp. 628–631, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. A. Lighvani, D. M. Frucht, D. Jankovic et al., “T-bet is rapidly induced by interferon-γ in lymphoid and myeloid cells,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 98, no. 26, pp. 15137–15142, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Lugo-Villarino, R. Maldonado-López, R. Possemato, C. Peñaranda, and L. H. Glimcher, “T-bet is required for optimal production of IFN-γ and antigen-specific T cell activation by dendritic cells,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 100, no. 13, pp. 7749–7754, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. L. Heckman, S. Radhakrishnan, T. Peikert et al., “T-bet expression by dendritic cells is required for the repolarization of allergic airway inflammation,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 2464–2474, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Nagayama, K. Sato, H. Kawasaki et al., “IL-12 responsiveness and expression of IL-12 receptor in human peripheral blood monocyte-derived dendritic cells,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 165, no. 1, pp. 59–66, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
U. Grohmann, M. L. Belladonna, C. Vacca et al., “Positive regulatory role of IL-12 in macrophages and modulation by IFN-γ,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 167, no. 1, pp. 221–227, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
U. Grohmann, M. L. Belladonna, R. Bianchi et al., “IL-12 acts directly on DC to promote nuclear localization of NF-κB and primes DC for IL-12 production,” Immunity, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 315–323, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Tompsett, W. D. Mc, and J. G. Kidd, “Tuberculostatic activity of blood and urine from animals given gliotoxin.,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 59–63, 1950.
View at: Google Scholar
M. L. Belladonna, J. Renauld, R. Bianchi et al., “IL-23 and IL-12 have overlapping, but distinct, effects on murine dendritic cells,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 168, no. 11, pp. 5448–5454, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Srivastava, M. Manchanda, S. Gupta et al., “Toll-like receptor 2 and DC-SIGNR1 differentially regulate suppressors of cytokine signaling 1 in dendritic cells during Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 284, no. 38, pp. 25532–25541, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. B. Smeltz, J. Chen, R. Ehrhardt, and E. M. Shevach, “Role of IFN-γ in Th1 differentiation: IFN-γ regulates IL-18Rα expression by preventing the negative effects of IL-4 and by inducing/maintaining IL-12 receptor β2 expression,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 168, no. 12, pp. 6165–6172, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Pan, M. Zhang, J. Wang et al., “Interferon-γ is an autocrine mediator for dendritic cell maturation,” Immunology Letters, vol. 94, no. 1-2, pp. 141–151, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. He, C. Tang, S. Xu, T. Moyana, and J. Xiang, “Interferon gamma stimulates cellular maturation of dendritic cell line DC2.4 leading to induction of efficient cytotoxic T cell responses and antitumor immunity,” Cellular & Molecular Immunology, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 105–111, 2007.
View at: Google Scholar
B. Hildenbrand, D. Lorenzen, B. Sauer et al., “IFN-γ enhances T_H1 polarisation of monocyte-derived dendritic cells matured with clinical-grade cytokines using serum-free conditions,” Anticancer Research, vol. 28, no. 3 A, pp. 1467–1476, 2008.
View at: Google Scholar
D. C. Fitzgerald, G. X. Zhang, M. El-Behi et al., “Suppression of autoimmune inflammation of the central nervous system by interleukin 10 secreted by interleukin 27-stimulated T cells,” Nature Immunology, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 1372–1379, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Murugaiyan, A. Mittal, and H. L. Weiner, “Identification of an IL-27/osteopontin axis in dendritic cells and its modulation by IFN-γ limits IL-17-mediated autoimmune inflammation,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 107, no. 25, pp. 11495–11500, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. L. Shinohara, J. Kim, V. A. Garcia, and H. Cantor, “Engagement of the type I interferon receptor on dendritic cells inhibits T helper 17 cell development: role of intracellular osteopontin,” Immunity, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 68–78, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. S. Do, K. Asosingh, W. M. Baldwin III, and B. Min, “Cutting edge: IFN-γR signaling in non-T cell targets regulates T cell-mediated intestinal inflammation through multiple mechanisms,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 192, no. 6, pp. 2537–2541, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Ö. Sercan, D. Stoycheva, G. J. Hämmerling, B. Arnold, and T. Schüler, “IFN-γ receptor signaling regulates memory CD8⁺ T cell differentiation,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 184, no. 6, pp. 2855–2862, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Zhu, H. Yamane, and W. E. Paul, “Differentiation of effector CD4⁺ T cell populations,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 28, pp. 445–489, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Nelms, A. D. Keegan, J. Zamorano, J. J. Ryan, and W. E. Paul, “The IL-4 receptor: signaling mechanisms and biologic functions,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 17, pp. 701–738, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. B. Lutz, M. Schnare, M. Menges et al., “Differential functions of IL-4 receptor types I and II for dendritic cell maturation and IL-12 production and their dependency on GM-CSF,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 169, no. 7, pp. 3574–3580, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Yao, W. Li, M. H. Kaplan, and C. Chang, “Interleukin (IL)-4 inhibits IL-10 to promote IL-12 production by dendritic cells,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 201, no. 12, pp. 1899–1903, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Maroof, M. Penny, R. Kingston et al., “Interleukin-4 can induce interleukin-4 production in dendritic cells,” Immunology, vol. 117, no. 2, pp. 271–279, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Guenova, T. Volz, K. Sauer et al., “IL-4-mediated fine tuning of IL-12p70 production by human DC,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 3138–3149, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Hurdayal, N. E. Nieuwenhuizen, M. Revaz-Breton et al., “Deletion of IL-4 receptor alpha on dendritic cells renders BALB/c mice hypersusceptible to Leishmania major infection,” PLOS Pathogens, vol. 9, no. 10, Article ID e1003699, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
S. L. Reiner and R. M. Locksley, “The regulation of immunity to Leishmania major,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 13, pp. 151–177, 1995.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Biedermann, S. Zimmermann, H. Himmelrich et al., “IL-4 instructs T_HI responses and resistance to Leishmania major in susceptible BALB/c mice,” Nature Immunology, vol. 2, no. 11, pp. 1054–1060, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Mencacci, G. Del Sero, E. Cenci et al., “Endogenous interleukin 4 is required for development of protective CD4+ T helper type 1 cell responses to Candida albicans,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 187, no. 3, pp. 307–317, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. O. Hall, J. S. Silver, and C. A. Hunter, “The Immunobiology of IL-27,” Advances in Immunology, vol. 115, pp. 1–44, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. V. Villarino, J. S. Stumhofer, C. J. M. Saris, R. A. Kastelein, F. J. de Sauvage, and C. A. Hunter, “IL-27 limits IL-2 production during Th1 differentiation,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 176, no. 1, pp. 237–247, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Lucas, N. Ghilardi, J. Li, and F. J. de Sauvage, “IL-27 regulates IL-12 responsiveness of naïve CD4+ T cells through Stat1-dependent and -independent mechanisms,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 100, no. 25, pp. 15047–15052, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. V. Villarino, E. Huang, and C. A. Hunter, “Understanding the pro- and anti-inflammatory properties of IL-27,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 173, no. 2, pp. 715–720, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Villarino, L. Hibbert, L. Lieberman et al., “The IL-27R (WSX-1) is required to suppress T cell hyperactivity during infection,” Immunity, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 645–655, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Batten, N. M. Kljavin, J. Li, M. J. Walter, F. J. de Sauvage, and N. Ghilardi, “Cutting edge: IL-27 is a potent inducer of IL-10 but not FoxP3 in murine T cells,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 180, no. 5, pp. 2752–2756, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Batten, J. Li, S. Yi et al., “Interleukin 27 limits autoimmune encephalomyelitis by suppressing the development of interleukin 17-producing T cells,” Nature Immunology, vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 929–936, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Guzzo, A. Ayer, S. Basta, B. W. Banfield, and K. Gee, “IL-27 enhances LPS-induced proinflammatory cytokine production via upregulation of TLR4 expression and signaling in human monocytes,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 188, no. 2, pp. 864–873, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Hölscher, A. Hölscher, D. Rückerl et al., “The IL-27 receptor chain WSX-1 differentially regulates antibacterial immunity and survival during experimental tuberculosis,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 174, no. 6, pp. 3534–3544, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Karakhanova, T. Bedke, A. H. Enk, and K. Mahnke, “Il-27 renders DC immunosuppressive by induction of B7-H1,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 89, no. 6, pp. 837–845, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. D. Mascanfroni, A. Yeste, S. M. Vieira et al., “IL-27 acts on DCs to suppress the T cell response and autoimmunity by inducing expression of the immunoregulatory molecule CD39,” Nature Immunology, vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 1054–1063, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Visperas, J. S. Do, K. Bulek, X. Li, and B. Min, “IL-27, targeting antigen-presenting cells, promotes Th17 differentiation and colitis in mice,” Mucosal Immunology, vol. 7, pp. 625–633, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Korn, E. Bettelli, W. Gao et al., “IL-21 initiates an alternative pathway to induce proinflammatory T H17 cells,” Nature, vol. 448, no. 7152, pp. 484–487, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Nurieva, X. O. Yang, G. Martinez et al., “Essential autocrine regulation by IL-21 in the generation of inflammatory T cells,” Nature, vol. 448, no. 7152, pp. 480–483, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Zhou, I. I. Ivanov, R. Spolski et al., “IL-6 programs TH-17 cell differentiation by promoting sequential engagement of the IL-21 and IL-23 pathways,” Nature Immunology, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 967–974, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Brandt, S. Bulfone-Paus, A. Jenckel, D. C. Foster, R. Paus, and R. Rückert, “Interleukin-21 inhibits dendritic cell-mediated T cell activation and induction of contact hypersensitivity in vivo,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 121, no. 6, pp. 1379–1382, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. J. Karrich, L. C. M. Jachimowski, M. Nagasawa et al., “IL-21-stimulated human plasmacytoid dendritic cells secrete granzyme B, which impairs their capacity to induce T-cell proliferation.,” Blood, vol. 121, no. 16, pp. 3103–3111, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. M. Liu, D. H. Lee, J. M. Sullivan et al., “Differential IL-21 signaling in APCs leads to disparate Th17 differentiation in diabetes-susceptible NOD and diabetes-resistant NOD.Idd3 mice,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 121, no. 11, pp. 4303–4310, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Korn, E. Bettelli, M. Oukka, and V. K. Kuchroo, “IL-17 and Th17 cells,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 27, pp. 485–517, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Laan, Z. Cui, H. Hoshino et al., “Neutrophil recruitment by human IL-17 via C-X-C chemokine release in the airways,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 162, no. 4, pp. 2347–2352, 1999.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Sergejeva, S. Ivanov, J. Lötvall, and A. Lindén, “Interleukin-17 as a recruitment and survival factor for airway macrophages in allergic airway inflammation,” American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 248–253, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Xu, Y. Han, X. Xu, Y. Bao, M. Zhang, and X. Cao, “IL-17A-producing γδT cells promote CTL responses against Listeria monocytogenes infection by enhancing dendritic cell cross-presentation,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 185, no. 10, pp. 5879–5887, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2014 Anabelle Visperas et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1316

Downloads

983

Citations