About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Journal of Nanomaterials
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 193704, 6 pages
Research Article

Therapeutic Angiogenesis of PLGA-Heparin Nanoparticle in Mouse Ischemic Limb

Department of Vascular Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing 100730, China

Received 11 January 2012; Revised 12 April 2012; Accepted 13 April 2012

Academic Editor: Haifeng Chen

Copyright © 2012 Lishan Lian et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Objective. To evaluate the possibility and efficacy of the nanoparticle encapsulating heparin as a novel delivery system to treat ischemic disease. Methods. Firstly, to synthesize the PLGA heparin and test the surface morphology, the average diameter, the loading efficiency, and the release time in vitro, then inject the PLGA heparin into mouse ischemic limbs to observe the perfusion recovery with LDPI at the time of postischemic 7, 14, 21, and 28 days, and, finally, test the expression of VEGF and HGF, the number of the neovessels and record the necrotic score of ischemic limbs. Results. The surface morphology of the PLGA heparin was smooth, the average diameter was 297 nm, the loading efficiency was 5.35%, and the release period maintained for 14 days. In animal experiment, the perfusion recovery, HGF expression level, and capillary density in PLGA-heparin group were significantly higher than that in control group, and this was consistent with less ischemic limb necrosis. Conclusion. Nanoparticle encapsulating heparin could be successful and efficient in ischemic disease. The therapeutic angiogenesis of PLGA heparin might be due to the prolongation of its biological effects with stimulating growth factor expression.

1. Introduction

Ischemic diseases are major cause of morbidity and mortality [1]. Though pharmacology, stents, and bypass have been advantageously developed in this area, some of the patients, with diabetes, hyperlipidemia, or hypertension, are poorer clinical outcomes as well as poorer responses to pharmacology and not eligible or poor candidates for revascularization [2]. There are currently no medical therapies available to improve perfusion and thereby alter the poor prognosis [3].

Angiogenesis is the growth and proliferation of new blood vessels from existing vascular structures [4]. Therapeutic angiogenesis seeks to employ this phenomenon for the treatment of disorders of inadequate tissue perfusion.

Currently, a lot of growth factors and stem cells have been tried as an angiogenic promoter. However, their clinical effects on patients are not as exciting as experimental results in animal models. Originally, heparin is a basic anticoagulant for the prevention and treatment of arterial and venous thromboembolic diseases [57]. The anticoagulant activity of heparin depends on a unique pentasaccharide which binds to antithrombin III (AT III), potentiates the inhibition of thrombin, and activates factor X (Xa) [810]. Heparin has also a number of other effects, including stimulating the expression of tissue factor pathway inhibitor, binding to numerous plasma and platelet proteins, acting with endothelial cells, and leukocytes, suppressing of platelet function, and improving vascular permeability. More importantly, heparin has been proved to improve angiogenesis in clinic [8]. However, heparin has pharmacokinetic and biological limitation of its short half-life. To maintain its function needs recurrent injection or continuous intravenous infusion.

Polymeric nanoparticles formulated from biodegradable copolymer, poly lactic-coglycolic acid (PLGA), have been extensively investigated in drug and gene delivery [1114]. PLGA nanoparticles have advantages such as a controlled release of drug delivery, high stability, being easily uptaken into the cells by endocytosis, and targeting ability to specific tissue or organ by adsorption or coating with ligand materials at the surface of spheres. In addition, PLGA has good biocompatibility and has been approved by Food and Drug Administration for certain human clinical uses [1517].

In this study, we evaluated the possibility and efficiency of PLGA nanoparticles encapsulating unfractionated heparin as a novel drug delivery system to prolong heparin release and investigated the therapeutic angiogenesis efficacy in ischemic limbs of mice.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Preparation of PLGA-Heparin Nanoparticles

Double emulsion-solvent evaporation method was used to synthesize PLGA-heparin nanoparticles [18]. Briefly, 2 mL unfractionated heparin solution (12500 IU) was emulsified in 10 mL of PLGA solution (5% w/v in methylene chloride), using homogenizer for 3 min in ice bath. The water-in-oil emulsion was further emulsified in 50 mL of a 2% (w/v) aqueous solution of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA, MW 30,000–70,000) for 3 min to form a water-in-oil-in-water (w/o/w) multiple emulsion. The emulsion was stirred to remove the methylene chloride above 2 h. The PLGA-heparin nanoparticles were recovered by ultracentrifugation (23,000 rpm for 20 min, Beckman, USA), washed 3 times to remove PVA, and then lyophilized to obtain a dry powder.

2.2. Characteristics of PLGA-Heparin Nanoparticles

A Submicro Laser Defractometer (PCS Brookhaven Co. USA, BI-9000AT Correlator, BI200SM Photometer) was used to assess the size distribution. The particle morphology was observed by scanning electron microscopy. Freeze-dried nanoparticles were spread on the sticky surface of an aluminum stub. The nanoparticle surface was coated with gold before being viewed under the microscope.

The amount of heparin entrapped within PLGA nanoparticles was determined by extracting the heparin using distilled water after dissolving the PLGA with a chloroform solution. Heparin concentration in the aqueous solution was assayed by spectrophotometer.

In vitro heparin release from the nanoparticles was performed in distilled water at 37°C utilizing double-chamber diffusion cell. A Millipore hydrophilic polyvinylidene fluoride membrane was placed between the two chambers. The receiver buffer was replaced with fresh distilled water at predetermined intervals. Heparin concentration in the aqueous solution was assayed by spectrophotometer.

2.3. Mouse Hindlimb Ischemic Model

C57BL/6J mice at 4 weeks of age (15–18 g body weight, from Laboratory Animals Center, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, China) were obtained. Hindlimb ischemic mouse model was surgically induced according to procedures described previously [19]. Briefly, mice underwent surgically induced unilateral hindlimb ischemia with ligation and excision of the femoral artery from its origin just above the inguinal ligament to its bifurcation at the origin of the saphenous and popliteal arteries under general anesthesia. The above-mentioned arteries from the opposite limb were not ligated and were used as an internal control to calculate perfusion recovery.

The extent of necrosis, if any, in ischemic hindlimb was recorded once between days 3 and 5 after surgery. The scores of necrosis were described as follows: grade 0, no necrosis in ischemic limb; grade I, necrosis limited to toes; grade II, necrosis extending to dorsum pedis; grade III, necrosis extending to curs; grade IV, necrosis extending to thigh.

Totally, 40 hindlimb ischemic mice were assigned to two groups: PLGA-heparin group ( 𝑛 = 2 0 ) and control group ( 𝑛 = 2 0 ). PLGA heparin (300 μL was equivalent to 6 IU heparin; this dosage of heparin was equivalent to 300 IU/kg in clinic) was intramuscular injected into the ischemic limb (6 points) of each mouse right after the femoral artery was ligated and excised. Same amount of saline was intramuscular injected into the ischemic limb as we did in treatment group.

Blood flow recovery was monitored with Laser Doppler Perfusion Image (LDPI, PERIMED, Stockholm, Sweden). Briefly, mice were anesthetized and placed on a heating pad to maintain a constant temperature. Hair was removed with an electric shaver followed by a depilatory cream. LDPI was used to estimate dermal blood flow in the calf and foot before, immediately after procedures, and on days 7, 14, 21, and 28 after hindlimb ischemia. Ratio of the operated/nonoperated limb was calculated to minimize the potential differences between ambient temperature and lighting.

2.4. Histological Examination, ELISA, and Western Blot
2.4.1. Preparation of Tissue Samples

Mice were sacrificed after LDPI at day 28 after-operation, and the gastrocnemius and tibialis anterior muscles from the right and left sides were harvested and weighed. The distal part of the muscle was frozen and embedded for histology study, and the proximal part was used either to detect vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) level with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or to determine hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) expression with Western blot.

