Identification of Specific Cell Surface Markers on Immune Cells of Squirrel Monkeys (<i>Saimiri sciureus</i>)

Nehete, Bharti P.; DeLise, Ashley; Nehete, Pramod N.

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/8215195

Journal of Immunology Research

On this page

Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Data Availability Ethical Approval Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments Supplementary Materials References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2024 | Article ID 8215195 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/8215195

Identification of Specific Cell Surface Markers on Immune Cells of Squirrel Monkeys (Saimiri sciureus)

Bharti P. Nehete,¹Ashley DeLise,¹and Pramod N. Nehete^1,2

Academic Editor: Rahul Shivahare

Received28 Sept 2023

Revised08 Mar 2024

Accepted14 Mar 2024

Published25 Mar 2024

Abstract

Nonhuman primates are an important experimental model for the development of targeted biological therapeutics because of their immunological closeness to humans. However, there are very few antibody reagents relevant for delineating the different immune cell subsets based on nonhuman primate antigens directly or with cross-reactivity to those in humans. Here, we report specific expression of HLA-DR, PD-1, and CD123 on different circulating immune cell subsets in the peripheral blood that included T cells (CD3+), T cells subsets (CD4+ and CD8+), B cells (CD20+), natural killer (NK) cells (CD3–CD16+), and natural killer T cells (CD3+CD16+) along with different monocyte subsets in squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus). We established cross-reactivity of commercial mouse antihuman monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), with these various immune cell surface markers. These findings should aid further future comprehensive understanding of the immune parameters and identification of new biomarkers to significantly improve SQM as a model for biomedical studies.

1. Introduction

The National Center for Research Resources of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) recognized the importance of the squirrel monkey in turn establishing a self-sustaining breeding colony to support the needs of NIH grantees in using squirrel monkeys for a multidisciplinary research program that will aid in better understanding the biology and behavior of squirrel monkeys (1980–1985) [1]. The squirrel monkey (genus Saimiri) belonging to the family Cebidae, is a neotropical primate native to Central and South America. Squirrel monkeys are commonly used as a model in biomedical research since they have remarkably similar immune systems to humans [2]. Like humans, aging monkeys show physical losses in activities [3–6]. Many biomedical studies employing Squirrel monkeys focus on infectious disease, prion infectivity, gene expression, cancer treatments, reproductive physiology, viruses, and role in parasitic diseases [2, 6–13]. Species differences regarding disease susceptibility has been overlooked until recently [8, 14]. Adult and neonate squirrel monkeys may be a suitable model for testing HBV therapeutics, compared to Woolly Monkey HBV (WMHBV) that exhibit prolonged viremia lasting 6–8 months which is twice the duration of viremia achieved in other nonhuman primates [15]. Experimental Zika virus infection of neotropical primates, both squirrel and owl monkeys were observed in the absence of detectable disease, but seroconversion occurred by day 28 [16]. Squirrel monkeys are also an important model in the development of pharmacological and physiotherapeutic interventions to improve motor recovery after stroke as described by Nudo et al. [17]. The squirrel monkey model can be useful for studying Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy (CAA), pathogenesis, and long-term effect of Amyloid Related Imaging Abnormalities (ARIA) for testing the safety and efficacy of emerging therapeutic for Alzheimer’s disease [18]. Similarly, we also observed age-related Alzheimer’s disease-related pathologies in squirrel monkey showing improvement by stimulating innate immunity via CpG administration [19]. Comparably, squirrel monkeys are a natural host of Herpesvirus saimiri (saimiri herpesvirus 2) which can be isolated from blood samples obtained from healthy squirrel monkeys [20, 21].

Squirrel monkeys (Saimiri spp.) are the most commonly used neotropical primates in biomedical research in the United States. Their physical characteristics, including small size and ease of handling, contribute to their desirability as research subjects. The mean body weight of adult squirrel monkeys is less than 1 kg compared to female rhesus monkeys, which usually weigh 4–5 kg. As a result, much smaller doses of synthesized compounds are necessary when using squirrel monkeys to evaluate new drugs, which is an important advantage when studies require the administration of expensive compounds. Squirrel monkeys easily adapt to laboratory housing as well as can be maintained in smaller and less expensive spaces as opposed to larger primates such as macaques and baboons. This characteristic is especially important for facilities with space limitations. The substantial number of studies using the squirrel monkey over the past 40 years has provided a wealth of basic information about the biology of this neotropical primate. This information provides important baseline data for studies being conducted today and for future studies. In addition, squirrel monkeys are small and can be easily managed in comparison to large Old-World primates such as the rhesus macaque and chimpanzee. Although research methods and approaches have changed radically over the past decade with advances in molecular and cellular biology, the use of squirrel monkeys has remained constant. However, the lack of specific immunological reagents for neotropical monkeys, such as Saimiri sciureus, is still a major factor limiting studies in these models. The present investigation is intended to circumvent this obstacle by selecting immunological reagents directed toward homologous human markers, with strong cross-reactivity.

2. Study Population

2.1. Animals, Care, Diet, and Housing

Squirrel monkeys were socially housed at the University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center at Keeling Center, Bastrop, TX, used in this study. Animals were maintained as described previously [22].

Animals had ad libitum access to the new world Primate Diet (Purina #5049) and water. In addition, they were fed either a fresh fruit or vegetable daily. Specialty foods, such as seeds, peanuts, raisins, yogurt, cereals, frozen juice cups, and peanut butter, were distributed daily as enrichment. The animals were never deprived of food or water. Animals were also given destructible enrichment manipulanda and various travel/perching materials on a rotating basis to promote typical species behavior.

3. Methods

3.1. Blood Collection

Blood samples (2–3 mL) were collected in EDTA-coated collection tubes from the femoral veins of study animals in the morning (8–9 AM) before the animals were fed. The monkeys were examined by veterinarians during the study period and determined to be healthy.

3.2. Antibodies, Reagents, and Flow Cytometry

A series of commercially available human monoclonal antibodies that cross-react with NHP mononuclear cells were used in flow cytometry analyses, as described previously [22]. A cocktail of monoclonal antibodies against CD3 (clone SP-34), CD4 (clone L200), CD8 (clone 3B5), CD20 (clone L27), CD14 (clone M5E2), CD16 (clone 3G8), CD123 (clone 7G3), PD-1 (clone EH12.1), and HLA-DR (clone L243) with appropriate isotype-control antibodies were used (Table 1). One hundred microliters of EDTA blood was incubated with the cocktail of antibodies for 15 min at room temperature in the dark. Red blood cells were then lysed with a 1 × RBC lysing solution (Becton Dickinson, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Immediately following, the samples were washed thoroughly in FACS buffer (1 × phosphate-buffer saline (PBS), FBS, and sodium azide) by centrifugation; then cell pellets were suspended in 1% paraformaldehyde buffer (300 µL) and acquired on a Celesta flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). All samples acquired in this study were compensated using the single-color stained beads. Lymphocytes, monocytes, NK, and natural killer T (NKT) cells were gated on a forward scatter versus side scatter plot, as shown in Figures S1–S5. FlowJo software (Tree Star, Inc., Ashland, OR USA) was used to analyze HLA-DR, PD-1, and CD123 expression on lymphocytes, monocytes, NK, and NKT cell subsets.

3.3. PBMC Preparation

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated by standard Ficoll–Hypaque 1640 density gradient (Sigma–Aldrich, USA) centrifugation and subsequently used for in vitro analyses including viability and functional assays.

3.4. In Vitro Mitogen Stimulation

Aliquots of PBMC (1 × 10⁵) were stimulated with Concanavalin A (Con A, Sigma–Aldrich, USA) (2 µg/mL) for 72 hr in the presence and absence of anti-PD-1 (5 µg/mL) blocking antibody. An Isotype control antibody (IgG1), at same concentration of anti-PD-1, was used as a control. Stimulation index was calculated by dividing the absorbance (A540) values for PBMC treated with Con A (+Con A) with those without treatment (−Con A). Similar analyses were performed for PBMC (1 × 10⁵) stimulated with Con A (2 µg/mL) for 72 hr in presence and absence of anti-HLA-DR antibody (Clone L243; 5 µg/mL) or an isotype control antibody (IgG2a).

3.5. ELISPOT Assay for Detecting Mitogen-Specific IFN-γ Producing Cells

Freshly isolated, PBMC (50,000) were stimulated with Con A (2 µg/mL) for 40 hr in the presence and absence of HLA-DR (clone L243) blocking antibody or an Isotype control antibody (IgG2a), each at 5 µg/mL in a precoated IFN-γ ELISPOT plate using the methodology reported earlier [22]. The ELISPOT plates were developed and read on an IRIS ELISPOT reader (Mabtech IRIS, Cincinnati, USA).

3.6. Statistical Analysis

Data were evaluated using GraphPad Prism 9 software. Ordinary one-way ANOVA with a Brown–Forsythe test was used to determine statistical significance with p values < 0.05 considered statistically significant.

4. Results

We determined the levels of major lymphocyte subsets in the peripheral blood of squirrel monkeys using flow cytometry to profile different lymphocyte subsets that included total T cells (CD3+), helper T cells (CD3+CD4+), cytotoxic T cells (CD3+CD8+), B cells (CD20+), natural killer (NK) cells (CD3–CD16+), and NKT cells (CD3+CD16+) (Figure 1(a)). Additionally, we identified different monocyte populations as classical (CD14⁺⁺CD16⁻), intermediate (CD14⁺⁺CD16⁺), and nonclassical (CD14⁺CD16⁺) subsets (Figure 1(b)).

(a)

(b)

It has been reported in mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease by Schwartz et al. [23] that immune checkpoint blockade targeting the programed death-1 (PD-1) pathway improved the immune responses that lead to disease modification. Since our earlier studies showed that innate immunity stimulation via treatment with CpG oligodeoxynucleotides ameliorates Alzheimer’s disease pathology in aged squirrel monkeys [19], we tested the modulation of the expression of PD-1 and HLA-DR on immune cells of squirrel monkey as a potential underlying mechanism.

For this, we first determined the expression of HLA-DR+ (Figure 2(a)), PD-1+ (Figure 2(b)), and CD123+ (Figure 2(c)) on different squirrel monkey immune cells, using flow cytometry.

(a)

(b)

(c)

Additionally, the next step was to show expression of HLA-DR+, PD-1+, and CD123+ on subsets of specific T cells: CD3+ (Figure 3(a)), CD4+(Figure 3(b)), and CD8+ (Figure 3(c)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

We also analyzed the expression of HLA-DR+, PD-1+, and CD123+ on B cells, NK cells, and NKT cells by incorporating all cell surface markers simultaneously. We define B cells (CD20+) (Figure 4(a)), NK (CD16+) (Figure 4(b)), and NKT (CD13+CD16+) (Figure 4(c)). The specificity of staining for the various markers was found according to the isotype control antibody used for each pair of combination markers. A scheme of the expression of HLA-DR+, PD-1+, and CD123+ on B, NK, and NKT cells along with compensation using single-color stained cells in whole blood of squirrel monkey by flow cytometry is shown in Figure 4.

(a)

(b)

(c)

The logical gating was used to identify the expression of HLA-DR, PD-1, and CD123 on the monocyte CD14+ (Figure 5) populations in whole blood. Using FlowJo analysis, we found that although classical monocytes (Figure 5(a)) are defined with high purity using CD14 and CD16, intermediate (Figure 5(b)) and nonclassical monocytes (Figure 5(c)) defined using CD14 and CD16 alone are frequently contaminated, with average intermediate and nonclassical monocyte purity of ∼86.0% and ∼87.2%, respectively.

