PGE<sub>2</sub>-Induced IDO1 Inhibits the Capacity of Fully Mature DCs to Elicit an <i>In Vitro</i> Antileukemic Immune Response

Trabanelli, Sara; Lecciso, Mariangela; Salvestrini, Valentina; Cavo, Michele; Očadlíková, Darina; Lemoli, Roberto M.; Curti, Antonio

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/253191

Journal of Immunology Research

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 | Article ID 253191 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/253191

PGE₂-Induced IDO1 Inhibits the Capacity of Fully Mature DCs to Elicit an In Vitro Antileukemic Immune Response

Sara Trabanelli,^1,2Mariangela Lecciso,¹Valentina Salvestrini,¹Michele Cavo,¹Darina Očadlíková,¹Roberto M. Lemoli,³and Antonio Curti¹

Academic Editor: Nathalie Cools

Received04 Dec 2014

Accepted10 Feb 2015

Published26 Feb 2015

Abstract

In the last years, dendritic cells (DC) have been evaluated for antitumor vaccination. Although DC-based vaccines have raised great expectations, their clinical translation has been largely disappointing. For these results, several explanations have been proposed. In particular, the concomitant expression by DCs of tolerogenic pathways, such as the immunosuppressive agent indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase-1 (IDO1), has been demonstrated. The aim of this study is to evaluate both the stimulatory and the tolerogenic feature of monocyte-derived DCs (Mo-DCs) after maturation with PGE₂. In particular, the role of IDO1 expression in PGE₂-matured Mo-DCs has been addressed. Here we show that PGE₂, which is required for full maturation of DCs, is one mediator of DC tolerance by enhancing IDO1. PGE₂-mediated expression of IDO1 results in the production of kynurenine, in the generation of T_regs, and in the inhibition of either the allogeneic or the autologous antigen-specific stimulatory capacity of DCs. When pulsed with leukemic lysates and matured with PGE₂, DCs are impaired in the induction of IFN-γ secreting CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells due to IDO1 upregulation. Moreover, the inhibition of IDO1 enhances the antileukemic response. Overall, these results point toward the use of IDO1 inhibitors to enhance the vaccination capacity of DCs, matured with PGE₂.

1. Introduction

Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase-1 (IDO1) is an immunoregulatory enzyme that catalyzes the first and rate-limiting step of tryptophan metabolism along the kynurenine [1]. Its activity is blocked by 1 methyl-tryptophan (1-MT) and, preferentially, by the L-isoform (1-MT-L) [2]. Tryptophan degradation and kynurenine starvation result in the inhibition of T-cell activation, proliferation and survival [3, 4], and in the expansion of regulatory T cells (T_regs) [5, 6]. The immunosuppressive and tolerogenic role of IDO1 has been observed during maternal tolerance toward the allogeneic fetus [7], regulation of autoimmune disorders [8, 9], and suppression of transplant rejection [10] and in tumor escape [11–15].

Because of their natural features, dendritic cells (DCs) are currently used as cellular vaccines against tumors [16]. In peripheral blood, DCs are a rare population, but the development of protocols to in vitro differentiate blood monocytes into DCs (Mo-DCs) triggered the possibility of DC-based immunotherapies [17]. However, DC-based vaccines have demonstrated less clinical efficacy than anticipated. To explain such dismal clinical results, several mechanisms have been proposed. One potential key mechanism is the expression of IDO1 by Mo-DCs. Indeed, Mo-DCs upregulate IDO1 expression upon in vitro maturation with the standard cytokine cocktail containing TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, and PGE₂, used in clinical protocols [18]. It has been shown that PGE₂ is necessary for the upregulation of CCR7 and metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9) on DCs and for their consequent migration into lymph nodes [19]. However, PGE₂ is one of the prominent inducers of IDO1 expression [20]. It has been shown that PGE₂-mediated IDO1 upregulation in DCs does not impair their capacity of antigen presenting cell [21]. However, IDO1-expressing DCs attract or induce regulatory Foxp3⁺ T cells and the presence of those cells at the site of DC injection suggests possible immunoregulatory effects of IDO1-expressing DCs [22]. Therefore, to improve DC-based vaccine therapy, much attention has to be paid to IDO1 complex modulation by cytokine stimulation of DCs.

Here, we characterize IDO1 expression in human Mo-DCs matured in presence of PGE₂, in order to test the efficacy of high IDO1-expressing DCs in eliciting an antileukemic response. We found that, combining PGE₂ with 1-MT-L, it is possible to obtain fully mature Mo-DCs that weakly induce T_regs and that elicit IFN-γ release by T cells stimulated with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) antigens.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Blood Samples

Cells were obtained from healthy donor buffy coats or from peripheral blood of AML patients who achieved complete remission (CR). PBMC were separated by density gradient centrifugation (Ficoll-Hypaque; Amersham Bioscience, Piscataway, NJ). Cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (Lonza, Milan, Italy) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Gibco-Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin (MP Biomedicals, Verona, Italy) at 37°C in 5% CO₂. CD14⁺, CD3⁺, and CD4⁺CD25⁺ cells were purified by magnetic separation column (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) according to manufacturer’s instructions.

2.2. DC Generation

Monocyte-derived DCs (Mo-DC) were generated by a 5-day culture of CD14⁺ cells in complete medium supplemented with 50 ng/mL granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulation factor (GM-CSF) (Endogen, Woburn, MA) and 800 U/mL IL-4 (Endogen), at 37°C in 5% CO₂ [23]. For maturation, day 5 Mo-DCs were cultured with GM-CSF and IL-4 and incubated for 48 hours in presence of (a) complete medium, (b) 1 μg/mL CD40L (Biolegend, San Diego, CA), (c) 1 μg/mL LPS (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louise, MO), (d) 1 μg/mL LPS with 100 U/mL IFN-γ (Endogen), (e) a cocktail of cytokine made of 10 ng/mL TNF-α (Endogen), 10 ng/mL IL-6 (Endogen), 10 ng/mL IL-1β (Endogen), with or without 1 μg/mL PGE₂ (Endogen).

2.3. IDO1 Expression

Total RNA was reverse transcribed in 20 μL using Promega Improm II kit and random hexamers (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA). Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed using ABI-PRISM 7900 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). qRT-PCR data were analyzed using the method. The relative level of a specific mRNA for IDO1 was calculated by subtracting Ct values of the control gene (GAPDH) from the Ct values of IDO1. Universal human RNA (Stratagene, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) was used as reference and taken as value of 1, IDO1 Assay ID Hs00158027_m1, GAPDH Assay ID Hs00266705_g1.

2.4. DC Immunophenotype

Dual-color immunofluorescence was performed using the following panel of mAbs: PE- or FITC-conjugated anti-human HLA-DR (clone L242, BD Pharmingen); PE- or FITC-conjugated anti-human CD1a (clone HI149, Biolegend); PE- or FITC-conjugated anti-human CD86 (clone IT2.2, Biolegend); PE-conjugated anti-human CD80 (clone 2D10, Biolegend); PE- or FITC-conjugated anti-human CD14 (clone HCD14, Biolegend); FITC-conjugated anti-human CD83 (clone HB15e, Biolegend); FITC-conjugated anti-human CD40 (clone HB14, Biolegend); PE-conjugated anti-human CCR7 (clone 150503, BD Pharmingen). Negative controls were isotype-matched irrelevant mAbs (BD Pharmingen, Biolegend). Cells were analyzed by using FACScan equipment or C6 Accuri equipment (Becton Dickinson). A minimum of 10,000 events was collected in list mode on FACScan software.

2.5. Enzyme Activity of IDO1

The amount of L-kynurenine in culture supernatants was measured with a spectrophotometric analysis [24]. Briefly, Mo-DCs were washed, resuspended in Hanks buffer supplemented with 500 μM L-tryptophan (Sigma-Aldrich), and incubated. Supernatants were harvested after 4 h and mixed with 30% trichloroacetic acid (2 : 1), vortexed, and centrifugated at 8000 g for 5 min. Subsequently, this solution was added to Ehrlich’s reagent (1 : 1, Sigma-Aldrich) in a 96-well plate. Triplicate samples were run against a standard curve of defined kynurenine concentrations (0–100 μM; Sigma-Aldrich). Optical density was measured at 490 nm, using a Multiskan EX microplate reader (Thermo Electron Corporation, Vantaa, Finland).

2.6. Allogeneic and Autologous T-Cell Proliferation

Irradiated (3000 cGy) Mo-DCs were incubated for 5 days with CFSE-labeled CD3⁺ T cells (1 : 10), with or without 1-MT-L (1 mM, Sigma-Aldrich). For autologous mixed leukocyte reaction (MLR) immature Mo-DCs were previously pulsed for 24 h with tetanus toxin (1 μg/mL; Sigma-Aldrich), then washed, and matured. At the end of the culture time, cultures were analyzed using BD FACSCanto II equipment (BD Biosciences).

2.7. Induction of Allogeneic and Autologous T_regs by Mo-DCs

Mo-DCs were cultured with CD3⁺ T cells (1 : 50) for 5 days with or without 1-MT-L (1 mM). At the end of culture time, cells (1 × 10⁵ cells/100 μL) were incubated with FITC-conjugated anti-human CD4 (clone RPA-T4) and APC-conjugated anti-human CD25 (clone BC96, Biolegend) in the dark for 20 min at 4°C and then for 30 min at room temperature with PE-conjugated anti-human Foxp3 (clone 206D), after 20 min of fixation and 15 min of permeabilization. Samples were analysed using BD FACSCanto II equipment (BD Biosciences). A minimum of 10,000 events was collected in list mode on FACSDiva software.

To test their suppressive activity, at the end of coculture, CD4⁺CD25⁺ T cells (10⁴/well) were purified, irradiated, and added to cultures consisting of CFSE-labeled CD3⁺ T cells (10⁵/well) as responders, stimulated by allogeneic immature Mo-DCs (1 : 10). After 5 days, cultures were analyzed using BD FACSCanto II equipment (BD Biosciences) [25].

2.8. Generation of Leukemic Lysate and DC Pulsing

AML cells were resolved in complete medium at 10⁷ cells/mL. Cells were treated with three cycles of heating (10 min at 37°C) and freezing (10 min at −80°C) and the necrotic cell material was filtered throughout a 29G syringe. The cell suspension was added to immature Mo-DCs (2 : 1). After an overnight incubation, pulsed DCs were washed and matured with the cytokine cocktail with or without PGE₂ [26].

2.9. Evaluation of IFN-γ Producing CD3⁺ T Cells

Leukemia-reactive IFN-γ producing CD3⁺ T cells were evaluated after the coculture with DCs pulsed with leukemic lysate and matured with the cytokine cocktail containing PGE₂. After 4 h of incubation, brefeldin A was added (2 μg/mL, Sigma-Aldrich) and incubated overnight at 37°C. At the end of the incubation, cell-surface staining was performed as described above (anti-CD4 FITC: clone OKT4, anti-CD8 APC: clone HIT8a, Biolegend). Then, cells were fixed (30 min at 4°C in 2% paraformaldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich)) and the anti-IFN-γ antibody (clone B27; Biolegend) was added in 0.1% saponin and incubated for 30 min at 4°C.

Both assays were performed in the presence or absence of 1-MT-L (1 mM). At the end of the culture time, cultures were analyzed using BD FACSCanto II equipment (BD Biosciences).

2.10. Statistical Analysis

Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. Depending on experimental conditions analysis has been performed with statistical Student’s -test or ANOVA (post hoc Bonferroni), , .

3. Results

3.1. PGE₂ Enhances IDO1 Expression and Activity

We first investigated whether different inflammatory stimuli affect IDO1 expression by Mo-DCs during maturation. To this end, we evaluated IDO1 expression in human Mo-DCs after maturation with LPS in presence or absence of IFN-γ, or with a cocktail of cytokines including IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α, with and without PGE₂. Immature Mo-DCs were used as control samples. In line with previous reports [20], maturation of DCs resulted in the significant upregulation of IDO1 (Figure 1(a)). IDO1 was strongly induced by LPS plus IFN-γ and by the cytokine cocktail containing PGE₂. In absence of PGE₂ the cytokine cocktail induced IDO1 at low level (Figure 1(a)). Of note, in presence of either LPS plus IFN-γ or the cytokine cocktail completed of PGE₂, DCs expressed the highest level of CD80, CD86, CD40, CD83, and CCR7, whereas in presence of the cytokine cocktail without PGE₂, DCs expressed the lowest level of these markers (Figure 1(b)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 1

Mature DCs expressed a functionally active IDO1 protein. Human CD14⁺ cells were isolated from healthy donors’ PBMC by using magnetic beads. Immature Mo-DCs were obtained after a 5-day culture in presence of GM-CFS and IL-4. Mature Mo-DCs were obtained following 2 days of incubation with LPS, LPS plus IFN-γ, the cytokine cocktail made of IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α, with or without PGE₂. (a) Cells were lysed and RNA was extracted. mRNA expression of IDO1 (normalized to GAPDH) was evaluated by real-time RT-PCR. Universal human RNA was used as reference and taken as value of 1. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM of 7 independent experiments. , versus immature DCs. (b) DC phenotype was evaluated by flow cytometry. (c) DCs were cultured in presence of 500 μM L-tryptophan for 4 h and supernatants were collected. IDO1 enzymatic activity was evaluated with a spectrophotometric analysis as the production of kynurenine in the supernatants. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM of 5 independent experiments. , versus immature DCs or versus medium alone.

To test the enzymatic activity of IDO1, supernatants of immature and mature DCs cultured with tryptophan-enriched medium were analyzed for L-kynurenine production. As shown in Figure 1(c), L-kynurenine production confirmed, at the functional level, mRNA expression results. Indeed, L-kynurenine concentration was increased after maturation, especially in the presence of LPS plus IFN-γ or the cytokine cocktail containing PGE₂, whereas in absence of PGE₂ it was weakly increased. L-kynurenine increase was inhibited by 1-MT-L, thus suggesting that the L-kynurenine production was due to IDO1 enzymatic activity.

These findings show that IDO1 expression and function are strongly modulated by the environmental cytokine composition and that PGE₂, which is required for full maturation, may also act as a switch for IDO1 expression and function.

3.2. The Inhibition of IDO1 in PGE₂-Matured DCs Enhances T-Cell Proliferation

Once evaluating that PGE₂ may act as a switch for IDO1 expression, we compared the ability of DCs matured with and without PGE₂ in inducing T-cell proliferation. We tested whether a high expression of IDO1 (i.e., in presence of PGE₂) by mature DCs resulted in a stronger inhibition of their ability to stimulate allogeneic or autologous T-cell proliferation in comparison to a low expression of IDO1 (i.e., in absence of PGE₂). Therefore, we used DCs matured with or without PGE₂ as stimulators and allogeneic or autologous CD3⁺ T cells as responders. Although PGE₂ has been shown to confer to DCs some tolerogenic features, such as IL-10 release [27] and IDO1 expression [20, 21], its combination with TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 enhances their immunogenicity by upregulating costimulatory molecules, stimulating the migration capacity and inducing IL-6 and IL-12 release [28–30]. Indeed, PGE₂-matured Mo-DCs showed a stronger immunostimulatory activity, both in the allogeneic and autologous setting, than DCs matured without PGE₂ (Figure 2(a)). However, the addition of 1-MT-L resulted in the significant enhancement of the proliferative capacity of allogeneic (Figure 2(b)) and autologous (Figure 2(c)) T-cells, demonstrating the tolerogenic role of IDO1. Of note, we observed an increase of T-cell proliferation after addition of 1-MT-L also when DCs cultured without PGE₂ were used as stimulators. Since IDO1 expression in DCs generated in absence of PGE2 is under the level of detection, these results may be explained by an off-target effect of 1-MT-L or by an interference with other tryptophan metabolic pathways, such as tryptophan dioxygenase and/or IDO2.

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 2

IDO1 expression inhibited the stimulatory capacity of mature DCs. (a) DCs matured with the cytokine cocktail without PGE₂ (expressing low IDO1) or complete of PGE₂ (expressing high IDO1) were used as stimulator of either allogeneic or autologous CD3⁺ T cells. For the stimulation of autologous CD3⁺ T cells, DCs were previously pulsed with tetanus toxin. , . Both in the allogeneic (b) and in the autologous (c) setting, the assay was performed either in presence or in absence of the IDO1-specific inhibitor 1-MT-L. The results are expressed as the mean of fold increase of 5 independent experiments ± SEM. , versus medium alone.

Taken together, these results suggest that while DCs matured with PGE₂ retain a stronger capacity of stimulating T-cell proliferation than those matured without PGE₂, they also upregulate the expression of the immunosuppressive enzyme IDO1. While PGE₂ is necessary to enhance stimulatory capacity of DCs by inducing a complete maturation, it is also implicated in the induction of tolerogenic pathways, such as IDO1. Indeed, the inhibition of IDO1 further enhances the stimulatory capacity of DCs matured with PGE₂.

3.3. IDO1-Expressing DCs Strongly Induce T_regs

To investigate the role of PGE₂ in inducing IDO1-mediated T_regs generation, we cocultured PGE₂-matured DCs with purified allogeneic or autologous CD3⁺ T cells. As shown in Figures 3(a) and 3(b), DCs induced a significant increase of the percentage of newly generated allogeneic and autologous CD4⁺CD25⁺Foxp3⁺ T cells, respectively, as compared to CD3⁺ T cells cultured alone. Accordingly, the addition to the cocultures of 1-MT-L significantly reduced the percentage of CD4⁺CD25⁺Foxp3⁺ T cells, thus suggesting that IDO1 represents an important mechanism by which DCs induce CD4⁺CD25⁺Foxp3⁺ T cells in the presence of PGE₂. To validate their T_regs nature, after coculture with PGE₂-matured Mo-DCs, purified CD4⁺CD25⁺ T cells were able to inhibit T-cell proliferation (Figure 3(c)). Thus, these results show that the CD4⁺CD25⁺ T cells obtained after coculture with IDO1-expressing DCs may be considered bona fide T_regs.

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 3

IDO1 expression induced T_regs. Expression of Foxp3 on (a) allogeneic and (b) autologous CD4⁺CD25⁺ T after 5-day culture with or without high IDO-expressing DCs that is matured with IL-1β/IL-6/TNF-α/PGE₂ (complete cocktail), in presence or in absence of the IDO1-specific inhibitor 1-MT-L. The results showed in (a)-(b) are expressed as the mean ± SEM of 5 different experiments. . (c) CD3⁺ T cells were stimulated by allogeneic immature DCs in the presence and absence of CD4⁺CD25⁺ T cells. CD4⁺CD25⁺ T cells were purified after 5 days of culture in presence of high IDO-expressing DCs (i.e., matured with PGE₂). The results are expressed as percentage of CD3⁺ T cell proliferation with the proliferation observed in absence of CD4⁺CD25⁺ T cells (w/o T_regs) as 100%. The results are expressed as the mean ± SEM of 3 different experiments. versus w/o T_regs.

Taken together, these data support the hypothesis that DCs matured in presence of PGE₂ acquire the ability of inducing a large number of newly differentiated and functional T_regs and that such property is linked to the expression of the immunoregulatory enzyme IDO1.

3.4. IDO1 Inhibition Enhances the DC Capacity to Elicit the IFN-γ Production of Leukemia-Specific T Cells

In the attempt to reproduce in vitro a model of antileukemia vaccination and to understand the role of PGE₂ in the induction of an antileukemic response, immature DCs were loaded with necrotic AML blasts, then matured with the cytokine cocktail in presence of PGE₂, and, finally, used as stimulators for autologous CD3⁺ T cells. As shown in Figure 4(a), Mo-DCs loaded with leukemic antigens were highly efficient in stimulating IFN-γ-secreting CD3⁺ T cells. However, although IDO1 inhibition did not impact on the allostimulatory capacity of Mo-DCs previously pulsed with leukemic blasts (data not shown), the addition of IDO1 inhibitor 1-MT-L resulted in a significant enhancement of the percentage of IFN-γ-secreting CD3⁺ T cells. This result suggests that IDO1 expression can inhibit the generation of leukemia-specific IFN-γ-secreting CD3⁺ T cells. Moreover, among the CD3⁺ T cells, only CD4⁺ T cells were able to produce IFN-γ if stimulated with DCs matured with PGE₂. Of note, the inhibition of IDO1 by 1-MT-L resulted in a significant enhancement of both IFN-γ-secreting CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells. Overall, these findings show that the expression of IDO1 in DCs matured in presence of PGE₂ is able to inhibit the generation of both leukemia-reactive IFN-γ-secreting CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells.

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 4

IDO1 expression inhibited leukemia-specific IFN-γ production. AML cells were lysed and used for the pulsing of immature Mo-DCs. Mo-DCs were subsequently matured with the cytokine cocktail containing PGE₂. Autologous CD3⁺ T cells were cocultured with the preloaded and matured DCs for an overnight, in the presence or absence of the IDO1-specific inhibitor 1-MT-L. As control samples, unloaded Mo-DCs were used (data not shown). (a) CD3⁺ T cells, (b) CD4⁺ T cells, and (c) CD8⁺ T cells were tested for leukemia-specific intracellular IFN-γ production. Results are expressed as the mean ± SEM of 3 independent experiments. , versus w/o DCs or versus medium alone.

3.5. PGE₂ Strongly Upregulates IDO1 Expression in DCs from AML Patients

To better elucidate the effects of PGE₂ in the setting of dendritic cell vaccination after chemotherapy-induced remission in acute myeloid leukemia, we evaluated IDO1 expression in normal Mo-DCs obtained from leukemia patients in complete remission. Also in this setting, Mo-DCs were matured in presence of the cytokine cocktail with or without PGE₂. As expected, in presence of PGE₂ we found, at mRNA level, a significant upregulation of IDO1 expression (Figure 5). Accordingly with the results obtained with Mo-DCs of healthy donors, we observed the highest expression of costimulation markers in presence of PGE₂ (data not shown).

Figure 5

IDO1 expression is enhanced in Mo-DCs from AML patients matured with PGE₂. Human CD14⁺ cells were isolated from PBMC of AML patients in complete remission by using magnetic beads. Immature Mo-DCs were obtained after a 5-day culture in presence of GM-CSF and IL-4. Mature Mo-DCs were obtained following 2 days of incubation with the cytokine cocktail made of IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α, with or without PGE₂. Cells were lysed and RNA was extracted. mRNA expression of IDO1 (normalized to GAPDH) was evaluated by real-time RT-PCR. Universal human RNA was used as reference and taken as value of 1. Results are expressed as fold increase of gene expression over immature Mo-DCs (taken as referral condition). The results represent the mean of 3 independent experiments ± SEM. versus immature DCs.

These findings confirm that PGE₂ is a potent inducer of IDO1 expression in DCs from leukemia patients similarly to DCs from healthy donors and might result in the induction of some of the tolerogenic effects observed in DC vaccination which are mediated by the immunosuppressive enzyme IDO1.

4. Discussion

Increasing evidence that DC vaccines can induce tumor-specific immune responses in cancer patients is newly leading for the development of therapeutic DC-based cancer vaccines [16, 31, 32]. In this view, it has been shown that type-1 polarized DCs drive Th1-type immune responses that have the potential to mediate tumor therapy through multiple effectors, such as CD8⁺ CTLs and Th1-skewed CD4⁺ T helper cells [33, 34]. Moreover, tumor cell loaded type-1 polarized DCs induce Th1-mediated tumor immunity [35].

In preclinical studies, type-1 polarized DCs are generated, from peripheral blood-derived precursors, by various cocktails of cytokines, commonly including IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6, PGE₂, and/or IFN-γ [18]. However, these cocktails of cytokines induce one of the main emerging mechanisms of immunosuppression, IDO1 (present report, [20, 36]), whose expression has been demonstrated to have implications for DC-based vaccines [22]. Notably, the impact on IDO1 expression of the different cytokines which are used for the formulation of DCs-based vaccines is not fully elucidated [37]. In particular the role on IDO1 expression of PGE₂, which is the most powerful maturation stimulus [38], needs further investigation.

In the present work we firstly compare different maturation stimuli in order to evaluate their capacity in inducing IDO1 and thus in generating tolerogenic Mo-DCs. In agreement with von Bubnoff and colleagues [39], we show that, during maturation, IDO1 expression is enhanced in Mo-DCs. Such result indicates that alongside the induction of full maturation of DCs, inflammatory cytokines and in particular PGE₂ upregulate IDO1. It has been already demonstrated that PGE₂ modulates IDO1 expression in circulating DCs from healthy subjects, playing a role in the induction of one of the most important mechanisms of immune tolerance, through the generation of regulatory T cells [38]. Nevertheless, PGE₂ is known to enhance the ability of DCs to migrate towards the lymph-nodes, as a consequence of upregulation of CCR7 [40]. Furthermore, it has been shown that DCs matured in presence of PGE₂ retain full ability in inducing allogeneic T-cell proliferation and in stimulating antigen-specific immune responses [28, 29]. In agreement, our data indicate that the presence of PGE₂ results in an enhanced antigen presenting capacity of DCs. However, our data indicate that PGE₂ mediates also tolerogenic effect through the induction of IDO1 in Mo-DCs. Indeed, the inhibition of IDO1 with its inhibitor 1-MT-L highly increased the response to tetanus toxin elicited by DCs matured with PGE₂. Thus, IDO1 expression by human DCs can result in the inhibition of T-cell proliferation (present report and [36]). Furthermore here we show that the addition to the culture of 1-MT-L significantly reduce the percentage of newly generated allogeneic and autologous CD4⁺CD25⁺Foxp3⁺ T_regs, corroborating the hypothesis that IDO1 overexpression affects the efficiency of the antitumor response. Thus, in the perspective of the development of a DC-based anticancer vaccine, the use of PGE₂ appears to be essential in order to generate fully mature DCs, but it is also necessary to minimize tolerogenic effects, such as the upregulation of the immunosuppressive enzyme IDO1.

A DCs-based vaccine against leukemia may be a successful strategy for the control or the eradication of the minimal residual disease. We previously demonstrated that in leukemic DCs, generated from acute myeloid leukemia cells, maturation with the complete cocktail of cytokines induces the upregulation of IDO1 gene and protein, thus resulting in tolerogenic effects that have important implications for the use of these cells as vaccines [26]. In the present work, we find that also normal Mo-DCs, obtained from AML patients, show high level of IDO1 expression after maturation with PGE₂-containing cytokine cocktail. Accordingly, blocking IDO1 activity by 1-MT-L in AML-loaded DCs, matured in presence of PGE₂ (and consequently expressing high level of IDO1), strongly enhanced the leukemia-specific IFN-γ production by T-cells. Our results indicate that an IDO1-mediated immunosuppressive mechanism is involved in weakening the antitumor efficacy elicited by AML-loaded DCs and that specific inhibition of IDO1 might be required for development of cancer vaccines. Our conclusion is in line with recent findings showing that 1-MT enhances the potency of DC-based vaccine against pancreatic adenocarcinoma and Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC) [41, 42]. In fact, in mice, the administration of 1-MT plus DC vaccine caused a slower increase of pancreatic adenocarcinoma as compared to the treatment with either DC or 1-MT alone. In addition, 1-MT enhances the antitumor efficacy elicited by DC/LLC fusion vaccine by delaying the tumor development and inducing stronger splenic CTL responses. Currently, different strategies are under investigation to improve the clinical efficacy of DC-based vaccines for cancer [43, 44]. The use of small interfering RNA to knock down IDO1 expression in a mouse model of breast cancer resulted in the enhancement of the immunogenicity of a DC-based vaccine [45]. Encouraging results were also obtained in cancer patients through immunization with IDO-silenced DCs [46].

5. Conclusions

Our paper demonstrates that by combining PGE₂ with 1-MT-L, it is possible to obtain fully mature Mo-DCs that weakly induce T_regs and that elicit IFN-γ release by T cells stimulated with AML antigens. Since selective IDO1 inhibitor compounds are currently under clinical investigation, pharmacological IDO1 inhibition is becoming an innovative strategy to potentiate the antitumor efficacy of DC-based vaccines.

Conflict of Interests

All the authors of this research have no conflict of interests to disclose.

Authors’ Contribution

Sara Trabanelli and Mariangela Lecciso equally contributed; Roberto M. Lemoli and Antonio Curti equally contributed.

Acknowledgments

The research was supported by Italian Ministry of Health, Regione Emilia-Romagna (Progetto di Ricerca Università-Regione Emilia-Romagna), Italian Association against Leukemia, Section of Bologna (BolognAIL), Cassa di Risparmio in Bologna, Fondazione FATRO.

References

A. L. Mellor and D. H. Munn, “Tryptophan catabolism and T-cell tolerance: immunosuppression by starvation?” Immunology Today, vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 469–473, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Lob, A. Konigsrainer, R. Schafer, H.-G. Rammensee, G. Opelz, and P. Terness, “Levo- but not dextro-1-methyl tryptophan abrogates the IDO activity of human dendritic cells,” Blood, vol. 111, no. 4, pp. 2152–2154, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Frumento, R. Rotondo, M. Tonetti, G. Damonte, U. Benatti, and G. B. Ferrara, “Tryptophan-derived catabolites are responsible for inhibition of T and natural killer cell proliferation induced by indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 196, no. 4, pp. 459–468, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Fallarino, U. Grohmann, C. Vacca et al., “T cell apoptosis by kynurenines,” Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol. 527, pp. 183–190, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Fallarino, U. Grohmann, S. You et al., “Tryptophan catabolism generates autoimmune-preventive regulatory T cells,” Transplant Immunology, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 58–60, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Curti, S. Pandolfi, B. Valzasina et al., “Modulation of tryptophan catabolism by human leukemic cells results in the conversion of CD25⁻ into CD25⁺ T regulatory cells,” Blood, vol. 109, no. 7, pp. 2871–2877, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. H. Munn, M. Zhou, J. T. Attwood et al., “Prevention of allogeneic fetal rejection by tryptophan catabolism,” Science, vol. 281, no. 5380, pp. 1191–1193, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Kwidzinski, J. Bunse, O. Aktas et al., “Indolamine 2,3-dioxygenase is expressed in the CNS and down-regulates autoimmune inflammation,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 19, no. 10, pp. 1347–1349, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Catani, D. Sollazzo, S. Trabanelli et al., “Decreased expression of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 in dendritic cells contributes to impaired regulatory T cell development in immune thrombocytopenia,” Annals of Hematology, vol. 92, no. 1, pp. 67–78, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Brandacher, R. Margreiter, and D. Fuchs, “Implications of IFN-γ-mediated tryptophan catabolism on solid organ transplantation,” Current Drug Metabolism, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 273–282, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Uyttenhove, L. Pilotte, I. Théate et al., “Evidence for a tumoral immune resistance mechanism based on tryptophan degradation by indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase,” Nature Medicine, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 1269–1274, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. H. Munn and A. L. Mellor, “Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase and tumor-induced tolerance,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 117, no. 5, pp. 1147–1154, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. B. Katz, A. J. Muller, and G. C. Prendergast, “Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase in T-cell tolerance and tumoral immune escape,” Immunological Reviews, vol. 222, no. 1, pp. 206–221, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Curti, M. Aluigi, S. Pandolfi et al., “Acute myeloid leukemia cells constitutively express the immunoregulatory enzyme indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase,” Leukemia, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 353–355, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Curti, S. Trabanelli, V. Salvestrini, M. Baccarani, and R. M. Lemoli, “The role of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase in the induction of immune tolerance: focus on hematology,” Blood, vol. 113, no. 11, pp. 2394–2401, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Banchereau and A. K. Palucka, “Dendritic cells as therapeutic vaccines against cancer,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 296–306, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Sallusto and A. Lanzavecchia, “Efficient presentation of soluble antigen by cultured human dendritic cells is maintained by granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus interleukin 4 and downregulated by tumor necrosis factor α,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 179, no. 4, pp. 1109–1118, 1994.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Schuler, B. Schuler-Thurner, and R. M. Steinman, “The use of dendritic cells in cancer immunotherapy,” Current Opinion in Immunology, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 138–147, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J.-H. Yen, T. Khayrullina, and D. Ganea, “PGE₂-induced metalloproteinase-9 is essential for dendritic cell migration,” Blood, vol. 111, no. 1, pp. 260–270, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Braun, R. S. Longman, and M. L. Albert, “A two-step induction of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) activity during dendritic-cell maturation,” Blood, vol. 106, no. 7, pp. 2375–2381, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Krause, E. Singer, P. I. Darley, J. Klebensberger, M. Groettrup, and D. F. Legler, “Prostaglandin E₂ is a key factor for monocyte-derived dendritic cell maturation: enhanced T cell stimulatory capacity despite IDO,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 82, no. 5, pp. 1106–1114, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Wobser, H. Voigt, R. Houben et al., “Dendritic cell based antitumor vaccination: impact of functional indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase expression,” Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, vol. 56, no. 7, pp. 1017–1024, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. R. Motta, S. Castellani, S. Rizzi et al., “Generation of dendritic cells from CD14⁺ monocytes positively selected by immunomagnetic adsorption for multiple myeloma patients enrolled in a clinical trial of anti-idiotype vaccination,” British Journal of Haematology, vol. 121, no. 2, pp. 240–250, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. J. Chung, M. Rossi, E. Romano et al., “Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase-expressing mature human monocyte-derived dendritic cells expand potent autologous regulatory T cells,” Blood, vol. 114, no. 3, pp. 555–563, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Trabanelli, D. Očadlíková, S. Gulinelli et al., “Extracellular ATP exerts opposite effects on activated and regulatory CD4⁺ T cells via purinergic P2 receptor activation,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 189, no. 3, pp. 1303–1310, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Curti, S. Trabanelli, C. Onofri et al., “Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase-expressing leukemic dendritic cells impair a leukemia-specific immune response by inducing potent T regulatory cells,” Haematologica, vol. 95, no. 12, pp. 2022–2030, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Hedi and G. Norbert, “Inhibition of IL-6, TNF-α, and cyclooxygenase-2 protein expression by prostaglandin E2-induced IL-10 in bone marrow-derived dendritic cells,” Cellular Immunology, vol. 228, no. 2, pp. 99–109, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Jonuleit, U. Kühn, G. Müller et al., “Pro-inflammatory cytokines and prostaglandins induce maturation of potent immunostimulatory dendritic cells under fetal calf serum-free conditions,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 3135–3142, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Rieser, G. Böck, H. Klocker, G. Bartsch, and M. Thurnher, “Prostaglandin E2 and tumor necrosis factor α cooperate to activate human dendritic cells: synergistic activation of interleukin 12 production,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 186, no. 9, pp. 1603–1608, 1997.
View at: Google Scholar
A. F. Sheibanie, I. Tadmori, H. Jing, E. Vassiliou, and D. Ganea, “Prostaglandin E2 induces IL-23 production in bone marrow-derived dendritic cells,” FASEB Journal, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 1318–1320, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. G. Figdor, I. J. M. De Vries, W. J. Lesterhuis, and C. J. M. Melief, “Dendritic cell immunotherapy: mapping the way,” Nature Medicine, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 475–480, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Ridgway, “The first 1000 dendritic cell vaccines,” Cancer Investigation, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 873–886, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Kaliński, C. M. U. Hilkens, E. A. Wierenga, and M. L. Kapsenberg, “T-cell priming by type-1 and type-2 polarized dendritic cells: the concept of a third signal,” Immunology Today, vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 561–567, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Rocha and C. Tanchot, “Towards a cellular definition of CD8⁺ T-cell memory: the role of CD4⁺ T-cell help in CD8⁺ T-cell responses,” Current Opinion in Immunology, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 259–263, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. A. Hokey, A. T. Larregina, G. Erdos, S. C. Watkins, and L. D. Falo Jr., “Tumor cell loaded type-1 polarized dendritic cells induce th1-mediated tumor immunity,” Cancer Research, vol. 65, no. 21, pp. 10059–10067, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Hwu, M. X. Du, R. Lapointe, M. Do, M. W. Taylor, and H. A. Young, “Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase production by human dendritic cells results in the inhibition of T cell proliferation,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 164, no. 7, pp. 3596–3599, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. W. Lee, T. Truong, K. Bickham et al., “A clinical grade cocktail of cytokines and PGE₂ results in uniform maturation of human monocyte-derived dendritic cells: implications for immunotherapy,” Vaccine, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. A8–A22, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Trabanelli, D. Ocadlíková, M. Ciciarello et al., “The SOCS3-independent expression of IDO2 supports the homeostatic generation of t regulatory cells by human dendritic cells,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 192, no. 3, pp. 1231–1240, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. von Bubnoff, M. Scheler, H. Wilms, R. Fimmers, and T. Bieber, “Identification of IDO-positive and IDO-negative human dendritic cells after activation by various proinflammatory stimuli,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 186, no. 12, pp. 6701–6709, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Scandella, Y. Men, S. Gillessen, R. Förster, and M. Groettrup, “Prostaglandin E2 is a key factor for CCR7 surface expression and migration of monocyte-derived dendritic cells,” Blood, vol. 100, no. 4, pp. 1354–1361, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Li, J. Xu, H. Zou, and C. Wang, “1-MT enhances potency of tumor cell lysate-pulsed dendritic cells against pancreatic adenocarcinoma by downregulating the percentage of Tregs,” Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology: Medical Science, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 344–348, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Ou, S. Cai, P. Liu et al., “Enhancement of dendritic cell-tumor fusion vaccine potency by indoleamine-pyrrole 2,3-dioxygenase inhibitor, 1-MT,” Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, vol. 134, no. 5, pp. 525–533, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. M. Westers, I. Houtenbos, A. A. van de Loosdrecht, and G. J. Ossenkoppele, “Principles of dendritic cell-based immunotherapy in myeloid leukemia,” Immunobiology, vol. 211, no. 6–8, pp. 663–676, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Delluc, P. Hachem, S. Rusakiewicz et al., “Dramatic efficacy improvement of a DC-based vaccine against AML by CD25 T cell depletion allowing the induction of a long-lasting T cell response,” Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, vol. 58, no. 10, pp. 1669–1677, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Zheng, J. Koropatnick, D. Chen et al., “Silencing IDO in dendritic cells: a novel approach to enhance cancer immunotherapy in a murine breast cancer model,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 132, no. 4, pp. 967–977, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Sioud, S. Sæbøe-Larssen, T. E. Hetland, J. Kærn, A. Mobergslien, and G. Kvalheim, “Silencing of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenaseenhances dendritic cell immunogenicity and antitumour immunity in cancer patients,” International Journal of Oncology, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 280–288, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2015 Sara Trabanelli et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1715

Downloads

1000

Citations

Journal of Immunology Research

PGE2-Induced IDO1 Inhibits the Capacity of Fully Mature DCs to Elicit an In Vitro Antileukemic Immune Response

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Blood Samples

2.2. DC Generation

2.3. IDO1 Expression

2.4. DC Immunophenotype

2.5. Enzyme Activity of IDO1

2.6. Allogeneic and Autologous T-Cell Proliferation

2.7. Induction of Allogeneic and Autologous Tregs by Mo-DCs

2.8. Generation of Leukemic Lysate and DC Pulsing

2.9. Evaluation of IFN-γ Producing CD3+ T Cells

2.10. Statistical Analysis

3. Results

3.1. PGE2 Enhances IDO1 Expression and Activity

3.2. The Inhibition of IDO1 in PGE2-Matured DCs Enhances T-Cell Proliferation

3.3. IDO1-Expressing DCs Strongly Induce Tregs

3.4. IDO1 Inhibition Enhances the DC Capacity to Elicit the IFN-γ Production of Leukemia-Specific T Cells

3.5. PGE2 Strongly Upregulates IDO1 Expression in DCs from AML Patients

4. Discussion

5. Conclusions

Conflict of Interests

Authors’ Contribution

Acknowledgments

References

Copyright

PGE₂-Induced IDO1 Inhibits the Capacity of Fully Mature DCs to Elicit an In Vitro Antileukemic Immune Response

2.7. Induction of Allogeneic and Autologous T_regs by Mo-DCs

2.9. Evaluation of IFN-γ Producing CD3⁺ T Cells

3.1. PGE₂ Enhances IDO1 Expression and Activity

3.2. The Inhibition of IDO1 in PGE₂-Matured DCs Enhances T-Cell Proliferation

3.3. IDO1-Expressing DCs Strongly Induce T_regs

3.5. PGE₂ Strongly Upregulates IDO1 Expression in DCs from AML Patients