2.4.2. Endothelial Phosphate Alkaline Staining for Capillary Density

Immunohistochemistry was performed on muscle sections of the gastrocnemius and tibialis anterior. Capillary per muscle fiber ratio was determined by endothelial phosphate alkaline staining; blue dots indicated capillaries. Capillary density was measured by counting six random high-power (magnification ×200) fields or a minimum of 200 fibers from each ischemic and nonischemic limb on an inverted light microscope.

2.4.3. Expression of VEGF and HGF

Available ELISA for VEGF was performed on homogenized muscle samples as the manufacturers instructions (R&D Systems, USA). Briefly, leg muscle harvested from sacrificed mice was snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and pulverized by using a prechilled mortar and pestle on dry ice. Approximately 100 mg of each muscle was homogenized in 1.5 mL NP-40 lysis buffer containing protease inhibitors. Muscle homogenates were centrifuged at 13000 rpm. The surface lipid layer was removed, and the supernatant was saved at −80°C for ELISA and protein assay. Protein concentration was measured by using a 1 : 500 dilution of the supernatant in the microtiter plate by micro-BCA protein assay (Pierce, Rockford, USA). Supernatant dilutions of 1 : 6 were used for the VEGF ELISA assays.

Protein samples were separated on SDS-polyacrylamide gels and then transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membranes which were treated with blocking buffer (5% skim milk). An anti-HGF antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnologies, CA) was used as the primary antibody followed by incubation with an anti-mouse horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody. Immune reactivity was visualized using ECL plus system. Quantification of results was performed by densitometry (Image J, NIH, USA), comparing the density of identically sized areas (corresponding to immunoreactive bands) and results analyzed as total integrated density (arbitrary units).

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). For comparison of mean data on PLGA-heparin treatment versus control, at one time point (i.e., VEGF HGF expression, capillary density), statistical significance was evaluated by use of 2-tailed Student’s paired 𝑡 test. To determine the perfusion ratio over time, a standard variance ANOVA repeated measure was performed. Probability values <0.05 were considered to be significant.

3. Results

3.1. Characteristics of PLGA-Heparin Nanoparticles

A scanning electron microphotograph of heparin nanoparticles showed that the nanoparticles were spherical and discrete particles without aggregation and that they were smooth in surface morphology (Figure 1(a)). The average diameter of the nanoparticles was 297 nm (Figure 1(b)).

Figure 1: (a) A scanning electron microphotograph of heparin nanoparticles. (b) Size distribution of heparin nanoparticles.

The loading efficiency of heparin in the nanoparticles was 5.35%. The heparin release from nanoparticles in vitro was 40% in day 1 and 85% in day 3 and sustained over 14 days (Figure 2).

Figure 2: Cumulative release profile (% of amount loaded) of heparin from nanoparticles.
3.2. PLAG Heparin Improved Blood Flow Restoration and Prevented Limb Necrosis

The recovery of perfusion in PLGA-heparin group was similar to that of control group on day 7 ( 0 . 5 0 0 ± 0 . 0 8 4 versus 0 . 4 8 5 ± 0 . 0 9 5 ). However, perfusion ratio was significantly increased on day 14 ( 0 . 6 2 3 ± 0 . 0 7 7 versus 0 . 5 3 6 ± 0 . 0 8 6 , 𝑃 < 0 . 0 5 ), day 21 ( 0 . 6 8 4 ± 0 . 0 6 8 versus 0 . 5 8 8 ± 0 . 0 8 2 , 𝑃 < 0 . 0 1 ), and day 28 ( 0 . 7 3 3 ± 0 . 0 9 3 versus 0 . 6 0 6 ± 0 . 0 7 9 , 𝑃 < 0 . 0 1 ) (Figure 3).

Figure 3: Perfusion recovery after surgical-induced hindlimb ischemia.

Immunohistochemical staining showed that capillary density was richer in PLGA-heparin group compared to that of in control group (in gastrocnemius, 0 . 1 9 ± 0 . 0 8 versus 0 . 3 0 ± 0 . 0 8 , 𝑃 < 0 . 0 5 ; in tibialis anterior 0 . 2 2 ± 0 . 1 1 versus 0 . 3 3 ± 0 . 0 4 , 𝑃 < 0 . 0 5 ). Capillary density was represented as capillaries per muscle fiber (Figure 4).

Figure 4: Endothelial phosphate alkaline staining for capillaries. The pictures represented staining of endothelial phosphate alkaline; blue dots indicated capillaries (original magnification ×200).

The results of necrotic scores were consistent with the blood flow recovery and capillary density. With more capillaries formation and more blood flow restoration, the limb necrosis was much less in PLGA-heparin treated group. Only 5% mice showed grade I necrosis. However, in control group, 20% mice presented limb necrosis, and they were grade I (10.0%), II (5.0%), and III (5.0%).

3.3. PLGA Heparin Upregulated the Expression of HGF

VEGF concentration was evaluated with ELISA. With ischemic injury stimulation, the VEGF level was increased in both PLGA-heparin group and control group (20.6% and 20.2% increased, respectively, 𝑃 > 0 . 0 5 ). There was no significant difference between these 2 groups.

However, western blot showed more expression of HGF in PLGA-heparin group than that in control group. Quantitative analysis with Image J showed the HGF/Tubulin ratio was significantly increased with PLGA-heparin versus control treatment, 0 . 4 3 ± 0 . 0 2 versus 0 . 2 0 ± 0 . 0 6 , 𝑃 < 0 . 0 5 , (integrated density) (Figure 5).

Figure 5: Western blot for HGF. Quantitative analysis with integrated density showed significantly more expression of HGF in PLGA-heparin group than that in control group.

4. Discussion

Heparin is a typical anticoagulant and has been used to prevent and treat thromboembolic ischemic diseases such as coronary artery disease and peripheral arterial occlusion disease which imperil people’s life or survive lower extremity limbs. However, a short half-life and the need for recurrent injection have limited its use for chronic ischemic disease. In this study, we attempt to use nanoparticle techniques to overcome this disadvantage and encapsulate heparin with PLGA to prolong its biological effect. To the best of our knowledge, this paper is the first to investigate the therapeutic efficiency of PLGA heparin in a preclinical hindlimb ischemic model. The major findings of our study were the following: (a) heparin could be encapsulated with PLGA and controlled release for at least 14 days; (b) PLGA heparin improved blood flow restoration with more capillaries formation and prevented limb necrosis; (c) the potential therapeutic angiogenesis of PLGA heparin might be due to interaction with growth factors.

According to our results, PLGA heparin nanoparticles formulated by double emulsion solvent evaporation technique were smooth and spherical in shape with a loading efficiency of 5.35%. The average diameter of PLGA heparin was 297 nm, with a range of 82 nm to 655 nm. The heterogeneity in particular size might relate to the homogenization method. The concentration of PVA and the speed of homogenization had been reported to affect the particle size of PLGA nanoparticles [20, 21]. The smaller particle size might have better potential effects of controlled release. The method of double-chamber diffusion was adopted for heparin release determination [22]. Result showed that heparin released from nanoparticles in vitro was 40% in day 1, 85% in day 3, and sustained over at least 14 days. Even though 90% of heparin was released from nanoparticle in the earlier 7 days, PLGA heparin did prolong the existence of heparin and made it possible to sustain the biological effects of heparin.

The controlled release of heparin from PLGA nanoparticles may offer the advantage of sustaining therapeutic effect in the target cells or tissues. A sustained drug release may be more important in the treatment of chronic disease such as critical limb ischemia and myocardial infarction. It also has the advantages that prolong the injection intermission for the convenience of clinic use and the improvement of patient compliance.

Our data showed that sustained heparin release from PLGA nanoparticles could be feasible and effective in therapeutic angiogenesis of mice in the setting of hindlimb ischemia. First of all, we detected the blood flow recovery with LDPI. Following surgical-induced hindlimb ischemia, the restoration of limb perfusion was spontaneous recovery over time, with one dosage of PLGA-heparin treatment; the restoration was accelerated. The differences demonstrated on day 14 following operation and lasted for 28 days. This finding was consistent with histological examination, with more capillaries formation in the PLGA-heparin treatment limbs. For clinical interest, less happening of necrosis on limbs confirmed the benefit of PLGA-heparin treatment.

We then sought to investigate the mechanisms of therapeutic angiogenesis of PLGA heparin. The vascular endothelial growth factor family is perhaps the most extensively studied angiogenic growth factor. VEGF is a key angiogenic factor that induces the proliferation, migration, and survival of endothelia cells and promotes angiogenesis [23]. We found an increase of VEGF expression during the recovery period after surgical-induced hindlimb ischemia. However, there was not distinct difference between the PLGA-heparin treatment and the saline control groups. That implied that there might be other mechanisms for promoting angiogenesis.

In this study, we found that PLGA heparin could upregulate the expression of HGF. HGF plays important roles in wound healing, tissue and organ regeneration, morphogenesis, and angiogenesis [24]. HGF and its specific receptor, c-met, have been expressed in the blood vessels, including endothelial cells and vascular smooth muscle cells. HGF had been confirmed as a novel angiogenic growth factor in models of hindlimb ischemia and myocardial infarction [25]. Moreover, clinical trials which are based on those bench works are on the way [26].

Taking all this information together, we conclude that it is a feasible and effective method to encapsulate the heparin into PLGA, and with controlled release of heparin, PLGA-heparin can promote therapeutic angiogenesis in hindlimb ischemic mouse model. The potential mechanisms may be due to the upregulation of angiogenic factors.


This paper was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 30772114).


  1. Y. He, Y. Jiang, J. Wang, L. Fan, X. Li, and F. B. Hu, “Prevalence of peripheral arterial disease and its association with smoking in a population-based study in Beijing, China,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 333–338, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. Y. H. Kusumanto, V. Van Weel, N. H. Mulder et al., “Treatment with intramuscular vascular endothelial growth factor gene compared with placebo for patients with diabetes mellitus and critical limb ischemia: a double-blind randomized trial,” Human Gene Therapy, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 683–691, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. B. Cristofaro, O. A. Stone, A. Caporali et al., “Neurotrophin-3 is a novel angiogenic factor capable of therapeutic neovascularization in a mouse model of limb ischemia,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 1143–1150, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. H. Zhou, Y. H. Yang, N. O. Binmadi, et al., “The hypoxia-inducible factor-responsive proteins semaphorin 4D and vascular endothelial growth factor promote tumor growth and angiogenesis in oral squamous cell carcinoma,” Experimental Cell Research. In press.
  5. M. Sobel and R. Verhaeghe, “Antithrombotic therapy for peripheral artery occlusive disease: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (8th edition),” Chest, vol. 133, no. 6, pp. 815S–843S, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. C. Kearon, S. R. Kahn, G. Agnelli, S. Goldhaber, G. E. Raskob, and A. J. Comerota, “Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic disease: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (8th edition),” Chest, vol. 133, no. 6, pp. 454S–545S, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. L. Norgren, W. R. Hiatt, J. A. Dormandy, M. R. Nehler, K. A. Harris, and F. G. R. Fowkes, “Inter-Society consensus for the management of peripheral arterial disease (TASC II),” European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, vol. 33, pp. S32–S53, 2007.
  8. D. A. Lane, “Heparin binding and neutralizing protein,” in Heparin: Chemical and Biological Properties, Clinical Applications, D. A. Lane and U. Lindahl, Eds., pp. 363–391, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 1989.
  9. R. D. Rosenberg and L. Lam, “Correlation between structure and function of heparin,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 1218–1222, 1979. View at Scopus
  10. J. Hirsh, T. E. Warkentin, S. G. Shaugnessy, et al., “Heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin: mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics, dosing considerations, monitoring, efficacy and safety,” Chest, vol. 119, supplement, pp. 64S–94S, 2001.
  11. M. Stern, K. Ulrich, D. M. Geddes, and E. W. F. W. Alton, “Poly (D, L-lactide-co-glycolide)/DNA microspheres to facilitate prolonged transgene expression in airway epithelium in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo,” Gene Therapy, vol. 10, no. 16, pp. 1282–1288, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S. W. Kang, H. W. Lim, S. W. Seo, O. Jeon, M. Lee, and B. S. Kim, “Nanosphere-mediated delivery of vascular endothelial growth factor gene for therapeutic angiogenesis in mouse ischemic limbs,” Biomaterials, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 1109–1117, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. O. Jeon, S. W. Kang, H. W. Lim, J. Hyung Chung, and B. S. Kim, “Long-term and zero-order release of basic fibroblast growth factor from heparin-conjugated poly(L-lactide-co-glycolide) nanospheres and fibrin gel,” Biomaterials, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 1598–1607, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. Yang, C. Song, Y. Li, et al., “Polymeric Particles with therapeutic gene for gene therapy: preparation and in vivo gene transfer study,” BioMedical Engineering, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 438–442, 2005.
  15. Y. Lemmouchi, E. Schacht, P. Kageruka et al., “Biodegradable polyesters for controlled release of trypanocidal drugs: in vitro and in vivo studies,” Biomaterials, vol. 19, no. 20, pp. 1827–1837, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. R. A. Jain, “The manufacturing techniques of various drug loaded biodegradable poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) devices,” Biomaterials, vol. 21, no. 23, pp. 2475–2490, 2000. View at Scopus
  17. X. Liu, J. Yang, C. Zhou, et al., “Constructing hybrid films of conjugated oligomers and gold nanoparticles for efficient photoeletronic properties,” Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 1984–1989, 2011.
  18. A. Lamprecht, N. Ubrich, M. Hombreiro Pérez, C. M. Lehr, M. Hoffman, and P. Maincent, “Biodegradable monodispersed nanoparticles prepared by pressure homogenization-emulsification,” International Journal of Pharmaceutics, vol. 184, no. 1, pp. 97–105, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. T. Couffinhal, M. Silver, L. P. Zheng, M. Kearney, B. Witzenbichler, and J. M. Isner, “Mouse model of angiogenesis,” American Journal of Pathology, vol. 152, no. 6, pp. 1667–1679, 1998. View at Scopus
  20. D. R. Kalaria, G. Sharma, V. Beniwal, and M. N. V. Ravi Kumar, “Design of biodegradable nanoparticles for oral delivery of doxorubicin: in vivo pharmacokinetics and toxicity studies in rats,” Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 492–501, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. J. Sameni, N. I. Bukhari, N. A. Azlan, T. Julianto, and A. B. A. Majeed, “The effect of preparation parameters on the size and morphology of PLGA-based nanoparticles,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ISIEA '09), pp. 700–704, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, October 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. J. Lv, Y. Zhao, G. Li et al., “Aggregation-enhanced emission in gold nanoparticles protected by tetradentate perylene derivative,” Langmuir, vol. 25, no. 19, pp. 11351–11357, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. T. T. Rissanen, I. Vajanto, M. O. Hiltunen et al., “Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (KDR/Fik-1) in ischemic skeletal muscle and its regeneration,” American Journal of Pathology, vol. 160, no. 4, pp. 1393–1403, 2002. View at Scopus
  24. R. Zarnegar and G. K. Michalopoulos, “The many faces of hepatocyte growth factor: from hepatopoiesis to hematopoiesis,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 129, no. 5, pp. 1177–1180, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. R. Madonna, C. Cevik, M. Nasser, et al., “Hepatocyte growth factor: molecular biomarker and player in cardioprotection and cardiovascular regeneration,” Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 107, no. 4, pp. 656–661, 2012.
  26. R. Morishita, H. Makino, M. Aoki et al., “Phase I/IIa clinical trial of therapeutic angiogenesis using hepatocyte growth factor gene transfer to treat critical limb ischemia,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 713–720, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus