Influence of Annealing on Properties of Spray Deposited ZnO Thin Films

Nadarajah, Kalyani; Yern Chee, Ching; Tan, Chou Yong

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/146382

Journal of Nanomaterials

On this page

Abstract Introduction Experimental Results and Discussion Conclusions References Copyright Related Articles

Special Issue

Nanostructured Surfaces, Coatings, and Films: Fabrication, Characterization, and Application

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2013 | Article ID 146382 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/146382

Influence of Annealing on Properties of Spray Deposited ZnO Thin Films

Kalyani Nadarajah,¹Ching Yern Chee,¹and Chou Yong Tan¹

Academic Editor: Mengnan Qu

Received08 Aug 2013

Revised18 Oct 2013

Accepted21 Oct 2013

Published14 Nov 2013

Abstract

Zinc Oxide (ZnO) thin films were deposited on glass substrates via the spray pyrolysis technique. The films were subsequently annealed in ambient air from 300°C to 500°C. The morphology and structural properties of the thin films were studied by field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), and X-ray diffractometry (XRD) techniques. Electrical resistivity of the thin films was measured using a data acquisition unit. The optical properties of the films were characterized by UV-vis spectroscopy and photoluminescence (PL) technique. X-ray diffraction data showed that the films were grown in the (002) direction with a hexagonal wurtzite structure. The average grain size ranged from 15 to 27 nm. Increasing annealing temperatures resulted in larger grain sizes and higher crystallinity, with the surface roughness of annealed films being more than twice if compared to unannealed film. The electrical resistivity of the films decreased with the increasing annealing temperature. The UV and visible band emissions were observed in the photoluminescence spectra, due to exciton and defect-related emissions, respectively. The transmission values of the films were as high as 90% within the visible range (400–700 nm).

1. Introduction

Currently, ZnO nanomaterials are being applied in electronics, photonics, catalysis, lighting, and chemical sensing. It is well known that ZnO exhibits many favorable properties, such as high chemical stability, wide bandgap of 3.37 eV, high exciton binding energy of 60 meV, and abundance in nature, and is also regarded as nontoxic [1, 2]. High-quality ZnO films are mainly fabricated by using physical and chemical methods. The physical methods include sputtering [3], molecular beam epitaxy [4], and laser ablation [5], while the chemical method includes spray pyrolysis [6], chemical vapor deposition (CVD) [7], sol-gel [8], spin coating [9], dip coating [10], and electrodeposition [11]. Most of the methods mentioned in the literature are not ideally suited for large area coatings. However, the spray pyrolysis method is one of the best methods to produce large area coatings based on the previous studies [3–11]. Additionally, it is simple, has low temperature deposition, is cost-effective, has good adhesion between films and substrate, and demonstrates uniform particle distribution, high purity, and excellent optical properties [12]. Some of the main factors affecting the properties of the film that uses spray pyrolysis technique are chemical solution (chemical composition, concentration), the distance between the substrate and atomizer interaction during film deposition, spray temperatures, substrate homogeneity, annealing conditions, and spray rates [13]. The spray pyrolysis method is efficient in producing thin film, multilayer film, thick film, and porous film on an inexpensive substrate [12]. Several oxides, such as ZnO [14], CdO [15], TiO₂ [16], SnO₂ [17], NiO [18], and Bi₂O₃ [19], have been deposited using a spray pyrolysis method. This technique involves a water/alcohol solution of metal salts sprayed onto a heated substrate, followed by allowing it to decompose into an oxide film. The formation of oxide due to the decomposition reaction is thermodynamically feasible and leaves no residue on other reactants. The substrate temperature strongly affects film morphology. By increasing the temperature, the film’s morphology can be changed from a cracked to a porous structure [20]. The types and concentrations of precursor and additive elements are other vital variables that influence the properties and structure [21]. The unannealed spray deposited film has high resistivity, low roughness, and less transparency due to its low crystallinity and the presence of organic residues [22–24]. The properties of the unannealed film can be enhanced due to the thermal annealing, plasma treatment, and laser treatment [25, 26]. Of these options, the thermal annealing is one of the simplest and effective ways to treat the spray deposited films. The thermal annealing temperatures, time, and various gaseous environments influence films and structural defects in the materials. During the thermal annealing process, dislocations and other structural defects in the material, adsorption, or decomposition are retained on the surface; therefore, the structure and the stoichiometric ratio of the material are altered [27]. Oxygen interstitials, zinc interstitials, oxygen vacancies, zinc vacancies, and excess oxygen are common defects found in deposited ZnO films. Zinc interstitial and oxygen vacancies are the most common defects [28, 29].

Nunes et al. [30, 31] reported the deposition of ZnO thin films using zinc acetate as a precursor. Their work reported the structural, optical, and electrical properties of undoped and doped ZnO thin films under different conditions. Yoon and Cho [32] demonstrated the synthesis of ZnO thin films using a zinc acetate dihydrate as a precursor. Their work reported on the effects of different substrate temperatures and heat treatments on the luminescence properties of ZnO film. Ayouchi et al. [33] also synthesized ZnO thin films using zinc acetate precursor and described the effects of substrate temperature and the physical properties of ZnO thin films. Despite our knowledge of various influences on film structure, the effects of annealing temperature on the ZnO films prepared by spray pyrolysis are unknown. In this study, the effects of annealing on the structural, morphological, electrical, optical, and photoluminescence behavior of ZnO films are investigated.

2. Experimental

2.1. Sample Preparation

The ZnO thin films were deposited on glass and Si substrates using spray pyrolysis techniques. The substrates were ultrasonically cleaned in methanol and acetone for 20 minutes and then immersed into 0.1 M HCl for 12 hours to remove the ionic contamination and metal residues. These substrates were rinsed with deionized water and dried in ambient air prior to the deposition. 0.1 M zinc acetate (Zn (C₂H₃O₂)₂ 99.9% purity Sigma Aldrich) was used as a precursor. A 2 mL acetic acid was added to the ethanol to assist in the complete dissolution of the zinc acetate. A schematic diagram of the spray pyrolysis system is illustrated in Figure 1. The precursor solution was atomized into fine uniform droplets on the heated substrate using the spray gun which is connected with nitrogen gas. The substrate was heated to 250°C during the deposition process. The outlet gas pressure was kept constant at 30 psi. The distance between the substrate and target was kept at 100 mm, and spray rate was 30 sec. After spraying, the deposited films were annealed in ambient air from 300°C to 500°C for 120 minutes. The annealing temperature was conducted until 500°C in this study since further increase of the temperature would cause the bending of the soda-lime glass substrate.

2.2. Characterization of Film

The morphologies of the film and grain size were studied with a Zeiss Ultra-60 field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM). The roughness and surface morphology were evaluated using an Ambios 4500 model atomic force microscope (AFM). Film crystallinity was characterized by Bruker X-ray diffraction (XRD) with CuKα radiation. The electrical resistivity of the film was measured using data acquisition unit. The film thickness was measured using KLA Tencor surface profile. The crystalline quality of the film was studied using Renishaw inVia Raman spectroscope with a He-Cd laser at 325 nm. Optical transmission spectra were characterized using a double beam UV-vis spectrophotometer (Cary 50) in the wavelength range of 300–800 nm.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Surface Morphology Study of Films by FESEM

Figure 2 illustrates the surface morphologies of the films before and after annealing (300°C and 500°C) process. It appears that the grain size and morphology of the films improved with the increasing annealing temperatures. The FESEM micrograph shows that the unannealed films are not compact and have very small crystallites on Si substrate, which occur due to incomplete intermediate products from the spray pyrolysis technique. The well-defined round shapes of the grains are observed in the film at an annealing temperature of 300°C. A 30 nm average grain size of ZnO films is achieved when the annealing temperature reaches 500°C. The grain size increases with the increase in the annealing temperatures, due to reduction of grain boundaries in ZnO thin film [34].

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

3.2. AFM Morphology Study of Films

Figures 3(a) to 3(c) show the AFM images with the corresponding rms value of unannealed and annealed ZnO thin films grown on Si substrates. For the unannealed films (Figure 3(a)), the result exhibits less elongated grains over the surface. Figures 3(b) and 3(c) display fine grains that exhibit greatly improved vertical alignment (nanotips-like morphology) than the unannealed films, which is consistent with the FESEM results. The surface roughness of the ZnO film is determined using AFM software. The rms roughness value can be estimated using the following formula [35]: where is the number of points, is the th point of , and is the average value of the . The unannealed film roughness is 2.1 nm. After being annealed at 300°C, 400°C, and 500°C, the film’s roughness increased to 4.3 nm, 5.4 nm, and 5.6 nm, respectively. The measurements of samples revealed that the average roughness of annealed films increased compared to that of the unannealed film. As a result of this, the annealing temperature enhances elongated grains over the surface of the film, which leads to the slight increase of surface roughness. Tong et al. [36] have reported that an increase of roughness is suitable for the growth of ZnO nanowires on ZnO thin films.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

3.3. Structural Studies of Films

The phase composition of ZnO thin films is determined using XRD at room temperature, with monochromatic CuKα ( nm). The intensity data is collected over a range of 2θ, from 30° to 70°, with a scan rate of 0.03 deg/s. The XRD spectra of the spray pyrolysis deposited unannealed and annealed ZnO films on Si substrate are illustrated in Figure 4. ZnO diffraction peaks are indexed as , , , , , , and for corresponding peak positions of 31.766°, 34.419°, 36.251°, 47.536°, 56.591°, 62.852°, and 67.942°. These diffraction peaks’ position and intensities quantities are well matched with the Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards (JCPDS) card no. 067454. The patterns observed from the XRD measurements show that the films possess the hexagonal wurtzite structure and a space group P6₃mc. The unannealed film shows lower diffraction peak intensities compared to that of the annealed film. The diffraction peaks intensities increase with the increasing annealing temperatures. Thus, the 500°C annealed film shows a strong preferential growth orientation along the plane. The diffraction peaks of the film become more intense when the annealing temperature increases, which in turn leads to increase in the grain size, as well as the enhancement of crystallinity. The full width half maxima (FWHM) values decrease with increasing annealing temperatures. The grain size () can be computed using the following Scherrer’s formula [37]: where is FWHM, is wavelength of X-ray, and is Bragg’s diffraction angle. Furthermore, the average grain sizes are estimated to be around 15, 20, 22, and 27 nm for unannealed and 300°C, 400°C, and 500°C annealed films, respectively. The decrease of FWHM with the increase of annealing temperature can be attributed to the increase of grain sizes. This correlates with the findings reported by previous researchers [24, 38].

3.4. Electrical Resistivity Study of Films

Figure 5 illustrates the electrical resistivity of ZnO thin films as a function of annealing temperatures. The electrical resistivity is greatly influenced by the annealing temperatures. It is observed that the resistivity of the film decreases dramatically up to 400°C and again decreases slowly afterward. This might be due to either an increase in the mobility and/or increase of the carriers. The increase of annealing temperature is attributed to larger grain sizes, thus leading to the increase of mobility change that has been reported in the literature [39]. At room temperature, there are very small numbers of charge carriers that are available in ZnO. The electronically active carriers increase when the temperature increases, thereby leading to an excess carrier in the conduction band. This increase in carriers occurs due to thermal excitation giving rise to the conductivity of the films. Similar results have been reported in the literature [40]. The resistivity of the 500°C annealed film is measured to be 0.81 Ω cm.

3.5. Photoluminescence Studies of Films

The room temperature photoluminescence (PL) spectra of unannealed and annealed ZnO thin films on glass substrate are illustrated in Figure 6. There are three peaks positions that are observed from the spectra. For unannealed films, the PL spectrum consists of three emission bands: a strong UV emission band at ~382 nm (3.25 eV), yellow band at ~603 nm (2.06 eV), and orange-red band at ~672 nm (1.85 eV), respectively. The band emission occurring in the UV range is due to excitonic recombination, while the band emission existing at the visible emission band is due to the recombination of deep-level holes and electrons [41]. All of the deep-level emissions are correlated to the defects arising during the growth of crystallites and are related to the change of crystallinity due to zinc interstitials, zinc vacancies, oxygen interstitials, oxygen vacancies, and dislocations [42]. Previous works [43, 44] reported that the yellow-orange emission originated from oxygen interstitials in ZnO, while the orange-red emission could be related to excess oxygen on the ZnO surface. From the spectra, it is observed that the PL peak intensity increases with the increasing annealing temperature. The increase of the visible emissions of the ZnO film is due to the increase of the oxygen interstitials and excess oxygen concentrations [45] by the increase of annealing temperature. The UV peak position is red shifted from 3.25 eV (for unannealed film) to 3.22 eV (for 500°C annealed film). The red shift can be explained by the quantum confinement theory, which states that the energy bandgap of a semiconductor decreases with increasing grain sizes [46]. However, after annealing, the yellow emission is improved with a blue shift towards a wavelength of 594 nm. Fujihara et al. [47] and Chen et al. [48] have also reported a blue shift in their studies.

The inset of Figure 6 shows the UV portion of the PL emission centered at 385 nm as a function of annealing temperatures. The intensity of UV-PL peak increases with the increasing annealing temperature, as shown in the inset of Figure 6. The increase in the UV portion of the PL emission is due to the removal of microstructural defects and homogenization of the films.

3.6. Transmission Studies of ZnO Thin Films

The optical transmission of ZnO films is carried out using a double beam spectrophotometer in the wavelength range from 300 to 800 nm. Figure 7 shows optical transmission spectra of both unannealed and annealed ZnO thin films. The average transmittance values are directly related to the thickness of films. The inset in Figure 7 illustrates the average thickness variation of the films with the increase of annealing temperatures. The thickness of unannealed film is 282.2 nm. After annealing at 300°C, 400°C, and 500°C, the film thickness decreases to 268.6 nm, 250.6 nm, and 228.4 nm, respectively. The relationship between the optical transmission and thickness is given by the Beer-Lambert equation as follows [49]: where is the transmitted intensity at a particular wavelength, is the incident light intensity, is the absorption coefficient, and is the film thickness. The equation shows that the optical transmission of the ZnO films will decrease inversely proportional to the film thickness. The optical transmission is inversely proportional to the thickness of the films. The transmission in the visible region of the unannealed film is approximately 80%. The visible transmission of the ZnO films increases from 90% to 92% when annealing temperature increased from 300°C to 400°C. The transmission film approaches to 96% when the annealing temperature reached 500°C. A very steep absorption edge near 370 nm is observed for both unannealed and annealed films indicating high crystal quality, which could enhance luminescent efficiency. The transmission of films increases in tandem with annealing temperatures due to the increase in grain sizes, structural homogeneity, and crystallinity. The same observation has been reported by previous researchers [50, 51]. Jayatissa et al. [52] have demonstrated that the transmission of ZnO films can be improved by annealing, which could lead to the reaction of oxygen with ZnO. It suggests that ambient conditions annealing would greatly influence the optical transmission of ZnO films. This is especially valuable for the applications as a front electrode and window materials in solar cell.

4. Conclusions

ZnO thin films were prepared by spray pyrolysis method, and it was thermally annealed at different temperatures. The structural, electrical, and optical properties of the ZnO thin films were characterized using XRD, AFM, data acquisition unit, and UV-vis spectrophotometer. The grain size of the films increases with the increase of annealing temperatures. The XRD diffractogram revealed that the thermal annealed film at 500°C possesses good crystalline hexagonal wurtzite structure, with a preferred plane orientation along (002). The grain size estimated from FESEM analysis is in good agreement with XRD data. The PL emission of the samples shows a narrow emission centered at 385 nm and a broad peak emission located at 594 nm and 672 nm. The ZnO films show an increase of transmission with the increase of annealing temperature. In particular, ZnO film annealed at 500°C achieves high light transmission of 96% in the visible range with low electrical resistivity of 0.82 Ω cm. These properties render that the ZnO film is attractive to optoelectronic device applications.

Acknowledgment

The authors acknowledge financial support from the University Malaya Postgraduate Research Grant of nos. PV033-2012A, CG013-2013, CG07-2013, RP011A-13AET, FP030-2013A, and ER014-2012A.

References

J.-H. Lee, K.-H. Ko, and B.-O. Park, “Electrical and optical properties of ZnO transparent conducting films by the sol-gel method,” Journal of Crystal Growth, vol. 247, no. 1-2, pp. 119–125, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Könenkamp, K. Boedecker, M. C. Lux-Steiner et al., “Thin film semiconductor deposition on free-standing ZnO columns,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 77, no. 16, pp. 2575–2577, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Eisermann, J. Sann, A. Polity, and B. K. Meyer, “Sputter deposition of ZnO thin films at high substrate temperatures,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 517, no. 20, pp. 5805–5807, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. C. Look, D. C. Reynolds, C. W. Litton, R. L. Jones, D. B. Eason, and G. Cantwell, “Characterization of homoepitaxial p-type ZnO grown by molecular beam epitaxy,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 81, no. 10, pp. 1830–1832, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Hiramatsu, K. Imaeda, N. Horio, and M. Nawata, “Transparent conducting ZnO thin films prepared by XeCl excimer laser ablation,” Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology A, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 669–673, 1998.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Ayouchi, D. Leinen, F. Martín, M. Gabas, E. Dalchiele, and J. R. Ramos-Barrado, “Preparation and characterization of transparent ZnO thin films obtained by spray pyrolysis,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 426, no. 1-2, pp. 68–77, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Faÿ, U. Kroll, C. Bucher, E. Vallat-Sauvain, and A. Shah, “Low pressure chemical vapour deposition of ZnO layers for thin-film solar cells: temperature-induced morphological changes,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 385–397, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Bao, H. Gu, and A. Kuang, “Sol-gel-derived c-axis oriented ZnO thin films,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 312, no. 1-2, pp. 37–39, 1998.
View at: Google Scholar
G. Srinivasan, N. Gopalakrishnan, Y. S. Yu, R. Kesavamoorthy, and J. Kumar, “Influence of post-deposition annealing on the structural and optical properties of ZnO thin films prepared by sol-gel and spin-coating method,” Superlattices and Microstructures, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 112–119, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. J. Brinker, G. C. Frye, A. J. Hurd, and C. S. Ashley, “Fundamentals of sol-gel dip coating,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 201, no. 1, pp. 97–108, 1991.
View at: Google Scholar
E. A. Dalchiele, P. Giorgi, R. E. Marotti et al., “Electrodeposition of ZnO thin films on n-Si(100),” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 245–254, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Perednis and L. J. Gauckler, “Thin film deposition using spray pyrolysis,” Journal of Electroceramics, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 103–111, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Korotcenkov, V. Brinzari, J. Schwank, and A. Cerneavschi, “Possibilities of aerosol technology for deposition of SnO₂-based films with improved gas sensing characteristics,” Materials Science and Engineering C, vol. 19, no. 1-2, pp. 73–77, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Krunks and E. Mellikov, “Zinc oxide thin films by the spray pyrolysis method,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 270, no. 1-2, pp. 33–36, 1995.
View at: Google Scholar
O. Vigil, F. Cruz, A. Morales-Acevedo, G. Contreras-Puente, L. Vaillant, and G. Santana, “Structural and optical properties of annealed CdO thin films prepared by spray pyrolysis,” Materials Chemistry and Physics, vol. 68, no. 1–3, pp. 249–252, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Natarajan, N. Fukunaga, and G. Nogami, “Titanium dioxide thin film deposited by spray pyrolysis of aqueous solution,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 322, no. 1-2, pp. 6–8, 1998.
View at: Google Scholar
V. Brinzari, G. Korotcenkov, and V. Golovanov, “Factors influencing the gas sensing characteristics of tin dioxide films deposited by spray pyrolysis: understanding and possibilities of control,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 391, no. 2, pp. 167–175, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. S. Patil and L. D. Kadam, “Preparation and characterization of spray pyrolyzed nickel oxide (NiO) thin films,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 199, no. 1–4, pp. 211–221, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. P. Gujar, V. R. Shinde, and C. D. Lokhande, “Spray pyrolysed bismuth oxide thin films and their characterization,” Materials Research Bulletin, vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 1558–1564, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Chen, E. M. Kelder, P. J. J. M. van der Put, and J. Schoonman, “Morphology control of thin LiCoO₂ films fabricated using the electrostatic spray deposition (ESD) technique,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 765–771, 1996.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Golshahi, S. M. Rozati, R. Martins, and E. Fortunato, “P-type ZnO thin film deposited by spray pyrolysis technique: the effect of solution concentration,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 518, no. 4, pp. 1149–1152, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Salam, M. Islam, M. Alam et al., “The effect of processing conditions on the structural morphology and physical properties of ZnO and CdS thin films produced via sol-gel synthesis and chemical bath deposition techniques,” Advances in Natural Sciences: Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, vol. 2, no. 4, Article ID 045001, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
X. Zhu, E. Defaÿ, M. Aïd et al., “Preferential growth and enhanced dielectric properties of Ba_0.7Sr_0.3TiO₃ thin films with pre annealed Pt bottom electrode,” Journal of Applied Physics D, vol. 46, Article ID 105301, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Karamdel, C. F. Dee, and B. Y. Majlis, “Effects of annealing conditions on the surface morphology and crystallinity of sputtered ZnO nano films,” Sains Malaysiana, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 209–213, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Yang, J. Bei, and S. Wang, “Enhanced cell affinity of poly (D,L-lactide) by combining plasma treatment with collagen anchorage,” Biomaterials, vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 2607–2614, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. D. Ahn, S. H. Oh, C. H. Lee, G. H. Kim, H. J. Kim, and S. Y. Lee, “Influence of thermal annealing ambient on Ga-doped ZnO thin films,” Journal of Crystal Growth, vol. 309, no. 2, pp. 128–133, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Wang, Y. Pu, W. Fang et al., “Effect of high-temperature annealing on the structural and optical properties of ZnO films,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 491, no. 1-2, pp. 323–327, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. S. Kang, J. S. Kang, J. W. Kim, and S. Y. Lee, “Annealing effect on the property of ultraviolet and green emissions of ZnO thin films,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 1246–1250, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Sagar, P. K. Shishodia, R. M. Mehra, H. Okada, A. Wakahara, and A. Yoshida, “Photoluminescence and absorption in sol-gel-derived ZnO films,” Journal of Luminescence, vol. 126, no. 2, pp. 800–806, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Nunes, E. Fortunato, and R. Martins, “Influence of the post-treatment on the properties of ZnO thin films,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 383, no. 1-2, pp. 277–280, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Nunes, B. Fernandes, E. Fortunato, P. Vilarinho, and R. Martins, “Performances presented by zinc oxide thin films deposited by spray pyrolysis,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 337, no. 1-2, pp. 176–179, 1999.
View at: Google Scholar
K. H. Yoon and J. Y. Cho, “Photoluminescence characteristics of zinc oxide thin films prepared by spray pyrolysis technique,” Materials Research Bulletin, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 39–46, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Ayouchi, F. Martin, D. Leinen, and J. R. Ramos-Barrado, “Growth of pure ZnO thin films prepared by chemical spray pyrolysis on silicon,” Journal of Crystal Growth, vol. 247, no. 3-4, pp. 497–504, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Uthirakumar and C.-H. Hong, “Effect of annealing temperature and pH on morphology and optical property of highly dispersible ZnO nanoparticles,” Materials Characterization, vol. 60, no. 11, pp. 1305–1310, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Periasamy, R. Prakash, and P. Chakrabarti, “Effect of post annealing on structural and optical properties of ZnO thin films deposited by vacuum coating technique,” Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 309–315, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Tong, Y. Liu, L. Dong et al., “Growth of ZnO nanostructures with different morphologies by using hydrothermal technique,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 110, no. 41, pp. 20263–20267, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Humayun, M. Kashif, and U. Hashim, “Area-selective ZnO thin film deposition on variable microgap electrodes and their impact on UV sensing,” Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 2013, Article ID 301674, 5 pages, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. B. Fang, Z. J. Yan, Y. S. Tan, X. Q. Liu, and Y. Y. Wang, “Influence of post-annealing treatment on the structure properties of ZnO films,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 241, no. 3-4, pp. 303–308, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Rusop, K. Uma, T. Soga, and T. Jimbo, “Post-growth annealing of zinc oxide thin films pulsed laser deposited under enhanced oxygen pressure on quartz and silicon substrates,” Materials Science and Engineering B, vol. 127, no. 2-3, pp. 150–153, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. H. Al-Hardan, M. J. Abdullah, A. Abdul Aziz, H. Ahmad, and L. Y. Low, “ZnO thin films for VOC sensing applications,” Vacuum, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 101–106, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Hong, H. Qi, J. Huang, H. He, Z. Fan, and J. Shao, “Influence of oxygen partial pressure on the structure and photoluminescence of direct current reactive magnetron sputtering ZnO thin films,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 473, no. 1, pp. 58–62, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. B. Djurišić, W. C. H. Choy, V. A. L. Roy et al., “Photoluminescence and electron paramagnetic resonance of ZnO tetrapod structures,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 856–864, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Q. Peng, S. C. Qu, G. W. Cong, and Z. G. Wang, “Structure and visible luminescence of ZnO nanoparticles,” Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing, vol. 9, no. 1–3, pp. 156–159, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Panigrahy, M. Aslam, D. S. Misra, M. Ghosh, and D. Bahadur, “Defect-related emissions and magnetization properties of ZnO Nanorods,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 1161–1165, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. B. Djurišić, Y. H. Leung, K. H. Tam et al., “Defect emissions in ZnO nanostructures,” Nanotechnology, vol. 18, no. 9, Article ID 095702, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Cho, J. Ma, Y. Kim, Y. Sun, G. K. L. Wong, and J. B. Ketterson, “Photoluminescence and ultraviolet lasing of polycrystalline ZnO thin films prepared by the oxidation of the metallic Zn,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 75, no. 18, pp. 2761–2763, 1999.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Fujihara, Y. Ogawa, and A. Kasai, “Tunable visible photoluminescence from ZnO thin films through Mg-doping and annealing,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 16, no. 15, pp. 2965–2968, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Chen, Z. Zhao, B. Z. Tang, and H. S. Kwok, “Growth methods, enhanced photoluminescence, high hydrophobicity and light scattering of 4, 4′-bis(1, 2, 2-triphenylvinyl)biphenyl nanowires,” Organic Electronics, vol. 13, pp. 1996–2002, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
V. S. Reddy, K. Das, A. Dhar, and S. K. Ray, “The effect of substrate temperature on the properties of ITO thin films for OLED applications,” Semiconductor Science and Technology, vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 1747–1752, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. L. Mercado, C. E. Allmond, J. G. Hoekstra, and J. M. Fitz-Gerald, “Pulsed laser deposition vs. matrix assisted pulsed laser evaporation for growth of biodegradable polymer thin films,” Applied Physics A, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 591–599, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Jones and D. Fried, “Attenuation of 1310-nm and 1550-nm laser light through sound dental enamel,” in Lasers in Dentistry VIII, vol. 4610 of Proceedings of SPIE, pp. 187–190, San Jose, Calif, USA, January 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. H. Jayatissa, S.-T. Cheng, and T. Gupta, “Annealing effect on the formation of nanocrystals in thermally evaporated tungsten oxide thin films,” Materials Science and Engineering B, vol. 109, no. 1–3, pp. 269–275, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2013 Kalyani Nadarajah et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

4234

Downloads

2483

Citations