- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Advance Access ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Annual Issues ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Articles in Press ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents
Journal of Nanomaterials
Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 932719, 8 pages
Dynamic Probing of Nanoparticle Stability In Vivo: A Liposomal Model Assessed Using In Situ Microdialysis and Optical Imaging
1Department of Physics, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 420, Taiwan
2Division of Medical Engineering Research, National Health Research Institutes, Zhunan, Miaoli 350, Taiwan
3Institute of NanoEngineering and MicroSystems, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan
4Department of Chemistry, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan
5Center for Nanomedicine Research, National Health Research Institutes, Zhunan, Miaoli 350, Taiwan
Received 7 June 2010; Revised 10 August 2010; Accepted 6 September 2010
Academic Editor: Libo Wu
Copyright © 2011 Chien-Chung Jeng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Nanoparticle-mediated drug delivery and controlled release has been a vigorous research area in contemporary nanomedicine. The in vivo stability of nanoparticle delivered on site is a prerequisite for the design of drug-controlled release by any means. In this study, the first methodology comprised of microdialysis and optical imaging to assess the liposome stability in vivo is reported. Macroscopically, we demonstrated the DPPG liposomes with negative surface charge fast accumulated in the rat liver upon their i.v. administration using optical imaging. Microscopically, the concurrent analysis of fluorescent molecules leaching from the liposomes, in situ sampled using microdialysis probe, provides the dynamic information of stability of DPPG liposomes locus in quo. The current combination of in situ microdialysis and optical imaging possesses a great potential for use as a platform technology to evaluate the nanoparticle stability and the bioavailability of drug payload released on targeted site in vivo.
Nanoparticle-mediated drug delivery has been emerging as a vigorous research area. The nanoformulation of chemotherapeutics can improve the pharmacokinetics; the controlled release of drug can be further exploited with either inherent pathophysiological conditions like acidic pH in tumor, or external physical means such as photoirradiation and alternating magnetic fields [1–4]. The high stability of nanoparticle delivered on-site is a critical prerequisite for the design of drug controlled release by any means. The otherwise spontaneous release of drug will result in unwanted side effects and collateral tissue damages, to compromise the advantages of using nanoparticles as carriers. Thus, to define a methodology that can dynamically monitor the stability of targeted nanoparticles and bioavailability of drug payload locus in quo is important in validation of the activatable drug release strategy.
Nanomedicine approaches to drug delivery center on developing nanoscale particles to improve the bioavailability of a drug. The biodistribution of nanoparticles including blood circulation, immunosystem interaction, clearance, and metabolism are synergically determined by many factors such as size, shape, surface chemistry, and charge. Among nanoparticles, liposomes have played an important role in formulation for potential drugs to improve their therapeutic index. Due to their biocompatibility and biodegradability, liposomes are by far the most studied colloidal particles applied in medicine, particularly in antitumor therapy. The use of liposomes as drug carriers requires the liposomal preparations with various clearance rates and biodistribution patterns to better fit the specifics of each particular application. Liposome charge and liposome coating with different polymers, such as PEG, are among the parameters known to strongly affect biological properties of liposomes . During the delivery process, after extravasation into tumor tissue, liposomes remain within tumor stroma as a drug-loaded depot and eventually are subject to enzymatic degradation and/or phagocytic attack, leading to release of drug for subsequent diffusion to tumor cells. Therefore, the temporal profiles of biodistribution and stability of nanoformulated contrast agent/drug carrier in vivo are critical in determining the imaging/therapeutic efficacy and the necessity for advanced design of activatable controlled release.
There are a number of imaging modalities that have been reported to trace the biodistribution of nanoparticles in vivo, including positron emission tomography (PET) , magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [7, 8], and optical image system . However, these techniques, though noninvasive, are not sensitive enough to reflect the dynamic changes of nanoparticle stability incurred by variations of pathophysiological microenvironments or activations of external means for drug-controlled release. The indiscernibility of image signals contributed from the contrast agent of intact nanoparticles and that leaching from the disintegrated nanoparticles can seriously impede the interpretation of nanoparticle biodistribution. Current maneuvers to validate the nanoparticle biodistribution measured using imaging modalities are to acquire ex vivo tissue dissections for inductively coupled plasma-mass spectroscopy (ICP-MS) measurement and/or TEM imaging with energy dispersed X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) for element analysis [10, 11]. By verifying the physical residence of nanoparticles in tissues that colocalized with the imaging contrast, it can assure an appropriate interpretation of nanoparticle biodistribution using the aforementioned non-invasive imaging modalities. Nevertheless, these processes are time consuming and difficult to acquire dynamic profiles of nanoparticle biodistribution and stability locus in quo.
Alternatively, to assess the stability of nanoparticle in response to local variations of microenvironments as residing in tissue, we exploited an in vivo microdialysis system. Such a technique used for intracerebral sampling, for example, can provide continuous monitoring of levels of compounds of a single animal and has been widely used for pharmacological and physiological studies to assay endogenous neurotransmitters or exogenous compounds [12, 13]. In the previous report , we applied fluorescent polystyrene nanospheres (20 nm) to study the blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability and used microdialysis probe which was implanted in the cerebral cortex of an anesthetized rat to in situ monitor the extravasation of administered fluorescent nanospheres into the brain across the blood-brain barrier. As illustrated in Scheme 1, since the microdialysis probe contains membrane with a specific molecular weight cutoff, it possesses a selective permeability for molecules with different sizes at locus of tissue, in the close vicinity of where the probe is positioned. If the contrast agent- or drug-encapsulating nanoparticles on site can maintain their morphological stability, their size will be too large to be selectively collected through the microdialysis membrane. On the contrary, the contrast agents or drug molecules leaching from the disintegrated nanoparticles, due to their small size, can easily diffuse through the probe membrane and be collected in microdialysates for further analysis. Thus, the microdialysis system has the potential of usage as a platform for dynamic monitoring of the nanoparticle stability in vivo, locus in quo.
In the present study, we synthesized carboxyfluorescein-(CF-)encapsulating liposomes with different surface charges as models of drug carrier. An analytical method was implemented that combined the optical image system as well as in vivo microdialysis sampling technique to simultaneously monitor the biodistribution of liposomes in vivo and to assess their on-site stability at the extracellular space of liver tissue, where the liposomes accumulated the most after the intravenous (i.v.) administration. The current instrument configuration comprised of the optical image system and the microdialysis platform can provide dynamic observations of nanoparticle stability in vivo, from the macroscopic to microscopic scales.
2. Experimental Section
2.1. Preparation of Referenced CF-Encapsulating Liposomes (Dipalmitoylphosphatidyl Choline-Liposome: DPPC-Liposome)
Liposomes were prepared using the film hydration method . The lipid mixture consisted of a molar ratio of DPPC, cholesterol, and DPPG. The total lipid mixture was dissolved in 4 mL of a solvent mixture consisting of chloroform and methanol (8 2), followed by a 1-min sonication at C. The organic solvent was then removed under vacuum on a rotary evaporator, leaving a milky white, gel-like suspension of proliposomes. It was followed by addition of 1 milliliter of CF solution (10 mM or 100 mM) to the lipid mixture. After sonication for 3 more min, the liposome preparation was ready to pass through a 0.2-m polycarbonate filter 20 times for the production of a homogeneous suspension of uniform size. Any unencapsulated dye or trace organic solvent was removed from the liposome preparation by gel filtration on Sephadex G-50 column at room temperature, followed by dialysis (MWCO, 12–14 kDa) against 0.01 M potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) at C in the dark.
2.2. Preparation of Relatively Cationic CF-Encapsulating Liposomes (Dipalmitoylphosphatidyl Ethanolamine-Liposome: DPPE-Liposome)
The procedure was similar to that for DPPC liposome, except the lipid mixture used for DPPE liposome consisted of a molar ratio of DPPC, cholesterol and DPPE.
2.3. Preparation of Relatively Anionic CF-Encapsulating Liposomes (Dipalmitoylphosphatidyl Glycerol-Liposome: DPPG-Liposome)
The procedure was similar to that for DPPC liposome, except the lipid mixture used for DPPG liposome consisted of a molar ratio of DPPC, cholesterol, and DPPG.
2.4. The HepG2 Cell Line Experiments
Human hepatoma cells (HepG2) were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) (Gibco; Carlsbad, CA) with 10% fetal bovine serum (Hyclone; Logan, Utah). Cells were seeded onto glass bottom dishes (35 mm OD 10 mm High, glass area: 22 mm dia., and glass thickness: 0.17 mm) (WillCo Wells BV; Amsterdam, Netherlands) at density of cells /dish, and cultured overnight in culture medium. Cell nucleus were labeled by 10 mM Hoechst33342 (Molecular probe, Carlsbad, CA) for 5 min and rinsed twice with PBS buffer. DPPC liposome or DPPE liposome, encapsulating 100 mM carboxyfluorescein, were added to cells at concentration liposome/ml in serum-free medium and cells were incubated for different time periods from 1 h to 4 h. Unfused liposome were removed by washing twice with PBS and replaced with DMEM medium without phenol red. Live cells were observed with Leica AS MDW system (Leica Microsystems; Wetzlar, Germany) at high magnification (63X). Carboxyfluorescein was imaged using 490 nm excitation wavelengths and 530/30 nm BP emission filter. Hoechst 33342 was excited by 380 nm and its emission was collected by 465/20 nm BP emission filter.
2.5. In Vivo Microdialysis System
The microdialysis system was perfused with 50 mM phosphate buffer solution (pH 7.4) at a flow rate of 2 L/min. Microdialysis probes, made of polyethylene sulfonate with a molecular weight cutoff at 100,000, were purchased from CMA (Carnegie Medicine Association, Solna, Sweden). The microdialysates were allowed to flow through a polyimide-coated fused-silica capillary (360-m o.d., 250-m i.d.). A 2-cm segment of the capillary was stripped of the polyimide coating to serve as the detection window and placed inside a fluorescence detector (Argos 250 FL detector, Flux Instruments, Basel, Switzerland). Polyethylene catheters were inserted into the liver of the rats.
2.6. Optical Imaging System
The light from a 100 W mercury lamp (color temperature is 5700 K) was passed with an interference filter (model 545AF75, Omega) to induce fluorescence. The imaging sensor of the in vivo imaging system was a charge-coupled device (CCD) camera (model DW436, Andor, Northern Ireland) cooled down to C. An interference filter (model FF495 Ex 02–25, Smerok, USA) covered the 50 mm f/1.2 lens (Nikon) to block the exciting light. The body temperature of the rats was maintained at C with a heating pad.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Properties of Fluorescent Liposomes
We synthesized DPPG-liposomes containing 10 mM and 100 mM of CF, respectively, by using the film hydration method (shown in Experimental Section). The characteristics of liposomes were described in Table 1. The hydrodynamic diameters of liposome are around 200250 nm and the calculated average volume of a single liposome is about 4.3–8.2 L.
The average diameters of the liposomes were measured using the Coulter LS particle analyzer (Coulter Corp., Miami, FL). The spectral analysis displayed the maximal absorption and fluorescence emission of CF-encapsulated liposomes at 495 nm and 520 nm, respectively, which resembled those of CF solution (Figure 1).
Since the biodistributions of liposome and of other nanoparticles were reported to greatly depend on the surface charge [15–17], the zeta potentials of DPPG- and DPPE-liposomes were measured and listed in Table 2. As described in Experimental Section, to vary the molar ratios of DPPG and DPPE to DPPC and cholesterol in lipid mixtures, the constructed liposomes can possess different surface charges. The DPPG-liposomes containing 10 mM and 100 mM CF exhibited negative zeta surface potentials of mV and mV at pH 7.4, respectively. In contrast, the DPPE-liposomes encapsulating 10 mM and 100 mM displayed the relatively positive surface potentials of mV and mV at pH 7.4, respectively (Table 2).
3.2. Dequenching of Fluorescent Liposomes upon Lysis by Nonionic Surfactant
The 100 mM fluorescent CF encapsulated within DPPG liposomes with the sizes around 200 nm indicated apparent self-quenching of fluorescence, due to its relatively high concentration confined within a relatively small volume (Figure 1). The quenching effect could be evaluated by disintegrating liposomes with the nonionic surfactant, Triton X-100, to compare the fluorescence intensity before and after lysis. The lysis buffer containing surfactant Triton X-100 of 0.1% in PBS buffer (pH 7.4) was added and mixed gently to 3 mL of the liposome solution for 10 minutes at room temperature. As demonstrated in Figure 1, the liposome-encapsulated CF at 10 mM showed comparable levels of fluorescence intensity before and after lysis, while the 100 mM specimens indicating ninefold increase of that after the liposomes being lyzed. Thus, this dramatic change of fluorescence intensity before and after liposome disintegration could be further applied to sense the stability of liposomal structure as delivered on site in tissue. On the other hand, for tracking biodistribution of liposome in vivo, the 10 mM specimen was selected, due to its traceable, bright fluorescence intensity.
3.3. In Vivo Biodistribution versus In Situ Stability of Fluorescence Liposomes
The biodistribution of CF-encapsulating DPPG liposome was monitored dynamically by homemade small animal optical imaging system, and its on-site stability was simultaneously assessed using in situ microdialysis probe. Prior to imaging, male Sprague Dawley rats (weight ca. 250 g) were placed on Teklad 2916 diets for 5 days and fasted for 12 h, to minimize rodent chow autofluorescence within the GI-tract and anesthetized with urethane (1.5 g/kg) i.p. injection. DPPG-liposomes containing 10 mM and 100 mM CF, at a dosage of 16 mg/kg, were injected i.v. via the tail vein of animals, respectively. The time-lapse optical images showed that liposome containing 10 mM CF, with the size of 200–240 nm, fast accumulated in rat liver as soon as 5 min after i.v. administration (Figure 2(a)). The fluorescence intensity observed from liver gradually increased and reached its plateau in 100 min. To evaluate the stability of these on-site DPPG liposomes in liver, the microdialysis probe with the molecular size cutoff at 100 kDa was implanted in situ to simultaneously analyze the fluorescence signals of extracellular fluid in liver (Shceme 1). As depicted in Figure 2(b), the profile of fluorescence intensity in microdialysates showed no significant variation throughout the concurrent optical imaging course after the i.v. injection of CF-encapsulating liposomes. It implicated that liposomes in liver were able to maintain their structural stability, preventing the encapsulated CF from leaching into the extracellular fluid and being sampled by the microdialysis probe. On the other hand, since the liposomes were not disintegrated, with the intact size of 200 nm, they were simply too large to permeate through the membrane of microdialysis probe.
For DPPG liposomes containing high concentration of 100 mM CF, due to the self-quenching phenomenon, there was no observable increase of fluorescence signal in liver of anesthetized rat during the optical imaging course, following the i.v. administration (Figure 3(a)). If the liposomes with 100 mM CF disintegrate on site, it would result in CF molecules permeating into the interstitial space of liver, consequently to compromise the self-quenching of fluorescence. Therefore, the dark time-lapse images of liver could be accounted for the macroscopic evidence that implicating the integrity of liposomes was remained intact at their loci of liver. To microscopic probing of the stability of liposomes encapsulating 100 mM CF, the positioned microdialysis in liver also revealed no increase of CF fluorescence in microdialysates over the 100-min concomitant optical imaging session (Figure 3(b)). The upshift of fluorescence baseline (from less than 0.01 to ca. 0.03 V) upon the i.v. injection of liposomes was due to the high concentration of encapsulated CF molecules. At the equilibrium, with 100 mM liposome-encapsulated CF, the concentration of free CF molecule in the prepared ready-to-use solution was much higher than that with 10 mM liposome-encapsulated CF. Consequently, it incurred the increase of baseline following the injection of liposome solution, as delineated in Figure 3(b). At later phase of imaging course, the lysis buffer of Triton X-100 was locally infused at 2 l/min via microdialysis probe. It caused the rupture of liposomal lipid integrity, resulting in an immediate increase of CF fluorescence intensity measured in the microdialysate (Figure 3(b)).
Since the lysis buffer diffused to the tissue only in the vicinity of microdialysis probe, its effective volume on tissue was very small; only those liposomes situated around the tip of microdialysis probe were subject to the lysis. Thus, this increase of fluorescence intensity, resulted from the leaching CF, could only be sensed by the microdialysis in situ, but not by the optical imaging measurement. As such, to deliver Triton-X for liposome disintegration was not an efficient means of controlled release, albeit it provided indirect evidence to substantiate the intact of liposomal structure in situ of liver. The release of CF molecules during the Triton-X lysis was a process of concentration-dependent diffusion, therefore, to probe the integrity of liposome via this means was better to use liposomes encapsulating 100 mM, rather than 10 mM.
To further validate the CF sensing of in situ microdialysis probe, 10 M free CF molecules were i.v. administered. As shown in Figure 4, with this CF concentration before the plasma dilution—less than a thousandth of that previously used with the liposome encapsulation, a prominent fluorescence signal was still able to be measured via the microdialysis sampling of extracellular fluid in liver. It implicated that the in situ microdialysis was suitable for monitoring of the drug controlled release in tissue locus in quo. In summary, all the evidence, from macroscopic optical imaging to microscopic microdialysis measurement, indicates that, following i.v. administration, the DPPG-liposomes would fast accumulate in the liver and reside in the extracellular space with the high stability of morphological integrity over the period of 2 h.
3.4. The Hepatoma Cell Uptakes of Liposomes versus Different Surface Charges
There are a number of reports demonstrating that the biodistribution of nanoparticles is surface charge-dependent [15–17]. In general, the nanoparticles with greater surface charge tend to be more avid for cell uptake via process like endocytosis. In the current study, the DPPG-liposomes, with the surface zata potential of ca. 40 mV, were demonstrated to reside in the extracellular space of liver tissue. How the surface charge of liposomes leads the propensity of their interactions with cells was investigated with the in vitro model of human hepatoma cell line (HepG2). The HepG2 cells ( cell number) were seeded onto a glass bottom dish and cultured overnight in culture medium. The cell nuclei were labeled by 10 mM Hoechst 33342 for 5 min and then rinsed twice with PBS buffer. Afterwards, the DPPG-liposomes (ca. mV) or DPPE-liposomes (ca. mV), both encapsulating 100 mM carboxyfluorescein, were respectively added to HepG2 cells at concentration of liposome/ml in serum-free medium, incubated for various time periods, from 1 h to 4 h. If the treated liposomes are engulfed into cells, the encapsulating 100 mM CF can be released from the disrupted liposomal structure via two possible pathways: direct lipid-cell membrane fusion or cell endocytosis. In the latter pathway, the lipase in endosomes is responsible to digest the liposome to release the CF molecules . Both cases will result in the increase of intracellular fluorescence intensity, due to the compromise of CF fluorescence self-quenching by its dilution in cytoplasm. In our study, the time-lapse fluorescence microscopy illustrated that, with the DPPG-liposomes, no CF fluorescence was observed in the cytoplasm of HepG2 cells, implicating no cell uptake of liposomes occurred in 4 h (Figure 5). However, with the DPPE-liposomes possessing relatively positive surface charge as compared to the DPPG liposomes, the pronounced intracellular fluorescence intensity was observed throughout the 4 h imaging course (Figure 6). These results of liposome-cell interaction are consistent to that for other reported nanoparticles [15–17] and are supportive to the in vivo observation of extracellular residence of DPPG liposomes in liver.
In this study, we successfully implement the first methodology comprised of microdialysis and optical imaging to dynamically assess the stability of liposome in vivo. Macroscopically, with the time-lapse optical imaging, we demonstrated that the DPPG-liposomes with surface charge around mV would accumulate in the liver of anesthetized rat upon their i.v. administration in 5 min. Microscopically, the concurrent analysis of fluorescent molecules in extracellular fluid of liver tissue, in situ-sampled using microdialysis probe, provided the dynamic information of stability of DPPG-liposomes locus in quo. From macroscopic to microscopic results, all the evidence implicated that the DPPG-liposomes could reside in the extracellular space of liver, with stable and intact morphological integrity, over a period of 2 h at least. The microdialysis probing the lipid integrity of liposome, by analyzing the increase of fluorescence intensity in microdialysates that attributed to the leaching of CF molecules, provides itself as a platform technology used for evaluation of nanoparticle stability (not only for liposome) and the bioavailability of drug payload released on targeted site in vivo. As such, the current combination of in situ microdialysis and optical imaging possesses a great potential to be used vigorously in the research of nanoparticle-mediated drug targeted delivery and controlled release.
This study was conducted with the support of the NHRI Intramural Research Grants MED-098-PP-04 and NM-098-PP-01 from National Health Research Institutes of Taiwan and of the Grant NSC 098-2221-E-400-001 from the National Science Council of Taiwan.
- K. K. Coti, M. E. Belowich, M. Liong, et al., “Mechanised nanoparticles for drug delivery,” Nanoscale, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 16–39, 2009.
- J. Lu, E. Choi, F. Tamanoi, and J. I. Zink, “Light-activated nanoimpeller-controlled drug release in cancer cells,” Small, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 421–426, 2008.
- T. D. Nguyen, K. C.-F. Leung, M. Liong, Y. Liu, J. F. Stoddart, and J. I. Zink, “Versatile supramolecular nanovalves reconfigured for light activation,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 17, no. 13, pp. 2101–2110, 2007.
- L.-A. Tai, P.-J. Tsai, Y.-C. Wang, Y.-J. Wang, L.-W. Lo, and C.-S. Yang, “Thermosensitive liposomes entrapping iron oxide nanoparticles for controllable drug release,” Nanotechnology, vol. 20, no. 13, Article ID 135101, 2009.
- T. Ishida, H. Harashima, and H. Kiwada, “Liposome clearance,” Bioscience Reports, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 197–224, 2002.
- S.-J. Kim, D. J. Doudet, A. R. Studenov et al., “Quantitative micro positron emission tomography (PET) imaging for the in vivo determination of pancreatic islet graft survival,” Nature Medicine, vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 1423–1428, 2006.
- M.-S. Martina, J.-P. Fortin, C. Ménager et al., “Generation of superparamagnetic liposomes revealed as highly efficient MRI contrast agents for in vivo imaging,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 127, no. 30, pp. 10676–10685, 2005.
- E. M. Shapiro, S. Skrtic, K. Sharer, J. M. Hill, C. E. Dunbar, and A. P. Koretsky, “MRI detection of single particles for cellular imaging,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 101, no. 30, pp. 10901–10906, 2004.
- Q. L. M. de Chermont, C. Chanéac, J. Seguin et al., “Nanoprobes with near-infrared persistent luminescence for in vivo imaging,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 104, no. 22, pp. 9266–9271, 2007.
- K. Kametani and T. Nagata, “Quantitative elemental analysis on aluminum accumulation by HVTEM-EDX in liver tissues of mice orally administered with aluminum chloride,” Medical Molecular Morphology, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 97–105, 2006.
- A. Patri, T. Umbreit, J. Zheng et al., “Energy dispersive X-ray analysis of titanium dioxide nanoparticle distribution after intravenous and subcutaneous injection in mice,” Journal of Applied Toxicology, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 662–672, 2009.
- U. Ungerstedt, “Measurement of neurotransmitter release by intracranial dialysis,” in Measurement of Neurotransmitter Release In Vivo, C. A. Marsden, Ed., pp. 210–245, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1984.
- E. C. M. de Lange, M. Danhof, C. Zurcher, A. G. de Boer, and D. D. Breimer, “Repeated microdialysis perfusions: periprobe tissue reactions and BBB permeability,” Brain Research, vol. 702, no. 1-2, pp. 261–265, 1995.
- C.-S. Yang, C.-H. Chang, P.-J. Tsai, W.-Y. Chen, F.-G. Tseng, and L.-W. Lo, “Nanoparticle-based in vivo investigation on blood-brain barrier permeability following ischemia and reperfusion,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 76, no. 15, pp. 4465–4471, 2004.
- T. S. Levchenko, R. Rammohan, A. N. Lukyanov, K. R. Whiteman, and V. P. Torchilin, “Liposome clearance in mice: the effect of a separate and combined presence of surface charge and polymer coating,” International Journal of Pharmaceutics, vol. 240, no. 1-2, pp. 95–102, 2002.
- F. Alexis, E. Pridgen, L. K. Molnar, and O. C. Farokhzad, “Factors affecting the clearance and biodistribution of polymeric nanoparticles,” Molecular Pharmaceutics, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 505–515, 2008.
- J. S. Souris, C. -H. Lee, S. -H. Cheng et al., “Surface charge-mediated rapid hepatobiliary excretion of mesoporous silica nanoparticles,” Biomaterials, vol. 31, no. 21, pp. 5564–5574, 2010.