(a)

(b)

(c)

4.1. Effect of Activation on the Expression Levels of HLA-DR, PD-1, and CD123 on Different Immune Cells Subsets

Results from animal studies suggest that PD-1/PD-L1 suppresses memory T cell responses, including proliferation and cytokine production [24]. Blocking the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway potentially results in an increase in T cell activation [25]. To begin to understand this phenomenon in the squirrel monkeys, we first determined the expression levels of PD-1 along with CD123 and HLA-DR on the different immune cell subsets after activation with Con A in the absence and presence of blocking antibodies specific to each of these markers. After treatment of PBMC with Con A for 24 hr, we observed no significant changes in the levels of any of the three markers on T, B, and NK cells (Figures 6(a), 6(b), and 6(d)). However, we observed significant increase in the expression of HLA-DR (Figure 6(c)) and CD123 on monocytes (Figure 6(k)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

(h)

(i)

(j)

(k)

(l)

4.2. Effect of Immune Cell Functions after Specific Binding of Antibodies

We evaluated for changes in the functionality of immune cells, in terms of proliferation and cytokine production, by stimulating the cells with Con A in the presence and absence of antibodies specific to PD-1, HLA-DR, and CD123 (Figure 7). Aliquots of PBMC were stimulated with Con A (2 µg/mL) for 72 hr with blocking antibodies or isotype control (IgG1) antibodies. We observed no significant blocking of proliferation in the presence of anti-HLA-DR antibody, but we saw significant reduction with anti-PD-1 antibody (Figure 7(a)).

(a)

(b)

Figure 7

Blocking of steady state PD-1 and HLA-DR expression on mitogen stimulation of squirrel monkey PBMC (a) and IFN-γ ELISPOT (b): PBMC (1 × 10⁵) were stimulated with Con A (2 µg/mL) for 72 hr in the presence and absence of PD-1 (5 µg/mL) or HLA-DR (Clone L243; 5 µg/mL) blocking antibodies. Stimulation index was calculated by division of absorbance (A540) of PBMC (+Con A) with absorbance of PBMC (−Con A) (a). PBMC (50,000) were stimulated with Con A (2 µg/mL) for 40 hr in the presence and absence of PD-1 (1 µg/mL) or HLA-DR (clone L243; 5 µg/mL) blocking antibodies for IFN-γ ELISPOT (b). In both experiments, an isotype control (IgG1 or IgG2a for PD-1 and HLA-DR, respectively) at the same concentration of PD-1 or HLA-DR was used as a control. Results from three animals are shown. Values are reported as not significant (ns), , or .

We also assessed cytokine production as a measure of activation using the IFN-γ ELISPOT assay. For this, aliquots of PBMC (50,000) were stimulated with Con A (2 µg/mL) for 40 hr in the presence and absence of antibodies specific to PD-1 (1 µg/mL) and HLA-DR (clone L243; 5 µg/mL) along with an isotype control (IgG1) antibody. We observed no significant inhibition in IFN-γ production in the ELISPOT assay (Figure 7(b)).

5. Discussion

The squirrel monkey (SQM) serves as an important nonhuman primate model for drug development, specifically in the next generation of targeted therapeutics that affect specific pathways and cell types rather than a broad activation of the immune system. Toward this goal, we have been diligently conducting studies to create a comprehensive atlas of antibodies that can be used for phenotypic and functional characterization of the immune cells in squirrel monkey. We reported earlier cross-reactivity between several commercially available mouse antihuman monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) conjugated to fluorochromes and peripheral blood major leukocyte surface antigens in NHP using whole blood flow cytometric analysis [26]. The present study is focused on determining the expression of HLA-DR, PD-1, and CD123 on SQM monocytes, NK, and NKT cells in addition to B cells and T cell subsets.

In squirrel monkeys, as in humans, monocytes are a major component of peripheral blood, accounting for ≈10% of all circulating leukocytes. They are divided into three major populations by flow cytometry using a quadrant-based gating scheme with CD14 and CD16 to distinguish among the three monocyte subsets defined as classical (CD14⁺⁺CD16⁻), intermediate (CD14⁺⁺CD16⁺), and nonclassical (CD14⁺CD16⁺) constituted at 68.3%, 5.7%, and 20.2% of total blood monocytes, respectively [27, 28]. Each of these subsets is distinguished from each other by the expression of distinct surface markers as well as their functions in homeostasis and disease. Intermediate monocytes are more abundant in bacterial sepsis [29], dengue fever [30], Crohn’s disease [31], cardiovascular disease (CAD) [32], and rheumatoid arthritis [33], whereas the nonclassical monocytes are more prevalent in periodontitis [34] yet reduced in stroke [35]. The contribution of human monocytes to the progression of these diseases highlights their candidacy as potential therapeutic cell targets [36]. Alterations in monocyte subset frequencies are associated with clinical outcomes, including cardiovascular disease, in which circulating intermediate monocytes independently predict cardiovascular events. However, delineating mechanisms of monocyte function is hampered by inconsistent results among studies.

Likewise, we observed NK cells, a type of cytotoxic lymphocyte in squirrel monkey representing 5%–20% of all circulating lymphocytes, similar to that in humans [37]. The role of NK cells is analogous to that of cytotoxic T cells in the vertebrate adaptive immune response. NK cells are unique as they can recognize and kill stressed cells in the absence of MHC restriction, allowing for a much faster immune reaction. They were named “natural killers” because of the notion that they do not require activation to kill cells that are missing “self” markers of MHC class 1 [38]. This role is especially important because harmful cells that may be missing MHC I markers cannot be detected or destroyed by other immune cells, such as T lymphocyte cells.

In addition, NKT cells are a subset of CD1d-restricted T cells at the interface between the innate and adaptive immune system. NKT cells are an extremely rare subset of T cells, typically less than 1% in peripheral blood of humans and nonhuman primates. NKT cells are rapid responders of the innate immune system and mediate potent immunoregulatory and effector functions in a variety of disease settings [39]. For example, NKT cells are known to develop increases in activation and effector function within the breast tumor microenvironment. Due to a lack of cross-reactivity of CD1d tetramer in SQM, as described previously, we define CD3+CD16+ cells as NKT cells.

We observed PD-1 expression on the cell surface of T cells, NK cells, NKT cells, B cells, and monocyte populations in squirrel monkey as reported earlier on human cells [40, 41]. PD-1 expression on naïve T cells is induced upon TCR activation [42]. This transient expression decreases in the absence of TCR signaling but is maintained upon chronic activation from a persisting epitope target such as in chronic viral infections or in cancer [43]. PD-1 ligation to its ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2 impairs TCR signaling and CD28 costimulation [44, 45].

As in humans, we also detected HLA-DR expression on effector T cell, B cell, and NK cells in squirrel monkey. In humans, HLA-DR expression upon their activation has been intensively described in some diseases, such as autoimmune diseases and viral infections [46–48]. The increase of HLA-DR on the surface of cytotoxic T cells (CTLs), upon stimulation, could also be required to boost an effective immune response. HLA-DR (a human leukocyte antigen) is a class II MHC molecule, normally expressed in professional antigen presenting cells, namely, CTLs were found to be upregulated 24/48 hr after activation of these cells and is associated with increased IFN-γ production [49–52].

Lastly, we observed CD123 expression on squirrel monkey immune cells as observed on human B cells and NK cells in multiple hematolymphoid neoplasms, including acute myeloid leukemia, blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, hairy cell leukemia, and malignant Hodgkin lymphoma [53, 54]. Recent studies indicate that CD123 is overexpressed in various hematologic malignancies, including acute myeloid and B-lymphoid leukemias, blastic plasmacytoid dendritic neoplasms (BPDCN), and hairy cell leukemia. Since CD123 is a membrane receptor, they are targeted for using the natural ligand or neutralizing monoclonal antibodies, showing promising antitumor activity in BPDCN and AML patients [55].

Overall, we facilitated the evaluation of the immunomodulatory activity of polyclonal activator Con A, treating squirrel monkey PBMCs and observing that increased expression of several cell surface molecules may lead to various immune responses. Our findings highlight the value of nonhuman primates and more specifically squirrel monkey, as valuable models for understanding the human immune system. Based on the association or correlation of the kinetics of activation marker expression, the result of our study defines the measurement of T cell activation and provides a comprehensive review to serve as a reference for monitoring lymphocyte function in clinical study samples. Overall, this study has revealed the cellular composition of peripheral blood in terms of lymphocyte populations using flow cytometry-based measurements of the immune systems in the squirrel monkeys.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

Ethical Approval

Use of animals and experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center and were carried out according to the principles included in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, the provisions of the Animal Welfare Act, PHS Animal Welfare Policy [56, 57].

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

We thank Elizabeth Lindemann for providing blood samples for this study. This work was funded by NIH P40OD010938, and Squirrel Monkey Breeding and Research Recourses—Administrative Supplement was awarded to Pramod N. Nehete.

Supplementary Materials

Gratetegy strategy for T cell, B cell, NK cell, monocyte, and monocyte subsets. (Supplementary Materials)

References

C. R. Abee, “The squirrel monkey in biomedical research,” ILAR Journal, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 11–20, 1989.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. G. Galland, “Role of the squirrel monkey in parasitic disease research,” ILAR Journal, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 37–43, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Maestripieri and J. R. Roney, “Evolutionary developmental psychology: contributions from comparative research with nonhuman primates,” Developmental Review, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 120–137, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Corr, “Social behavior in aged rhesus macaques,” Collegium Antropologicum, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 87–94, 2003.
View at: Google Scholar
H. C. Veenema, B. M. Spruijt, W. H. Gispen, and J. A. R. A. M. van Hooff, “Aging, dominance history, and social behavior in java-monkeys (Macaca fascicularis),” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 509–515, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Almeling, K. Hammerschmidt, H. Sennhenn-Reulen, A. M. Freund, and J. Fischer, “Motivational shifts in aging monkeys and the origins of social selectivity,” Current Biology, vol. 26, no. 13, pp. 1744–1749, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. R. Boyne, K. J. Colgan, and A. Whitehouse, “Herpesvirus saimiri ORF57: a post-transcriptional regulatory protein,” Frontiers in Bioscience, vol. 13, no. 13, pp. 2928–2938, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. U. Jung, J.-K. Choi, A. Ensser, and B. Biesinger, “Herpesvirus saimiri as a model for gammaherpesvirus oncogenesis,” Seminars in Cancer Biology, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 231–239, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. L. Rogers, G. B. McClure, J. C. Ruiz, C. R. Abee, and J. A. Vanchiere, “Endemic viruses of squirrel monkeys (Saimiri spp.),” Comparative Medicine, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 232–240, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
A. J. Stevenson, E. Frolova-Jones, K. T. Hall et al., “A Herpesvirus saimiri-based gene therapy vector with potential for use in cancer immunotherapy,” Cancer Gene Therapy, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 1077–1085, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. D. Tardif, C. R. Abee, and K. G. Mansfield, “Workshop summary: neotropical primates in biomedical research,” ILAR Journal, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 386–392, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. L. Walker, D. C. Anderson, J. G. Herndon, and L. C. Walker, “Ovarian aging in squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus),” Reproduction, vol. 138, no. 5, pp. 793–799, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. L. Ritchie, S. V. Gibson, C. R. Abee, T. R. Kreil, J. W. Ironside, and P. Brown, “Blood transmission studies of prion infectivity in the squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus): the Baxter study,” Transfusion, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 712–721, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. M. Ward and E. J. Vallender, “The resurgence and genetic implications of new world primates in biomedical research,” Trends in Genetics, vol. 28, no. 12, pp. 586–591, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Y. Chen, B. Y. Winer, D. Chavez et al., “Woolly monkey-HBV infection in squirrel monkeys as a surrogate nonhuman primate model of HBV infection,” Hepatology Communications, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 371–386, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. A. Vanchiere, J. C. Ruiz, A. G. Brady et al., “Experimental zika virus infection of neotropical primates,” The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 173–177, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. J. Nudo, D. Larson, E. J. Plautz, K. M. Friel, S. Barbay, and S. B. Frost, “A squirrel monkey model of poststroke motor recovery,” ILAR Journal, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 161–174, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Heuer, J. Jacobs, R. Du et al., “Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities in an aged squirrel monkey with cerebral amyloid angiopathy,” Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 519–530, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. G. Patel, P. N. Nehete, S. R. Krivoshik et al., “Innate immunity stimulation via CpG oligodeoxynucleotides ameliorates Alzheimer’s disease pathology in aged squirrel monkeys,” Brain, vol. 144, no. 7, pp. 2146–2165, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. A. Falk, L. G. Wolfe, and F. Deinhardt, “Isolation of Herpesvirus saimiri from blood of squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus),” JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 1499–1505, 1972.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Epstein, A. B. Rickinson, R. A. Weiss, H. Fickenscher, and B. Fleckenstein, “Herpesvirus saimiri,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, vol. 356, no. 1408, pp. 545–567, 2001, 1408.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. N. Nehete, B. P. Nehete, G. K. Wilkerson, S. J. Schapiro, and L. E. Williams, “Effects of relocation on immunological and physiological measures in female squirrel monkeys (Saimiri boliviensis boliviensis),” PLOS ONE, vol. 16, no. 2, Article ID e0240705, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Schwartz, M. Arad, and H. Ben-Yehuda, “Potential immunotherapy for Alzheimer disease and age-related dementia,” Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 21–25, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Gotsman, N. Grabie, R. Dacosta, G. Sukhova, A. Sharpe, and A. H. Lichtman, “Proatherogenic immune responses are regulated by the PD-1/PD-L pathway in mice,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 117, no. 10, pp. 2974–2982, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Liechtenstein, I. Dufait, C. Bricogne et al., “PD-L1/PD-1 co-stimulation, a brake for T cell activation and a T cell differentiation signal,” Journal of Clinical & Cellular Immunology, vol. 1, no. S12, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. N. Nehete, L. E. Williams, S. Chitta et al., “Class C CpG oligodeoxynucleotide immunomodulatory response in aged squirrel monkey (Saimiri Boliviensis Boliviensis),” Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, vol. 12, Article ID 36, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. D. Thomas, A. A. J. Hamers, C. Nakao et al., “Human blood monocyte subsets: a new gating strategy defined using cell surface markers identified by mass cytometry,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 1548–1558, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Godo and H. Shimokawa, “Endothelial functions,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. e108–e114, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Poehlmann, J. C. Schefold, H. Zuckermann-Becker, H.-D. Volk, and C. Meisel, “Phenotype changes and impaired function of dendritic cell subsets in patients with sepsis: a prospective observational analysis,” Critical Care, vol. 13, no. 4, Article ID R119, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. L. Azeredo, P. C. Neves-Souza, A. R. Alvarenga et al., “Differential regulation of toll-like receptor-2, toll-like receptor-4, CD16 and human leucocyte antigen-DR on peripheral blood monocytes during mild and severe dengue fever,” Immunology, vol. 130, no. 2, pp. 202–216, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Grip, A. Bredberg, S. Lindgren, and G. Henriksson, “Increased subpopulations of CD16(+) and CD56(+) blood monocytes in patients with active Crohn’s disease,” Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 566–572, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. S. Rogacev, B. Cremers, A. M. Zawada et al., “CD14++CD16+ monocytes independently predict cardiovascular events: a cohort study of 951 patients referred for elective coronary angiography,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 60, no. 16, pp. 1512–1520, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Rossol, S. Kraus, M. Pierer, C. Baerwald, and U. Wagner, “The CD14(bright) CD16+ monocyte subset is expanded in rheumatoid arthritis and promotes expansion of the Th17 cell population,” Arthritis & Rheumatism, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 671–677, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Nagasawa, H. Kobayashi, M. Aramaki, M. Kiji, S. Oda, and Y. Izumi, “Expression of CD14, CD16 and CD45RA on monocytes from periodontitis patients,” Journal of Periodontal Research, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 72–78, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Urra, N. Villamor, S. Amaro et al., “Monocyte subtypes predict clinical course and prognosis in human stroke,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 994–1002, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. S. Kapellos, L. Bonaguro, I. Gemünd et al., “Human monocyte subsets and phenotypes in major chronic inflammatory diseases,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 10, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. M. Arachchige and A. Shavinda, “Human NK cells: from development to effector functions,” Innate Immunity, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 212–229, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Vivier, D. H. Raulet, A. Moretta et al., “Innate or adaptive immunity? The example of natural killer cells,” Science, vol. 331, no. 6013, pp. 44–49, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Terabe and J. A. Berzofsky, “The role of NKT cells in tumor immunity,” Advances in Cancer Research, vol. 101, pp. 277–348, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Petrovas, J. P. Casazza, J. M. Brenchley et al., “PD-1 is a regulator of virus-specific CD8+ T cell survival in HIV infection,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 203, no. 10, pp. 2281–2292, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Liu, Y. Yu, S. Yang et al., “Regulation of arginase I activity and expression by both PD-1 and CTLA-4 on the myeloid-derived suppressor cells,” Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 687–697, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Chikuma, S. Terawaki, T. Hayashi et al., “PD-1-mediated suppression of IL-2 production induces CD8+ T cell anergy in vivo,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 182, no. 11, pp. 6682–6689, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Youngblood, K. J. Oestreich, S.-J. Ha et al., “Chronic virus infection enforces demethylation of the locus that encodes PD-1 in antigen-specific CD8(+) T cells,” Immunity, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 400–412, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Yokosuka, M. Takamatsu, W. Kobayashi-Imanishi, A. Hashimoto-Tane, M. Azuma, and T. Saito, “Programmed cell death 1 forms negative costimulatory microclusters that directly inhibit T cell receptor signaling by recruiting phosphatase SHP2,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 209, no. 6, pp. 1201–1217, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Hui, J. Cheung, J. Zhu et al., “T cell costimulatory receptor CD28 is a primary target for PD-1-mediated inhibition,” Science, vol. 355, no. 6332, pp. 1428–1433, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Sáez-Cirión, C. Lacabaratz, O. Lambotte et al., “HIV controllers exhibit potent CD8 T cell capacity to suppress HIV infection ex vivo and peculiar cytotoxic T lymphocyte activation phenotype,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 104, no. 16, pp. 6776–6781, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J.-F. Viallard, P. Blanco, M. André et al., “CD8+ HLA-DR+ T lymphocytes are increased in common variable immunodeficiency patients with impaired memory B-cell differentiation,” Clinical Immunology, vol. 119, no. 1, pp. 51–58, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. F. Viallard, C. Bloch-Michel, M. Neau-Cransac et al., “HLA-DR expression on lymphocyte subsets as a marker of disease activity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus,” Clinical and Experimental Immunology, vol. 125, no. 3, pp. 485–491, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. G. Santis, M. R. Campanero, J. L. Alonso et al., “Tumor necrosis factor-α production induced in T lymphocytes through the AIM/CD69 activation pathway,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 1253–1259, 1992.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Reddy, E. Eirikis, C. Davis, H. M. Davis, and U. Prabhakar, “Comparative analysis of lymphocyte activation marker expression and cytokine secretion profile in stimulated human peripheral blood mononuclear cell cultures: an in vitro model to monitor cellular immune function,” Journal of Immunological Methods, vol. 293, no. 1-2, pp. 127–142, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. M. Rea, S. E. McNerlan, and H. D. Alexander, “CD69, CD25, and HLA-DR activation antigen expression on CD3+ lymphocytes and relationship to serum TNF-α, IFN-γ, and sIL-2R levels in aging,” Experimental Gerontology, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 79–93, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Thèze, P. M. Alzari, and J. Bertoglio, “Interleukin 2 and its receptors: recent advances and new immunological functions,” Immunology Today, vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 481–486, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. H. Xie, M. Biondo, S. J. Busfield et al., “CD123 target validation and preclinical evaluation of ADCC activity of anti-CD123 antibody CSL362 in combination with NKs from AML patients in remission,” Blood Cancer Journal, vol. 7, no. 6, Article ID e567, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Tettamanti, V. Marin, I. Pizzitola et al., “Targeting of acute myeloid leukaemia by cytokine-induced killer cells redirected with a novel CD 123-specific chimeric antigen receptor,” British Journal of Haematology, vol. 161, no. 3, pp. 389–401, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
U. Testa, E. Pelosi, and A. Frankel, “CD 123 is a membrane biomarker and a therapeutic target in hematologic malignancies,” Biomarker Research, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 4, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
U.S. National Institutes of Health, “Laboratory animal welfare: public health service policy on humane care and use of laboratory animals by awardee institutions; notice,” Federal Register, vol. 50, no. 90, pp. 19584-19585, 1985.
View at: Google Scholar
GTFC, Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, National Research Council, Washington, DC, USA, 8th edition, 2011.

Copyright

Copyright © 2024 Bharti P. Nehete et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

183

Downloads

118

Citations