Research Article
Hybrid Discrete Wavelet Transform and Gabor Filter Banks Processing for Features Extraction from Biomedical Images
Table 5
Comparison with the literature.
| | Features | Classifier | Accuracy* |
| Mammograms | | | | [3] | Gabor | k-NN | 80% | [4] | DT-CWT | SVM | 88.64% | [5] | Contourlet | SVM | 96.6% | Our approach | DWT-Gabor | SVM | 96.67% (±0.05) | Retina | | | | [1] | DWT + GLCM | LDA | 82.2% | [2] | Morphological + GLCM | Probabilistic boosting algorithm | 81.3%–92.2% 71.7%–85.2% | [39] | Gabor | SVM | 83% | Our approach | DWT-Gabor | SVM | 100% | Brain | | | | [6] | DWT | SVM | 98% | [8] | DWT + PCA | BPNN | 100% | | | SVM | 90% | [38] | Voxels | Bayes | 92% | | | VFI | 78% | Our approach | DWT-Gabor | SVM | 97.36% (±0.02) |
|
|
Correct classification rate.
|