About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Journal of Nanomaterials
Volume 2010 (2010), Article ID 289173, 7 pages
Research Article

Biomimetic Synthesis of Zinc Oxide 3D Architectures with Gelatin as Matrix

State Key Laboratory of Chemical Resource Engineering, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China

Received 27 November 2009; Accepted 31 March 2010

Academic Editor: Steve Acquah

Copyright © 2010 Yong Gan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Peanut-like and flower-like zinc oxide 3D architectures were synthesized via a facile biomimetic process using gelatin as matrix. Techniques of XRD, SEM, HRTEM, FT-IR, and UV-vis absorption spectra were used to characterize the structure and property of the zinc oxide architectures. The experimental results show that the peanut-like ZnO and flower-like ZnO architectures can be obtained through changing the concentration or the aging time. FT-IR spectra indicate that the is coupled with the C=O bond of the gelatin molecules through the electrostatic interaction. Based on the experimental process, the possible growth mechanism of the ZnO 3D architectures is proposed. UV-vis absorption spectrum of the peanut-like ZnO has a broad absorption band in the UV region, and the blue-shifting of the band is observed.

1. Introduction

Nanomaterials have attracted much attention because they have special characteristics in optical, photovoltaic, and catalytic applications that differ from those of bulk materials [1]. Zinc oxide has a wide band gap (3.37 eV) and a large exciton binding energy (60 meV) at room temperature and has been extensively investigated for applications in luminescence, photocatalysts, surface acousite wave filters, piezoelectric transducers and actuators, gas sensors, solar cells and so on [28]. Recently, many synthesis methods have been employed for the growth of ZnO nanomaterials such as the hydrothermal process [911], the conventional sputter deposition technique [12], the chemical vapor deposition (CVD) [1315] and the thermal evaporation [4]. Moreover, many graceful nano-architectures have been prepared by different techniques, such as nanowires, nanobridges, nanosnails, nanobundles and nanocombs [10, 15, 16]. However, the methods used to prepare these types of ZnO usually require relatively high temperature and sometimes complicated process. Comparatively, the wet chemical method, for it employs a low growth temperature ( 100°C) process and has good potential for scale-up, becomes one of the successful techniques for preparing nanosized ZnO [1722].

Biominerals are usually formed on the surface of organic templates (or matrixes). Recently, inorganic materials with higher performance and more exquisite morphologies have been obtained by biomimetic synthesis. Simulating the biomineralization process of the nucleation and growth of inorganic materials mediated by organic matrixes has become the focus of material science [23, 24]. Gelatin is the denaturation product of collagen which is the major structural protein in the connective tissue of animal skin and bones. Gelatin has been investigated by in vitro biomineralization [2531]. Heterogeneous nucleation of ZnO using gelatin as the organic matrix has been studied [20]. However, the reported synthetic methods are limited to the growth of 1D or 2D ZnO (thin films) and only few on 3D ordered architectures [6]. In the present work, a simple and biomimetic process was employed to synthesize 3D zinc oxide architectures at room temperature. The biomimetic growth and self-assembly of zinc oxide 3D architectures in the gelatin solution were investigated, and the formation mechanism of the 3D ZnO architectures was also discussed.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Materials

Gelatin was obtained from Beijing Aoboxing Universeen Bio-Tech Co. Ltd (Beijing, China). , absolute ethyl alcohol and ammonia were purchased from Beijing Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd (Beijing, China) and all of reagents were of analytical grade. De-ionized water was used in each synthesis and washing step.

2.2. Synthesis of Zinc Oxide 3D Architectures

In this experiment, a simple biomineralized method to obtain zinc oxide crystals was adopted. In brief, the aqueous solution of gelatin as mineralized solution was prepared using 3 g gelatin dissolved in 100 ml de-ionized water. The concentration of the gelatin was 3%(wt). 1.84 g was added in 100 ml as-prepared gelatin solution and dissolved. The mixed solution was stirred continuously and titrated with ammonia (6 mol/L) at room temperature, and then the pH value of the mixed solution was adjusted to 8.0. After being stirred for 30 minutes, the suspension was kept at 30°C for 24 hours. The precipitate was obtained by centrifugation at a speed of 4500 rpm and then washed thoroughly with de-ionized water to remove the diffluent salts. Three cycles of washing and centrifuging were required. Afterwards, the precipitate was washed twice with absolute ethyl alcohol. Finally, the sample was harvested by centrifugation and oven-dried at 60°C for 12 hours. According to the same process, 2.97 g was added in gelatin solution and the other sample was obtained.

2.3. Characterization

The crystallization and purity of the samples were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis with a D/max 2500VB2+/PC X-ray diffractometer using graphite monochromatized Cu Kα radiation ( ) at a scanning speed of 10  . Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM, Hitachi S-4700) was employed to characterize the morphological features of the samples that were sputter-coated with gold prior to examination. The detailed morphology and structural characterization were investigated through high-resolution transmission electron microscope (HRTEM, JEM3010). For infrared adsorption analysis, 1 mg of the samples was carefully mixed with 200 mg of KBr (infrared grade) and pelletized (diameter of the disk shaped pellet 7 mm) under the pressure of 4 tons for 1 minute. The pellets were analyzed by using a Nicolet Avatar 370 MCT Fourier-transform infrared (FT-IR) spectrometer in the range of 4000–400 cm−1. The optical property of the samples was measured by UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Hitachi Model U-3010).

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. The Structural Characterization of ZnO Nanoarchitectures

Figure 1 shows the XRD patterns of the products. Product A and Product B were obtained when the concentrations of Zn2+ were 0.06 mol/L and 0.1 mol/L, respectively. The diffraction peaks were indexed as the (100), (002), (101), (102), (110), (103), (200), (112), (201), (004), (202), (104), and (203) reflections of wurtzite (hexagonal) structured ZnO (JCPDS card No. 65–3411, lattice parameters of , ). The products are well crystallized and the crystallization degree of Product A is better than that of Product B according to the intensity of the XRD pattern. No peaks associated with other crystalline forms are detected, which indicates that ZnO crystals were successfully synthesized through the simple biomimetic process.

Figure 1: XRD patterns of zinc oxide synthesized at the different Zn2+ concentration in 3%(wt) gelatin solution: A, 0.06 mol/L ; B, 0.1 mol/L .
3.2. The Morphology of the 3D ZnO Architectures

Figure 2 presents the FESEM images of the 3D ZnO architectures. It can be seen that the as-prepared products are mainly composed of two types of architectures: peanut-like (Figure 2(a)) and flower-like (Figure 2(b)) structures. The peanut-like products are obtained when the concentration of Zn2+ is 0.06 mol/L, and the morphologies of the 3D peanut-like ZnO architectures are with length ranging from 500 nm to 1  and width varying from 200 nm to 300 nm. However, as the concentration of Zn2+ ions increases to 0.1 mol/L, flower-like ZnO structures produce, consisting of nano-rods with 80 nm in length and 20 nm in diameter. These experimental results reveal that the development of ZnO architectures in gelatin solution is greatly influenced by the concentration ratio of Zn2+ to gelatin.

Figure 2: FESEM images of the zinc oxide synthesized at the different Zn2+ concentration in 3%(wt) gelatin solution: (a), 0.06 mol/L; (b), 0.1 mol/L.

High-Resolution Transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) studies were carried out to examine the crystallography and structure of the peanut-like ZnO architectures. Figure 3 shows the HRTEM images of the peanut-like ZnO sample. Figure 3(a) is the low-magnification TEM image of the peanut-like ZnO after sonication treatment in ethanol for 30 minutes. The dimensions of the peanut-like ZnO are about 500–800 nm in length and about 200 nm in width, which are consistent in the FESEM observations. The HRTEM images in Figure 3(b) show that the peanut-like ZnO architectures are organized with nanorods, and have a clean and perfect lattice structure without dislocation and stacking faults. The lattice space of adjacent planes is about 0.25 nm, corresponding to the (101) fringe perpendicular to the growth direction, which is consistent with that of the bulk wurtzite ZnO crystal.

Figure 3: HRTEM images of the peanut-like ZnO: (a), low-magnification; (b), high-magnification.
3.3. FTIR Measurement

Figure 4 is the FT-IR spectra of the gelatin and the peanut-like ZnO. It shows that the characteristic absorption bands at 1260, 1416 and 1628 cm−1 are assigned to the amide I, II, III of gelatin [27]. The 1342 cm−1 band in gelatin represents the carboxyl group, which is attributed to the so-called wagging vibration of praline side chains. These absorption bands indicate that a small amount of gelatin exists in the ZnO architectures. Compared with the spectra, the reflectance strong C=O peak at 1628 cm−1 in gelatin shifts to higher wavenumber at 1654 cm−1 in the ZnO sample due to the Zn2+ ions coupled with the C=O through electrostatic interaction. This result suggests that the nucleation and self-organization of ZnO nanocrystals can be controlled by the gelatin macromolecules, and the carbonyl groups on the surface of gelatin molecules can be the nucleation sites of ZnO. Then, the ZnO nanocrystals precipitate on the surface of the gelatin macromolecules and are spontaneously formed into 3D ZnO architectures.

Figure 4: FT-IR spectra of the peanut-like ZnO and the gelatin.
3.4. The Proposed Growth Model and Mechanism

To further investigate the growth process of the peanut-like ZnO architectures, FESEM studies were carried out for the products obtained at different reaction times. Figure 5 shows the FESEM images of the product obtained at the aging time of 10 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, 18 hours and 24 hours. It can be found that the morphology of as-synthesized samples vary from nanoparticle and flower-like structure to peanut-like structure. When the aging time is less than 2 hours, the particle structures produce, as shown in Figures 5(a)5(c). In comparison, as the aging time reaches 2 hours and 6 hours, the flower-like structures form (Figures 5(d)5(f)). The peanut-like structures are shown in Figure 5(e) and the quantity of the flower-like structures decreases when the aging time is more than 12 hours. As the time comes up to 18 hours and 24 hours, lots of peanut-like architectures produce (Figure 5(g)). In the growth process, the gelatin molecules can induce the nanoparticles to become flower-like and peanut-like 3D architectures. The formation of 3D ZnO architectures could be a self-assembly process. Individual ZnO nanoparticles self-assemble to hierarchical nanostructures as the primary unit, and then hierarchical nanostructures interact via Van der Waals forces and electrostatic forces, which results in their spontaneous self-organization and the formation of the higher-order structures [12].

Figure 5: FESEM images of the samples synthesized at different reaction times: (a) 10 minutes; (b) 30 minutes; (c) 1 hour; (d) 2 hours; (e) 6 hours; (f) 12 hours; (g) 18 hours; (h) 24 hours.

Schematic representation of nucleation, growth and self-assembled aggregation of the 3D ZnO architectures are displayed in Scheme 1 based on the process of growth at different aging times. The nucleation begins with the electrostatic attraction between the positive charges of metallic ions and the negative charges of carboxylic groups of the gelatin molecule (Scheme 1(a)) [20]. The gelatin mainly disperses as random coils (Scheme 1(b)) and these random coils behave as organic matrixes holding Zn2+ cations on the negative charge of gelatin molecules, and the nucleation can be initiated from these active sites as a heterogeneous reaction. After nucleation, ZnO growth takes place in the free space among gelatin macromolecule chains with obvious consequences on the morphology of the inorganic deposits. Owing to the effect of the Van der Waals forces, electrostatic forces and hydrogen bonds among the gelatin macromolecules chains, the ZnO nanocrystals as primary units self-organize to the flower-like 3D structures (Scheme 1(c)). According to the XRD results, the crystallization degree of the flower-like ZnO is weaker. As the mineralization is in progress, the ZnO crystals would recrystallize further and the single flower-like 3D architecture can be transformed and organized to the peanut-like 3D architectures as a sub-unit structure of self-assembly process (Scheme 1(d)). The HRTEM results show that the peanut-like architectures, which are composed of rod-like ZnO, are better crystallization and stabler morphology to wurtzite ZnO [30]. Therefore, when the reaction time is more than 18 hours, the final particle structures incline to turn into 3D peanut-like ZnO architectures.

Scheme 1: Illustration of growth process of 3D ZnO architectures: (a) nucleation; (b) growth; (c) flower-like structure; (d) peanut-like structure.
3.5. UV-Vis Characterization

Figure 6 presents the UV-Vis absorption spectra of the ZnO samples. Curve A is the sample of peanut-like ZnO and Curve B is the sample of flower-like ZnO. It can be seen from Curve A in Figure 6 that there is intensive absorption in the ultraviolet band of about 200–400 nm. With respect to the bulk absorption edge appearing at 373 nm at room temperature, a stronger excitonic absorption feature at about 345 nm is blue shifted about 30 nm [1, 32]. The fact that the excitonic peak shifts to blue results from their decreasing crystal size due to the pronounced quantum confinement effect in the ZnO nanocrystallites [32]. As to Curve B, on the other hand, the absorption peak is located at 305 nm and shows a poor UV absorption because of weaker crystallization.

Figure 6: UV-vis spectra of the ZnO samples: Curve A is the peanut-like ZnO; Curve B is the flower-like ZnO.

4. Conclusions

In summary, zinc oxide 3D architectures were synthesized by the biomimetic process in the gelatin solution at the room temperature. XRD, FESEM, HRTEM, FT-IR and UV-Vis absorption spectra had been used to characterize the as-obtained ZnO samples. The XRD patterns prove that as-prepared products indexed to the wurtzite (hexagonal) structure of ZnO are well crystallized and have no obvious impurity phase. By changing concentrations of Zn2+ ions or the reaction time, peanut-like 3D ZnO architectures and flower-like 3D ZnO architectures can be successfully synthesized. FT-IR spectra show that the Zn2+ ions are coupled with the C=O bond through electrostatic interaction, which suggests that the amide groups and carboxyl groups on the surface of gelatin molecules are the nucleation sites of ZnO. The ZnO nanocrystals then precipitate on the surface of the gelatin and spontaneously self-organize to 3D ZnO architectures. The UV-Vis absorption spectra of the peanut-like ZnO nanocrystals reveal a stronger excitonic absorption feature at about 345 nm. It is expected that this study can offer a convenient and efficient route for the preparation of ZnO architectures.


This work was supported by the China National Natural Science Fund (No. 20875007) and Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Development project (No. Z080003032208012).


  1. C. He, T. Sasaki, Y. Shimizu, and N. Koshizaki, “Synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles using nanosecond pulsed laser ablation in aqueous media and their self-assembly towards spindle-like ZnO aggregates,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 254, no. 7, pp. 2196–2202, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. K. M. Sulieman, X. Huang, J. Liu, and M. Tang, “Formation of ZnO three-side teethed nanostructures,” Materials Letters, vol. 61, no. 8-9, pp. 1756–1759, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. X. An, C. Cao, and H. Zhu, “Bio-inspired fabrication of ZnO nanorod arrays and their optical and photoresponse properties,” Journal of Crystal Growth, vol. 308, no. 2, pp. 340–347, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. C. Li, G. Fang, N. Liu, Y. Ren, H. Huang, and X. Zhao, “Snowflake-like ZnO structures: self-assembled growth and characterization,” Materials Letters, vol. 62, no. 12-13, pp. 1761–1764, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. L. Wu, Y. Wu, and Y. Lü, “Self-assembly of small ZnO nanoparticles toward flake-like single crystals,” Materials Research Bulletin, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 128–133, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. Liu, X. Huang, Y. Li, J. Duan, and H. Ai, “Large-scale synthesis of flower-like ZnO structures by a surfactant-free and low-temperature process,” Materials Chemistry and Physics, vol. 98, no. 2-3, pp. 523–527, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. X. Cao, X. Lan, C. Zhao, W. Shen, and D. Yao, “Porous ZnS/ZnO microspheres prepared through the spontaneous organization of nanoparticles and their application as supports of holding CdTe quantum dots,” Materials Research Bulletin, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 1135–1144, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. Z. Jia, L. Yue, Y. Zheng, and Z. Xu, “Rod-like zinc oxide constructed by nanoparticles: synthesis, characterization and optical properties,” Materials Chemistry and Physics, vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 137–141, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. Y. Ni, G. Wu, X. Zhang, et al., “Hydrothermal preparation, characterization and property research of flowerlike ZnO nanocrystals built up by nanoflakes,” Materials Research Bulletin, vol. 43, no. 11, pp. 2919–2928, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. Z. Fang, K. Tang, G. Shen, D. Chen, R. Kong, and S. Lei, “Self-assembled ZnO 3D flowerlike nanostructures,” Materials Letters, vol. 60, no. 20, pp. 2530–2533, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. T. Ghoshal, S. Kar, J. Ghatak, and S. Chaudhuri, “ZnO nanocones: solvothermal synthesis and photoluminescence properties,” Materials Research Bulletin, vol. 43, no. 8-9, pp. 2228–2238, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S. C. Lyu, Y. Zhang, H. Ruh, et al., “Low temperature growth and photoluminescence of well-aligned zinc oxide nanowires,” Chemical Physics Letters, vol. 363, no. 1-2, pp. 134–138, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J.-J. Wu and S.-C. Liu, “Catalyst-free growth and characterization of ZnO nanorods,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 106, no. 37, pp. 9546–9551, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. C. Newton and P. A. Warburton, “ZnO tetrapod nanocrystals,” Materials Today, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 50–54, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. Muruganandham and J. J. Wu, “Synthesis, characterization and catalytic activity of easily recyclable zinc oxide nanobundles,” Applied Catalysis B, vol. 80, no. 1-2, pp. 32–41, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. H. Yan, R. He, J. Johnson, M. Law, R. J. Saykally, and P. Yang, “Dendritic nanowire ultraviolet laser array,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 125, no. 16, pp. 4728–4729, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. Y. Y. Tay, S. Li, F. Boey, Y. H. Cheng, and M. H. Liang, “Growth mechanism of spherical ZnO nanostructures synthesized via colloid chemistry,” Physica B, vol. 394, no. 2, pp. 372–376, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. Z. R. Tian, J. A. Voigt, J. Liu, B. Mckenzie, and M. J. Mcdermott, “Biomimetic arrays of oriented helical ZnO nanorods and columns,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 124, no. 44, pp. 12954–12955, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. S. A. Morin, F. F. Amos, and S. Jin, “Biomimetic assembly of zinc oxide nanorods onto flexible polymers,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 129, no. 45, pp. 13776–13777, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. L. P. Bauermann, A. D. Campo, J. Bill, and F. Aldinger, “Heterogeneous nucleation of ZnO using gelatin as the organic matrix,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 2016–2020, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. Q. Dong, H. Su, J. Xu, D. Zhang, and R. Wang, “Synthesis of biomorphic ZnO interwoven microfibers using eggshell membrane as the biotemplate,” Materials Letters, vol. 61, no. 13, pp. 2714–2717, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. S. Kaluza, M. K. Schröter, R. N. D'Alnoncourt, T. Reinecke, and M. Muhler, “High surface area ZnO nanoparticles via a novel continuous precipitation route,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 18, no. 22, pp. 3670–3677, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. S. Busch, H. Dolhaine, A. DuChesne, et al., “Biomimetic morphogenesis of fluorapatite-gelatin composites: fractal growth, the question of intrinsic electric fields, core/shell assemblies, hollow spheres and reorganization of denatured collagen,” European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 10, pp. 1643–1653, 1999. View at Scopus
  24. A. Bigi, E. Boanini, S. Panzavolta, and N. Roveri, “Biomimetic growth of hydroxyapatite on gelatin films doped with sodium polyacrylate,” Biomacromolecules, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 752–756, 2000. View at Scopus
  25. M. A. Martins, C. Santos, M. M. Almeida, and M. E. V. Costa, “Hydroxyapatite micro- and nanoparticles: nucleation and growth mechanisms in the presence of citrate species,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 318, no. 2, pp. 210–216, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. H. Cölfen and M. Antonietti, “Mesocrystals: inorganic superstructures made by highly parallel crystallization and controlled alignment,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition, vol. 44, no. 35, pp. 5576–5591, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. S. Teng, J. Shi, and L. Chen, “Formation of calcium phosphates in gelatin with a novel diffusion system,” Colloids and Surfaces B, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 87–92, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. J. Li, Y. Chen, Y. Yin, F. Yao, and K. Yao, “Modulation of nano-hydroxyapatite size via formation on chitosan-gelatin network film in situ,” Biomaterials, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 781–790, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. Y. Zhai, F. Z. Cui, and Y. Wang, “Formation of nano-hydroxyapatite on recombinant human-like collagen fibrils,” Current Applied Physics, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 429–432, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. Y. Q. Chen, J. Jiang, Z. Y. He, Y. Su, D. Cai, and L. Chen, “Growth mechanism and characterization of ZnO microbelts and self-assembled microcombs,” Materials Letters, vol. 59, no. 26, pp. 3280–3283, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. D. W. James and L. Rintoul, “Protein-water Interactions in solution: the water-gelatin-electrolyte system,” Australian Journal of Chemistry, vol. 35, pp. 1157–1163, 1982.
  32. Y. C. Zhang, X. Wu, X. Y. Hu, and R. Guo, “Low-temperature synthesis of nanocrystalline ZnO by thermal decomposition of a “green” single-source inorganic precursor in air,” Journal of Crystal Growth, vol. 280, no. 1-2, pp. 250–254, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus