About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Journal of Nanomaterials
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 637637, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/637637
Research Article

The Properties of Sprayed Nanostructured P-Type CuI Films for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells Application

NANO-ElecTronic Centre (NET), Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), 40450 Shah Alam, Malaysia

Received 19 May 2012; Accepted 2 July 2012

Academic Editor: Yao Liu

Copyright © 2012 M. N. Amalina et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

In our experiments, we provide a new approach for depositing CuI (inorganic compound) thin films using the mister atomizer technique. The CuI solution was sprayed into fine droplets using argon as a carrier gas at different solution concentrations. The solution sprayed was 50 ml for all samples with substrate temperature constant at 50°C during the deposition process. The result shows that the CuI thin film properties strongly depend on its precursor concentration. The structural properties were characterized by XRD with strong (111) orientation shows for all the CuI thin films. FESEM images revealed that all the CuI thin films deposited were uniform with the existence of nanostructured CuI particle. The EDX measurement confirms the existence of Cu:I in the films. The nanostructured CuI will improve the penetration of p-type between the mesoporous matrix of TiO2 thin film. Promising conductivity value of about 10° S cm−1 was obtained for CuI thin films deposited by this new deposition method. Low transmittance of below 50% was observed for all CuI thin films. The band gap energy obtained here was between 2.82 eV and 2.92 eV which is much smaller than the reported band gap which is 3.1 eV.

1. Introduction

In the 21st century, sustainable energy is among the hot topic discussed globally. With the increase in oil prices worldwide due to rapid depletion of resources, renewable energy sources are seen to provide promising alternatives which is no more reliance on oil, coal, and natural gas. Those renewable sources technologies include wind turbines, hydropower, wave and tidal power, solar cells, solar thermal, biomass-derived liquid fuels, and biomass-fired electricity generation. However, among of all these renewable energy, photovoltaic technology utilizing solar energy is the most promising one since the energy source is readily available. The most popular and commercially available type of solar cell is silicon-based solar cell. However, there are problems regarding its stability, scaling-up and cost. Dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) are one of other many types of solar cells to replace silicon-based type. In 1991, O’Regan and Gratzel had successfully fabricated the dye-sensitized solar cell with efficiency of 11% based on nanocrystalline TiO2, I/I3− redox electrolyte and dye [1]. However, the use of liquid electrolyte leads to a several problems such as solvent evaporation, degradation, and seal imperfection [2]. Hence, quasi solid or solid state DSSC is introduced to replace the liquid electrolyte [3, 4]. There are several inorganic based on copper compound materials such as CuBr [2], CuSCN [5], CuI [6] that are employed as a hole transport material (HTM) for regeneration of dye where electron is donated by the hole conductor.

CuI is water insoluble solid with three crystalline phases which are α, β, γ. The α-phase is cubic structure with high temperature of 392°C, hexagonal β-phase is an ionic conductor with temperature between 392°C and 350°C, and γ-phase is a cubic structure with a low temperature below 350°C which behaves as a p-type semiconductor with a band gap of 3.1 eV. There are several important aspects that need to be considered for a p-type semiconductor in DSSC. Firstly it must be able to transfer holes from the sensitizing dye after the dye has injected electrons into the TiO2. Next, it must be able to be deposited within the nanocrystalline layer and the method used for the deposition will not dissolve and degrading the monolayer of dye on the TiO2 nanocrystallites. Lastly, it must be transparent in the visible spectrum or it must be as efficient in electron injection as the dye during light absorptions [7, 8]. Tennakone et al. fabricated the first DSSC using CuI as a hole conductor shows an efficiency of 2.4% [9].

In this research the mister atomizer technique was used for CuI thin film deposition. The mister atomizer is essentially the same film processing technique as so-called spray pyrolysis technique. The most commonly used precursors for spraying technique for an inorganic compound are nitrate, carbonate, sulfate, and chloride [10]. The morphological properties of CuI play an important role in improving the solid state dye-sensitized solar cells (SSDSSCs) performance since it determines the interfacial connection between the dyed TiO2 and CuI so that dye regeneration can occurs [11]. The opt-electrical properties of CuI affect the photoelectron conversion efficiency which depends on its conductivity and absorption ability of the material to circumvent the insufficient light absorption due to the limited inner surface area of the TiO2 and interfacial recombination due to the lack of substantial interfacial electric field. In this research, the CuI films properties were investigated and its suitability to be used as a hole conductor for SSDSSC was discussed.

2. Methods

The 2.5 cm × 2.5 cm glass substrates were cleaned using acetone, methanol, and deionized water in the ultrasonic cleaner stage by stage at 10 minutes each. The deposition of CuI films onto the substrates were taken at room temperature by atomization technique. The CuI solution was prepared by mixing precursor CuI powder (ALDRICH, 98%) with acetonitrile as a solvent. All chemicals were used without any further purification. The CuI solutions were stirred for 3 hours at room temperature. The glass substrates were preheated at 50°C for 10 min before the deposition process. The parameter investigated in this present research work is the molar concentration which varies form 0.05 M to 0.5 M. The solution was then sprayed in fine droplets using argon as a carrier gas. The solution sprayed was 50 mL for all samples. The deposition takes for 15 minutes at a constant flow rate of 50 mL/15 min for all samples. After the spraying of CuI solutions, the films were dried at 50°C for 10 min to evaporate the solvent. The characterizations were done for structural, electrical, and optical properties. The structural properties of the thin films were investigated using X-ray diffractometer (XRD, PAN Analytical). The surface morphology of the films was observed with a field emission scanning electron microscope (JEOL JSM-J600F). The elemental analysis of the films was carried by energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer attached to FESEM (JEOL JSM-J600F). The thin films have been characterized by 2 point probe current-voltage (I-V) measurement by solar simulator (CEP 2000). Au was used as metal contacts for I-V measurement and deposited using sputter coater (EMITECH K550X). The optical measurements of the films were characterized by JASCO UV-VIS-NIR spectrophotometer. The wavelength for the optical measurement was measured at wavelengths between 400 nm–800 nm. The thickness of the thin film is characterized using surface profiler (VEECO DEKTAK 150). All of the measurements were done in room ambient.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Structural Properties

The XRD patterns were recorded for CuI thin film deposited onto glass substrates which varies from 0.05 M to 0.5 M and was shown in Figure 1. The diffraction peaks can be assigned to polycrystalline γ-phase CuI with zinc blend face centered cubic phase (JCPDS card no. 06-0246). There are several peaks observed in the series of Bragg reflections in XRD pattern which are (111), (222), (220), (311), (222), (331), (422). Therefore, it is confirmed that the CuI thin film is a hole transport semiconductor since it is a γ-phase rather than the α-phase or β-phase which are an ionic conductors. From the figure, the (111) diffraction peak is much more intense than other any other peak. The high intensity of (111) orientation suggests that the (111) facets planes tend to be preferentially oriented parallel to the surface of the supporting substrate [12]. Sharper peaks were obtained for film at higher concentration compared to 0.05 M which has very low intensity since it has the lowest thickness. Furthermore, the weak peak of 0.05 M was due to the small crystallite size with full crystallization or evaporation of the acetonitrile during the deposition and not because of amorphous nature which originated from the incomplete pyrolysis of the precursor [13]. The instability of intensity at different molar concentration may be due to the thickness and defect of the thin film itself. However, the peak observed here is good enough to determine its suitability to be used as a hole conductor in DSSC [14]. Other than that, good crystallization of CuI film is observed even there is no annealing treatment is done on all of the samples. Therefore, it is confirmed that the CuI thin film deposited by mister atomizer is a hole transport semiconductor since it is a γ-phase rather than the α-phase or β-phase which are ionic conductors.

637637.fig.001
Figure 1: XRD spectra of CuI thin films at different molar concentration.

Table 1 shows the thin film thickness, crystallite size, and grain size. The thickness was estimated using surface profiler measurement. The crystallite sizes were determined from the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the XRD spectra while the grain sizes were obtained from the FESEM images. The crystallite sizes were calculated using Scherrer’s formula, and the crystallite size CuI increased with the increase of molar concentration. At higher concentration (0.5 M) the crystallite size is sharply decreased. The evaporation of individual fine droplets during the spray process attributed to the formation of smaller crystallite size [15]. For low concentration (0.05 M) the mobility of ions is insufficient for growing, while at higher concentration (0.5 M) the mobility of ions is higher and leads to crystal agglomerate destruction. Therefore, complete grain growth does not occur, which reduces the formation of crystallite size [16]. Besides that, the crystallites in CuI films normally will grow with time: however, for solid state DSSC application, the usage of CuI films in devices depends on stability against the crystallite growth. The thickness of the CuI thin film increased as the concentration increased. The thickness of the thin film affects the crystallinity, electrical, and optical properties of the thin film. The reported thickness for CuI for fabrication of solid state DSSC is around 3 𝜇m above the TiO2 layer [17].

tab1
Table 1: Thickness, crystallite size, and grain size of CuI at different molar concentration.

The surface morphology images of CuI thin films obtained by FESEM are shown in Figure 2 From the figures, it could be understood that the surface morphology of CuI films depends on the solution concentration. The CuI thin films at 0.5 M concentration show much more rougher surface with presence of many bigger grain sizes compared to other solution concentration. However, the grain sizes for all thin films are not uniform and it varies from 30 nm to 80 nm. The concentration supposedly affects the grain size where higher grain size with lower grain boundaries should be achieved as the solution concentration increased. However, the variation of grain size in this research could be happened due to the agglomeration of smaller particles. The CuI particle (spherical) like structure was obtained as expected and this is in the good agreement by Yan et al. which also used spraying method for CuI deposition [18]. Therefore, the grain sizes observed by FESEM were the aggregations of smaller primary particles which are the crystallites which were too small to be observed in FESEM. The nanostructured CuI is favorable for electronic devices, for instance CuI can be used as hole conductor for solid state dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs). In solid state DSSC, the porous TiO2 (n-type semiconductor) was used to increase high surface area for more electron movement. However, the problem of hole transport material to fill the porous structure TiO2 is the bigger challenge [19]. Several crystal growth inhibitors such as 1-methyl-3ethyl-imidazolium thiocyanate (MEIT), triethylamine hydrothiocyanate (THT), and tetramethyl-ethylene-diamine (TMED) is normally used in solid state DSSC application to control the crystal size by means to get nanosize of CuI [2022]. The nanoparticle CuI obtained by using mister atomizer can be new way of depositing CuI onto the porous TiO2 for better interconnection to avoid recombination and hence gives better efficiency. The elemental analysis of Cu:I is investigated by EDX analysis as shown in Figure 2(e). The EDX measurement confirms the existence of Cu:I in the films. The weak peak of Si and O shown in the EDX spectra is corresponded to the glass substrate material.

fig2
Figure 2: FESEM images of CuI films at (a) 0.05 M, (b) 0.075 M, (c) 0.1 M, (d) 0.25 M, (e) 0.5 M solution concentration, and (f) EDX pattern of the CuI films.
3.2. Electrical Properties

