- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Annual Issues ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Articles in Press ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents

Journal of Nanomaterials

Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 189731, 7 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/189731

## Barrier Inhomogeneity and Electrical Properties of InN Nanodots/Si Heterojunction Diodes

^{1}Materials Research Centre, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India^{2}Central Research Laboratory, Bharat Electronics, Bangalore 560013, India

Received 25 July 2011; Accepted 28 August 2011

Academic Editor: Zhi Li Xiao

Copyright © 2011 Mahesh Kumar et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

#### Abstract

The electrical transport behavior of indium nitride nanodot-silicon (InN ND-Si) heterostructure Schottky diodes is reported here, which have been fabricated by plasma-assisted molecular beam epitaxy. InN ND structures were grown on a 20 nm InN buffer layer on Si substrates. These dots were found to be single crystalline and grown along [0 0 0 1] direction. Temperature-dependent current density-voltage plots () reveal that the ideality factor () and Schottky barrier height (SBH) () are temperature dependent. The incorrect values of the Richardson constant () produced suggest an inhomogeneous barrier. Descriptions of the experimental results were explained by using two models. First one is barrier height inhomogeneities (BHIs) model, in which considering an effective area of the inhomogeneous contact provided a procedure for a correct determination of . The Richardson constant is extracted ~110 A cm^{−2} K^{−2} using the BHI model and that is in very good agreement with the theoretical value of 112 A cm^{−2} K^{−2}. The second model uses Gaussian statistics and by this, mean barrier height and were found to be 0.69 eV and 113 A cm^{−2} K^{−2}, respectively.

#### 1. Introduction

Group III nitrides represent a material class with promising electronic and optical properties [1]. Among these, InN possesses the lowest effective mass, the highest mobility, narrow band gap of 0.7–0.9 eV and the highest saturation velocity [2, 3], which make this an attractive material for applications in solar cells, terahertz emitters, and detectors [4–6]. Good quality InN layers are difficult to grow because of the low dissociation temperature of InN and the lack of an appropriate substrate [7, 8]. The above constraints lead to the formation of dislocations and strain in the grown epitaxial layers resulting in the degradation of the device performance. Grandal et al. [9] reported that defect- and strain-free InN nanocolumns of very high crystal quality can be grown by molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) with and without buffer layer on silicon substrates. Since silicon is the most sought semiconductor material, it is very important to understand the transport mechanism of InN nanostructure-based devices and their behavior at different temperatures prior to their adoption in the fabrication of optoelectronic devices. In the present study, InN nanodot (ND) structures were grown on Si substrates using an InN buffer layer by plasma-assisted MBE.

The interfaces of the semiconductor heterostructures are important part of semiconductor electronic and optoelectronic devices. One of the most interesting properties of a semiconductor heterostructure interface is its Schottky barrier height (SBH) (), which is a measure of the mismatch of the energy levels for the majority carriers across the interface. Temperature-dependent ideality factor () and SBH () and incorrect values of the Richardson constant () suggest an inhomogeneous barrier. Two techniques exist to modify the classic Richardson plot to extract the barrier height, taking into account SBH lowering due to an inhomogeneous contact. The first involves extracting the barrier height relevant to analyses, a value referred to as the effective barrier height *.* For this technique, Tung [10] developed a barrier height inhomogeneities (BHIs) model of such inhomogeneities on the electron transport across the metal semiconductor interface, taking into account the possible presence of a distribution of nanometer-sized “patches” with lower barrier height embedded in a uniform high barrier background. Gammon et al. [11] has been reported that same BHI model can be applied to inhomogeneous heterojunction Schottky contacts. The second technique uses Gaussian statistics to modify the classic Richardson plot to extract the barrier height, taking into account SBH lowering due to an inhomogeneous contact.

In this article, we have studied the electrical transport behavior of InN ND/Si heterostructure Schottky diodes that have been fabricated by plasma-assisted MBE. These electrical measurements showed a dependence on the temperature of the ideality factor () and the SBH () that can be explained by BHI and Gaussian statistics model. The BHI model provided a method for a correct determination of the Richardson constant. Hence, the observed underestimation of the value could be attributed to an effective area, involved in the current transport, which may be significantly lower than the geometric area of the diode.

#### 2. Experimental Procedure

The growth system used in this study was a plasma-assisted MBE system equipped with a radio frequency (RF) plasma source. The base pressure in the system was below 1 × 10^{−10} mbar. The -Si (111) (~2 × 10^{16} cm^{−3}) wafers were first chemically cleaned followed by dipping in 5% HF to remove the surface oxide and then thermally cleaned at 900°C for one hour in ultrahigh vacuum. The deposition of InN consists of a two-step growth method. The initial low temperature buffer layer of thickness ~20 nm was deposited at 400°C. Further, the substrate temperature was raised to 500°C to fabricate the NDs. The duration of NDs growth was kept for 60 min. The general set of growth conditions includes indium beam equivalent pressure (BEP), nitrogen flow rate, and rf-plasma power, which were kept at 2.1 × 10^{−7} mbar, 0.5 sccm, and 350 W, respectively. The structural evaluation of the as-grown NDs was carried out by the high-resolution X-ray diffraction (HRXRD), field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The aluminum contacts were fabricated by thermal evaporation. The adequate Ohmic nature of the contacts to InN and Si was verified. The device transport characteristics were studied at various temperatures using the probe station attached with the KEITHLEY-236 source measure unit.

#### 3. Results and Discussion

Figure 1 shows XRD pattern of the InN NDs grown on Si (111) substrate. From the figure it can be seen that except the substrate peaks, only (0002) InN diffracted peak at is present, indicating the InN NDs to be highly oriented along the [0001] direction of the wurtzite structures of InN. Figure 2(a) shows a typical FESEM image of InN NDs and illustrates that the as-grown NDs are vertically aligned and uniformly grown over the entire substrate. Figures 2(b)–2(d) represent typical TEM micrographs, high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) images, and selected area electron diffraction (SAED) of InN NDs, respectively. The HRTEM shows one of the corner edges of an ND. The interplanar spacing, as observed from the fringe pattern of the HRTEM image, is 0.305 nm, which corresponds to the (1000) lattice spacing of InN. The SAED pattern shows clearly visible bright spots which represent that each ND is single crystalline.

The current density-voltage-temperature () characterization of the Schottky diodes was performed in order to determine the significant parameters ruling the current transport across the InN ND/Si contact, namely, the ideality factor () and the SBH ()*. *Figure 3(a) shows a schematic diagram of the device and measurement method. Figure 3(b) shows the semilogarithmic plot of the curves of the InN ND/Si diodes, which were acquired in the temperature range of 120–450 K. An excellent rectifying behavior was observed at lower temperatures, but at high temperatures, a deterioration was observed in the rectifying nature, which may be due to thermally generated carrier tunneling. It is very clear from the curve that at fixed bias, the forward current increases with increasing temperature. This indicates that the current is induced by the thermionic emission (TE). The values of SBH () and the ideality factor () for the junction were calculated as a function of measuring temperature by fitting a line in the linear region of the forward curves using the TE equation [12, 13]:
where is the saturation current density expressed by

Here, is the area of the diode, is the effective Richardson constant (112 A cm^{−2 }K^{−2} for -type Si) [14], is the Boltzmann’s constant, is the electron charge, and is the measure temperature.

Figure 4 shows the ideality factor () and the SBH () of InN ND/Si Schottky diodes as function of temperature, which have been extracted from the forward bias characteristics. It may be clearly seen that these parameters are both temperature dependent. In particular, by decreasing temperatures the ideality factor deviates from the unity and SBH () decreases from the value of 0.68 eV at 450 K to 0.48 eV at 120 K. The deviation from the ideality observed at lower temperatures suggests the presence of an inhomogeneous barrier. Further, to justify the application of the BHI model to our data, the temperature dependence of the ideality factor was reported in a plot of versus and is shown in Figure 5, in which the straight line shows an ideal behavior of a Schottky contact (). The experimental data could be fitted by a straight line, which is parallel to that of the ideal Schottky contact behavior and the ideality factor () can be expressed in the form , with K in present case, as determined by the fit parameters. This behavior is referred as the “ anomaly” [15]. Such parametric dependence is typical of a real Schottky contact with a distribution of barrier inhomogeneities [16].

Plotting the SBH () against their respective ideality factors as shown in Figure 6 displays the linear correlation between the two. Extrapolating a linear fit of the data to reveals the average barrier height [17]. By the extrapolation of SBH () at of the experimental data reported in Figure 6, a value of eV was determined. Another technique used to extract the barrier height is via a Richardson plot. The values of the saturation current density () were determined from the extrapolation at of the linear fit of the curves in the range 280–450 K, that is, where the deviation from the ideality is small. The conventional Richardson’s plot of ln() versus was obtained and is shown in Figure 7. From the linear fit to the plot, the Richardson constant () and effective Schottky barrier height () were calculated to be ~16 A cm^{-2 }K^{−2} and 0.57 eV, respectively. The value of obtained from the conventional Richardson plot is more than a factor of seven lower with respect to the theoretical value of 112 A cm^{−2 }K^{−2} for -type Si. Also, the value of effective barrier height is less than the average barrier height , suggesting the formation of an inhomogeneous SBH at the interface.

The expression of the current flowing through the InN ND/Si Schottky diodes can be obtained by adding the current through the low barrier patches to the current which passes through the surrounding homogeneous regions. However, it is often reasonably assumed that the characteristic is dominated by the current flow through the low SBH patches. Considering the TE equations ((1) and (2)), the area can be replaced with the product , which represents the total area of a contact made up of a low SBH. Individually, is the number of patches in the area and is the area of a single patch of a low SBH. Equation (1) can be rewritten substituting in the product
where the SBH modeling parameter replaces * _{.}* The effective area of the low SBH patch can be expressed as
where is the band bending at the InN ND/Si interface and .

The experimental curves were fitted by using (3) with the number of patches as free parameter. A value of × 10^{7} gave a good fit of the experimental data in the investigated range of temperatures. The product represents the total effective area contributing to the current transport. Although is independent of temperature, as it gives the number of patches in the contact, the product exhibits temperature dependence. Figure 8 shows that selecting the correct balance of the variables , , and ideality factor () provides a very good approximation to the linear fits of the experimental data. The values of used were those extracted from each individual plot, as was illustrated in Figure 4. The values of and were arrived at by using a modified Richardson plot. The product is temperature dependent, in order to eliminate the temperature dependence on the SBH within a Richardson plot, the total area dominated by the low SBH patches () is taken into consideration within the Richardson plot is (3) rearranged to
Figure 9 shows the modified Richardson’s plot. From the slope of the straight line fitting the data, the value of was obtained ~0.57 eV, while from the intercept, a value of the Richardson constant of A cm^{-2 }K^{−2} was determined and this is very close to the theoretical value of 112 A cm^{-2 }K^{−2}. The product of was found 8.27 × 10^{−5} cm^{2} at room temperature, represented 11% of the total area.

The other technique used the Gaussian statistics [18–20] to modify the classic Richardson plot to extract the barrier height, taking into account SBH lowering due to an inhomogeneous contact. This technique uses Gaussian statistics to relate experimental values of SBH extracted from analysis , back to the mean SBH . The amount of patches () that will have SBH values falling between and the value of SBH measured from the individual curves have a Gaussian distribution given by
where is the standard deviation of the distribution and is the total number of patches in the area . Solving (1), (2), and (6), the total forward current can be given by [11]
The TE equation for current over the barrier is
Combining (7) and (8) and rearranging
this allows the values of SBH measured from the analysis to be plotted against the inverse thermal energy, to extract and . This is shown in Figure 10 where and were found to be 0.0593 eV and 0.70 eV, respectively. Verification of this value can be carried out using a Richardson plot, and rearranging (7) and (9):
Figure 11 shows the resulting Richardson plot where was found to be 0.69 eV and was 113 A cm^{−2 }K^{−2}.

#### 4. Conclusions

We have demonstrated the electrical transport behavior of -InN ND/Si heterostructure Schottky diodes that have been fabricated by plasma-assisted MBE. Single-crystalline wurtzite structures of InN NDs are verified by the X-ray diffraction and transmission electron microscopy. Temperature-dependent current-voltage plots () reveal that the ideality factor () and Schottky barrier height (SBH) () are temperature dependent and that incorrect values of the Richardson constant () are being produced, suggesting an inhomogeneous barrier. Descriptions of the experimental results were explained by using BHI and Gaussian statistics models. The Richardson constant was extracted to be ~110 A cm^{−2 }K^{−2} using the BHI model and that is in very good agreement with the theoretical value of 112 A cm^{−2 }K^{−2}. The second model uses Gaussian statistics and by this, mean barrier height and were found to be 0.69 eV and 113 A cm^{−2 }K^{−2}, respectively.

#### References

- S. Nakamura, “The roles of structural imperfections in InGaN-based blue light- emitting diodes and laser diodes,”
*Science*, vol. 281, no. 5379, pp. 956–961, 1998. View at Scopus - J. Wu, W. Walukiewicz, K. M. Yu et al., “Unusual properties of the fundamental band gap of InN,”
*Applied Physics Letters*, vol. 80, no. 21, p. 3967, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - M. Kumar, B. Roul, T. N. Bhat et al., “Kinetics of self-assembled InN quantum dots grown on Si (111) by plasma-assisted MBE,”
*Journal of Nanoparticle Research*, vol. 13, p. 1281, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - H. C. Yang, P. F. Kuo, T. Y. Lin, et al., “Mechanism of luminescence in InGaN/GaN multiple quantum wells,”
*Applied Physics Letters*, vol. 76, no. 25, p. 3712, 2000. - E. Bellotti, B. K. Doshi, K. F. Brennan, J. D. Albrecht, and P. P. Ruden, “Ensemble Monte Carlo study of electron transport in wurtzite InN,”
*Journal of Applied Physics*, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 916–923, 1999. View at Scopus - C. Y. Chang, G. C. Chi, W. M. Wang et al., “Transport properties of InN nanowires,”
*Applied Physics Letters*, vol. 87, no. 9, Article ID 093112, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar - Q. Guo, O. Kato, and A. Yoshida, “Thermal stability of indium nitride single crystal films,”
*Journal of Applied Physics*, vol. 73, no. 11, pp. 7969–7971, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - K. Wang and R. R. Reeber, “Thermal expansion and elastic properties of InN,”
*Applied Physics Letters*, vol. 79, no. 11, pp. 1602–1604, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - J. Grandal, M. A. Sánchez-García, E. Calleja, E. Luna, and A. Trampert, “Accommodation mechanism of InN nanocolumns grown on Si(111) substrates by molecular beam epitaxy,”
*Applied Physics Letters*, vol. 91, no. 2, Article ID 021902, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar - R. T. Tung, “Electron transport at metal-semiconductor interfaces: general theory,”
*Physical Review B*, vol. 45, no. 23, pp. 13509–13523, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - P. M. Gammon, A. Pérez-Tomás, V. A. Shah et al., “Analysis of inhomogeneous Ge/SiC heterojunction diodes,”
*Journal of Applied Physics*, vol. 106, no. 9, Article ID 093708, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar - L. Wang, M. I. Nathan, T. H. Lim, M. A. Khan, and Q. Chen, “High barrier height GaN Schottky diodes: Pt/GaN and Pd/GaN,”
*Applied Physics Letters*, vol. 68, no. 9, pp. 1267–1269, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - H. Morkoc,
*Handbook of Nitride Semiconductors and Devices*, Wiley-VCH, New York, NY, USA, 2008. - C. Hayzelden and J. L. Batstone, “Silicide formation and silicide-mediated crystallization of nickel-implanted amorphous silicon thin films,”
*Journal of Applied Physics*, vol. 73, no. 12, pp. 8279–8289, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - F. Roccaforte, F. La Via, V. Raineri, R. Pierobon, and E. Zanoni, “Richardson's constant in inhomogeneous silicon carbide Schottky contacts,”
*Journal of Applied Physics*, vol. 93, no. 11, pp. 9137–9144, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - B. Abay, G. Cankaya, H. S. Guder, H. Efeoglu, and Y. K. Yogurtcu, “Barrier characteristics of Cd/p-GaTe Schottky diodes based on I–V–T measurements,”
*Semiconductor Science and Technology*, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 75–81, 2003. - R. F. Schmitsdorf, T. U. Kampen, and W. Mönch, “Explanation of the linear correlation between barrier heights and ideality factors of real metal-semiconductor contacts by laterally nonuniform Schottky barriers,”
*Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology B*, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 1221–1226, 1997. - Y. P. Song, R. L. Van Meirhaeghe, W. H. Laflère, and F. Cardon, “On the difference in apparent barrier height as obtained from capacitance-voltage and current-voltage-temperature measurements on Al/p-InP Schottky barriers,”
*Solid State Electronics*, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 633–638, 1986. View at Scopus - J. H. Werner and H. H. Güttler, “Barrier inhomogeneities at Schottky contacts,”
*Journal of Applied Physics*, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 1522–1533, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - F. E. Jones, B. P. Wood, J. A. Myers, C. Daniels-Hafer, and M. C. Lonergan, “Current transport and the role of barrier inhomogeneities at the high barrier n-InP | poly(pyrrole) interface,”
*Journal of Applied Physics*, vol. 86, no. 11, pp. 6431–6441, 1999. View at Scopus