Research Article

Comparison of Carotid Intima-Media Thickness in Pediatric Patients with Metabolic Syndrome, Heterozygous Familial Hyperlipidemia and Normals

Table 1

(a) Patient characteristics, CIMT, and lipid variables. (b) values for measurements in Table 1(a).
(a)

Characteristic MS heFH MS+heFH Control

Age (years) (SD)
14.0 (±2.9)12.5 (±3.7)12.7 (±3.1)12.2 (±4.2)
BMI (SD)31.8 (±5.1)23.4 (±4.8)31 (±6.4)19.3 (±4.1)
Waist circumference (cm) (SD)104 (±13.4)79.3 (±15)97.3 (±15.7)
Blood pressure (mm/Hg)
CIMT (µm) (SD)469.8 (±67)443.8 (±61)478.3 (±70)423.2 (±45)
LDL (mg/dL) (SD)116 (±25.3)178.3 (±34.9)189.4 (±42.4)
HDL (mg/dL) (SD)37 (±6.9)45.6 (±9.5)43.2 (±136.1)
Triglycerides (mg/dL) (SD)208 (±70.8)139.8 (±112.3)225.3 (±148.1)
Non-HDL (mg/dL)157.6 206.3 209.7

(b)

Comparisons CIMT LDL HDL TGs Non-HDL Age

MS versus heFH 0.022 0.0005 0.013 0.06
MS versus MS+heFH0.61 0.0003 0.19 0.73 0.19
heFH versus MS+heFH0.65 0.483 0.61 0.13 0.074 0.87
MS versus control 0.0035
heFH versus control0.038 0.77
MS+heFH versus control0.003 0.67