The electrical properties of CuI films were by using 2-point probe I-V measurement. The voltage applied is in the range of −5 V and 5 V and measured in dark and under illumination condition. The white bias light with intensity of 1000 W m−2 with illuminated area of 0.05 cm2 is used to observe the photoconductivity of CuI thin films and the data were recorded with solar simulator (CEP 2000). The metal contact used for the measurement is aurum (gold). From the I-V curves and reported thickness, the resistivity, ρ, and conductivity, σ, of CuI thin film were calculated using following equation (1): 𝑉𝜌=𝐼𝑤𝑡𝑙=1𝜎,(1) where 𝑉 is supplied voltage, 𝐼 is measured current, 𝑡 is the film thickness, 𝑤 is the electrode width, and 𝑙 is the length between electrodes. Figure 3 shows the conductivity of CuI films in dark and under illumination condition deposited at different deposition condition and concentration. The conductivity value obtained in this work was 5.65, 0.69, 0.26, 0.66, 0.63 S cm−1. It could be concluded that the conductivity of the thin films decreased with the increase of molar concentration up to 0.5 M. There seems to exist an inconsistency between the concentration and the conductivity. The reduction of conductivity at higher concentration contradicts from usual cases where conductivity should increased at higher concentration due to the existence more concentrated Cu2+ ions in films which then significantly increased the grain size. This might be due to the incomplete crystallization or pyrolysis of the precursor at higher concentration due to increased amount of solute with constant substrate temperature for all deposition of different concentrations. Huang and Meng had discussed in detail the effect of grain size the resistivity [23]. They said that the increase in grain size will reduce the carrier concentration and hence increase the resistivity. The resistivity obtained by using this technique is about 10−1 to 100 Ω cm which is much lower than resistivity reported using vacuum technology such as pulse laser deposition (PLD). The CuI deposition using PLD done by Sirimanne et al. exhibits a high resistivity of about 103 Ω cm while Zhu and Zhao obtained 10−1 Ω cm [24, 25]. The CuI thin film conductivity being also observed under illumination condition which shows similar trend as in dark with higher conductivity was noted. This behavior indicated photoresponse characteristics for the thin films. Therefore, higher p-type conductivity which means higher hole concentration and the photoresponse characteristics shown by CuI thin films deposited by mister atomizer is suitable to be applied in solid state DSSC application.

637637.fig.003
Figure 3: Conductivity of CuI films at different solution concentration for in dark and under illumination condition.
3.3. Optical Properties

Figure 4 shows the transmittance spectra of CuI thin films at different solution concentration. The wavelength is taken at the range between 300 to 1000 nm. The result shows that all the thin films exhibit very low transparency of less than 50%. Currently, the transmittance of CuI thin films deposited by spraying technique is still under optimization process. The transmittance increases form 0.05 M to 0.1 M and then significantly decreases to 0.5 M. In the case of 0.05 M to 0.1 M, the increment of transmittance can be related to its surface morphology, where from the FESEM images, the surface becomes smoother up to 0.1 M. The decrease of the optical transmittance of CuI films at high molar concentrations (0.25 M to 0.5 M) was due to optical increased of scattered light at the grain boundaries. In addition, it also could be observed that a sharp absorption edge at wavelength of about 410 nm indicates the absorption properties of CuI at visible range.

637637.fig.004
Figure 4: Transmittance of CuI films at different solution concentration.

Figure 5 shows the absorption coefficient (α2) against the photon energy (hv) for CuI films deposited at different solution concentration. The absorption coefficient, α, was calculated by using Lambert’s law as shown in following equation: 1𝛼=𝑡1ln𝑇,(2) where 𝑡 is the thin film thickness and 𝑇 is the transmittance spectra of the thin films. Then, from the absorption coefficient the band gap can be obtained either the films have direct or indirect band gap by plotting of (αhν)2 and (αhν)1/2 versus (hν). In this research, (αhν)2 versus (hν) gives better linearity and therefore all the CuI films films have a direct band transition as shown in Figure 5.

637637.fig.005
Figure 5: Tauc’s plot of CuI films at different solution concentration.

It can be observed that the optical band gap of the films decreased from 2.92 eV to 2.83 eV for concentration 0.05 M to 0.1 M. The decrease in band gap of CuI films may be due to the enhancement in the crystalline quality of the films and increase of grain size. The high band gap at small crystallite size is attributed to the quantum confinement effect. The quantum confinement effect is where the spacing between the energy levels increases as the nanocrystallite size is decreased [26]. The overall band gap deposited by mister atomizer is smaller than the reported band gap of 3.1 eV [27]. The smaller band gap gives better energy utilization for a longer wavelength which is at the blue part of the solar spectrum.

4. Conclusions

The growth of CuI by spraying method is significant to provide fine particle and nanoparticle (below 100 nm) thin films. The structural, electrical, and optical properties of the films at different solution concentration were investigated. The XRD result shows strong (111) orientation of CuI thin film which behaves as γ-phase with p-type semiconductor behavior. The smallest crystallite size was obtained for thin film deposited at 0.05 M solution concentration which is 6.40 nm. From FESEM measurement, the surface morphology and grain sizes were determined. The nanostructured CuI film has been successfully deposited by mister atomizer technique with particle size approximately between 30 nm to 80 nm. The variation of CuI particle size was due to the agglomeration of smaller particles. The conductivity of CuI films is greatly improved in dark and under illumination condition of about 100 S cm−1 which is higher than those deposited by high-vacuum deposition method. The CuI thin films show good photoresponse characteristics which are suitable to be used in solar cell application. The band gap observed is lower than the reported band gap of 3.1 eV which is around 2.9 eV. The smaller band gap gives better utilization for bigger solar cell spectrum. Therefore, this technique is very reliable in producing nanostructured and uniform films with low-cost deposition method for fabrication of hole transport material for solid state dye sensitized solar cells application.

Acknowledgments

Many thanks to Universiti Tekonologi Mara (UiTM), Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE), and Research Management Institute (Excellence Fund (600-RMI/ST/DANA 5/3/Dst (397/2011))), UiTM for the financial support.

References

  1. B. O'Regan and M. Gratzel, “Low cost and highly efficient solar cells based on the sensitization of colloidal titanium dioxide,” Nature, vol. 353, pp. 737–740.
  2. B. Li, L. Wang, B. Kang, P. Wang, and Y. Qiu, “Review of recent progress in solid-state dye-sensitized solar cells,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 90, no. 5, pp. 549–573, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. A. R. S. Priya, A. Subramania, Y. S. Jung, and K. J. Kim, “High-performance Quasi-solid-state dye-sensitized solar cell based on an electrospun PVdF-HFP membrane electrolyte,” Langmuir, vol. 24, no. 17, pp. 9816–9819, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. C. Olson, D. Veldman, K. Bakker, and F. Lenzmann, “Characterization of the pore filling of solid state dye sensitized solar cells with photoinduced absorption spectroscopy,” International Journal of Photoenergy, vol. 2011, Article ID 513089, 11 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. Y. Zhenzhen, C. P. Katherine, L. Di-Jia, R. Yang, and X. Tao, “Solid dye-sensitized solar cells prepared through a counter strategy for filling of solid hole transporter,” Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, vol. 3, Article ID 063101, 2011.
  6. V. P. S. Perera and K. Tennakone, “Recombination processes in dye-sensitized solid-state solar cells with CuI as the hole collector,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 249–255, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. K. Tennakone, G. R. R. A. Kumara, A. R. Kumarasinghe, K. G. U. Wijayantha, and P. M. Sirimanne, “Dye-sensitized nano-porous solid-state photovoltaic cell,” Semiconductor Science and Technology, vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 1689–1693, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. G. P. Smestad, S. Spiekermann, J. Kowalik et al., “A technique to compare polythiophene solid-state dye sensitized TiO2 solar cells to liquid junction devices,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 85–105, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. K. Tennakone, V. P. S. Perera, I. R. M. Kottegoda, and G. R. R. A. Kumara, “Dye-sensitized solid state photovoltaic cell based on composite zinc oxide/tin (IV) oxide films,” Journal of Physics D, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 374–379, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. D. S. Jung, S. B. Park, and Y. C. Kang, “Design of particles by spray pyrolysis and recent progress in its application,” Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 1621–1645, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. K. H. Wong, K. Ananthanarayanan, S. R. Gajjela, and P. Balaya, “Solid state dye-sensitized solar cell with TiO2/NiO heterojunction: effect of particle size and layer thickness on photovoltaic performance,” Materials Chemistry and Physics, vol. 125, no. 3, pp. 553–557, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. C. H. B. Ng and W. Y. Fan, “Facile synthesis of single-crystalline y-cul nanotetrahedrons and their induced transformation to tetrahedral CuO nanocages,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 111, no. 26, pp. 9166–9171, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. Y. Matsushima, Y. Nemoto, T. Yamazaki, K. Maeda, and T. Suzuki, “Fabrication of SnO2 particle-layer on the glass substrate using electrospray pyrolysis method and the gas sensitivity for H2,” Sensors and Actuators B, vol. 96, no. 1-2, pp. 133–138, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. Han, J. M. Chen, X. W. Zhou et al., “Efficiency enhancement of solid-state dye sensitized solar cell by in situ deposition of Cul,” Surface and Interface Analysis, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 1393–1396, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. R. Thiyagarajan, M. Mahaboob Beevi, and M. Anusuya, “Nano structural characteristics of Zicronium Sulphide thin films,” Journal of Americal Science, vol. 5, pp. 6–12, 2009.
  16. A. A. Akl, “Effect of solution molarity on the characteristics of vanadium pentoxide thin film,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 252, no. 24, pp. 8745–8750, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. K. Tennakone, G. R. R. A. Kumara, A. R. Kumarasinghe, K. G. U. Wijayantha, and P. M. Sirimanne, “Dye-sensitized nano-porous solid-state photovoltaic cell,” Semiconductor Science and Technology, vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 1689–1693, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. Y.-H. Yan, Y.-C. Liu, L. Fang, Z.-C. Lu, Z.-B. Li, and S.-X. Zhou, “Growth of CuI buffer layer prepared by spraying method,” Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 359–363, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. J. Han, J. M. Chen, X. W. Zhou et al., “Efficiency enhancement of solid-state dye sensitized solar cell by in situ deposition of Cul,” Surface and Interface Analysis, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 1393–1396, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. G. R. A. Kumara, A. Konno, K. Shiratsuchi, J. Tsukahara, and K. Tennakone, “Dye-sensitized solid-state solar cells: use of crystal growth inhibitors for deposition of the hole collector,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 954–955, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. G. R. A. Kumara, S. Kaneko, M. Okuya, and K. Tennakone, “Fabrication of dye-sensitized solar cells using triethylamine hydrothiocyanate as a CuI crystal growth inhibitor,” Langmuir, vol. 18, no. 26, pp. 10493–10495, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. A. R. Zainun, M. H. Mamat, U. M. Noor, and M. Rusop, “Particles size and conductivity study of P-Type copper (I) iodide (CUI) thin film for solid state dye-sensitized solar cells,” in Proceedings of the Conference on Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology (CAMAN '09), November 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. L. Y. Huang and L. Meng, “Effects of film thickness on microstructure and electrical properties of the pyrite films,” Materials Science and Engineering B, vol. 137, no. 1–3, pp. 310–314, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. P. M. Sirimanne, M. Rusop, T. Shirata, T. Soga, and T. Jimbo, “Characterization of transparent conducting CuI thin films prepared by pulsed laser deposition technique,” Chemical Physics Letters, vol. 366, no. 5-6, pp. 485–489, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. B. L. Zhu and X. Z. Zhao, “Transparent conductive CuI thin films prepared by pulsed laser deposition,” Physica Status Solidi (A) Applications and Materials, vol. 208, no. 1, pp. 91–96, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. K. E. Andersen, C. Y. Fong, and W. E. Pickett, “Quantum confinement in CdSe nanocrystallites,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, vol. 299–302, no. 2, pp. 1105–1110, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. W. Sekkal and A. Zaoui, “Monte Carlo study of transport properties in copper halides,” Physica B, vol. 315, no. 1–3, pp. 201–209, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus