- About this Journal
- Abstracting and Indexing
- Aims and Scope
- Article Processing Charges
- Articles in Press
- Author Guidelines
- Bibliographic Information
- Citations to this Journal
- Contact Information
- Editorial Board
- Editorial Workflow
- Free eTOC Alerts
- Publication Ethics
- Reviewers Acknowledgment
- Submit a Manuscript
- Subscription Information
- Table of Contents
Journal of Neurodegenerative Diseases
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 879710, 11 pages
Immunolocalization of Kisspeptin Associated with Amyloid-β Deposits in the Pons of an Alzheimer’s Disease Patient
1Department of Human and Health Sciences, School of Life Sciences, University of Westminster, 115 New Cavendish Street, London W1W 6UW, UK
2Health Sciences Research Centre, University of Roehampton, Holybourne Avenue, London SW15 4JD, UK
Received 3 February 2013; Revised 23 April 2013; Accepted 24 April 2013
Academic Editor: Gal Bitan
Copyright © 2013 Amrutha Chilumuri et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The pons region of the Alzheimer’s disease (AD) brain is one of the last to show amyloid-β (Aβ) deposits and has been suggested to contain neuroprotective compounds. Kisspeptin (KP) is a hormone that activates the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis and has been suggested to be neuroprotective against Aβ toxicity. The localization of KP, plus the established endogenous neuroprotective compounds corticotropin releasing hormone (CRH) and catalase, in tissue sections from the pons region of a male AD subject has been determined in relation to Aβ deposits. Results showed Aβ deposits also stained with KP, CRH, and catalase antibodies. At high magnification the staining of deposits was either KP or catalase positive, and there was only a limited area of the deposits with KP-catalase colocalization. The CRH does not bind Aβ, whilst both KP and catalase can bind Aβ, suggesting that colocalization in Aβ deposits is not restricted to compounds that directly bind Aβ. The neuroprotective actions of KP, CRH, and catalase were confirmed in vitro, and fibrillar Aβ preparations were shown to stimulate the release of KP in vitro. In conclusion, neuroprotective KP, CRH, and catalase all colocalize with Aβ plaque-like deposits in the pons region from a male AD subject.
The deposition of the amyloid-β (Aβ) peptide within plaques in the Alzheimer’s disease (AD) brain is a central feature of the disease pathology [1, 2]. A sequential pattern of Aβ deposition within different regions of the brain has been suggested as AD progresses [3–6]. The staging of Aβ deposition by Thal et al. (2002)  identified the cerebellum plus brainstem nuclei including the pons as the last to show Aβ deposits. In transgenic mice overexpressing the human amyloid precursor protein (APP) the Aβ deposition showed a similar sequential pattern, with the cerebellum and pons again the last to show Aβ deposits . The apparent resistance of the cerebellum and pons to neurodegenerative changes suggests that endogenous neuroprotective processes may play a role in these tissues.
A range of endogenous compounds have been suggested to have neuroprotective properties against Aβ in AD models [8–16]. In a recent study kisspeptin (KP) peptides were suggested to have neuroprotective properties against Aβ plus related amyloid proteins . The KP peptide is a reproductive hormone , and the female hypothalamic levels of KP show elevations after menopause that are not seen in males . Female AD onset is typically postmenopausal, and there is significantly less neurodegeneration in the hypothalamus in women compared to men . The release of KP from human neuronal cells has been shown to be stimulated by Aβ  suggesting that in regions that express the KiSS-1 gene, which encodes for the KP peptides, there may be changes in KP levels in AD due to the elevations of Aβ.
The KP peptide was identified as having similarity to the catalase region that binds Aβ , and KP binds Aβ itself . Catalase has been shown to bind directly to Aβ fibrils  and has been found by immunohistochemistry in amyloid plaques in AD brains . The catalase enzyme has been shown to have neuroprotective properties as an antioxidant enzyme [24, 25], as an Aβ binding protein [26, 27] and when targeted to the mitochondria as a modifier of Aβ secretion . The CRH peptide has well-established neuroprotective properties and prevents Aβ toxicity [10, 28–33]. The mechanism for CRH neuroprotection, unlike KP neuroprotection, is receptor mediated [30–32], and the peptide does not bind Aβ, unlike catalase and KP [17, 26]. In AD the CRH peptide has been found to be associated with thioflavin S-positive deposits , and the levels of CRH are markedly reduced in some brain regions [35, 36].
The KP peptide [37, 38], CRH peptide , and catalase [40, 41] are all found in the pons, where neurodegenerative changes and Aβ deposition occur in the latter stages of the disease [3, 7]. In this study the localization of immunoreactive (ir-) KP, CRH, and catalase in relation to Aβ deposits has been determined in pons sections from a male AD patient. The neuroprotective effects of KP, CRH, and catalase plus ir-KP release from human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells have also been studied.
2. Materials and Methods
Pons sections from a 72-year-old male with AD (Cat. no. ab4586; Lot no. B506287) and a 26-year-old normal male (Cat. no. ab4316; Lot no. A504234) and BAM-10 mouse anti-Aβ antibody were obtained from Abcam PLC, Cambridge, UK. Rabbit anti-KP 45–54 antiserum, KP 1–54, KP 42–54, KP 45–54, KP 45–50, neuropeptide-FF (NPFF), CRH, Aβ 1–46, Aβ 1–43, Aβ 1–42, Aβ 1–40, Aβ 1–38, and Aβ 17–40 were purchased from Bachem AG, Switzerland. Goat anti-mouse IgG Alexa Fluor 568 and goat anti-rabbit IgG Alexa Fluor 488 were purchased from Chemicon, UK. VECTASHIELD Mounting Media was purchased from Vector Laboratories Ltd., UK. The CAT-505 mouse anti-catalase antibody, alkaline phosphatase conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG, alkaline phosphatase conjugated anti-mouse IgG, and all other chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, UK.
2.2. Aβ Fibril Formation
Batches of synthetic Aβ 1–46, Aβ 1–43, Aβ 1–42, Aβ 1–40, Aβ 1–38, Aβ 17–40, or Aβ 25–35 were dissolved in distilled water at a concentration of 1.0 mg/mL and incubated at 37°C for 24 h, with constant oscillation. Following incubation, the formation of fibrils was confirmed by TEM or Congo red assay as previously described by Milton and Harris [22, 42, 43].
2.3. Antibody Characterization
NUNC MaxiSorp 96-well immunoplates were coated with 1 μg/mL of either KP peptides, NPFF peptides, CRH peptides, catalase, or Aβ peptides in 50 mM carbonate buffer, pH 9.6, and unoccupied sites blocked with 0.2% (w/v) marvel. Either the BAM-10 mouse anti-Aβ antibody , rabbit anti-Aβ 21–32 antiserum , rabbit anti-KP 45–54 antiserum , KCHMB001 mouse anti-CRH antibody [46–48], or CAT-505 mouse anti-catalase antibody  at a final concentration of 0.1 μg/mL in 50 mM TRIS (containing 0.1% BSA and 0.1% Triton X-100) was added (100 μL/well) and incubated at 4°C for 16 hours. Some plates were coated with Aβ 1–42 fibrils, prepared, and tested as described by Milton and Harris (2009) , and these plates were preincubated at 4°C for 24 hours with KP 45–54, NPFF, CRH or catalase prior to addition of antibodies. After washing to remove unbound material an alkaline phosphatase conjugated goat anti-rabbit or anti-mouse secondary antibody was added and incubated at 24°C for 2 hours. After washing to remove unbound material p-nitrophenylphosphate substrate was added and absorbance at 405 nm determined.
2.4. Immunohistochemistry and Confocal Microscopy
Pre-mounted and paraffin-embedded pons tissue sections from a normal or an AD patient at a thickness of 5 μM were used. The tissue had been examined and diagnosed by a licensed pathologist and was ethically obtained. The sections were processed for immunostaining  and incubated overnight at 4°C with 1 : 1000 dilutions (1 μg/mL final concentration) of BAM-10 mouse anti-Aβ antibody , rabbit anti-Aβ 21–32 antiserum , rabbit anti-KP 45–54 antiserum , KCHMB001 mouse anti-CRH antibody [46–48], and CAT-505 mouse anti-catalase antibody  in phosphate buffered saline containing 0.01% Tween 20 (PBST). For some of the incubations with anti-KP 45–54 the antibody solutions were preincubated with NPFF (10 μg/mL) for 24 h to block binding to endogenous NPFF . The sections were then washed for 3 × 5 min with PBST before the secondary antibodies were applied (goat anti-mouse IgG-Alexa Fluor 568 and goat anti-rabbit IgG-Alexa Fluor 488, 1 : 500) for 1 hour. The sections were then washed in PBST, and cover slips were mounted with VECTASHIELD Mounting Media.
Images were acquired by sequential scanning using a Leica TCS SP2 confocal system (Leica Microsystems, Milton Keynes, UK) with a 63x ceramic dipping objective. A 488 nm laser was used for excitation of Alexa Fluor 488 labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG, while a 543 nm laser was used for Alexa Fluor 568 labeled goat anti-mouse IgG excitation .
2.5. Cell Cultures
Human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells were routinely grown in a 5% CO2 humidified incubator at 37°C in a 1 : 1 mixture of Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium and HAM’s F12 with Glutamax (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS), 1% nonessential amino acids, penicillin (100 units/mL), and streptomycin (100 mg/mL) . Human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells were cultured in 6-well or 96-well plates and differentiated with retinoic acid for 7 days prior to experimentation.
2.6. KP Release
2.5 × 105 differentiated SH-SY5Y cells/well in 6-well plates were incubated in 4 mL of medium containing a subtoxic dose (100 nM) of either fibrillar Aβ 1–46, Aβ 1–43, Aβ 1–42, Aβ 1–40, Aβ 1–38, Aβ 17–40, or Aβ 25–35 for 4 h. Control cells were cultured in medium alone. Media was harvested and KP extracted using a polyclonal anti-KP 45–54 antiserum and a protein-A agarose column. The immunoreactive KP was eluted from the column in 0.5 M acetic acid and was further purified using a Sep-Pak C18 extraction step. The Sep-Pak C18 columns were prewetted with methanol and 0.5 M acetic acid, acidified samples applied, and columns washed with 0.5 M Acetic acid prior to elution of bound peptide with 70% acetonitrile. After drying under a stream of nitrogen, samples were resuspended in PBS containing 0.1% BSA plus 0.05% Tween 20.
2.7. Determination of ir-KP
ELISA plates were coated with 1 μg/mL anti-KP 45–54 antiserum in 50 mM carbonate buffer, pH 9.6, and unoccupied sites blocked with 5% (w/v) marvel. Samples or synthetic KP 45–54 standards (0–1000 pg/mL) were applied in assay buffer (PBS containing 0.1% BSA plus 0.05% Tween 20) and incubated for 24 h. After washing with assay buffer to remove unbound material, biotinyl-KP 45–50 (10 ng/mL) was added and incubated for 2 h. After washing to remove unbound material, immunoreactive- (ir-) KP-like material was detected using a streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase conjugate and 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine substrate . Sample levels were compared to KP 45–54 standards and ir-KP-like peptide levels expressed as a % of control cell release.
2.8. Effect of KP, CRH, and Catalase on Aβ Neurotoxicity
On the day of the experiment 5 × 103 differentiated SH-SY5Y cells/well in 96-well plates were pretreated with either media alone (control) or anti-KP 45–54 antibody (10 μg/mL) to block endogenous KP, KCHMB001 anti-CRH antibody (10 μg/mL) to block endogenous CRH, or 3-aminotriazole (3AT: 50 μM) to inhibit endogenous catalase [24, 53] for a 4 h period. The Aβ 1–42 (10 μM) was then added to induce toxicity, and cells were incubated for 16 hours prior to determination of cell viability. In experiments to assess the neuroprotection by KP, CRH, or catalase the KP 1–54 (10 μM), CRH (10 nM), or catalase (5 μg/mL) was incubated for 4 h with the Aβ 1–42 (10 μM) to allow binding to occur prior to addition to cells. The mixtures of Aβ 1–42 plus either media alone or KP 1–54, CRH, or catalase were added to cells to induce toxicity and incubated for 16 hours prior to determination of cell viability.
2.9. Cell Viability
After treatment with test peptides or drugs and incubation for the appropriate time, the viability was determined by MTT reduction . After incubation with test substances, MTT (10 μL : 12 mM stock) was added and cells incubated for a further 4 hours. Cell lysis buffer (100 μL/well; 20% (v/v) SDS, 50% (v/v) N,N-dimethylformamide, pH 4.7) was added, and after repeated pipetting to lyse cells, the MTT formazan product formation was determined by measurement of absorbance change at 570 nm. Control levels in the absence of test substances were taken as 100% and the absorbance in the presence of cells lysed with Triton X-100 at the start of the incubation period with test substances taken as 0% .
2.10. Data Analysis
All data are expressed as means ± SEM for ir-KP measurements levels in samples were determined from a standard curve using synthetic KP 45–54 as the standard. For cytotoxicity experiments data are expressed as % control cells (MTT reduction). Statistical analysis was performed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey or Dunnett multiple comparison post hoc testing using GraphPad Prism software (version 6), with a value of <0.05 considered statistically significant.
3.1. Characterization of Antibodies
The binding of BAM-10 mouse anti-Aβ antibody , rabbit anti-Aβ 21–32 antiserum , rabbit anti-KP 45–54 antiserum , CAT-505 mouse anti-catalase antibody , and KCHMB001 mouse anti-CRH antibody  to Aβ, KP, NPFF, catalase, and CRH was tested. Both of anti-Aβ antibodies, BAM-10 mouse anti-Aβ and rabbit anti-Aβ 21–32, showed significant binding to full length Aβ but not to KP, NPFF, catalase, or CRH (Figure 1(a)). The BAM-10 antibody did not bind Aβ 17–40 in agreement with the published specificity of this antibody for Aβ 1–12 [44, 55, 56], whilst the anti-Aβ 21–32 antibody showed significant binding to Aβ 17–40. The anti-KP 45–54 antibody showed significant binding to KP 1–54 plus KP 45–54 and also showed significant binding to NPFF but did not cross-react with Aβ, catalase, or CRH (Figure 1(a)). The CAT-505 anti-catalase antibody showed significant binding to catalase and showed no cross-reactivity with Aβ, KP, NPFF, or CRH peptides. The KCHMB001 anti-CRH antibody showed significant binding to CRH and showed no cross-reactivity with Aβ, KP, NPFF or catalase.
The BAM-10 anti-Aβ, anti-Aβ 21–32, and anti-KP 45–54 antibodies all showed significant binding to plates coated with Aβ 1–42 fibrils and pretreated with KP 45–54 (Figure 1(b)). The BAM-10 anti-Aβ and anti-Aβ 21–32 antibodies but not the anti-KP 45–54 antibody showed significant binding to plates coated with Aβ 1–42 fibrils and pretreated with NPFF (Figure 1(b)). This observation contrasts with the cross-reactivity of the anti-KP 45–54 antibody with NPFF (Figure 1(a)) and suggests either that no specific binding of NPFF to Aβ had occurred or that the epitope of NPFF recognized by the antibody is inaccessible for antibody binding when the NPFF is bound to Aβ. The CAT-505 anti-catalase antibody showed no significant binding to plates coated with Aβ 1–42 fibrils and pretreated with either KP 45–54 or NPFF (Figure 1(b)). The BAM-10 anti-Aβ, anti-Aβ 21–32, and CAT-505 anti-catalase antibodies showed significant binding to plates coated with Aβ 1–42 fibrils and pretreated with catalase (Figure 1(b)). The anti-KP 45–54 antibody showed no binding to plates coated with Aβ 1–42 fibrils and pretreated with catalase (Figure 1(b)). The KCHMB001 anti-CRH antibody showed no significant binding to plates coated with Aβ 1–42 fibrils or those pretreated with either CRH, KP 45–54, NPFF, or catalase (Figure 1(b)), suggesting that either no specific CRH binding to Aβ had occurred or that the epitope of CRH recognized by the antibody is inaccessible for antibody binding when the CRH is bound to Aβ. The BAM-10 anti-Aβ and anti-Aβ 21–32 antibodies showed significant binding to plates coated with Aβ 1–42 fibrils and pretreated with CRH (Figure 1(b)).
3.2. Double-Labeling Immunohistochemistry for KP and Aβ in a Normal Control
Immunohistochemistry analysis with anti-KP 45–54 alone in pons sections from a 26-year-old normal male (Cat. no. ab4316; Lot no. A504234) showed staining that was detectable with green fluorescence but not red fluorescence. Immunohistochemistry analysis with BAM-10 anti-Aβ alone showed staining that was detectable with red fluorescence but not green fluorescence. Control incubations with secondary antibodies showed no detectable staining above background. The results from the double-labeling immunohistochemistry showed staining of tissue with the anti-KP 45–54 (Figure 2(a)) and BAM-10 anti-Aβ (Figure 2(b)) antibodies. There was no colocalization of anti-KP 45–54 and BAM-10 anti-Aβ labeling observed in the tissue (Figure 2(c)).
3.3. Double-Labeling Immunohistochemistry for KP and Aβ in AD
The results from the double-labeling immunohistochemistry in the pons sections from a 72-year-old male with AD (Cat. no. ab4586; Lot no. B506287) show that the anti-KP 45–54 (Figure 3(a)) and BAM-10 anti-Aβ (Figure 3(b)) antibodies labeled deposits. The anti-KP 45–54 staining was shown to colocalize with the BAM-10 anti-Aβ labeling in the plaque-like deposits (Figure 3(c)). The KP labeling was unaltered by preincubation of the antibody with NPFF  (Figures 3(d), 3(e), and 3(f)), and colocalization with the BAM-10 anti-Aβ labeling was still observed. The colocalization of KP and Aβ appeared to be confined to plaque-like deposits rather than throughout the tissue (Figures 3(c) and 3(f)). Control incubations with secondary antibodies showed no detectable staining or colocalization in plaque-like deposits above the background for green fluorescence (Figures 3(g) and 3(i)) or red fluorescence (Figures 3(h) and 3(i)).
3.4. Double-Labeling Immunohistochemistry for CRH and Aβ
To confirm the observations of Powers et al. (1987)  that CRH is present in AD amyloid plaques double labeling immunohistochemistry with a polyclonal anti-Aβ 21–32 antibody and the KCHMB001 monoclonal anti-CRH antibody was carried out. The results showed labeling with both antibodies and colocalization of the Aβ and CRH in plaque-like deposits (Figures 4(a), 4(b) and 4(c)). The Aβ labeling with the anti-Aβ 21–32 polyclonal primary antibody (Figure 4(b)) showed a similar pattern of Aβ labeling to that seen with the BAM-10 monoclonal anti-Aβ antibody (Figure 3(b)).
3.5. Double-Labeling Immunohistochemistry for Catalase and Aβ
To confirm the observations of Pappolla et al. (1992)  that catalase is present in AD amyloid plaques double-labeling immunohistochemistry with a polyclonal anti-Aβ 21–32 antibody and the CAT-505 monoclonal anti-catalase antibody was carried out. The results showed labeling with both antibodies and colocalization of the Aβ and catalase in plaque like deposits (Figures 5(a), 5(b), and 5(c)).
3.6. Double-Labeling Immunohistochemistry for KP and Catalase
The lack of Aβ positive deposits that did not show KP or catalase labeling suggested that the two compounds might colocalize in the plaques. Double-labeling immunohistochemistry results showed that this was the case (Figures 6(a), 6(b), and 6(c)). Of interest was the observation at higher magnification that there appeared to be specific KP and catalase sites with only limited colocalization within plaque-like deposits (Figures 6(d), 6(e), and 6(f)).
3.7. Fibrillar Aβ Stimulation of KP Release
The effects of fibrillar Aβ peptides on endogenous KP release were tested using human SH-SY5Y neurons. The assay used cross-reacts with KP 1–54, KP 27–54, KP 42–54, KP 45–54, and KP 45–50 but not KP 47–50 or NPFF. Results showed that fibrillar Aβ 1–46, Aβ 1–43, Aβ 1–42, Aβ 1–40, Aβ 1–38, Aβ 17–40, and Aβ 25–35 all stimulated a significant 3-4-fold increase, from a basal level of 10.5 ± 0.6 pg/mL, in ir-KP release from SH-SY5Y neurons during a 4-hour incubation (Figure 7(a)). A dose response curve for fibrillar Aβ 1–42 stimulated ir-KP release showed that at doses above 100 nM there was a significant increase in ir-KP release (Figure 7(b)). At the two highest doses (1 μM and 10 μM) there was significant ir-KP release; however, this was accompanied by neurotoxicity, and it is likely that the higher levels may be due to KP released from dead cells rather than KP directly stimulated by Aβ.
3.8. Effect of KP, CRH, and Catalase on Fibrillar Aβ 1–42 Toxicity
In order to inhibit endogenous KP, CRH, and catalase the effects of the anti-KP 45–54 antibody, the KCHMB001 anti-CRH antibody, and the catalase inhibitor 3AT on fibrillar Aβ 1–42 toxicity were tested using human SH-SY5Y neurons. The results showed that both the anti-KP 45–54 antibody and the catalase inhibitor 3AT caused a significant enhancement of Aβ 1–42 toxicity (Figure 8(a)), whilst the KCHMB001 anti-CRH antibody had no effect.
The direct effects of the KP 1–54, CRH, and catalase on fibrillar Aβ 1–42 toxicity were also tested using human SH-SY5Y neurons. The results showed that the KP 1–54, CRH, and catalase were all able to prevent Aβ neurotoxicity (Figure 8(b)).
The colocalization of KP with Aβ in plaque-like deposits (Figure 3) is a novel observation. The colocalization of CRH with Aβ confirms the observations of Powers et al. (1987)  and the colocalization of catalase with Aβ confirms the observations of Pappolla et al. (1992) . The failure of CRH to directly bind Aβ (Figure 1(b)) confirms previous studies [26, 31] and raises the possibility that the colocalization could be due to either the peptide being trapped within the extracellular debris, that is, part of the amyloid plaques, or that it binds to another component of the plaques. It is not possible from these studies to determine whether the KP in the Aβ positive deposits has directly bound the Aβ as described by Milton et al. (2012)  or whether it is trapped in the plaque debris. Both KP and catalase bind fibrillar forms of Aβ [17, 22]. The lack of secondary antibody binding to the plaque-like deposits suggests that the localization of KP, CRH catalase, and Aβ observed in these studies is due to direct binding of the primary antibodies to the respective proteins in the deposits. In the case of KP there is a known cross-reactivity of KP 45–54 antibodies with NPFF ; however, preadsorption of the antibody with NPFF peptide did not reduce the binding, suggesting that the KP is authentic material and not NPFF. Further studies are required to confirm these findings and also determine the regional expression of KP in AD. Changes in hypothalamic KP expression have previously been documented in women at menopause , and it is well known that the KiSS-1 expression is regulated by estrogen . The estrogen regulation of KiSS-1 and KP peptides also differs between different brain regions [58–60], and it has been suggested that the expression patterns of the α and β estrogen receptors are responsible for this . The expressions of the α and β estrogen receptors are also changed in AD , and this in turn may alter KiSS-1 expression and KP levels. The contribution of the cell surface G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPR30) to KP regulation is unknown, but this form has been found in hippocampal tissue [63, 64] and could contribute to changes seen after menopause.
The KP peptides have been shown to be released from human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells in response to fibrillar Aβ forms (Figure 7) and have previously been shown to be released by other amyloid-fibril forming peptides when in a fibrillar form . The doses of amyloid-fibril forming peptides used previously were subtoxic  and selected based on the most toxic fibrillar amyloid peptide; in the current study we also show significant increases in KP release in response to toxic doses. The reduced release at the highest dose of Aβ tested corresponds to a significant toxicity during the incubation time and may be caused by the release of degradative enzymes from dead cells. The levels of KP released are relatively low and suggest that the neuroprotection observed with toxic doses of fibrillar Aβ is more likely to be receptor mediated rather than via a direct Aβ binding action. However, in previous studies the KP receptor antagonist or the NPFF receptor antagonist, which blocks some actions of KP [65–67], had no effect on KP neuroprotection . A recent study suggests that the NPFF antagonist RF9 used in previous studies does not block all of the actions of NPFF  and these peptides are known to activate acid sensing ion channels (ASICs) in a nonreceptor mediated action . Our observations that KP is present in the pons region of an AD brain suggest that KP neuroprotection could occur in an AD setting, and further studies into the mechanism of action of KP may define the mechanism of action.
The protective roles of catalase are well documented [12, 24–27], and here we confirm enhancement of fibrillar Aβ toxicity by the catalase inhibitor 3AT plus protection against Aβ toxicity by catalase (Figure 8). The CRH protection is also well documented [10, 28–33] and here is only seen with added CRH in the SH-SY5Y model. In the pons of AD there are both catalase and CRH colocalization with Aβ deposits, suggesting potential neuroprotective roles for catalase or CRH.
In conclusion, we present evidence of colocalization of KP, CRH, and catalase in Aβ positive plaque-like deposits in the pons of the AD brain. The in vitro observations that fibrillar Aβ stimulates ir-KP release and that both endogenous KP and catalase are neuroprotective suggest potential neuroprotective roles in AD. The colocalization study is the first demonstration of an interaction of KP with Aβ in an in vivo AD setting and suggests a potential role for KP in AD pathology.
Conflict of Interests
Nathaniel G. N. Milton is named as the inventor on patent applications filed by the University of Roehampton for the use of kissorphin peptides to treat Alzheimer’s disease, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, or diabetes mellitus (Publication nos. GB2493313 A, WO 2011/144714 A1, and EP 2 388 012 A1); under the University of Roehampton rules he could benefit financially if these patents are granted and commercially exploited.
Nathaniel G. N. Milton conceived and designed the experiments. Amrutha Chilumuri, Maria Ashioti, Amanda N. Nercessian, and Nathaniel G. N. Milton performed the experiments. Amrutha Chilumuri, Maria Ashioti, Amanda N. Nercessian and Nathaniel G. N. Milton analyzed the data. Nathaniel G. N. Milton wrote the paper. Amrutha Chilumuri, Maria Ashioti, Amanda N. Nercessian and Nathaniel G. N. Milton critically reviewed the paper.
The work was funded by the University of Roehampton plus a Grant from West Focus (Park Board, PCF II 104 to Nathaniel G. N. Milton). The authors would like to thank Drs Anatoliy Markiv and Diluka Peris for assistance with confocal image acquisition.
- C. Reitz, “Alzheimer's disease and the amyloid cascade hypothesis: a critical review,” International Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 2012, Article ID 369808, 11 pages, 2012.
- E. Karran, M. Mercken, and B. D. Strooper, “The amyloid cascade hypothesis for Alzheimer's disease: an appraisal for the development of therapeutics,” Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 698–712, 2011.
- D. R. Thal, U. Rüb, M. Orantes, and H. Braak, “Phases of A beta-deposition in the human brain and its relevance for the development of AD,” Neurology, vol. 58, no. 12, pp. 1791–1800, 2002.
- I. Alafuzoff, D. R. Thal, T. Arzberger et al., “Assessment of β-amyloid deposits in human brain: a study of the BrainNet Europe Consortium,” Acta Neuropathologica, vol. 117, no. 3, pp. 309–320, 2009.
- B. T. Hyman, C. H. Phelps, T. G. Beach et al., “National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association guidelines for the neuropathologic assessment of Alzheimer's disease,” Alzheimer's & Dementia, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2012.
- T. J. Montine, C. H. Phelps, T. G. Beach et al., “National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association guidelines for the neuropathologic assessment of Alzheimer's disease: a practical approach,” Acta Neuropathologica, vol. 123, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2012.
- A. Rijal Upadhaya, E. Capetillo-Zarate, I. Kosterin et al., “Dispersible amyloid β-protein oligomers, protofibrils, and fibrils represent diffusible but not soluble aggregates: their role in neurodegeneration in amyloid precursor protein (APP) transgenic mice,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 2641–2660, 2012.
- D. Caruso, A. M. Barron, M. A. Brown et al., “Age-related changes in neuroactive steroid levels in 3xTg-AD mice,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 1080–1089, 2013.
- A. Corrales, P. Martínez, S. García et al., “Long-term oral administration of melatonin improves spatial learning and memory and protects against cholinergic degeneration in middle-aged Ts65Dn mice, a model of Down syndrome,” Journal of Pineal Research, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 346–358, 2013.
- Y. Koutmani, P. K. Politis, M. Elkouris et al., “Corticotropin-releasing hormone exerts direct effects on neuronal progenitor cells: implications for neuroprotection,” Molecular Psychiatry, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 300–307, 2013.
- G. A. Scullion, K. N. Hewitt, and M. C. Pardon, “Corticotropin-releasing factor receptor 1 activation during exposure to novelty stress protects against alzheimer's disease-like cognitive decline in AβPP/PS1 mice,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 781–793, 2013.
- P. Mao, M. Manczak, M. J. Calkins et al., “Mitochondria-targeted catalase reduces abnormal APP processing, amyloid β production and BACE1 in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease: implications for neuroprotection and lifespan extension,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 21, no. 13, pp. 2973–2990, 2012.
- X.-L. Chen, J. Zhang, and C. Chen, “Endocannabinoid 2-arachidonoylglycerol protects neurons against β-amyloid insults,” Neuroscience, vol. 178, pp. 159–168, 2011.
- J. Koppel, H. Bradshaw, T. E. Goldberg et al., “Endocannabinoids in Alzheimer's disease and their impact on normative cognitive performance: a case-control and cohort study,” Lipids in Health and Disease, vol. 8, article 2, 2009.
- V. Micale, C. Mazzola, and F. Drago, “Endocannabinoids and neurodegenerative diseases,” Pharmacological Research, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 382–392, 2007.
- A. Dejda, P. Sokołowska, and J. Z. Nowak, “Neuroprotective potential of three neuropeptides PACAP, VIP and PHI,” Pharmacological Reports, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 307–320, 2005.
- N. G. N. Milton, A. Chilumuri, E. Rocha-Ferreira, A. N. Nercessian, and M. Ashioti, “Kisspeptin prevention of amyloid-β peptide neurotoxicity in vitro,” ACS Chemical Neuroscience, vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 706–719, 2012.
- E. J. Mead, J. J. Maguire, R. E. Kuc, and A. P. Davenport, “Kisspeptins: a multifunctional peptide system with a role in reproduction, cancer and the cardiovascular system,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 151, no. 8, pp. 1143–1153, 2007.
- N. E. Rance, “Menopause and the human hypothalamus: evidence for the role of kisspeptin/neurokinin B neurons in the regulation of estrogen negative feedback,” Peptides, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 111–122, 2009.
- C. Schultz, H. Braak, and E. Braak, “A sex difference in neurodegeneration of the human hypothalamus,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 212, no. 2, pp. 103–106, 1996.
- N. G. N. Milton, N. P. Mayor, and J. Rawlinson, “Identification of amyloid-β binding sites using an antisense peptide approach,” NeuroReport, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 2561–2566, 2001.
- N. G. N. Milton and J. R. Harris, “Polymorphism of amyloid-β fibrils and its effects on human erythrocyte catalase binding,” Micron, vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 800–810, 2009.
- M. A. Pappolla, R. A. Omar, K. S. Kim, and N. K. Robakis, “Immunohistochemical evidence of antioxidant stress in Alzheimer's disease,” American Journal of Pathology, vol. 140, no. 3, pp. 621–628, 1992.
- N. G. N. Milton, “Inhibition of catalase activity with 3-amino-triazole enhances the cytotoxicity of the Alzheimer's amyloid-β peptide,” NeuroToxicology, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 767–774, 2001.
- T. Gáspár, F. Domoki, L. Lenti et al., “Neuroprotective effect of adenoviral catalase gene transfer in cortical neuronal cultures,” Brain Research, vol. 1270, no. C, pp. 1–9, 2009.
- N. G. N. Milton, “Amyloid-beta binds catalase with high affinity and inhibits hydrogen peroxide breakdown,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 344, pp. 293–296, 1999.
- L. K. Habib, M. T. C. Lee, and J. Yang, “Inhibitors of catalase-amyloid interactions protect cells from beta-amyloid-induced oxidative stress and toxicity,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 285, no. 50, pp. 38933–38943, 2010.
- N. Bayatti and C. Behl, “The neuroprotective actions of corticotropin releasing hormone,” Ageing Research Reviews, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 258–270, 2005.
- N. Bayatti, J. Zschocke, and C. Behl, “Brain region-specific neuroprotective action and signaling of corticotropin-releasing hormone in primary neurons,” Endocrinology, vol. 144, no. 9, pp. 4051–4060, 2003.
- L. Facci, D. A. Stevens, M. Pangallo, D. Franceschini, S. D. Skaper, and P. J. L. M. Strijbos, “Corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) and related peptides confer neuroprotection via type 1 CRF receptors,” Neuropharmacology, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 623–636, 2003.
- N. G. N. Milton, “Anandamide and noladin ether prevent neurotoxicity of the human amyloid-β peptide,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 332, no. 2, pp. 127–130, 2002.
- W. A. Pedersen, R. Wan, P. Zhang, and M. P. Mattson, “Urocortin, but not urocortin II, protects cultured hippocampal neurons from oxidative and excitotoxic cell death via corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor type I,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 404–412, 2002.
- C. R. Elliott-Hunt, J. Kazlauskaite, G. J. C. Wilde, D. K. Grammatopoulos, and E. W. Hillhouse, “Potential signalling pathways underlying corticotrophin-releasing hormone-mediated neuroprotection from excitotoxicity in rat hippocampus,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 416–425, 2002.
- R. E. Powers, L. C. Walker, E. B. DeSouza et al., “Immunohistochemical study of neurons containing corticotropin-releasing factor in Alzheimer's disease,” Synapse, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 405–410, 1987.
- D. F. Swaab, A. M. Bao, and P. J. Lucassen, “The stress system in the human brain in depression and neurodegeneration,” Ageing Research Reviews, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 141–194, 2005.
- E. B. De Souza, P. J. Whitehouse, D. L. Price, and W. W. Vale, “Abnormalities in corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) in Alzheimer's disease and other human disorders,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 512, pp. 237–247, 1987.
- G. C. Brailoiu, S. L. Dun, M. Ohsawa et al., “KiSS-1 expression and metastin-like immunoreactivity in the rat brain,” Journal of Comparative Neurology, vol. 481, no. 3, pp. 314–329, 2005.
- H. R. Kirby, J. J. Maguire, W. H. Colledge, and A. P. Davenport, “International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. LXXVII. Kisspeptin receptor nomenclature, distribution, and function,” Pharmacological Reviews, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 565–578, 2010.
- M. C. Austin, J. E. Janosky, and H. A. Murphy, “Increased corticotropin-releasing hormone immunoreactivity in monoamine-containing pontine nuclei of depressed suicide men,” Molecular Psychiatry, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 324–332, 2003.
- S. Moreno, E. Mugnaini, and M. P. Ceru, “Immunocytochemical localization of catalase in the central nervous system of the rat,” Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, vol. 43, no. 12, pp. 1253–1267, 1995.
- J. Samson, R. S. Devi, R. Ravindran, and M. Senthilvelan, “Effect of noise stress on free radical scavenging enzymes in brain,” Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 142–148, 2005.
- N. G. N. Milton and J. R. Harris, “Human islet amyloid polypeptide fibril binding to catalase: a transmission electron microscopy and microplate study,” The Scientific World Journal, vol. 10, pp. 879–893, 2010.
- N. G. N. Milton and J. R. Harris, “Fibril formation and toxicity of the non-amyloidogenic rat amylin peptide,” Micron, vol. 44, pp. 246–253, 2013.
- L. A. Kotilinek, B. Bacskai, M. Westerman et al., “Reversible memory loss in a mouse transgenic model of Alzheimer's disease,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 22, no. 15, pp. 6331–6335, 2002.
- N. G. N. Milton, “Phosphorylated amyloid-beta: the toxic intermediate in alzheimer's disease neurodegeneration,” Sub-cellular biochemistry, vol. 38, pp. 381–402, 2005.
- N. G. N. Milton, E. W. Hillhouse, S. A. Nicholson, C. H. Self, and A. M. McGregor, “Production and utilization of monoclonal antibodies to human/rat corticotrophin-releasing factor-41,” Journal of Molecular Endocrinology, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 159–166, 1990.
- N. G. N. Milton, E. W. Hillhouse, and A. S. Milton, “Activation of the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenocortical axis in the conscious ratbbit by the pyrogen polyinosinic: polycytidylic acid is dependent on corticotrophin-releasing factor-41,” Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 135, no. 1, pp. 69–75, 1992.
- N. G. N. Milton, E. W. Hillhouse, and A. S. Milton, “A possible role for endogenous peripheral corticotrophin-releasing factor-41 in the febrile response of conscious rabbits,” Journal of Physiology, vol. 465, pp. 415–425, 1993.
- T. S. Hwang, H. K. Choi, and H. S. Han, “Differential expression of manganese superoxide dismutase, copper/zinc superoxide dismutase, and catalase in gastric adenocarcinoma and normal gastric mucosa,” European Journal of Surgical Oncology, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 474–479, 2007.
- M. Ashioti, J. S. Beech, A. S. Lowe, M. B. Hesselink, M. Modo, and S. C. R. Williams, “Multi-modal characterisation of the neocortical clip model of focal cerebral ischaemia by MRI, behaviour and immunohistochemistry,” Brain Research, vol. 1145, no. 1, pp. 177–189, 2007.
- N. Iijima, K. Takumi, N. Sawai, and H. Ozawa, “An immunohistochemical study on the expressional dynamics of kisspeptin neurons relevant to GnRH neurons using a newly developed anti-kisspeptin antibody,” Journal of Molecular Neuroscience, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 146–154, 2011.
- A. Markiv, R. Beatson, J. Burchell, R. V. Durvasula, and A. S. Kang, “Expression of recombinant multi-coloured fluorescent antibodies in E. coli cytoplasm,” BMC Biotechnology, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 117, 2011.
- N. G. N. Milton, “Homocysteine inhibits hydrogen peroxide breakdown by catalase,” The Open Enzyme Inhibition Journal, vol. 1, pp. 34–41, 2008.
- N. G. N. Milton, “Amyloid-β phosphorylation,” in Cell Biology Protocols, J. R. Harris, J. M. Graham, and D. Rickwood, Eds., vol. 6, pp. 364–368, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 2006.
- A. M. Floden and C. K. Combs, “β-Amyloid stimulates murine postnatal and adult microglia cultures in a unique manner,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 26, no. 17, pp. 4644–4648, 2006.
- J. F. Jordão, C. A. Ayala-Grosso, K. Markham et al., “Antibodies targeted to the brain with image-guided focused ultrasound reduces amyloid-β plaque load in the TgCRND8 mouse model of Alzheimer's disease,” PLoS ONE, vol. 5, no. 5, Article ID e10549, 2010.
- M. A. Bosch, C. Xue, and O. K. Rønnekleiv, “Kisspeptin expression in guinea pig hypothalamus: effects OF 17β-Estradiol,” Journal of Comparative Neurology, vol. 520, no. 10, pp. 2143–2162, 2011.
- J. Cao and H. B. Patisaul, “Sex-specific expression of estrogen receptors α and β and Kiss1 in the postnatal rat amygdala,” Journal of Comparative Neurology, vol. 521, no. 2, pp. 465–478, 2013.
- J. Kim, S. J. Semaan, D. K. Clifton, R. A. Steiner, S. Dhamija, and A. S. Kauffman, “Regulation of Kiss1 expression by sex steroids in the amygdala of the rat and mouse,” Endocrinology, vol. 152, no. 5, pp. 2020–2030, 2011.
- D. H. Eghlidi, G. E. Haley, N. C. Noriega, S. G. Kohama, and H. F. Urbanski, “Influence of age and 17β-estradiol on kisspeptin, neurokinin B, and prodynorphin gene expression in the arcuate-median eminence of female rhesus macaques,” Endocrinology, vol. 151, no. 8, pp. 3783–3794, 2010.
- J. Cao and H. B. Patisaul, “Sexually dimorphic expression of hypothalamic estrogen receptors α and β and Kiss1 in neonatal male and female rats,” Journal of Comparative Neurology, vol. 519, no. 15, pp. 2954–2977, 2011.
- A. Hestiantoro and D. F. Swaab, “Changes in estrogen receptor-α and -β in the infundibular nucleus of the human hypothalamus are related to the occurrence of Alzheimer's disease neuropathology,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 89, no. 4, pp. 1912–1925, 2004.
- T. Funakoshi, A. Yanai, K. Shinoda, M. M. Kawano, and Y. Mizukami, “G protein-coupled receptor 30 is an estrogen receptor in the plasma membrane,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 346, no. 3, pp. 904–910, 2006.
- S. B. Cheng, J. A. Quinn, C. T. Graeber, and E. J. Filardo, “Down-modulation of the G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor, GPER, from the cell surface occurs via a trans-golgi-proteasome pathway,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 286, no. 25, pp. 22441–22455, 2011.
- Y. Lyubimov, M. Engstrom, S. Wurster, J. M. Savola, E. R. Korpi, and P. Panula, “Human kisspeptins activate neuropeptide FF2 receptor,” Neuroscience, vol. 170, no. 1, pp. 117–122, 2010.
- S. Oishi, R. Misu, K. Tomita et al., “Activation of neuropeptide FF receptors by kisspeptin receptor ligands,” ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 53–57, 2011.
- N. G. N. Milton, “In vitro activities of kissorphin, a novel hexapeptide KiSS-1 derivative, in neuronal cells,” Journal of Amino Acids, vol. 2012, Article ID 691463, 6 pages, 2012.
- L. Maletínská, A. Tichá, V. Nagelová et al., “Neuropeptide FF analog RF9 is not an antagonist of NPFF receptor and decreases food intake in mice after its central and peripheral administration,” Brain Research, vol. 1498, pp. 33–40, 2013.
- S. Catarsi, K. Babinski, and P. Séguéla, “Selective modulation of heteromeric ASIC proton-gated channels by neuropeptide FF,” Neuropharmacology, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 592–600, 2001.