- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Advance Access ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Annual Issues ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Articles in Press ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents
Journal of Nanomaterials
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 743236, 7 pages
Surface Modification of LiMn2O4 for Lithium Batteries by Nanostructured LiFePO4 Phosphate
Department of Materials Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, P.O. Box 4838-141, Tehran, Iran
Received 17 May 2012; Revised 31 August 2012; Accepted 31 August 2012
Academic Editor: Christian Brosseau
Copyright © 2012 B. Sadeghi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
LiMn2O4 spinel cathode materials have been successfully synthesized by solid-state reaction. Surface of these particles was modified by nanostructured LiFePO4 via sol gel dip coating method. Synthesized products were characterized by thermally analyzed thermogravimetric and differential thermal analysis (TG/DTA), X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX). The results of electrochemical tests showed that the charge/discharge capacities improved and charge retention of battery enhanced. This improved electrochemical performance is caused by LiFePO4 phosphate layer on surfaces of LiMn2O4 cathode particles.
Since the birth of the lithium ion battery in the early 1990s, its development has been very fast and it has been widely applied as power source for a lot of light and high value electronics due to its significant advantages over traditional rechargeable battery systems [1, 2]. Due to its low cost and low toxicity, the spinel LiMn2O4, the cathode for Li-ion batteries, has been extensively investigated. The spinel LiMn2O4 has a cubic structure with the space group of Fd3m symmetry in which lithium and manganese ions occupy tetrahedral (8a) sites and octahedral (16d) sites, respectively, within a cubic close packed oxygen array with oxygen ions in 32e sites. Many reports revealed that the spinel LiMn2O4 offers a potentially attractive alternative to the presently commercialized LiCoO2. However, a key problem prohibiting LiMn2O4 from commercialization is its severe capacity and cycling performance fading during cycling [3, 4]. Several factors cause capacity fade of Spinel LiMn2O4, as it had been reported by some investigators [5–11].(1) Dissolution of Mn3+. At the end of discharge, the concentration of Mn3+ arrives at its highest level. Meanwhile, after cycling or storage, the surface of LiMn2O4 is rich in Mn3+, contrary to the bulk structure. The Mn3+ at the surface may disproportionate according to the following reaction: then, Mn2+ ions from this reaction dissolve in the electrolyte solutions.(2) Jahn Teller effect. At the end of discharge, the Jahn Teller effect happening at first on the surface of some particles may expand into an overall composition of Li[1+δ]Mn2O4. Thermodynamically speaking, this system is not really at equilibrium. The phase transition from a cubic into a tetragonal symmetry is a first order process. Even though this kind of distortion is small, it is big enough to destroy the structure to form a tetragonal structure, which is low in symmetry and high in disorder.(3) In organic solvents, the highly delithiated particles are not stable at the end of discharge; namely, the high oxidation ability of Mn4+ will lead to a decomposition of the solvents.
Synthesis approaches of the spinel LiMn2O4 are various, including solid reaction [12–14], sol-gel reaction [15, 16], and Pechini process . However, specific capacity of the LiMn2O4 seems to be independent of the synthesis approaches, which typically is around 120 mAh/g between 3.5 and 4.3 V. Compared to sol-gel and Pechini approaches, in which additional starting materials and synthetic procedures are generally needed for preparation and separation of the targeted Li-Mn precursors, solid reaction is simpler and easier in being handled. Therefore, in this work we selected solid reaction to synthesize spinel LiMn2O4.
Recent research demonstrated that the importance of surface structural features of electrode materials for their electrochemical performance so, an effective strategy, coating the spinel LiMn2O4 with organic and inorganic compounds, has been investigated. Jiang et al.  coated LiMn2O4 spinel with 2 wt. %Li-M-PO4 (M = Co, Ni, Mn) and improved the discharge test by showing the cycling and rate capacities of the spinel LiMn2O4 cathode materials. LiFePO4 due to its potentially low cost, environmental benignness, and the belief that it could have a major impact in electrochemical energy storage, is the subject of many researches. Also, it can be a good candidate for improving electrochemical properties of conventional cathodes like LiMn2O4.
In this study, we coated the LiMn2O4 cathode with nanostructured LiFePO4 layer. The modified LiMn2O4 can be protected from Mn dissolution, as the LiFePO4 nanostructure is formed on the surface of the spinel LiMn2O4 cathode. The cycling and rate capacity of LiMn2O4 cathode materials were significantly enhanced by stabilizing the electrode surface with LiFePO4 nanostructure.
2.1. Synthesis of LiMn2O4
Spinel LiMn2O4 powder was prepared by a solid-state reaction. All starting materials for the synthesis of LiMn2O4 were purchased from Merck Company. To prepare this spinel, first manganese oxide (II) and lithium hydroxide with molar ratio of 7 : 3 were mechanically mixed. To achieve a more homogenous mixture and lowering calcification time, the mixture was prepared using a planetary mill with higher power, ball to power ratio of 10 : 1, and rotation speed of 200 rpm. Milling was stopped after 15 min and the obtained powder was heated in an electrical tube furnace for 5 hours. The hearting rate of the furnace was 10°C min−1. It must be mentioned that the other parameters of the mill was supposed as constant.
2.2. Synthesis of LiFePO4 Particles and Nanostructure Layers
Sol-gel synthesis is a low temperature, wet chemical approach, which is often used for the preparation of metal oxides or especially thin film. Standard sol-gel synthesis involves the formation of a sol, that is, a stable colloidal suspension of solid particles in a solvent and the gelation of the sol to form a gel consisting of interconnected rigid skeleton with pores made of colloidal particles. The properties of the gel are determined by the particle size and cross linking ratio. The gel can then be dried to form xerogel, which shows reduced volume. To obtain the final products, all liquids need to be removed from the surface of pores by a heat treatment carried out at elevated temperatures .
As X-ray diffraction peaks of LiFePO4 thin film layers cannot be detected due to low-weight percentage, first we synthesized phosphate powders by sol gel process to determine optimum synthesis condition. Stoichiometric amounts of lithium phosphate (Li3PO4, Aldrich 33,889-3) and phosphoric acid (H3PO4, Merck, 100563) were dissolved in 200 mL water by stirring for 60 min. Separately, citrate iron (III)(Merck, S3657400 219) was dissolved in 300 mL of water by stirring for 60 min.The two solutions were mixed together and obtained a transparent gel which was dried at 70°C for 30 h at atmosphere of 99.999% argon. After grinding with a mortar and pestle, the obtained materials were calcined for 1 h. Calcination temperature was measured using thermogravimetry and differential thermal analysis (TG/DTA) result of the dried gel. The heating rate was 10°C min−1. Same sol was used for sol gel dip coating of samples. Three layers of phosphate coat were applied with drawl speed of 10 mm/min, remaining time of 2 min and up speed of 2 mm/min. After each coating step, the sample was dried 70°C for 30 h. Final coated samples were calcined at 670°C for 1 h. Reaction conditions used for preparing different sample of LiMn2O4 electrodes and LiFePO4 sol were listed in Table 1.
2.3. Structural and Morphological Characterization of Synthesized LiMn2O4 Powder and LiFePO4 Sol
The thermal decomposition behavior of the gel was examined with a thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA, Perkin Elmer, TAC 7/DX) under N2 flow. Structural analysis of the obtained products was carried out using an XRD instrument (Philips Expert) with radiation source of Cu-Kα. The surface morphology and energy dispersive spectrometry (EDAX) of the coated particles were taken with a SEM (Philips XL30) microscope. The cyclic voltammogram properties of LiFePO4-coated LiMn2O4 sample were teted.
2.4. Electrochemical Measurements
Charge and discharge diagrams and cyclic performance were conducted using the AUTOLAB-302 machine. In order to produce LiMn2O4 cathode with coated LiFePO4, first synthesized LiMn2O4 as well as carbon black and PTFE binder was mixed together with ratio of 85 : 15 : 5 and was placed in a nickel mesh as current collector. Then, using the dip coating method this mesh was placed in the LiFePO4 sol to contaminate the surface of materials in the mesh. At the end, the mesh was heated at optimum calcination temperature for 1 h in Ar atmosphere. For the negative electrode, the graphite as well as carbon black and PTFE binder was mixed together with ratio of 85 : 15 : 5 and was placed in a nickel mesh as current collector. The used electrolyte was a 1 M solution of LiClO4 in EC: DMC (1 : 1 ratio by volume). Charge/discharge and cyclic voltammetry experiments were carried out in a two-electrode glass cell that was built for this purpose. It must be noted that the battery assemble as well as all electrochemical experiments was performed within the glove box at the presence of Ar atmosphere.
3. Results and Discussion
Figure 1 presents DTA and TG diagrams produced for LiFePO4 gel from sole-gel process. The figure exhibits three distinct weight loss zones. At the first step, a weight drop of 6.4% was observed which is due to evaporation of the physically absorbed water and degradation of organic components with the sole. The second loss in within the temperature range of 200 to 500°C, where weight drop is about 33.4% which can be due to release of water during the crystallization as well as pyrolysis of citrate and other organic components. The last weight loss of the given gel will gradually initiate from the temperature of 522°C and continue up to 800°C. The weight drop in this zone is 11% which is due to pyrolysis of remained organic components. All events during the heating of LiFePO4 gel in zones 1 and 2 took place at the temperatures of 132 and 372°C, respectively. These reactions are endothermic, while events occurred in zone 3 are at the temperature of 653°C and are exothermic. So we selected the temperature 670°C as calcination temperature.
Figure 2 shows the progression of the reaction between MnO2 and LiOH mixed in a 7 : 3 ratio from 200°C to 900°C. As can be seen, the peaks of LiMn2O4 without any impurities have seen in 800°C. Also, MnO2 and Mn2O3 impurities can be exist at 200°C and 500°C, respectively. The parameters like insufficient temperature and time, decomposition of unreacted MnO2 can be reasons such impurities, respectively. On the other hand, the XRD patterns at 800°C show clearly the characteristic peaks of the spinel LiMn2O4 structure, for example, the (111), (311), (222), (400), (331), and (511) peaks. When the heating temperature exceeds 800°C, some characteristic peaks of Mn3O4 appear due to excess manganese oxide present in original sample. Given these observations, it could be deduced that with increasing heating temperature, the crystallites of the spinel LiMn2O4 grow and become ordered and at 800°C a well-ordered spinel structure LiMn2O4 is produced.
Figure 3 displays XRD pattern for uncoated LiMn2O4, phosphate components of LiFePO4, and LiMn2O4 coated by phosphate components of LiFePO4. The lattice constants of bare LiMn2O4 and modified LiMn2O4 were calculated from the XRD spectrums which are 0.821 and 0.823 nm, respectively. The modified samples have a larger lattice constant than bare spinel, According to Hu et al. , LiFePO4 may form not only a thin layer on the surface of spinel but a solid solution by interacting with spinel. In addition, the decrease in the lattice parameter of the modified sample may be due to substitute iron ion with manganese. The increase of lattice constant can make the crystal structure more stable, leading to the stable cycling performance of LiFePO4-modified LiMn2O4 during charge/discharge process. Figure 4 shows the surface and cross-section SEM images of LiFePO4 thin film prepared by dip coating sol gel deposited on LiMn2O4 substrate at 670°C under argon atmosphere with the thickness of about 300 nm. As shown in Figure 4, average grain size of LiMn2O4 is about 100 nm. Figures 4(b) and 4(c) show SEM and TEM images of LiFePO4 coating. As can be seen in Figures 4(b) and 4(c), the thickness of film is about 300 nm. It is interesting to note if the oxide coating is too thin, it may fail to protect the cathode material over long electrochemical cycling; if the oxide coating is too thick, the capacities of the cathode material may be reduced because the oxide coating has higher electronic resistance and higher diffusion resistance for lithium ions .
So, based on Figure 4(c) we can conclude that the particle size of LiFePO4 is less than 100 nm, and LiFePO4 film is nanostructure.
Figure 5 shows EDX analysis of the LiFePO4 nanostructure film. Each peak on the spectrum represents a transition with a characteristic energy. Every element has its own “fingerprint” of peaks so we can deduce that it is a represent. The P element can be clearly observed on the surface of modified materials.
The main difference of this study is applying nanostructured LiFePO4 coatings directly on cathode surface instead of surface of cathode particles. Figure 6 shows the initial discharge profile with c-rate performances of the bare LiMn2O4 and modified by LiFePO4 nanostructure in the voltage range of 3.4–4.3 V. Two plateau features of LiMn2O4 can be seen in all curves which is the special characterization of lithium manganese dioxide. Figure 7 shows performance of the bare LiMn2O4 which has been modified by LiFePO4 nanostructure. This cell was tested for 100 cycles at a constant current density of 120 mAh/g (1 C rate: 1 C rate means that the cell has been charged for 1 h upto 4.3 V) and the voltage between 3.0 and 4.3 V. It is clear that surface modification significantly improves the cyclability of LiMn2O4. Both samples show initial discharge capacity of more than 115 and 125 mAh g−1, respectively. It can be accepted that presence of LiFePO4 phosphate layer leads to a better electrical conductivity of the LiMn2O4 particles as well as lowering or hindering the additional reactions of cathode materials with the electrolyte. All in all, this not only improves the cyclic capacity of the battery at the higher rates, but also results in higher discharge rates of cathode materials of LiMn2O4 coated with phosphate layer of LiFePO4.
Figure 8 shows the cyclic voltammogram (CV) of the LiMn2O4 and LiFePO4-coated LiMn2O4 electrodes. The voltammetric traces were recorded at a scan rate of 0.05 mVs−1, and lithium served as both the counter and reference electrodes. The bare LiMn2O4 and LiFePO-coated LiMn2O4 materials exhibited typical voltammograms with different kinetic properties. The CV curves of these samples give two pairs of well-separated reversible oxidation/reduction peaks at around 3.98 and 4.13 V, which are attributed to the splitting of the original Li position in tetrahedral sites (8a). An extra peak at 3.4 V has been observed only for modified one. The presence of the shoulder like appearance at around 3.4 V during the cathodic and anodic sweep corresponded to one of the electrochemical characterizations of LiFePO4 and confirmed the presence of the LiFePO4 layer. . Additionally, the appearance of the dual oxidation and reduction peak corroborated to the coexistence of the LiMn2O4 phase during cathodic and anodic sweep. From these results, the thin LiFePO4 layer was strongly believed to hamper the Mn dissolution during lithiation, improving the electrochemical performance of LiFePO4-coated LiMn2O4.
Effects on surface modification of the spinel LiMn2O4 by a LiFePO4 nanostructure as a cathode for Li-ion batteries have been studied as an approach to investigate the electrochemical performance. The results of electrochemical tests showed better capacity retention due to coating layer on the surface of bare LiMn2O4 material.
- L. J. Fu, H. Liu, C. Li et al., “Surface modifications of electrode materials for lithium ion batteries,” Solid State Sciences, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 113–128, 2006.
- C. W. Lee, H. S. Kim, and S. I. Moon, “Effects on surface modification of spinel LiMn2O4 material for lithium-ion batteries,” Materials Science and Engineering B, vol. 123, no. 3, pp. 234–237, 2005.
- X. Li and Y. Xu, “Enhanced cycling performance of spinel LiMn2O4 coated with ZnMn2O4 shell,” Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry, vol. 12, no. 7-8, pp. 851–855, 2008.
- Y. Xia, N. Kumada, and M. Yoshio, “Enhancing the elevated temperature performance of Li/LiMn2O4 cells by reducing LiMn2O4 surface area,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 135–138, 2000.
- R. J. Gummow, A. de Kock, and M. M. Thackeray, “Improved capacity retention in rechargeable 4 V lithium/lithium-manganese oxide (spinel) cells,” Solid State Ionics, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 59–67, 1994.
- J. M. Tarascon, F. Coowar, G. Amatucci, F. K. Shokoohi, and D. Guy-omard, “Synthesis conditions and oxygen stoichiometry effects on Li insertion into the spinel LiMn2O4,” Journal of The Electrochemical Society, vol. 141, pp. 1421–1427, 1994.
- T. F. Yi, Y. R. Zhu, X. D. Zhu, J. Shu, C. B. Yue, and A. N. Zhou, “A review of recent developments in the surface modification of LiMn2O4 as cathode material of power lithium-ion battery,” Ionics, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 779–784, 2009.
- A. M. Kannan and A. Manthiram, “Surface/chemically modified LiMn2O4 cathodes for lithium-ion batteries,” Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters, vol. 5, no. 7, pp. A167–A169, 2002.
- Y. Ein-Eli, R. C. Urian, W. Wen, and S. Mukerjee, “Low temperature performance of copper/nickel modified LiMn2O4 spinels,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 50, no. 9, pp. 1931–1937, 2005.
- D. Jang, Y. Shin, and S. Oh, “Dissolution of spinel oxides and capacity losses in 4 V Li / LixMn2O4 Cells,” Journal of The Electrochemical Society, vol. 143, pp. 2204–2211, 1996.
- Y. J. Park, J. G. Kim, M. K. Kim, H. G. Kim, H. T. Chung, and Y. Park, “Electrochemical properties of LiMn2O4 thin films: suggestion of factors for excellent rechargeability,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 69–77, 2000.
- M. M. Thackeray, P. J. Johnson, L. A. De Picciotto, P. G. Bruce, and J. B. Goodenough, “Electrochemical extraction of lithium from LiMn2O4,” Materials Research Bulletin, vol. 19, pp. 172–177, 1984.
- J. M. Tarascon and D. Guyomard, “Li metal-free rechargeable batteries based on Li1+xMn2O4 cathodes () and carbon anodes,” Journal of The Electrochemical Society, vol. 138, no. 10, pp. 2864–2868, 1991.
- Y. Gao and J. R. Dahn, “Synthesis and characterization of Li1+xMn2−xO4 for Li-ion battery applications,” Journal of The Electrochemical Society, vol. 143, no. 1, pp. 100–114, 1996.
- M. M. Thackeray, “A comment on the structure of thin-film LiMn2O4 electrodes,” Journal of The Electrochemical Society, vol. 144, no. 5, pp. L100–L102, 1997.
- K. Amine, H. Tukamoto, H. Yasuda, and Y. Fujita, “A new three-volt spinel Li1+xMn1.5Ni0.5O4 for secondary lithium batteries,” Journal of The Electrochemical Society, vol. 143, no. 5, pp. 1607–1613, 1996.
- W. Liu, G. C. Farrington, F. Chaput, and B. Dunn, “Synthesis and electrochemical studies of spinel phase LiMn2O4 cathode materials prepared by the pechini process,” Journal of The Electrochemical Society, vol. 143, no. 3, pp. 879–884, 1996.
- Q. L. Jiang, K. Du, Y. B. Cao, Z. D. Peng, G. R. Hu, and Y. X. Liu, “Synthesis and characterization of phosphate-modified LiMn2O4 cathode materials for Li-ion battery,” Chinese Chemical Letters, vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 1382–1386, 2010.
- O. Toprakci, H. A. K. Toprakci, L. Ji, and X. Zhang, “Fabrication and electrochemical characteristics of LiFePO4 powders for lithium-ion batteries,” Kona Powder and Particle Journal, vol. 28, pp. 50–73, 2010.
- G. R. Hu, X. R. Deng, Z. D. Peng, et al., “Comparison of AlPO4- and Co3(PO4)2-coated LiNi0.8Co0.2O2 cathode materials for Li-ion battery,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 2567–2573, 2008.
- D. Guan, Novel surface modifications and new nanostructured titania synthesis for high-performance lithium-ion batteries and solar cells [Ph. D. thesis], The Department of Mechanical Engineering, Louisiana State University, 2012.
- I. C. Jang, H. H. Lim, S. B. Lee et al., “Preparation of LiCoPO4 and LiFePO4 coated LiCoPO4 materials with improved battery performance,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 497, no. 1-2, pp. 321–324, 2010.