About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Journal of Nanomaterials
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 526580, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/526580
Research Article

Properties of Surfactin C-15 Nanopeptide and Its Cytotoxic Effect on Human Cervix Cancer (HeLa) Cell Line

Deptartement of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil 11367-56199, Iran

Received 16 February 2012; Revised 24 October 2012; Accepted 9 November 2012

Academic Editor: Xiaoming Li

Copyright © 2012 Zahra Nozhat et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Surfactin is one of the most powerful biosurfactants that has been known so far. It is an acidic cyclic nonribosomal lipoheptapeptide that is produced by Bacillus subtilis. In this presentation we investigated different properties of surfactin C-15. The nanomicelle forming ability of surfactin C-15 in different aqueous environments with various ionic strengths was studied by scanning electron microscope. Surfactin second structure was investigated by Far-UV CD spectrum. Its hemolytic activity and cytotoxicity were measured by hemolysis and MTT assays, respectively. Surfactin formed spherical nanomicelles in distilled water and amorphous nanomicelles in PBS buffer . The hemolysis assay results indicated that HC50 of surfactin was 47 μM. Surfactin C-15 arrested growth of human cervix cancer HeLa cell line in a time- and dosage-dependent method, so that its IC50 at 16, 24, and 48h were 86.9, 73.1, and 50.2 μM, respectively.

1. Introduction

Surfactin-like lipopeptides produced by the genus Bacillus are one of the most important classes of these natural compounds. They have low critical micelle concentration (CMC), stable emulsification properties, and excellent foamability [1]. Surfactin is an efficient biosurfactant produced by some Bacillus subtilis strains. It is a cyclic lipoheptapeptide containing seven amino acids and a β-hydroxyl fatty acid. In aqueous solution the peptide ring of surfactin shows a “horse-saddle” topology because of the two negatively charged amino acid residues l-Glu and l-Asp [2]. Due to its amphiphilic structure it shows unique surface-, interface-, and membrane-active properties [3]. It also has hemolytic, anticoagulant, antimicrobial and antitumoral activities [1, 46] inhibition of cAMP phosphodiesterase [7], and anti-HIV properties [7, 8]. These activities are related with their interactions with biomacromolecules such as enzymes and lipopolysaccharide. The surfactant properties and biological activities of surfactin analogues appear very interesting in the perspective of their utilization both in cosmetic and in pharmaceutical fields. Surfactins are a large variety of isoforms which differ by variation of the length and branching of their fatty acid components as well as by amino acid replacements in their peptide ring [1]. How this molecule can be effective in various biological events is still largely unknown; however, it is speculated that the structural and lipophilic properties of surfactin may affect the stability of biological membranes [9]. With attention to the increasing application of diverse biocompatible nanoparticles in medicine and considering that active fields of research are currently also dedicated to investigate the applications of biosurfactants in pharmaceutical and biomedical sciences and knowing that the surfactin is one of the most powerful biosurfactants [1015], in this presentation, after investigation of different properties of surfactin C-15 such as its nanomicellization ability, secondary structure, and hemolytic activity, we studied its cytotoxic effect on HeLa cell line.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Surfactin and 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl Tetrazolium Bromide (MTT) were obtained from Sigma. RPMI-1640, fetal bovine serum (FBS), and Trypsin-EDTA 5x were purchased from Gibco, and HeLa cell line was obtained from Pastor Institute of Iran.

2.2. Surfactin Second Structure Study

The Far-UV CD spectrum of surfactin was recorded in PBS (pH = 7.4). It was measured by AVIV 215 spectropolarimeter in different concentration (20, 40, 60, 240, 500, and 766 μM) at 25°C. The wavelength ranged between 195 and 260 nm.

2.3. Physical Characterization of Surfactin Nanomicelles

For the preparation of nanomicelles by surfactin, 1 mg surfactin was sonicated in 1 mL distilled water (pH = 7.4) and 1 mL PBS (phosphate buffer saline, pH = 7.4) for 15 min at 30°C. The size and shape of nanomicelles were studied by scanning electron microscope (SEM, LEO1430VP).

2.4. Red Blood Cell Preparation

Human red blood cells (RBCs) were separated by centrifugation at 2000 ×g. RBCs were then washed once in PBS-EDTA and three times in an isotonic buffer (10 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl adjusted to pH 8.5 with HCl). RBCs were then suspended in this buffer at a cell density of 5 × 108 cells/mL [16].

2.5. Hemolysis Assay

850 μL of isotonic buffer was added to 50 μL of a PBS solution containing the copolymer. 100 μL of RBC suspension was added, and the reaction was performed at 25°C during 30 min. Unaltered RBCs were then removed by a 10000 ×g centrifugation, and the absorbance of the supernatant at 540 nm was compared with two control samples in order to determine the percentage of hemolysis. The first one (100%) was totally hemolysed with distilled water [16], and the second one (0%) contained 900 μL PBS plus 100 μL of RBC suspension. Each test has been carried out at least twice.

2.6. Cell Culture

Human cervix cancer HeLa cell line was cultured in RPMI-1640 medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 U/mL streptomycin, and 1% glutamine in a humidified cell incubator with an atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37°C [17].

2.7. MTT Assay

Cell viability was estimated by MTT assay. Briefly, 3 × 106 cells/well was plated in 24-well culture plates. After overnight incubation, the cells were treated with different concentrations of surfactin (0, 20, 40, 60, and 80 μM) for 16, 24, and 48 hours. The cells were treated with 50 μL of 5 mg/mL MTT and the resulting formazan crystals were dissolved in DMSO (500 μL). The optical density (OD) of each well was measured at 570 nm. Each test was performed in triplicate experiments. The effect of surfactin and surfactin-loaded nanoparticles on cell viability was assessed as percentage cell viability compared to vehicle-treated control cells, which were arbitrarily assigned 100% viability [18, 19].

2.8. Statistical Analysis

All of the experiments were done in triplicates, and the averages of the data were compared with independent t-test. A value of <0.05 was considered as a statistical significance.

3. Results

3.1. Surfactin Second Structure Study

Surfactin C-15 in PBS showed a CD spectrum dominated by a broad negative band centered at 225 nm and a maximum peak at 195 nm (Figure 1). Surfactin second structure percents were measured (Table 1).

tab1
Table 1: Surfactin second structure percents.
526580.fig.001
Figure 1: CD spectrum of surfactin in PBS.
3.2. Physical Characterization of Surfactin Nanomicelles

Micellization ability of surfactin C-15 was studied by scanning electron microscope. The results exhibited that the nanomicelles in distilled water were spherical in shape and their size was about 100–200 nm (Figure 2(a)), while the nanomicelles shape in PBS was amorphous and their size was 100–400 nm (Figure 2(b)).

fig2
Figure 2: Scanning electron microscope scan of surfactin nanomicelles in distilled water (a) and PBS (pH = 7.4) (b).
3.3. Hemolysis Assay

Surfactin C-15 was tested in different concentration for its hemolytic activity. The results were exhibited in Figure 3. It gives rise to a concentration-dependent hemolysis [10]. HC50 which is defined as the concentration of surfactin that bursts 50% of RBC [10] was 47 μM.

526580.fig.003
Figure 3: Surfactin hemolysis assay. (A) HC50 of surfactin C-15 was estimated 47 μM; (B) the macroscopic figure of surfactin C-15 hemolysis assay in (a) negative control, (b) 20 μM, (c) 40 μM, (d) 60 μM, (e) 80 μM, and (f) positive control.
3.4. MTT Assay

To study the cytotoxic effects of surfactin C-15, HeLa cell line was treated with different concentration of surfactin C-15 for 16, 24, and 48 h, and then cell viability was determined by MTT assay. Surfactin C-15 arrested HeLa cell line growth in a dose- and time-dependent method (Figure 4), with IC50 at 16, 24, and 48 h of 86.9, 73.1, and 50.2 μM, respectively.

fig4
Figure 4: Cell viability assay for surfactin C-15 on HeLa cell line. The cell line was treated by different concentration of surfactin for (a) 16 h, (b) 24 h, and (c) 48 h with IC50 of 86.9, 73.1, and 50.2 μM, respectively.

4. Discussion and Conclusion

In this study, scanning electron microscope determined that surfactin C-15 exhibits different manners in different ionic aqueous solutions. Surfactin nanomicelles in PBS show the presence of large and amorphous aggregates. This is a similar result to that observed by Zou et al. [20]. The nanomicelles in distilled water are spherical in shape and smaller in size compared with the nanomicelles in PBA, and this caused different ionic strengths in distilled water and PBS. The study carried out by Li et al. showed that when the acyl chain length of the surfactin decreases, the hemolytic activity under hypotonic conditions decreases [10], and in this study the HC50 of surfactin C-14 was recorded 300 μM. According to our study, HC50 of surfactin C-15 is 47 μM that is consistent with Li et al. studies. Surfactins have been considered to be potential antitumoral agents. Recently, it is reported that the cytotoxic effects of surfactins on tumor cells are by inducing the apoptosis, which is related with the enzyme activities. In addition, several biological activities of some lipopeptides are also related with their effects on the enzyme activities. For instance, the selective inhibitory effect of surfactin on cytosolic phospholipase A2 contributes to its anti-inflammatory activities. Another study indicates that the inhibitory effect of surfactin on the alkaline phosphatase had been attributed to a chelating action of the free carboxyl groups of the Asp and Glu residues in the peptide moiety of surfactin [1]. Although the obtained results show the cytotoxic effect of surfactin C-15 on HeLa cell line in a dose- and time-dependent method, more studies are necessary to confirm its anticancer effects. Also more studies are needed to determine and clarify the mechanism of surfactin action and anti-proliferative effects on cancerous cell lines targeted delivery.

References

  1. X. Y. Liu, S. Z. Yang, and B. Z. Mu, “Production and characterization of a C15-surfactin-O-methyl ester by a lipopeptide producing strain Bacillus subtilis HSO121,” Process Biochemistry, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 1144–1151, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. J. Liu, A. Zou, and B. Mu, “Surfactin effect on the physicochemical property of PC liposome,” Colloids and Surfaces A, vol. 361, no. 1–3, pp. 90–95, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. H. Kell, J. F. Holzwarth, C. Boettcher, R. K. Heenan, and J. Vater, “Physicochemical studies of the interaction of the lipoheptapeptide surfactin with lipid bilayers of l-α-dimyristoyl phosphatidylcholine,” Biophysical Chemistry, vol. 128, no. 2-3, pp. 114–124, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. L. Rodrigues, I. M. Banat, J. Teixeira, and R. Oliveira, “Biosurfactants: potential applications in medicine,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 609–618, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. P. Singh and S. S. Cameotra, “Potential applications of microbial surfactants in biomedical sciences,” Trends in Biotechnology, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 142–146, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. S. S. Cameotra and R. S. Makkar, “Recent applications of biosurfactants as biological and immunological molecules,” Current Opinion in Microbiology, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 262–266, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. Bortolato, F. Besson, and B. Roux, “Inhibition of alkaline phosphatase by surfactin, a natural chelating lipopeptide from Bacillus subtilis,” Biotechnology Letters, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 433–435, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. R. Maget-Dana and M. Ptak, “Interactions of surfactin with membrane models,” Biophysical Journal, vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 1937–1943, 1995. View at Scopus
  9. S. Y. Kim, J. Y. Kim, S. H. Kim et al., “Surfactin from Bacillus subtilis displays anti-proliferative effect via apoptosis induction, cell cycle arrest and survival signaling suppression,” FEBS Letters, vol. 581, no. 5, pp. 865–871, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. X. Li, L. Wang, Y. Fan, Q. Feng, and F. Cui, “Biocompatibility and toxicity of nanoparticles and nanotubes,” Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 2012, Article ID 548389, 19 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. J. D. Desai and I. M. Banat, “Microbial production of surfactants and their commercial potential,” Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, vol. 61, pp. 47–64, 1997.
  12. X. Li, C. A. van Blitterswijk, Q. Feng, F. Cui, and F. Watari, “The effect of calcium phosphate microstructure on bone-related cells in vitro,” Biomaterials, vol. 29, no. 23, pp. 3306–3316, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. X. Li, H. Liu, X. Niu et al., “The use of carbo n nanotubes to induce osteogenic differentiation of human adipose-derived MSCs in vitro and ectopic bone formation in vivo,” Biomaterials 33, pp. 4818–4827, 2012.
  14. S. K. Smart, A. I. Cassady, G. Q. Lu, and D. J. Martin, “The biocompatibility of carbon nanotubes,” Carbon, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 1034–1047, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. H. Abbasi, K. A. Noghabi, M. M. Hamedi et al., “Physicochemical characterization of a monorhamnolipid secreted by Pseudomonas aeruginosa MA01 in aqueous media. An experimental and molecular dynamics study,” Colloids and Surfaces B, vol. 101, pp. 256–265, 2013.
  16. S. Dufour, M. Deleu, K. Nott, B. Wathelet, P. Thonart, and M. Paquot, “Hemolytic activity of new linear surfactin analogs in relation to their physico-chemical properties,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1726, no. 1, pp. 87–95, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. X. Cao, A. H. Wang, R. Z. Jiao et al., “Surfactin induces apoptosis and G2/M arrest in human breast cancer MCF-7 cells through cell cycle factor regulation,” Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 163–171, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. C. D. Helganson and C. L. Miller, Basic Cell Culture Protocols, vol. 290, Human Press, 2003.
  19. A. Doyle and J. B. Griffiths, Cell and Tissue Culture. Laboratory Procedures in Biotechnology, John Wiley & Sons, 1998.
  20. A. Zou, J. Liu, V. M. Garamus, Y. Yang, R. Willumeit, and B. Mu, “Micellization activity of the natural lipopeptide [Glui, Asp5] surfactin-C15 in aqueous solution,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 114, no. 8, pp. 2712–2718, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus