About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Journal of Immunology Research

Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 850831, 6 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/850831
Review Article

Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections in Infants Affected by Primary Immunodeficiency

1Pediatrics and Neonatology Unit, Imola Hospital, Via Montericco 4, 40026 Imola, Italy

2DIMEC, Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, St. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Via Massarenti 11, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy

3DIMES, Clinical Microbiology Unit, Laboratory of Virology, St. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Via Massarenti 9, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy

Received 5 May 2014; Revised 11 June 2014; Accepted 12 June 2014; Published 25 June 2014

Academic Editor: Roshini Sarah Abraham

Copyright © 2014 Marcello Lanari et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Primary immunodeficiencies are rare inherited disorders that may lead to frequent and often severe acute respiratory infections. Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is one of the most frequent pathogens during early infancy and the infection is more severe in immunocompromised infants than in healthy infants, as a result of impaired T- and B-cell immune response unable to efficaciously neutralize viral replication, with subsequent increased viral shedding and potentially lethal lower respiratory tract infection. Several authors have reported a severe clinical course after RSV infections in infants and children with primary and acquired immunodeficiencies. Environmental prophylaxis is essential in order to reduce the infection during the epidemic season in hospitalized immunocompromised infants. Prophylaxis with palivizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody against the RSV F protein, is currently recommended in high-risk infants born prematurely, with chronic lung disease or congenital heart disease. Currently however the prophylaxis is not routinely recommended in infants with primary immunodeficiency, although some authors propose the extension of prophylaxis to this high risk population.

1. Introduction

RSV is a ubiquitous RNA virus of the Pneumovirus genus and Paramyxoviridae family responsible for frequent acute respiratory infections especially in young infants. Specific antibodies are detectable in 87% of infants younger than 18 months [1] and virtually in all 3-year-old infants.

It was estimated that over 33 million episodes of RSV-related lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) occurred worldwide in 2005 in children younger than 5 years of age [2]. During that same year, the estimated hospitalizations for severe acute LRTI in young children were 3.4 (2.8–4.3) million (16.9 per 1000 for infants aged 0 to 5 months and 5.1 per 1000 for infants aged 6 to 11 months). The mortality rate was 66,000–199,000/year for children younger than 5 years; 99% of deaths occurred in the developing countries [3].

RSV epidemics in infants younger than 5 years old have a strong impact on pediatric healthcare. In 2000 in the USA, RSV infections lead to 86,000 hospitalizations, 402,000 emergency room visits, 1.7 million office visits, and 236,000 hospital outpatient visits. The estimated cost of these visits and hospitalization was near $258 million [4]. Moreover, RSV LRTI was observed to have a long term impact in the incidence of recurrent wheezing during the first year of life, as recently pointed out in healthy preterm infants born at 33–35 weeks of gestational age [5].

Although RSV-associated mortality is ninefold higher than influenza-associated mortality during the first year of life [6], mortality rate in healthy infants with RSV infections is less than 0.5%, but it may reach up to 60% in infants with immunodeficiency [7]. Several studies have reported that life-threatening RSV LRTI are more frequent in infants with congenital or acquired immunodeficiencies (HIV infections, hematopoietic stem cells, and solid organs transplant recipients) than in healthy infants [812]. These infants have prolonged viral shedding because of impaired B-cell and T-cell immunity, lymphopenia, and neutropenia [13]. Prolonged viral shedding may lead to a higher viral load, which is responsible for a more severe LRTI.

2. Immune Response to RSV Infections in Infancy

Two different subtypes (A and B) of RSV were identified depending on variations in G protein and the two subtypes coexist during every RSV season. Subtype A is probably associated to more severe infections [14, 15]. The severity of the disease and the need for hospitalization are not only related to the subtype, but also to individual factors influencing the immune response such as age, prematurity, preexisting diseases, immunological disorders, and environmental factors (birth during the epidemic season, presence of siblings, crowding, second-hand smoke exposure, daycare attendance, pollutions, meteorological parameters as temperature, and humidity that may interfere with viral replication and with the clearance of the virus in the airways [1618]).

Similar to other respiratory viruses, RSV infection does not induce an effective immunological memory because of the high heterogeneity of protein A, B, and G [19] and for this reason it can cause reinfections that are usually less severe than the primary infection and may occur repeatedly [20, 21].

Especially in younger infants, a primary RSV infection evokes a poor immune response, and it has limited effect on subsequent reinfection [22, 23]. Once a host is exposed to RSV, the innate mucosal immune response is activated and it determines the serum antibody response that prevents the progression to LRTI through virus neutralization [2426].

The response to RSV infection induces both serum and secretory antibody production, even in the first years of life when the antibody titers are lower [27, 28]. In murine models, RSV-specific antibodies do not seem to play an essential role in the resolution of infection [29]. Canadian databases reported that the incidence of RSV-induced LRTI is significantly lower with higher antibody titers [30]. However, when the virus infects the lungs of the host it is the cellular immune response that promotes viral clearance.

T-cell mediated immune response is also involved in the protection against RSV associated illness through the induction of viral clearance, even if the mechanisms of the immune response has not been extensively clarified [25, 26].

The role of CD4 T cells is crucial to maintain the balance between the effector and the regulatory immune response in the lungs infected by RSV. An abnormal CD4 T-cell response was observed to lead to a more severe disease through the activation of Th2-, Th9-, and Th17-related cytokines as observed in murine models or in some vaccination trials [31]. Moreover, IL-10 polymorphisms are related to susceptibility to severe LRTI [31].

RSV infection leads to a CD4 Th2-mediated immune response resulting in mucus production and airway hyperactivity that determine the symptoms of bronchiolitis and LRTI; young infants are more predisposed toward this response than adults [32].

Newborn and infants, particularly those born prematurely, are susceptible to severe LRTI because of the small size of the airways where the airway edema and sloughing of epithelial cells cause atelectasis and subsequent mismatching of ventilation and perfusion and decreased oxygenation.

CD4 Th2 cells also play a key role in the regulation of the immune response aimed to protect the lungs to an immunomediated toxic effect; this homeostasis is mediated by regulatory T cells (Tregs) and IL-10 [3336]. Alterations in number and function of Tregs and IL-10 result in a more severe immune response after RSV infection in animal models, while the effects of these alterations in human are still not clear, but they have an influence on the clinical course of the infection [32].

Several hypotheses on the mechanisms modulating the immune response against RSV infections may be inferred from an unfortunate experience with a potential RSV vaccine that occurred in the 1960s. In the 1960s, an experimental vaccine against RSV inactivated with formalin (FI-RSV) was administered in a randomized controlled trial to a group of four-month-old infants and their siblings younger than 10 years (219 subjects received FI-RSV vaccine) and to a group of healthy infants between the ages of 6 and 24 months [36]. As a result of a subsequent natural RSV infection that occurred during the following epidemic season, 80% of the FI-RSV-vaccinated children were hospitalized with a severe LRTI [3638]. In two cases, RSV infection after FI-RSV-immunization was fatal [39]. Postmortem histology of the lungs revealed an extensive mononuclear cell infiltrate and the presence of numerous eosinophils. In addition, a significantly greater number of eosinophils were found in the blood of vaccinated infants than in blood of control children [36]. The immune mechanisms responsible for this response to vaccine were subsequently investigated through a murine model.

The lack of protective effect of FI-RSV vaccine and its correlation to a more severe clinical course of the infection was probably due to several factors, including the inadequate development of poorly neutralizing antibodies against RSV-encoded epitopes, incomplete affinity maturation of the antibodies, and lack of an anti-RSV cytotoxic T lymphocyte response [40]. The response to FI-RSV vaccine was associated to the activation of IL-4 secreting CD4+ cells (Th2) with more significant pulmonary damages, often marked by eosinophilic infiltration, leading to severe respiratory disease in these children [41, 42].

Children with T-cell deficiencies are unable to efficiently clear RSV, confirming that T cells indeed play a role in virus neutralization and subsequently they are at a higher risk for severe and potentially lethal viral infections, including RSV LRTI [23, 43]. Moreover, both neutropenia and lymphocyte depletion are risk factors for prolonged and increased viral replication and shedding, which leads to severe and prolonged respiratory infections. The most important causes of deaths in infants with primary immunodeficiency are sepsis and pneumonia [44].

The real incidence of primary immunodeficiency is probably underestimated [45], since they usually start with recurrent infections that are very common also in healthy infants in the first period of life. Infections are often severe and caused by unusual pathogens, but also recurrent respiratory infections caused by RSV and other widespread respiratory viruses are often a presenting feature of undiagnosed T-cell immunodeficiencies at a median age of four months [46, 47].

3. Epidemiology of RSV Infections in Immunocompromised Infants

Clinical studies considering the incidence of RSV infections in immunocompromised infants often consider both primary and acquired immunodeficiencies, probably because RSV causes the same clinical manifestations in infants with any severe immunodeficiency including hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and oncologic disorders [8, 11, 39, 48, 49], HIV infection [50, 51].

The first study considering immunocompromised infants with RSV infections was conducted over ten consecutive winter seasons, [52] and analyzed the correlation between the severity of an episode of RSV infection and the immune status in 608 hospitalized infants younger than 5 years. Of these, 7.7% of them had an immunocompromised status due to chemotherapy, steroid therapy, or a primary immunodeficiency disorder and they had a higher mortality rate. A retrospective review [53] observed that 2.2% infants hospitalized for RSV infections were immunocompromised. Moreover, infants with immunodeficiency had a longer hospital stay (median 39 days) than other high-risk infants like those with CHD or CLD (11 days) and infants <6 weeks of age (5 days). The presence of preexisting diseases including immunodeficiencies was demonstrated to increase admissions in intensive care units (ICU) and mortality (RR 2.36, 95% CI 2.02 to 2.76) in a cohort of 406 infants hospitalized for RSV infections from 1999 to 2007 [12]. A retrospective study [43] reviewed 22 cases of respiratory infections in children with primary immunodeficiency undergoing bone marrow transplantation: RSV was detected in 3 cases of severe viral pneumonitis that were treated with ribavirin and high-titre specific immunoglobulin. In the PICNIC study (Paediatric Investigators Collaborative Network on Infections in Canada) [54], the incidence of RSV-related hospitalizations was observed to be higher in infants with immunodeficiency, as well as other high-risk infants such as infants born prematurely or with CLD or CHD. Infants with Down syndrome are at high risk of severe LRTI because they are often affected by CHD, but they may also have immunological disorders involving B cells and T cells [5557]. A prospective national birth cohort [58] reported a hospitalization rate near 10% in these infants irrespective of coexisting CHD. This phenomenon occurred because Down syndrome children have altered immune response, abnormal thymic development and function, and decreased number of B cells and T cells, especially in the first 2 years of life. In addition, in vivo proliferative tests showed an increased susceptibility to infectious pathogens. These data were confirmed by a recent cohort study [7] that enrolled 117 immunocompromised pediatric in-patients with an acute community-acquired RSV infection from 2006 to 2011: 28.2% had Down syndrome. The ICU admission rate was >20% and the mortality rate was 5%.

4. RSV Prophylaxis in Immunocompromised Infants

Environmental prevention is extremely important to reduce both nosocomial and community-acquired respiratory infections, in particular in high-risk patients as immunocompromised infants.

The diffusion of the virus can be controlled by protective measures such as hand washing, isolation of positive hospitalized cases (cohorting) and with the use of gloves, masks, and protective clothing by dedicated staff. Moreover, in epidemic seasons immunocompromised infants and children should be hospitalized in special designated areas where other patients, caregivers, and visitors should be checked for respiratory infections and where the admission of visitors is limited [59].

Pharmacological prophylaxis in immunocompromised infants is based on the use of palivizumab. Palivizumab is a humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody obtained through recombining DNA technique specific for an epitope of antigen A of F (fusion) protein of RSV. The mAbs have the same properties of a human IgG1, with a long half-life (28 days). It is free from the risk of transmission of blood-borne pathogens, which is particularly important in immunocompromised infants. Palivizumab was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in the United States in 1998; it is currently the only approved monoclonal antibody used for RSV prophylaxis and it was observed to determine a 55% decrease in RSV-related hospitalizations [60]. It is composed of two sequences, a human one (95%) and a murine one (5%). Palivizumab neutralizes and inhibits the fusion of the F protein of the virus to infected epithelial respiratory cells and interferes with viral replication. It is currently used in epidemic periods with monthly intramuscular administration to prevent RSV hospitalizations in high risk subjects. The use of this drug is regulated by guidelines and recommendations of several pediatric societies to optimize its cost-effectiveness [6166] (AAP, Canadian Pediatric Society, Italian Neonatology Society, Spanish Neonatology Society, Japan Pediatric Society, and others). The recommendations are well defined in presence of prematurity, CLD, and hemodynamically significant CHD. However, the use of this drug in infants with immunological disorders is instead still controversial and rarely recommended in current guidelines and its cost-effectiveness is still a matter of debate. Until recently, the British Columbia Guidelines [65] has stated that infants eligible for palivizumab administration include infants with severe immunodeficiency. A recent Japanese study [67] reported that 1,115 infants younger than 4 years were hospitalized for RSV infections in a 2-year consecutive seasons: 756 of them had underlying disorders that were not included in the criteria for palivizumab prophylaxis in Japan. These disorders included severe immunodeficiency and Down syndrome.

The severity of RSV infections in infants with primary immunodeficiency and the lack of recommendations for prophylaxis in current guidelines have led several authors to consider the “off-label” extension of the use of palivizumab to these uncommon and severe diseases. A Delphi study was performed by Gaboli et al. [9] to obtain a consensus in a group of expert pediatric pulmonologists regarding the off-label use of palivizumab in 43 diseases: the consensus was obtained for 24 out of the 43, including primary immunodeficiencies. In Italy, even if prophylaxis in these cases was not included in the Italian Neonatology Society [62] recommendations, some authors [68] administered the prophylaxis with palivizumab to 2 infants with primary immunodeficiencies (one case with Di George syndrome and one case with Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome) and 2 infants with acquired immunodeficiencies (2 cases with HIV infection) with good compliance and efficacy.

5. Conclusions

Mortality and morbidity due to RSV LRTI infections are higher in infants with primary immunological disorders than in healthy infants. The risk is similar to other rare and severe disorders such as malformations of the airways, cystic fibrosis, and neuromuscular diseases, which are also not included in current recommendations for prophylaxis. The experience of clinicians treating these rare and severe disorders is essential to assess that prophylaxis should be extended to all infants at increased risk for severe and potentially lethal RSV infections.

The use of palivizumab in addition to environmental prophylaxis in selected immunocompromised patients was proved to be effective and free from adverse events. Current guidelines for this prophylaxis do not contain recommendations for these high risk infants, although some authors endorse the extension for treatment to immunodeficient subjects. The inclusion of such very high risk patients in guidelines will prevent unnecessary hospitalizations and deaths.

At present, randomized clinical trials (RCT) on the efficacy of palivizumab prophylaxis in immunocompromised infants have not been conducted, probably because of the low incidence of these disorders and the ethical controversies surrounding them.

RCT conducted in patients with immunological disorders could confirm the efficacy and the cost-effectiveness of prophylaxis with palivizumab in these infants, allowing the inclusion of infants and children with primary immunodeficiency in international recommendations and guidelines.

Conflict of Interests

All authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper. Marcello Lanari and Silvia Vandini received payment for lectures and advisory boards from Abbvie.

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to acknowledge Lucy Scioscia for editing this paper.

References

  1. E. A. F. Simoes, “Respiratory syncytial virus infection,” The Lancet, vol. 354, no. 9181, pp. 847–852, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. H. Nair, V. R. Verma, E. Theodoratou et al., “An evaluation of the emerging interventions against Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV)-associated acute lower respiratory infections in children,” BMC Public Health, vol. 11, supplement 3, article S30, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. C. B. Hall, G. A. Weinberg, M. K. Iwane et al., “The Burden of respiratory syncytial virus infection in young children,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 360, no. 6, pp. 588–598, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. L. C. Paramore, V. Ciuryla, G. Ciesla, and L. Liu, “Economic impact of respiratory syncytial virus-related illness in the US: an analysis of national databases,” PharmacoEconomics, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 275–284, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. O. Blanken, M. M. Rovers, J. M. Molenaar et al., “Respiratory syncytial virus and recurrent wheeze in healthy preterm infants,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 368, no. 19, pp. 1791–1799, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. W. W. Thompson, D. K. Shay, E. Weintraub et al., “Mortality associated with influenza and respiratory syncytial virus in the United States,” The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 289, no. 2, pp. 179–186, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S. Asner, D. Stephens, P. Pedulla, S. E. Richardson, J. Robinson, and U. Allen, “Risk factors and outcomes for respiratory syncytial virus-related infections in immunocompromised children,” Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, vol. 32, no. 10, pp. 1073–1076, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. H. Choi, E. H. Choi, H. J. Kang et al., “Respiratory viral infections after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children,” Journal of Korean Medical Science, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 36–41, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. Gaboli, O. A. de la Cruz, M. I. de Agüero, A. Moreno-Galdó, G. P. Pérez, and M. S. de Querol, “Use of palivizumab in infants and young children with severe respiratory disease: a delphi study,” Pediatric Pulmonology, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 490–502, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. Y. J. Kim, M. Boeckh, and J. A. Englund, “Community respiratory virus infections in immunocompromised patients: hematopoietic stem cell and solid organ transplant recipients, and individuals with human immunodeficiency virus infection,” Seminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 222–242, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. B. Resch, P. Manzoni, and M. Lanari, “Severe respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection in infants with neuromuscular diseases and immune deficiency syndromes,” Paediatric Respiratory Reviews, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 148–153, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. K. Thorburn, “Pre-existing disease is associated with a significantly higher risk of death in severe respiratory syncytial virus infection,” Archives of Disease in Childhood, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 99–103, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. C. Sommer, B. Resch, and E. A. Simões, “Risk factors for severe respiratory syncytial virus lower respiratory tract infection,” Open Microbiology Journal, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 144–154, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. R. A. Martinello, M. D. Chen, C. Weibel, and J. S. Kahn, “Correlation between respiratory syncytial virus genotype and severity of illness,” Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 186, no. 6, pp. 839–842, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. R. Gilca, G. de Serres, M. Tremblay et al., “Distribution and clinical impact of human respiratory syncytial virus genotypes in hospitalized children over 2 winter seasons,” Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 193, no. 1, pp. 54–58, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. S. Vandini, L. Corvaglia, R. Alessandroni et al., “Respiratory syncytial virus infection in infants and correlation with meteorological factors and air pollutants,” Italian Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 39, no. 1, article 1, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. T. J. Meerhoff, J. W. Paget, J. L. Kimpen, and F. Schellevis, “Variation of respiratory syncytial virus and the relation with meteorological factors in different winter seasons,” Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 860–866, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. D. E. Noyola and P. B. Mandeville, “Effect of climatological factors on respiratory syncytial virus epidemics,” Epidemiology and Infection, vol. 136, no. 10, pp. 1328–1332, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. B. Garcia-Barreno, C. Palomo, C. Penas, T. Delgado, P. Perez-Brena, and J. A. Melero, “Marked differences in the antigenic structure of human respiratory syncytial virus F and G glycoproteins,” Journal of Virology, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 925–932, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. C. le Nouën, P. Hillyer, S. Munir et al., “Effects of human respiratory syncytial virus, metapneumovirus, parainfluenza virus 3 and influenza virus on CD4+ T cell activation by dendritic cells,” PLoS ONE, vol. 5, no. 11, Article ID e15017, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. J. R. Groothuis, J. M. Hoopes, and V. G. H. Jessie, “Prevention of serious respiratory syncytial virus-related illness. I: disease pathogenesis and early attempts at prevention,” Advances in Therapy, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 91–109, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. E. O. Ohuma, E. A. Okiro, R. Ochola et al., “The natural history of respiratory syncytial virus in a birth cohort: the influence of age and previous infection on reinfection and disease,” American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 176, no. 9, pp. 794–802, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. P. A. Piedra, A. M. Jewell, S. G. Cron, R. L. Atmar, and W. P. Glezen, “Correlates of immunity to respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) associated-hospitalization: establishment of minimum protective threshold levels of serum neutralizing antibodies,” Vaccine, vol. 21, no. 24, pp. 3479–3482, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. A. Mejías, S. Chávez-Bueno, A. M. Ríos et al., “Comparative effects of two neutralizing anti-respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) monoclonal antibodies in the RSV murine model: time versus Potency,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 49, no. 11, pp. 4700–4707, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. J. B. Domachowske and H. F. Rosenberg, “Respiratory syncytial virus infection: immune response, immunopathogenesis, and treatment,” Clinical Microbiology Reviews, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 298–309, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. D. Kruijsen, M. J. Bakkers, N. O. Van Uden et al., “Serum antibodies critically affect virus-specific CD4+/CD8+ T cell balance during respiratory syncytial virus infections,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 185, no. 11, pp. 6489–6498, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. K. McIntosh, H. B. Masters, I. Orr, R. K. Chao, and R. M. Barkin, “The immunologic response to infection with respiratory syncytial virus in infants,” Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 138, no. 1, pp. 24–32, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. K. McIntosh, J. McQuillin, and P. S. Gardner, “Cell-free and cell-bound antibody in nasal secretions from infants with respiratory syncytial virus infection,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 276–281, 1979. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. B. S. Graham, G. S. Henderson, Y. W. Tang, X. Lu, K. M. Neuzil, and D. G. Colley, “Priming immunization determines T helper cytokine mRNA expression patterns in lungs of mice challenged with respiratory syncytial virus,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 151, no. 4, pp. 2032–2040, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. B. J. Law, E. E. Wang, N. MacDonald et al., “Does ribavirin impact on the hospital course of children with respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection? An analysis using the pediatric investigators collaborative network on infections in Canada (PICNIC) RSV database,” Pediatrics, vol. 99, no. 3, article E7, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. A. F. Christiaansen, C. J. Knudson, K. A. Weiss, and S. M. Varga, “The CD4 T cell response to respiratory syncytial virus infection,” Immunologic Research, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. D. You, N. Marr, J. Saravia, B. Shrestha, G. I. Lee, and S. E. Turvey, “IL-4Ra on CD4+ T cells plays a pathogenic role in respiratory syncytial virus reinfection in mice infected initially as neonates,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 93, no. 6, pp. 933–942, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  33. R. B. Fulton, D. K. Meyerholz, and S. M. Varga, “Foxp3+ CD4 regulatory T cells limit pulmonary immunopathology by modulating the CD8 T cell response during respiratory syncytial virus infection,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 185, no. 4, pp. 2382–2392, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. D. C. P. Lee, J. A. E. Harker, J. S. Tregoning et al., “CD25+ natural regulatory T cells are critical in limiting innate and adaptive immunity and resolving disease following respiratory syncytial virus infection,” Journal of Virology, vol. 84, no. 17, pp. 8790–8798, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. K. A. Weiss, A. F. Christiaansen, R. B. Fulton, D. K. Meyerholz, and S. M. Varga, “Multiple CD4+ T cell subsets produce immunomodulatory IL-10 during respiratory syncytial virus infection,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 187, no. 6, pp. 3145–3154, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. J. Chin, R. L. Magoffin, L. A. Shearer, J. H. Schieble, and E. H. Lennette, “Field evaluation of a respiratory syncytial virus vaccine and a trivalent parainfluenza virus vaccine in a pediatric population,” American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 89, no. 4, pp. 449–463, 1969. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. E. M. Castilow and S. M. Varga, “Overcoming T-cell-mediated immunopathology to achieve safe respiratory syncytial virus vaccination,” Future Virology, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 445–454, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. A. Z. Kapikian, R. H. Mitchell, R. M. Chanock, R. A. Shvedoff, and C. E. Stewart, “An epidemiologic study of altered clinical reactivity to respiratory syncytial (RS) virus infection in children previously vaccinated with an inactivated RS virus vaccine,” The American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 89, no. 4, pp. 405–421, 1969. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. H. W. Kim, J. G. Canchola, C. D. Brandt et al., “Respiratory syncytial virus disease in infants despite prior administration of antigenic inactivated vaccine,” American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 89, no. 4, pp. 422–434, 1969. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. Y. Murata, “Respiratory syncytial virus vaccine development,” Clinics in Laboratory Medicine, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 725–739, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. W. H. Alwan, F. M. Record, and P. J. M. Openshaw, “CD4+ T cells clear virus but augment disease in mice infected with respiratory syncytial virus. Comparison with the effects of CD8+ T cells,” Clinical and Experimental Immunology, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 527–536, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. Y. Tang and B. S. Graham, “T cell source of type 1 cytokines determines illness patterns in respiratory syncytial virus-infected mice,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 99, no. 9, pp. 2183–2191, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. B. N. A. Crooks, C. E. Taylor, A. J. L. Turner et al., “Respiratory viral infections in primary immune deficiencies: significance and relevance to clinical outcome in a single BMT unit,” Bone Marrow Transplantation, vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 1097–1102, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. W. Al-Herz and L. D. Notarangelo, “Classification of primary immunodeficiency disorders: one-fits-all does not help anymore,” Clinical Immunology, vol. 144, no. 1, pp. 24–25, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. M. W. Baker, W. J. Grossman, R. H. Laessig et al., “Development of a routine newborn screening protocol for severe combined immunodeficiency,” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 124, no. 3, pp. 522–527, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. L. D. Notarangelo, “Primary immunodeficiencies,” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 125, no. 2, supplement 2, pp. S182–S194, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. W. Al-Herz and M. A. A. Moussa, “Survival and predictors of death among primary immunodeficient patients: a registry-based study,” Journal of Clinical Immunology, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 467–473, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. M. S. Lo, G. M. Lee, N. Gunawardane, S. K. Burchett, C. S. Lachenauer, and L. E. Lehmann, “The impact of RSV, adenovirus, influenza, and parainfluenza infection in pediatric patients receiving stem cell transplant, solid organ transplant, or cancer chemotherapy,” Pediatric Transplantation, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 133–143, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. Y. Shachor-Meyouhas, I. Zaidman, Z. Kra-Oz, N. Arad-Cohen, and I. Kassis, “Detection, control, and management of a respiratory syncytial virus outbreak in a pediatric hematology-oncology department,” Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 124–128, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. S. M. C. Mendoz, J. Ruiz-Contreras, J. L. Vivanco et al., “Respiratory virus infections in children with cancer or HIV infection,” Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 154–159, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  51. J. Moyes, C. Cohen, M. Pretorius et al., “Epidemiology of respiratory syncytial virus-associated acute lower respiratory tract infection hospitalizations among HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected South African children, 2010-2011,” The Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 208, supplement 3, pp. S217–S226, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  52. C. B. Hall, K. R. Powell, N. E. MacDonald et al., “Respiratory syncytial viral infection in children with compromised immune function,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 315, no. 2, pp. 77–81, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. L. Navas, E. Wang, V. de Carvalho, and J. Robinson, “Improved outcome of respiratory syncytial virus infection in a high-risk hospitalized population of Canadian children,” Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 121, no. 3, pp. 348–354, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. E. E. Wang, B. J. Law, and D. Stephens, “Pediatric Investigators Collaborative Network on Infections in Canada (PICNIC) prospective study of risk factors and outcomes in patients hospitalized with respiratory syncytial viral lower respiratory tract infection,” The Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 126, no. 2, pp. 212–219, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. M. Murphy, M. J. Lempert, and L. B. Epstein, “Decreased level of T cell receptor expression by Down syndrome (trisomy 21) thymocytes,” American Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 37, supplement S7, pp. 234–237, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. M. Murphy, W. Hyun, B. Hunte, A. D. Levine, and L. B. Epstein, “A role for tumor necrosis factor-α and interferon-γ in the regulation of interleukin-4-induced human thymocyte proliferation in vitro. Heightened sensitivity in the Down syndrome (trisomy 21) thymus,” Pediatric Research, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 269–276, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. Y. C. M. De Hingh, P. W. Van Der Vossen, E. F. A. Gemen et al., “Intrinsic abnormalities of lymphocyte counts in children with down syndrome,” Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 147, no. 6, pp. 744–747, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. B. L. P. Bloemers, A. M. van Furth, M. E. Weijerman et al., “Down syndrome: a novel risk factor for respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis—a prospective birth-cohort study,” Pediatrics, vol. 120, no. 4, pp. e1076–e1081, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. S. S. Blanchard, M. Gerrek, C. Siegel, and S. J. Czinn, “Significant morbidity associated with RSV infection in immunosuppressed children following liver transplantation: case report and discussion regarding need of routine prophylaxis,” Pediatric Transplantation, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 826–829, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. The IMpact-RSV Study Group, “Palivizumab, a humanized respiratory syncytial virus monoclonal antibody, reduces hospitalization from respiratory syncytial virus infection in high-risk infants,” Pediatrics, vol. 102, no. 3, part 1, pp. 531–537, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Infectious Disease, “Policy statement—modified recommendations for use of palivizumab for prevention of respiratorysyncytial virus infections,” Pediatrics, vol. 124, no. 6, pp. 1694–1701, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  62. “Raccomandazioni della società italiana di neonatologia per la prevenzione delle malattie da virus respiratorio sinciziale (VRS),” Acta Neonatologica e Pediatrica, vol. 18, pp. 19–30, 2004.
  63. Grupo de trabajo de la Guía de Práctica Clínica sobre la Bronquiolitis Aguda, “Guía de práctica clínica sobre la bronquiolitis aguda,” Guías de Práctica Clínica en el SNS AATRM Núm. 2007/05, Plan de Calidad para el Sistema Nacional de Salud (SNS) del Ministerio de Sanidad y Política Social, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  64. Joint statement with the Fetus and Newborn Committee, “Palivizumab and respiratory syncytial virus immune globulin intravenous for the prophylaxis of respiratory syncytial virus infection in high risk infants,” Paediatrics and Child Health, vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 474–489, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  65. BC Guidelines for RSV Infection Immunoprophylaxis 2012—13 RSV Season, http://www.childhealthbc.ca/.
  66. “Canadian Pediatric Society Statement Palivizumab and respiratory syncytial virus immune globulin intravenous for the prophylaxis of respiratory syncytial virus infection in high risk infants,” Paediatrics and Child Health, vol. 4, no. 7, 1999.
  67. M. Mori, H. Kawashima, H. Nakamura et al., “Nationwide survey of severe respiratory syncytial virus infection in children who do not meet indications for palivizumab in Japan,” Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 254–263, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. P. Manzoni, M. Leonessa, D. Farina, and G. Gomirato, “Respiratory syncytial virus infection and prophylaxis with palivizumab in immunosuppressed children: the experience of a large Italian neonatal care setting,” Pediatric Transplantation, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 456–457, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus